|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
I have a question for some of my conservative brethren.. I saw where one of the Broncos said, and I've seen many others say it on this board and in other places... if folks don't feel safe or don't feel equal economic opportunity or just generally don't like the direction of the United States, then why don't they leave, just pack up and go someplace else if they think it will be better... it's a reasonably common sentiment.....
So if that's the case, if that's how you feel... then why in countries like Mexico or Syria, where people don't feel safe or don't feel they have equal economic opportunity, and they try to leave... why do you call them cowards and say they should stay and fight (politically or militarily) and try to fix their own country? So what is it??????
I think you're talking about families, & refugee's fleeing oppression and war vs people immigrating to another country due to political opinions. I'd never call families and refugees cowards. The cowards are all the political leaders who can't find or deliver peace in their country. The saying goes "America! Love it or Leave it." It's always going to be directed towards the opposition party of the WH every 4 years. The saying has been repeated since I can remember. It never fails to be uttered. Thanks to everybody who answered my question.. I highlighted the part in bold because that was kind of what I was getting at.. where is the line between stay and fight and pack up the family and go. I'm sure everybody's line will be drawn in different places, I just wanted to see if there were some opinions on where that line might be. That's why I used Mexico and Syria as my examples.. Syria is war-torn and battered, Mexico is just a rotten mess with no economic opportunity for most..
Last edited by DCDAWGFAN; 09/25/17 01:14 PM.
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469 |
I didn't answer cause you asked conservatives
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399 |
I didn't answer cause you asked conservatives Perfect Spiral answered. And the reason I asked conservatives is because this is one apparent hypocrisy that liberals don't have.. they are ok with Syrians and Mexicans fleeing their own countries for their own reasons.. But if you would like to answer, your opinion is always valued.
yebat' Putin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
jc
So does anybody still have hope that the two 'sides' can reconcile on anything meaningful?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933 |
How do you know I'm not conservative? Actually I've voted more on the right than the left in my lifetime. Issue is, the right has moved too far right. I haven't changed at all, the scale moved.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,537
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,537 |
jc
So does anybody still have hope that the two 'sides' can reconcile on anything meaningful? Nope. I also don't think we'll go to war (actual fighting) with them either unless Trump fires first. I don't think they want a war, they want embargos lifted and recognition as a legitimate power, which they are not. At this point, a nuclear war (if nobody else got involved) would last about 45 minutes and result in their total destruction. They might get lucky and hit us or our allies once or twice.
Last edited by OldColdDawg; 09/25/17 01:48 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
jc
So does anybody still have hope that the two 'sides' can reconcile on anything meaningful? Nope. I also don't think we'll go to war (actual fighting) with them either unless Trump fires first. I don't think they want a war, they want embargos lifted and recognition as a legitimate power, which they are not. At this point, a nuclear war (if nobody else got involved) would last about 45 minutes and result in their total destruction. They might get lucky and hit us or our allies once or twice. What the heck are you going on about? This is not the NK thread and I think Haus was referring to sports and people fighting over the issue in this thread!
Last edited by 40YEARSWAITING; 09/25/17 01:52 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
How do you know I'm not conservative? Actually I've voted more on the right than the left in my lifetime. Issue is, the right has moved too far right. I haven't changed at all, the scale moved. You know the funny about that, I said the same thing only on opposite spectrums. JFK would be considered a right wing kook in todays Left
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
jc
So does anybody still have hope that the two 'sides' can reconcile on anything meaningful? Nope. I also don't think we'll go to war (actual fighting) with them either unless Trump fires first. I don't think they want a war, they want embargos lifted and recognition as a legitimate power, which they are not. At this point, a nuclear war (if nobody else got involved) would last about 45 minutes and result in their total destruction. They might get lucky and hit us or our allies once or twice. I believe he was talking about the protestors and the ones against the protesting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933 |
How do you know I'm not conservative? Actually I've voted more on the right than the left in my lifetime. Issue is, the right has moved too far right. I haven't changed at all, the scale moved. You know the funny about that, I said the same thing only on opposite spectrums. JFK would be considered a right wing kook in todays Left Guess you were leaning right and I was leaning left anyways. I disagree on JFK as I would if you said Ronald R. would be considered a Left Wing kook today. Makes no sense.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770 |
Right now they are either choosing to succumb to their own cowardice
So the owners standing up to pressure of the president for the rights of the players to have a peaceful protest is cowardice? Someone must have redefined the meaning of that word while I wasn't watching.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
The fact is both parties have taken a turn to the far, I will agree to that. I just felt (and we can agree to disagree on this, its just what I felt), that the left is simply going that way to use people to stay in power. They want to control what most people say, do, and think. They want conformist (this is the far left I am speaking of).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
daytna,
I would actually think the ratings from this past week would be high, with all wondering what the players were going to do and how they would respond. Now that they have, I would bet those ratings really take a dip this coming week. JMO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
Polls also range from 54%-72% don't agree with the kneeling. NFL should be concerned about how their fans feel. Not good business. As they should, it is a business. However, they do not want a lawsuit filed from the players for violating their rights. I am sure the NFL (who is lead by a lawyer) has consulted legal counsel already, and realizes that if they tried to stop it, they would open themselves up for lawsuit. JMO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469 |
IMO, I think the problem is that Americans on a regular are spoiled compared to other countries.
As such, our views on the topic you brought up aren't gonna match amongst each other, compared to other places.
It sounds weird so I'll try to explain.
There's no active war zone in America. The best we got is Chiraq, but at the end of the day it's Americans fighting other Americans over something that is a fixable problem at our level.
Places like Syria and Mexico are NOT a fixable problem at the civilian level, and that's what I believe conservatives have a hard time grasping.
Far too often some conservatives think that because we liberals have criticism of the country, that MUST mean we don't like it here. Just because we view the relationship between cops and minorities as toxic doesn't mean we want to leave. It means we want the situation to be fixed that way the quality of life for everyone is raised.
Just because there's income inequality in America doesn't mean we want to leave, or SHOULD leave somewhere else. It just means it's a problem we feel needs to be solved as soon as possible.
We have a lot of somewhat easily correctable problems in this country. Countries like Syria and Mexico and Afghanistan do not. It's why I get frustrated when people go "if you don't like it, move". That makes no sense as Americans. We aren't a war torn nation like others trying to escape from a brutal dictatorship. I mean it makes sense WHY those civilians flee to Europe and Mexicans and other central/South Americans try to flee to America.
It's why I got upset at these Hollywood carts talking about if such and such wins then I'm moving.
For what? I mean how spoiled is that? The fact that we can just pack up and move whenever we want to is a luxury most people around the world do not have. But just because we are the best country in the world doesn't mean we don't have problems. We can always do better, BE better.
I think it's cowardly to move away- or to TELL someone to move away - from a country over petty social issues that can be addressed by people simply gaining some perspective.
However it's not cowardly to flee from an active war zone where you have ZERO control over the outcome in an attempt to save not only yourself, but your families life. That's actually the bravest thing someone can do.
Because there's no standing and fighting when you have no weapons and the other guys are using chemical attacks. That's not bravery; it's stupidity to stay and die knowing you won't affect the outcome whatsoever.
People in America are spoiled, and specifically conservatives like to judge people's in certain situations or environments that they have little to no experience in.
Nobody on this board knows what it's like to flee from Ecuador because of drug cartels. Nobody on this board knows what it's like to have to abandon the country because the leader is gassing his own people.
I mean how much if a dirt bag would I come off as if I told someone who had their child get addicted to opioids that if they don't like big pharma inside America then they should pack up and leave?
It's disgusting.
Last edited by Swish; 09/25/17 02:26 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770 |
I have a question for the liberal brethren. Why when the players who wanted to wear 9/11 tribute cleats they were fined and liberals stood up for the NFL saying "well its in the contract they cant wear those, blah blah blah." But its in the contract for the players to be on the sideline standing, and now nothing by the NFL? Since when is protecting people's constitutional rights a liberal thing? When it's suddenly a right you wish to infringe upon because you disagree with it? There is nothing in their contract about standing for the National anthem. Here's the irony in all of this. I'm a gun owner. I value my second amendment freedom to own firearms. I expect it to be upheld as it's one of my constitutional rights. There are many people posting on this very thread that feel the same way. However, when it comes to the constitutional rights of others and their freedoms, they want to drape themselves in the flag to make an excuse as to why the constitutional rights of others should be infringed upon. Now you all can sit here and explain why your rights are somehow more important than those who you disagree with. Just don't be surprised when your rights are infringed upon as well. When you start undermining the rights of others, soon they will be undermining yours. I always thought that our service men and women fought for our rights and our freedoms. Not our flag.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770 |
They want to control what most people say, do, and think. They want conformist (this is the far left I am speaking of). Oh the irony. In this thread we have the right trying to control what people do and you have this to say?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
jc
So does anybody still have hope that the two 'sides' can reconcile on anything meaningful? The two sides will come together when the players come to the realization that kneeling during the National Anthem offends most of America and change their ways. This started with Kaperdink protesting Pigs. Then it moved to Racism. Then equality and rights. Next it will move to Transgenders and such, just like with the NBA. President Trump is not talking negatively about protesting. He is talking positively about honoring our Flag, National Anthem and America herself. He speaks of respect. He is speaking for the hundreds of thousands who stand for our Anthem versus the couple of hundred who won't. America is a great Nation and has made the World a better place to live in. To dishonor the Flag and National Anthem is to dishonor all the VOLUNTEERS who willingly signed up to risk their lives to defend her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,859
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,859 |
Star-Spangled Bigotry: The Hidden Racist History of the National AnthemJason Johnson 7/04/16 5:52am Americans generally get a failing grade when it comes to knowing our “patriotic songs.” I know more people who can recite “America, F—k Yeah” from Team America than “America the Beautiful.” “Yankee Doodle”? No one older than a fifth-grader in chorus class remembers the full song. “God Bless America”? More people know the Rev. Jeremiah Wright remix than the actual full lyrics of the song. Most black folks don’t even know “the black national anthem.” (There’s a great story about Bill Clinton being at an NAACP meeting where he was the only one who knew it past the first line. Bill Clinton: Woke in the ’90s.) In the case of our national anthem, “The Star-Spangled Banner,” perhaps not knowing the full lyrics is a good thing. It is one of the most racist, pro-slavery, anti-black songs in the American lexicon, and you would be wise to cut it from your Fourth of July playlist. “The Star-Spangled Banner,” as most Americans know it, is only a couple of lines. In fact, if you look up the song on Google, only the most famous lyrics pop up on Page 1: Oh say can you see, By the dawn's early light, What so proudly we hailed, At the twilight's last gleaming? Whose broad stripes and bright stars, Through the perilous fight, O'er the ramparts we watched, Were so gallantly streaming. And thy rocket's red glare, Thy bombs bursting in air, Gave proof through thee night, That our flag was still there. Oh say does that star spangled banner yet wave, O'er the land of the free, and the home of the brave. The story, as most of us are told, is that Francis Scott Key was a prisoner on a British ship during the War of 1812 and wrote this poem while watching the American troops battle back the invading British in Baltimore. That—as is the case with 99 percent of history that is taught in public schools and regurgitated by the mainstream press—is less than half the story. To understand the full “Star-Spangled Banner” story, you have to understand the author. Key was an aristocrat and city prosecutor in Washington, D.C. He was, like most enlightened men at the time, not against slavery; he just thought that since blacks were mentally inferior, masters should treat them with more Christian kindness. He supported sending free blacks (not slaves) back to Africa and, with a few exceptions, was about as pro-slavery, anti-black and anti-abolitionist as you could get at the time. Of particular note was Key’s opposition to the idea of the Colonial Marines. The Marines were a battalion of runaway slaves who joined with the British Royal Army in exchange for their freedom. The Marines were not only a terrifying example of what slaves would do if given the chance, but also a repudiation of the white superiority that men like Key were so invested in. All of these ideas and concepts came together around Aug. 24, 1815, at the Battle of Bladensburg, where Key, who was serving as a lieutenant at the time, ran into a battalion of Colonial Marines. His troops were taken to the woodshed by the very black folks he disdained, and he fled back to his home in Georgetown to lick his wounds. The British troops, emboldened by their victory in Bladensburg, then marched into Washington, D.C., burning the Library of Congress, the Capitol Building and the White House. You can imagine that Key was very much in his feelings seeing black soldiers trampling on the city he so desperately loved. A few weeks later, in September of 1815, far from being a captive, Key was on a British boat begging for the release of one of his friends, a doctor named William Beanes. Key was on the boat waiting to see if the British would release his friend when he observed the bloody battle of Fort McHenry in Baltimore on Sept. 13, 1815. America lost the battle but managed to inflict heavy casualties on the British in the process. This inspired Key to write “The Star-Spangled Banner” right then and there, but no one remembers that he wrote a full third stanza decrying the former slaves who were now working for the British army: And where is that band who so vauntingly swore, That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion A home and a Country should leave us no more? Their blood has wash’d out their foul footstep’s pollution. No refuge could save the hireling and slave From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave, And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave. In other words, Key was saying that the blood of all the former slaves and “hirelings” on the battlefield will wash away the pollution of the British invaders. With Key still bitter that some black soldiers got the best of him a few weeks earlier, “The Star-Spangled Banner” is as much a patriotic song as it is a diss track to black people who had the audacity to fight for their freedom. Perhaps that’s why it took almost 100 years for the song to become the national anthem. To hear more of the story, there is an excellent short documentary about the history of “The Star-Spangled Banner” by some students at Morgan State University. In the meantime, it might be a good idea to switch up your Fourth of July patriotic playlist. http://www.theroot.com/star-spangled-bigotry-the-hidden-racist-history-of-the-1790855893 Maybe a little understanding is what we need. Who cares!!!! We cannot change history. We can only honor those that fought and died for this country.
Romans 10:9 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,859
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,859 |
I'm not sad at all and I love and fought for this country.
Speak for yourself because you don't speak for me. You should be. People disrespecting their country to get at a President they do not like.
Romans 10:9 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770 |
Yeah, who cares? Pointing out history isn't the same as trying to change it.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445 |
jc
So does anybody still have hope that the two 'sides' can reconcile on anything meaningful? Nope. I also don't think we'll go to war (actual fighting) with them either unless Trump fires first. I don't think they want a war, they want embargos lifted and recognition as a legitimate power, which they are not. At this point, a nuclear war (if nobody else got involved) would last about 45 minutes and result in their total destruction. They might get lucky and hit us or our allies once or twice. What the heck are you going on about? This is not the NK thread and I think Haus was referring to sports and people fighting over the issue in this thread! That is correct. I just meant the two sides always bickering at each other in general-- the left/liberals/Democrats on one side, and the right/conservatives/Republicans on the other. (Many people do not fit neatly into one category-- many conservatives do not identify with the Republican party for example-- but I'm sure you all know what I mean.)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,770 |
It's just usually not a president cussing at people who he disagrees with inciting a fight.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 712
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 712 |
Polls also range from 54%-72% don't agree with the kneeling. NFL should be concerned about how their fans feel. Not good business. As they should, it is a business. However, they do not want a lawsuit filed from the players for violating their rights. I am sure the NFL (who is lead by a lawyer) has consulted legal counsel already, and realizes that if they tried to stop it, they would open themselves up for lawsuit. JMO I agree. I know the average profit margin for a business is around 7%. I have no clue what the NFL margin is but if I'm losing 10% of my fan base I'd be very concerned. What will cost more, settling a lawsuit with players or losing my sponsors that really make me money?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933 |
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
Far too often some conservatives think that because we liberals have criticism of the country, that MUST mean we don't like it here. Just because we view the relationship between cops and minorities as toxic doesn't mean we want to leave. It means we want the situation to be fixed that way the quality of life for everyone is raised. I don't. I don't speak for others. But it is MY OPINION that people get tired of hearing the same argument no matter the case. Has their been police brutality? Absolutely! Is it as widespread as some make it out to be, no. Do people use it as a reason to do bad things, or a reason to justify abhorrent behavior, yes. And that is what causes a great divide. Just because there's income inequality in America doesn't mean we want to leave, or SHOULD leave somewhere else. It just means it's a problem we feel needs to be solved as soon as possible. Again, because YOU or your side feels there is a problem, doesn't mean this is. Some feel that those people worked for every dollar they have, some don't. But you are saying there is a problem is an opinion, and instead of opening up discussion about why the left feels its a problem, they tell the other side they is a problem and it has to be fixed. And this is actually one where I think there is, but its an example I am using. However it's not cowardly to flee from an active war zone where you have ZERO control over the outcome in an attempt to save not only yourself, but your families life. I don't have a problem with that, but I have do have a problem when those come here and expect the US to change to conform to them. (I.e the fringe that have tried to implement sharia law, call for genitalia mutilation etc). That is where people get p'o about. They also get P'O when the country is spending billions of dollars to support these refugees, and yet let US citizens die in the streets homeless.
Last edited by willitevachange; 09/25/17 02:35 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 712
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 712 |
Unless you live in New Smyrna Beach, Florida, you won't be seeing me. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,933 |
Polls also range from 54%-72% don't agree with the kneeling. NFL should be concerned about how their fans feel. Not good business. As they should, it is a business. However, they do not want a lawsuit filed from the players for violating their rights. I am sure the NFL (who is lead by a lawyer) has consulted legal counsel already, and realizes that if they tried to stop it, they would open themselves up for lawsuit. JMO I agree. I know the average profit margin for a business is around 7%. I have no clue what the NFL margin is but if I'm losing 10% of my fan base I'd be very concerned. What will cost more, settling a lawsuit with players or losing my sponsors that really make me money? If the NFL banned players from taking a knee the lawsuit would null the CBA totally and players would probably regain majority control of proceeds again. Owners will eventually lose bigly.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 712
All Pro
|
All Pro
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 712 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469 |
So you don't think we have a problem of systemic racism in this country?
And when it comes to trump, I can list a specific reason as to why he's a problem. And it's real obvious.
Last edited by Swish; 09/25/17 02:47 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
Polls also range from 54%-72% don't agree with the kneeling. NFL should be concerned about how their fans feel. Not good business. As they should, it is a business. However, they do not want a lawsuit filed from the players for violating their rights. I am sure the NFL (who is lead by a lawyer) has consulted legal counsel already, and realizes that if they tried to stop it, they would open themselves up for lawsuit. JMO I agree. I know the average profit margin for a business is around 7%. I have no clue what the NFL margin is but if I'm losing 10% of my fan base I'd be very concerned. What will cost more, settling a lawsuit with players or losing my sponsors that really make me money? If the NFL banned players from taking a knee the lawsuit would null the CBA totally and players would probably regain majority control of proceeds again. Owners will eventually lose bigly. I am not a lawyer, but I also think criminal charges could pressed as well, no? Trying to silence someone's constitutional rights should be against the law, and criminal, at least I would think. but it remains to be seen. The NFL is not going to go broke over this, 10% will hurt, but the amount of money it brings in, it can cover it. A suit from the players in the amount of billions - that could close them up. The NFL is a business, if they sided with the players (which they did) its because it is less costly.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
So you don't think we have a problem of systemic racism in this country?
And when it comes to trump, I can list a specific reason as to why he's a problem. And it's real obvious. I never said there wasn't racism - I am saying people are of free will and make their own decisions to break the law. The police didn't make someone steal or murder someone else.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469 |
But that's not what we're kneeling over.
And even still, that makes no sense. Unarmed civilians didn't "make" the cops shooter them, either.
When you look at these cases of cops shooting unarmed black men, why was it that none of them were suspected of murder prior to being shot?
What's the common theme around here?
Don't resist arrest and you won't get shot, right?
So resisting arrest = death?
And then yo go further. If that was indeed the case, then why is that a white guy can kill two people, eat their faces, then fight the cops and not get shot, yet a guy selling cigarettes on a street corner gets choked to death?
Why is it that a guy can be laying in the street with his hands up and still get shot?
Why is it that a guy can run, clearly NOT a threat, yet get shot in the back 8 times, then have the taser dropped by his body in a way to make it look like a struggle?
As I've said before, when it comes to black men, conservatives are A ok with cops being the judge, jury, and executioner. The criminal justice system seems to work perfectly fine when it comes to locking us up. We're thugs, savages, need to go back to Africa.
But when it's the opposite, it's "I feared for my life", or he stood his ground, or he has a mental illness and needs help. And then we they get mistrials and acquitted.
THATS what these protest and BLM is all about, bro. We just want equality. We just want equal protection under the law and equality in the criminal justice system.
But yet apparently that's too much to ask in the supposedly greatest nation on earth.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,537
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,537 |
jc
So does anybody still have hope that the two 'sides' can reconcile on anything meaningful? Nope. I also don't think we'll go to war (actual fighting) with them either unless Trump fires first. I don't think they want a war, they want embargos lifted and recognition as a legitimate power, which they are not. At this point, a nuclear war (if nobody else got involved) would last about 45 minutes and result in their total destruction. They might get lucky and hit us or our allies once or twice. I believe he was talking about the protestors and the ones against the protesting. Wrong thread, oops.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,317
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,317 |
Don't know if your white or black honestly don't care. Me? Lily, nary a spot. Me 25 percent Indian. My daughter -in-law= half black half white I guess that makes my grand daughter part white, black, and Indian. Do you really want to start the white spot argument with me?
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
But that's not what we're kneeling over.
And even still, that makes no sense. Unarmed civilians didn't "make" the cops shooter them, either.
When you look at these cases of cops shooting unarmed black men, why was it that none of them were suspected of murder prior to being shot?
What's the common theme around here?
Don't resist arrest and you won't get shot, right?
So resisting arrest = death?
And then yo go further. If that was indeed the case, then why is that a white guy can kill two people, eat their faces, then fight the cops and not get shot, yet a guy selling cigarettes on a street corner gets choked to death?
Why is it that a guy can be laying in the street with his hands up and still get shot?
Why is it that a guy can run, clearly NOT a threat, yet get shot in the back 8 times, then have the taser dropped by his body in a way to make it look like a struggle?
As I've said before, when it comes to black men, conservatives are A ok with cops being the judge, jury, and executioner. The criminal justice system seems to work perfectly fine when it comes to locking us up. We're thugs, savages, need to go back to Africa.
But when it's the opposite, it's "I feared for my life", or he stood his ground, or he has a mental illness and needs help. And then we they get mistrials and acquitted.
THATS what these protest and BLM is all about, bro. We just want equality. We just want equal protection under the law and equality in the criminal justice system.
But yet apparently that's too much to ask in the supposedly greatest nation on earth. You would be actually surprised that I agree with a lot of that. We are referring to two different things. I personally think the there have been cases that were lets say "more than questionable" the police officers handling, and then there have been cases no so clean cut. Yet cities burned before any real evidence was presented. But what I was referring too was when people use the actual atrocities to try to justify their bad decisions. I really don't think police brutality is the reason people were looting during any of the storms, or the reason people are shooting others in record numbers in some cities. Its the faux outrage of some, that gets me to lean the other way. And that's JMO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,469 |
I agree with you when it comes to looting during storms and such.
But that's not related to why the players are kneeling. Nobody is defending those kinds of actions.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Don't know if your white or black honestly don't care. Me? Lily, nary a spot. Me 25 percent Indian. My daughter -in-law= half black half white I guess that makes my grand daughter part white, black, and Indian. Do you really want to start the white spot argument with me? It is where I will focus. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,986 |
It certainly does.
Why? Because all these people who didn't even serve are using us as a talking point.
""It's so disrespectful to the vets who fought".
Yet when I, an ACTUAL combat vet, like many others come out in support, now people like you want to claim that I'm throwing my service around.
That's a double standard. You say nothing about those who didn't serve using ME andother vets as a talking point, but then turn around and come at me because I'm an actual vet with a different opinion?
That's why I don't take you serious on any of these social discussions.
So yea, it makes my opinion more valid than most, and equal to those who did serve who have a different opinion.
People are gonna have a problem with what I say and I don't care because that's how I feel.
You voted for a draft dodger. You, 40, Haus, Devil, and others. So if you want to know why I essentially wipe my ass with you guys opinion, it's because you guys have no credibility on this topic.
You guys claim it's disrespectful to the country to kneel, yet voted for a guy who bitched out and dodged the draft when said COUNTRY called on him to serve.
That's the most disrespectful crap to a nation ever, short of treason. But hell, there's a good chance he did that too.
Yea, I'll take social justice warriors over double standard, draft dodging supporters all day everyday. Hey Swish, I'm a vet too and I got to wonder if you are lying about you're service. I belong to the VFW and every vet I know is disgusted with these spoiled crybabies. That's pretty low to question someone's service because you don't agree with them. My dad is a Vietnam Vet and he has no issue with the protests. I've heard from several vets on both sides of the issue. Doesn't make their views any less valid either way. If vets fight to protect American rights, why would they be upset when others use their rights in a peaceful way? That's why I have no problem with this protest. They are doing it peacefully, and most I've seen are still bowing their heads or facing the flag with hand on their heart. Most of the people up in arms about this are probably ones in line for food and beer as the anthem plays at the stadium, or aren't even in the stadium yet as they are too busy drinking in the Muni lots.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus President Trump Calls Out Sports
Figures
|
|