Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 11 of 11 1 2 … 9 10 11
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,188
You really are incapable of comprehension, aren't you?

pffft.


I didn't say that folks defended those creatures. I said they argue with me about stuff that actually come from my life.


"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
You were answering Portland who said, "To add, white nationalist are all our problems. It needs to be shouted down from everyone."

You said you can't.
It won't work if I try. Folks will just take the adversarial stance, and that will be that.

I comprehended that.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,188
And it's exactly what you did.
Predictable as always.

pffft.


"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Ok, so don't answer.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Vambo Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
NFL, players have one easy answer for how to end protests on their own terms

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/co...rump/754607001/

So, what to do? There’s a very simple answer: Go back to the days before 2009 when teams were not required to come out of the locker room until after the anthem was played (except for the Super Bowl and after 9/11).

With no players on the field, the anthem will go on, fans will stand at attention or stand in line for nachos or run in from the parking lot or do whatever it is they do during the anthem, and the controversy — at least the visible part of it — will be over.

This quick fix would deprive Trump of visual evidence of player protests, which has provided the oxygen for his incessant and incendiary tweets. He’d find something else to tweet about, for sure, but it likely wouldn’t be about players on the sidelines during the anthem, because they wouldn’t be there anymore.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,411
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,411
So Pence would have to stay and watch the game? Too much crap following this around. North Korea is at least as important. So is a return to the Cold War posturing. Just makes me sick.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
Originally Posted By: Vambo
NFL, players have one easy answer for how to end protests on their own terms

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/co...rump/754607001/

So, what to do? There’s a very simple answer: Go back to the days before 2009 when teams were not required to come out of the locker room until after the anthem was played (except for the Super Bowl and after 9/11).

With no players on the field, the anthem will go on, fans will stand at attention or stand in line for nachos or run in from the parking lot or do whatever it is they do during the anthem, and the controversy — at least the visible part of it — will be over.

This quick fix would deprive Trump of visual evidence of player protests, which has provided the oxygen for his incessant and incendiary tweets. He’d find something else to tweet about, for sure, but it likely wouldn’t be about players on the sidelines during the anthem, because they wouldn’t be there anymore.


What about those players that are more than happy to come out and stand for the anthem, because they consider it a right?


[Linked Image from s2.excoboard.com]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Vambo Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: ErikInHell
Originally Posted By: Vambo
NFL, players have one easy answer for how to end protests on their own terms

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/co...rump/754607001/

So, what to do? There’s a very simple answer: Go back to the days before 2009 when teams were not required to come out of the locker room until after the anthem was played (except for the Super Bowl and after 9/11).

With no players on the field, the anthem will go on, fans will stand at attention or stand in line for nachos or run in from the parking lot or do whatever it is they do during the anthem, and the controversy — at least the visible part of it — will be over.

This quick fix would deprive Trump of visual evidence of player protests, which has provided the oxygen for his incessant and incendiary tweets. He’d find something else to tweet about, for sure, but it likely wouldn’t be about players on the sidelines during the anthem, because they wouldn’t be there anymore.


What about those players that are more than happy to come out and stand for the anthem, because they consider it a right?


Ask Derek Carr...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,850
Quote:
where was the "respect" for the military then? where was the "Respect" for the military when those guys came home from Nam and got called baby killers? where was the "respect" while we have homeless soldiers on the streets, vets struggling to receive proper medical treatment, and so many with mental problems?


*Giving Swish a standing ovation for that part of his post*

We as Americans ignore that part and focus on people standing for the Anthem SMH

Just one more reason for me to say common sense is dead in this country.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
Quote:
where was the "respect" for the military then? where was the "Respect" for the military when those guys came home from Nam and got called baby killers? where was the "respect" while we have homeless soldiers on the streets, vets struggling to receive proper medical treatment, and so many with mental problems?


We as Americans ignore that part and focus on people standing for the Anthem SMH


Well this "We" disagrees about you saying we ignore our Vets and their difficulties. thumbsdown

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,850
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,850
We as in MOST of the country. Our vets laid there lives on the line for us, served our country then many of them get ignored when their service is over. We (yes I include myself) have done a pee poor job at taking care of our vets frown


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Page 11 of 11 1 2 … 9 10 11
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus NFL players seeking month dedicated to social activism

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5