Is there anything this guy can't do? I mean, the stock market has had gains, so that must mean the National Debt is reduced by....well, let him explain it:
------------------------------ *In Baker we trust* -------------------------------
Yo I thought conservatives said this dude was smart?
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Yo I thought conservatives said this dude was smart?
Biggest lie they've pushed. Politico or The Intercept, I forget, published a story where DJT asked his senior advisers if a trillion dollars spending program meant the government would have a trillion dollars deficit. He was shocked to learn the answer. The dude is a fool.
Is there anything this guy can't do? I mean, the stock market has had gains, so that must mean the National Debt is reduced by....well, let him explain it:
Ok, so I listened to it twice in order to see your point and found the President was simply making a correlation between the amount of money Obama squandered versus the amount of money America has made in the 9 months of Trumps Presidency.
They are almost equal already.
But you are having such fun I really hated to post sense to you.
I would suggest two things for you in the future...
1- The next time you think you understand anything to do with money and growth, you stop yourself from commenting and ask a sympathetic Republican for the truth and...
Go down with this ship if you want to. That’s your prerogative, I suppose.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Is there anything this guy can't do? I mean, the stock market has had gains, so that must mean the National Debt is reduced by....well, let him explain it:
Ok, so I listened to it twice in order to see your point and found the President was simply making a correlation between the amount of money Obama squandered versus the amount of money America has made in the 9 months of Trumps Presidency.
They are almost equal already.
But you are having such fun I really hated to post sense to you.
I would suggest two things for you in the future...
1- The next time you think you understand anything to do with money and growth, you stop yourself from commenting and ask a sympathetic Republican for the truth and...
Under your logic, since the stock market gains during the 8 years under Obama generated WAY more than $10T into our economy then the $10T accumulated debt should be just fine then, right?
Right? Isn't that exactly what DJT is saying?
------------------------------ *In Baker we trust* -------------------------------
Go down with this ship if you want to. That’s your prerogative, I suppose.
Have an adult listen to it for you.
Well I was hoping the adult in the Oval Office would explain it but he doesn’t even know what he’s talking about.
The fact that you have to constantly attempt to explain what the president means is telling.
But hey, adult day care, right?
Sad, very sad.
Last edited by Swish; 10/12/1701:32 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Is there anything this guy can't do? I mean, the stock market has had gains, so that must mean the National Debt is reduced by....well, let him explain it:
Ok, so I listened to it twice in order to see your point and found the President was simply making a correlation between the amount of money Obama squandered versus the amount of money America has made in the 9 months of Trumps Presidency.
They are almost equal already.
But you are having such fun I really hated to post sense to you.
I would suggest two things for you in the future...
1- The next time you think you understand anything to do with money and growth, you stop yourself from commenting and ask a sympathetic Republican for the truth and...
Under your logic, since the stock market gains during the 8 years under Obama generated WAY more than $10T into our economy then the $10T accumulated debt should be just fine then, right?
Right? Isn't that exactly what DJT is saying?
No! it was only a "correlation". He listened to it twice!
Is there anything this guy can't do? I mean, the stock market has had gains, so that must mean the National Debt is reduced by....well, let him explain it:
Ok, so I listened to it twice in order to see your point and found the President was simply making a correlation between the amount of money Obama squandered versus the amount of money America has made in the 9 months of Trumps Presidency.
They are almost equal already.
But you are having such fun I really hated to post sense to you.
I would suggest two things for you in the future...
1- The next time you think you understand anything to do with money and growth, you stop yourself from commenting and ask a sympathetic Republican for the truth and...
Everybody wants to pick on and pile on republican presidents, who knows what their agenda is.
So glad Trump is president, the "only" thing I prefer he does,
seriously the only thing any republican has to do to be an "amazing" success is simply NOT do the Democrats Awful work that tears down the lives of people
in so many ways, and so alarmingly and constantly 100% of the time.
I mean, by that, I mean, it is alarming that so much of so 100% of everything that democrats want to do, for so many years has been exclusively "bad" for everyone,
that I'm just so thankful for any republican who just stops their awful plans and dastardly schemes.
The republicans schemes are pretty bad too, so all the best the government can possibly do is absolutely nothing.
So in that frame of mind.
Trump is probably the best president since; no definetly the best president since Reagan, and probably, potentially the best president since long before that too.
Yo I thought conservatives said this dude was smart?
He is ... and it ain’t just conservatives saying it ....
I’d have to go watch the interview instead of just the snippet and see what the subject was and what led up to this ... what was the question and how had he answered up til then ... the snippet is very very vague ... it could mean a few things depending on the convo that led up to this and the specific question he was answering ......
Did any of u guys piling on the trumpster watch the entire question and answer or are u just piling on over the snippet in this video?
Just listening to the snippet i think what he was saying is that under Obama we went 10 trillion further in debt and under him the market has gained over 5 trillion in value and the taxes paid off that 5 trillion would be almost equivelant to the 10 trillion in debt your boy saddled us with ...
So if u guys want to rip him for misstating (lying) about the affects of the stock market gains and how the taxes paid on them have affected the national debt ... have at it ... cause he misstated (lied) that on about four or five different levels ... *L* ...
The direction u guys went in ... u make yourselves look worse than he does ...
In this snippet he doesn’t even come close to saying he eliminated the national debt ... he is a very smart man ... he also has a wee bit of an ego ... sometimes that ego overtakes the brain and then trouble usually follows .. *L*
I watched the whole thing. It’s as bad as it looks.
And nobody makes themselves look worse than “I know more than the generals” Trump.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I watched the whole thing. It’s as bad as it looks.
And nobody makes themselves look worse than “I know more than the generals” Trump.
Commander in Chief Trump does know more than the Generals. He doesn't know how to fight a battle like the Generals just as he doesn't know how to proceed with Diplomacy like his State Department. He doesn't need to know those things, he has people for that!
What he does know is how to lead these people in the direction he sees is best for America.
Just like I am not an Attorney or an Accountant but I sure know more than them about my goals and the direction I want to take things. Then they fill in the details of how it gets done.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
What he does know is how to lead these people in the direction he sees is best for America.
And the next time he's right about something will be the first time he's right about anything.
Why the extremes? ... nevermind .. i know ... can’t say as i blame u ... guess with my past behavior I oughta go clean up the glass from my rock shattered house ... *L* ...
I think i’ll Reply to U somewhere else and see if your up to trying to have a discussion again ... can’t blame u if u don’t want to .. just like the country, were doing a lot of wheel spinning in here and its hard to get past andfilter out all the “sound” ..
After all of the things the right wing media said about Obama you have the gall to say that?
If you can't see that both sides play this same game then you're blinded by one side. Even the man you voted for as president spread the lie that Obama wasn't a citizen for years. You're a funny guy. Funny odd, not funny ha ha.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
After all of the things the right wing media said about Obama you have the gall to say that?
If you can't see that both sides play this same game then you're blinded by one side. Even the man you voted for as president spread the lie that Obama wasn't a citizen for years. You're a funny guy. Funny odd, not funny ha ha.
Where did I say they didn't? However the VAST MAJORITY of media is left wing. Go ahead, again show me where I said it wasn't on both sides.......ill wait.
Short answer: I've looked down my nose at this guy for 35+ years. He represents everything My Parents raised me to loathe. He's a loud, crude, ill-mannered, boastful, insecure man-child who bullies others and sucks up to dictatorial strongmen.
Please understand: I've never felt this way about any other public figure. Never. It's just him. So... we can probably enjoy talk about a great many things, but my stance on this guy will never change. I couldn't stand him when he was a cheesy D-list TV presence and I can't stand him now.
Short answer: I've looked down my nose at this guy for 35+ years. He represents everything My Parents raised me to loathe. He's a loud, crude, ill-mannered, boastful, insecure man-child who bullies others and sucks up to dictatorial strongmen.
Please understand: I've never felt this way about any other public figure. Never. It's just him. So... we can probably enjoy talk about a great many things, but my stance on this guy will never change. I couldn't stand him when he was a cheesy D-list TV presence and I can't stand him now.
Sorry, my man... it's just the way it is.
Thanks for the welcome back sir .... I’d like to say its good to be back .. im just not sure exactly why i’m here ... *L* ...
When i asked the question .... “why the extremes” ... i was referring to him having done nothing right not weather u like him or not .... but the way u took my question and answered it can be a good starting point for what my ultimate goal is here ... and that would be a civil discussion that would hopefully lead to us understanding each other’s points of view and i’m sure we’d find more common ground than we thought ...
I don’t think we’ll ever change each other’s mind ... i sure would like to have rational discussions with folks so we can try and learn from each other instead of just taking things to the extremes we all do .. like I’m doing with Swish now .. i have enjoyed talking with him and learned from him and have enjoyed getting to know what makes him tick ... i’m pretty sure no one saw that coming, including me and Swish .. *L* ...
I’ve never been a fan of trumps either ... only adjective u used to describe him i would disagree with you on would be the last one about sucking up to dictators .. but thats for another day ...
When the talk first started about him running ... my thoughts were ... who cares, its just another side show publicity stunt for him to get his name in the news for free advertising for his brand (smart) and to feed his ego (sad) ....
When he announced he was running I thought it was a joke and he’d be gone before the first primary ... i wasn’t even going to pay attention to him ... he left us all no choice but to pay attention to him with every controversial remark ...
Once he forced me to pay attention ... funny thing happend and it felt really really strange at first ... i went into it with the attitude of “whats this egotistical ass” going to say today to tell us how great he is .... i wasn’t sure exactly how to feel when i found myself agreeing with almost everything he said .... i felt dirty in a way ... that lasted only a few days ... it had become clear to me that the egotistical a-hole was the guy that wanted the same things for the country i did ...
Not that u care or asked ... i’m not quite sure how it evolved into this myself ... but thats how i came to support the egotistical jackass that i am now proud to call my president ....
No, you only took a play out of the Trump playbook. You only directed it in one direction.
Once again - you are wrong
Originally Posted By: 40YEARSWAITING
Originally Posted By: DCDAWGFAN
Originally Posted By: willitevachange
Quote:
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
I think if a news organization has a reason to question policy or politicians, they actually have a duty to question it/them. How else will we know what's going on in our country?
I disagree, its there job to list and inform what policy was produced, and then the PEOPLE make their own opinions on said policy based on the information, not opinions. But the media has not ever worked that way.. ever. If it worked as you suggest, the "newspaper" would be a compilation of tables full of statistics, bills in their original form, police blotters, and box scores. There would be no articles or editorializing at all.
And as a result, nobody would buy it.
Not necessarily. They would return to the day where they understood the difference between News and Opinion and report it as such, separately. thumbsup EXACTLY! I have no problem with a program that is left leaning, as long as they state that. Maddow/Holt etc parlay their shows are journalism, when it is strictly commentators and pundits.
the same on the right with Hannity. Hes not a journalist, hes a commentator. The only person I know of that would say he was not a journalist was Bill Oreilly. Tucker does as well now, he states he is a commentator.
