Wouldn't it seem odd to you that the committee would pick two teams from the ACC, including the runner up, over the champion of the conference which the committee's own poll considers the strongest?
I don't think the poll makes the Big Ten out to be the strongest conference?
Coming in, I think the general consensus among college football fans (aside from homer SEC fans) was that the Big Ten was the strongest conference.
After 11 weeks, I'm not sure the Big Ten is the best conference. Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State have not really lived up to the hype. Wisconsin has probably surpassed some expectation, and the rest of the conference is right where most thought they would be.
The Big Ten has 3 top ten teams, and that's still pretty good.
But so does the SEC. The ACC is top heavy, but both Clemson and Miami have really good wins over teams in the top ten, that aren't even in their own conference.
To be honest, I don't think any conference this year looks all that dominant.
While Ohio State got in because of an impressive resume, I think an equal factor to that was Penn State having 2 losses. If Penn State, for whatever reason, had only one loss and everything else finished the way it did, they would have been in over Ohio State, and I don't think anyone can really argue that.
The committee did a good job of keeping the urgency of the regular season intact.