Don't know the criteria from the site in question but whatever it is it is the same for all.
Are you sure about that? I've seen different numbers at different sites.
Not what I said...but I can see how you saw it that way. Talking about the individual site...what ever criteria they use its the same for all WRs. Not saying same from each site. Just the one site where ever it is they will use the same formula for all WRs.
Like an ump with a strike zone....it normally is the same for both teams.
Hope that clears it up.
Pit you make less and less sense. Are you sure you know football.
I do look at WRs and especially when they have a camera from the back where we can see the QB and some of the field.
Game after game I see WRs (not wide open) but NFL Window open for throws to come within 2 seconds. That is why I don't buy into this Kizer doesn't have anyone open.
I know its the talking point of all announcers cause that read it from others and don't research the Browns. I laugh at them cause they are stating that as a fact...while a replay is going on and right there in front of my eyes is a WR...getting separation. So I laugh at the analysts...now I know a lot see the same game and think well the analyst said so, so it must be.
Yes, I can make a better effort in watching them. But don't think I'm missing that much...but I could always be wrong.
jmho Eo, I've been paying attention to, and many of the completed passes are high risk.
Our WR get pushed to the paint, very few space to throw it and ends up in high risk passes. This has all to do with the lack of physicality and quality of the WR, who run to where the D wants.
Our Wr play with little cushion, making it hard for easy completions from the QB. CBs are willing to take chances with our WRs and that tell us a lot o the quality of the receivers