DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Roy Moore accused of sexual encounter with 14-year-old girl when he was 32

NRSC drops out of fundraising agreement with Moore
By ALEX ISENSTADT and GABRIEL DEBENEDETTI

The Republican Party's Senate campaign wing on Friday severed its fundraising agreement with Roy Moore.

Federal Election Commission paperwork filed on Friday showed that the National Republican Senatorial Committee is no longer listed as part of a joint fundraising committee with Moore's campaign, the Alabama Republican Party, and the Republican National Committee. The other three entities remain in the contract, as of Friday afternoon.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/10/nrsc-drops-out-of-fundraising-agreement-with-moore-244783

Amazing what it takes to get a thick headed Liberal to listen and understand my point.

You should be ashamed of yourself, not only for cracking penis jokes in a discussion of pedophilia, but also for trying to smear me as complicit in predatory sexual behavior of another, as well as dismissing corroborated and heavily sourced reports from several females claiming to be molested by Roy Moore.

You're talking to a wall.

His moral repugnance serves as a good example of how many of these situations come to be.

"Haha Bill Clinton is a rapist and Anthony Weiner was a sexual predator who preyed on minors rofl!" or "we shouldn't rush judgement when nearly fifty people claim a politician I like is a child molester" shows that he has absolutely no conscience, or even acknowledgement that these women exist or have been wronged. Claiming that I am responsible for the situations and trauma my friends suffered at the hands of a sexual predator is also inline with his disgusting depravity, and he should be ashamed of himself.

If I'm talking to a wall, fine by me.

but he carries a gun... Murica!

If he did any of this, he should remove himself. Just disgusting.

There is absolutely no proof in this case with very suspicious timing. I smell a big fat liberal democrat rat here.

Then he should consider filling libel suit due to defamation of character. The fact that he hasn't (along with the Hollywood pedophiles) tells me that these claims carry more weight.

Not only that, but you'd figure the guy should have no problem emphatically denying it in a softball interview. He couldn't even do that.

Just as there is no proof he did sexually assault this woman there is no proof he did not. The statue of limitations has passed on this case nearly 40 years ago. This man has been in the public eye for years and this woman never came forward. Not ten years later, not 20 years later, not even 30 years later. Get my point. She is getting paid by George Soros and company to come forward now.

There are four women, with dozens and dozens of corroborations. For example, one of the women's exe's says she had first told him the story nearly a decade ago. Each woman has multiple corroborations like this. There are over 30 sources putting their name in it, all with fairly airtight witness corroborations. All 30 of these people, if wrong or lying, will lose their careers and be sued into the stratosphere.

In what year do you think Soros cooked up this plan on the off chance that Ray Moore ever ran for public office? 1979? 1994? 2007? Do you think he enlisted the 40+ cogs in this grand plan right away, or did he add pieces over time? And how much do you think he pays? Must be quite a bit to keep a crew like that from turning?

And is it possible that Ray Moore himself is on the payroll, and perhaps that's why he struggled to emphatically deny these accusations in a softball interview?

Using the courage of women who were molested by a pedophile as a pawn on a political chess board is immoral and revolting.

The women can't file suit due to statute of limitations. But Roy Moore can file character defamation suits since these claims we're just put in the paper / online. The fact that he hasn't is telling. The fact that his supporters are going on TV and saying this type of behavior is no big deal (biblical even) is further telling. If Roy Moore's brother is on the Soros payroll perhaps you should tell him so he can collect back pay.

Someone didn't report to the legal system that a judge sexually assaulted them? I'm shocked.

There's that too, and also the problem that until recently the opinion of sexual assault and rape was quite often that a "histerical woman was asking for it." I'm hopeful that the current climate enables victims of sexual assault to come forward and not be afraid of character assassination.

Well, at least we now know what's considered the age of consent in AL.

unreal.

Clem,
When a person says they would vote for a pedophile vs a non-pedophile, or even NEVER suggest another republican, that shows a sickness!! People who thin like that are sick!

You'll get no argument from me.

I really don't get it. And I'm glad I don't get it.

I think I heard plenty about the Clinton 'PizzaGate' pedo ring and lot's of GOP on here condemning them with absolutely NO PROOF. Yet here you have 4 women with little reason to lie and a history of telling others this happened to them... But they are liars and need to be shamed by the same people who crucified libs over a bizarre conspiracy theory like PizzaGate! smdh

Advertisers Ditch Sean Hannity Over His Coverage Of Roy Moore’s Alleged Pursuit of Teens

https://www.yahoo.com/news/advertisers-ditch-sean-hannity-over-171635526.html

This is how you fight Fox News. lol. These poor businesses will quickly tire of being caught in the middle on Fox.

Okay, to be fair to Roy Moore I have to admit when he was a young man 14 was a reasonable age for a bride and cowboy hats were more than fashion.

But in the modern era, I don't recall a time that 14, 16, or 18 year old females were seriously crushing on the mid thirties dad bods... smh. I guess he's okay with admitting he dated young women in his 30s with 16 being the age of consent and all. But he was a good guy and got their parents permission first! WTH?

Do you know what I would have done to a 30 something showing up at my house asking to date my 16 or 18 year old! Oh hell nah!

I guess in America all you need is an accusation to be guilty. sad.

I find it ironic that nothing was ever brought up until the man ran for office.

Nothing can be done about the court of public opinion. But the fact that he has done nothing against this woman in court against this "well timed attack" speaks volumes as well.

This happened a lot in the South back in the day. Accusation, accuser, followed by a Lynching.

I guess its making a comeback.

I did see this morn the Judge is filing a lawsuit against the Washington Post for false reporting.

Your opinion obviously, maybe he is just being the bigger man. Maybe the allegations are so ludicrous he doesn't feel the need to even respond. Maybe he realizes that this lady is getting paid a lot money to say these things. Opinions galore....But as a judge, I highly doubt that you would not have heard of any of these things ever in his career.

Judge Sues

You were saying .

Yeah it's sad that it actually takes the accusations of 4 women before it got anyone's attention at all.

This is the biggest, most stupid comment that can be made. It's not "an accusation", it's "four accusations". And the funny part about the "prove it/innocent until found guilty" crowd, is that they KNOW or SHOULD KNOW that these allegations are far beyond the statute of limitations. Which means there will never be a trial. They know this so they stand behind the fact that there will never be a trial to support never having to say he's guilty of anything.

That's like saying since Cosby could only be tried on one count of his accusations, it can't be said he was guilty of the other 50 something things he was accused of.

And here's another stupid thing being said. "It's all political."

Yeah, four different women and thirty people to help support their stories all ganged up in a conspiracy to attack Moore. Yeah, right. Some of you look so stupid right now.

J/C

The TDS crowd out in full force today.

Some of us aren't fond of and don't defend sexual predators. We understand the BS behind people claiming you must prove someone guilty when they know that the statute of limitations guarantee a man will never stand trial. We understand that when the number of accusers reaches four of them, what the history of these things indicate.

While others stick their fingers i their ears going, "la,la,la,la".

If it was proven that Roy Moore crucified Jesus Christ his base would still vote for him so there's no surprises with the comments I'm hearing here.

The Left prosecutes sexual predators. The Right elects them.

I really don't understand why the hell this is a left/right thing, other than the fact the usual suspects on this board are predictably defending their affiliated sides...

If, if, if you could prove anything about the Judge's situation, this would be an easily solved situation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poz6W0znOfk

And that's exactly what makes it a left/right thing.

With one difference as was mentioned by Perfect. In Hollywood they call them out and lose their jobs. So the left actually isn't defending theirs. In politics, the right is defending him and trying to elect him. Makes you wonder who really cares about morals and family values doesn't it?

That's a convenient line of BS since you know the statute of limitations insures he'll never go to trial. Yeah, and Cosby was innocent of all but one of the accusations because all the others were past the statute of limitations. He was only guilty of that one. lmao

So you support Lynchings.

Not really.

Its not a left or right issue.

In Moores case, just like with POTUS during the election, there was never an accuser until they were running for office.

In the cases of Hollywood stars, they are all innocent until proven guilty. In some stars cases, however, it has been shown and admitted by others that they have covered it up in the past. It also has been reported in the Weinstein case, that NY is planning on charging him. We will see how that ends up. I personally do not take stock into all the other allegations (dustin Hoffman, Louis ck, etc yet as they are allegations and no evidence.).

If Roy Moore did anything, he deserves what he gets, but its funny that every time a R runs for office, these allegations get thrown around and then disappear after than run for office....