DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Trump Derangement Syndrome

This is pathetic.. seriously. I really think you need some help.

For the record, my thoughts here are not just in response to those two posts. I had taken some time off from posting in this sub-forum but I would still occasionally read through some threads.

Over and over I'd come across posts from you that were really quite exceptional in their tone and hostility. It's really something to stand to stand out from the crowd in that respect. It's the language, it's accepting all the Trump conspiracy theories and proofless accusations as fact, it's the odd obsession with being in the "throes of dementia", and so many other things.

All well, Swish got his wish after all.

It is a time for giving, after all lololol.

But for real, you gotta remember that while some do go super hard on trump, you and a few others are beyond soft when it comes to criticizing him.

The same standard y’all used to trash obama all of a sudden doesn’t apply to trump. It’s hypocritical.

Maybe I could have have picked a different day to deliver my thoughts. The "mentally retarded" posts really crossed the line though and I had to say something.

About criticizing Trump: I have actually gotten used to such unfair and over the top criticism of the President and I normally wouldn't even say much (for one poster in particular to stand out is saying something.)

Maybe I have gone soft on that to some extent, but then I see how media and so many people on the left react so strongly at little provocation. I just don't see the need to pile on.

I actually didn't trash Obama on here all that much. Maybe some digs here and there (more so recently) but I really wasn't that involved with politics on this board until one and a half, maybe two years ago.

Yes, when you're trying to sell f35s to Asia and the Middle East. It's really only funny, because he said the same thing last month during the Puerto Rico response. Also funny that he hated the f-35 during the primaries, until he found out what it was.

Why did I get drug into the middle of this

It's very easy to spot who has TDS by looking at the level of angst, anxiety, and how unhinged they are over simple things. If they try to spin good things Trump does into bad, that is also another symptom of TDS.

Other symptoms of TDS...

-Hate of Tax Reform.
-Hate of Borders.
-Hate when our Leader stands up to a Tyrant and tells him to come get some!
-Hate better Trade Deals.
-Quick to drop to one knee.
-Hate more Jobs.
-Hate.

There seems to be a common denominator there ... ...

Hey bud, glad you responded, meant to tell you your sign is ready...

SOCIALISM
TRICKLE UP POVERTY!

Thanks bro ... please add at the bottom ....

NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!

What have you won? Trump has yet to pass any sort of meaningful legislation that takes effect.

That’s exactly it though. He’s not tired of the winning because they haven’t done any yet.

Not gonna waste much time on U ... you’ve proven to be as big a waste of time as your boy Swish ...

1. U hear of Neil Gosrsich ... thats just the BEGGINING ... while u and yours whine about everything/anything Trump ... here’s STEP TWO in that VERY IMPORTANT ASPECT ...

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/11/2...es-to-come.html

Newt Gingrich: Trump's historic impact on the federal court system will help our nation prosper for decades to come

As Congress and President Trump continue to work to pass the most significant tax cuts in more than 30 years, the president is also implementing another enormous conservative reform that will strengthen America for decades.

With the help of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the president is restoring the intended purpose of the federal judiciary – to uphold the rule of law as outlined in the Constitution.

Our Founding Fathers intended for the judicial branch to be an impartial institution with the sole mission of interpreting the law and ensuring it is applied fairly to all Americans.

Under the Obama administration, judges instead cast themselves as political activists pursuing a liberal-leaning agenda. Our Founders fully understood the threat that a politically saturated judicial branch posed to our God-given and legally protected American freedoms.

Fortunately, President Trump does too.

With help from adviser Leonard Leo, as well as guidance from John Malcolm and others at the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society, President Trump has already taken monumental steps to restore the integrity of the federal bench by appointing originalist judicial nominees who will apply the law as it is written, rather than in the way current political forces desire.

In addition to conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, 13 more of President Trump’s judicial nominees have been confirmed by the Senate as of last Thursday. By comparison, only eight of President Obama’s appointees had been confirmed by the end of November 2009 – when the Democrats controlled the Senate with 60 seats.

The numbers alone speak to how tremendously effective President Trump and Leader McConnell have been. Republicans have a slim 53-vote Senate majority (including Vice President Pence’s vote). Imagine what they could get done with 60 reliable votes – a point to keep in mind going into the 2018 midterm elections.

The left and the media are panicked because they know the large-scale changes President Trump is making will have long-lasting, history-shaping effects.

Federal judicial appointments are for life, and President Trump is selecting relatively young individuals, by federal court standards. This means these conservative judges could potentially occupy these positions for a long time.

In fact, Ronald A. Klain wrote in July in the Washington Post that the average age of President Trump’s Court of Appeals nominees was 48 – seven years younger than the average age of President Obama’s nominees. This means, “on average, Trump’s appellate court nominees will sit through nearly two more presidential terms than Obama’s,” Klain wrote.

In addition to serving longer terms, these judges will also bring new experiences and aptitudes into the judicial system. This can be tremendously helpful as cases involving cybercrime, data theft, and malicious use of technology become more common.

The importance of this dramatic reshaping of the entire federal court system cannot be overstated. While it is easy to focus on the U.S. Supreme Court, lower and appellate court judges will make decisions that impact ordinary Americans on a daily basis for decades to come. This Trump transformation in the judiciary could establish the most pro-American, pro-individual rights federal bench in modern American history.

There is no doubt that the tax cuts President Trump and Republicans in Congress are working on will do wonders to boost our economy, create jobs and increase wages. In addition, President Trump’s deregulation efforts will spur innovation and empower Americans to focus on the work they love.

However, the Trump revolution taking place in the federal court system will help our nation continue to prosper by ensuring that our judges protect our lives, liberty and core values for decades to come.

NOW feel free to find a tweet to MELTDOWN OVER ...

I need another laugh ...

Oh look, another opinion piece from Fox News.

Matches Diam’s character. All opinion and no facts.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/imm...d84e_story.html

TL; DR version: Trump and has team have used a variety of executive orders and other tactics to strongly curtail illegal immigration, even in the current absence of a literal, physical wall.
___

How Trump is building a border wall that no one can see

By Maria Sacchetti and Nick Miroff November 21

President Trump’s vision of a “big, beautiful” wall along the Mexican border may never be realized, and almost certainly not as a 2,000-mile physical structure spanning sea to sea.

But in a systematic and less visible way, his administration is following a blueprint to reduce the number of foreigners living in the United States — those who are undocumented and those here legally — and overhaul the U.S. immigration system for generations to come.

Across agencies and programs, federal officials are wielding executive authority to assemble a bureaucratic wall that could be more effective than any concrete and metal one. While some actions have drawn widespread attention, others have been put in place more quietly.

The administration has moved to slash the number of refugees, accelerate deportations and terminate the provisional residency of more than a million people, among other measures. On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security said nearly 60,000 Haitians allowed to stay in the United States after a devastating 2010 earthquake have until July 2019 to leave or obtain another form of legal status.

“He’s building a virtual wall by his actions and his rhetoric,” said Kevin Appleby, migration policy director for the Center for Migration Studies, a nonprofit think tank.

Trump administration officials say they are simply upholding laws their predecessors did not and preserving American jobs. Previous Republican and Democratic administrations were too soft on enforcement, they say, and too rosy in their view of immigration as an unambiguously positive force.

“For decades, the American people have been begging and pleading with our elected officials for an immigration system that’s lawful and serves the national interest,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in Austin last month. “Now we have a president who supports that.”

Bob Dane, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which has pushed for many of the Trump administration’s main goals on immigration, said the president has “really scaled back this expansive view of immigration that occurred under the Obama administration.”

The new restrictions could significantly reduce the number of foreign-born workers in the U.S. labor force, but demographic experts say there is little chance they will alter the country’s broader racial and ethnic transformation, which Trump’s critics say is his goal. Census projections show the United States will no longer have a single racial or ethnic majority by mid-century, according to the Pew Research Center.

Still, by erecting tougher, taller administrative hurdles for foreigners seeking to move to the United States or remain in the country after arriving illegally, the White House is attempting to shift the country back toward the tighter controls on immigration in place before the 1960s.

“Within the administration there are a number of key players who are just looking for every opportunity, every program . . . every administrative or regulatory leeway they have to restrict entry into the United States,” said Linda Hartke, president and chief executive of the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, which resettles refugees.

Even as they fight court orders seeking to halt parts of Trump’s immigration agenda, Sessions, White House senior adviser Stephen Miller and other key players are finding ways to shrink the immigration system. Miller was an aide to Sessions before both men joined the administration; in less than a year, their immigration policy prescriptions have moved from the realm of think-tank wish lists to White House executive orders.

In October, the White House — in a plan led by Miller — said it had conducted a “bottom-up review of all immigration policies” and found “dangerous loopholes, outdated laws, and easily exploited vulnerabilities in our immigration system — current policies that are harming our country and our communities.”

Trump has endorsed GOP legislation to cut annual, legal immigration by half, reducing the number of green cards issued annually from about 1 million to 500,000. More weight would be given to immigrants with job skills, as opposed to those with extended family in the United States.

The president cut the number of refugees the United States is willing to accept annually from 110,000 to 45,000, the lowest level since 1980, and ordered the implementation of a time-consuming “extreme vetting” system that could mean the number of refugees cleared each year is much lower. In October, 1,242 refugees arrived in the United States, down from 9,945 in October 2016.

Trump also eliminated a smaller program specifically for refugees fleeing violence in Central America. The Pentagon, citing concerns about vetting, suspended a recruitment program offering skilled foreigners a fast track to citizenship if they serve in uniform.

Muzaffar Chishti, the director of the Migration Policy Institute at the New York University School of Law, said nearly 350,000 of the newcomers who arrive legally to the United States each year are the spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. Since barring those arrivals is not under consideration, Chishti said, the government would have to eliminate or sharply restrict almost all other avenues to reduce the annual number of immigrants to 500,000.

In addition to this week’s decision on Haitians, the government earlier this month declined to renew Temporary Protected Status, a form of provisional residency, for about 2,500 Nicaraguans. The State Department says conditions in Central America and Haiti that had been used to justify the protection for as long as two decades no longer necessitate a reprieve. Decisions on more than 250,000 Hondurans and Salvadorans with the provisional residency permits are pending.

Trump is also ending Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, the Obama administration program that granted work permits to 690,000 young immigrants brought here as children. Trump’s administration is expanding immigration courts and detention centers and has ratcheted up deportations from the interior of the United States, where millions of undocumented immigrants with U.S.-born children and no serious criminal records held little fear of expulsion under President Barack Obama.

Arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement are up more than 40 percent this year, and the agency wants to more than double its staff by 2023, according to a federal contracting notice published this month. ICE is calling for a major increase in workplace raids and has signed more than two dozen agreements with state and local governments that want to help arrest and detain undocumented residents.

“If you’re in this country illegally and you committed a crime by entering this country, you should be uncomfortable,” Thomas Homan, the top official at ICE, told lawmakers this year. “You should look over your shoulder. And you need to be worried.”

The president and his aides have pressed forward despite an outcry from advocates and Democratic lawmakers, who in states such as California and Illinois have instructed police and public officials to shun cooperation with ICE. The Trump administration has threatened to strip such “sanctuary” jurisdictions of federal funding in an escalating legal standoff.

Trump’s tough talk alone appears to be one of the administration’s best bulwarks: Illegal crossings along the border with Mexico have plunged to their lowest level in 45 years, and U.S. agents are catching a far greater share of those attempting to sneak in. Applications for H-1B skilled visas and new foreign-student enrollment have also declined.

William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, said that until now U.S. immigration rates have largely spared the country from the challenges facing advanced industrial nations such as Japan and Germany that can’t replace aging workers fast enough. By slashing immigration, Frey said, the country could end up with labor shortages and other workforce issues.

But although some of Trump’s most fervent supporters see curbing immigration as a way to turn back the United States’ rapid racial and ethnic transformation, Frey said it is an unrealistic goal. By 2020, census projections show minorities will account for more than half of the under-18 U.S. population, because of higher birthrates in nonwhite populations. And by 2026, the number of whites is projected to begin declining in absolute numbers, he said, as deaths exceed births.

“You can slow the rate of Latino and Asian immigration, but it won’t make the population whiter,” Frey said. “It will just become less white at a slower pace.”

Trump continues to insist his administration will build a border wall, despite exorbitant cost projections and senior DHS officials saying a 2,000-mile structure is impractical. His supporters say they admire the president for plowing ahead in his overhaul efforts and see a historic, generational shift underway.

“There is more than one way to get to the goal,” Dane said. “Legislative solutions are all great, but clearly the administration has done things behind the scenes. . . . The results have been dramatic.”

Looks like trump has TDS

Donald Trump Endorses Site That Says George Soros, the Vatican and Satanists Control the World

https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-endorses-says-george-173613540.html

Trump continues to embarrass himself and this country. Sad.

Nobody can keep track of every blog, website, social media account and everything they've ever done in their multi-year history. Sometimes you come across some meme or tweet or whatever and there's no real way to know where it came from. It is what it is.

This is where you say something about how that's a weak ass excuse, I say I don't care, and we take it to another thread.

At least you’re aware that what you said was a weak ass excuse. Progress, I suppose.

I personally think the future looks very bright for America as a Latino/White Majority will kick butt and America will be better than ever before.

Most Latino's are hard working self made people with strong family values and a good Christian background. They are responsible for opening the most small businesses in America for the last bunch of years.
This Majority will work to lessen the impact of the biggest threat this Nation has ever faced, the White Liberal/Progressive.

Latino Americans will have nothing to do with their crap.

------------------------------

Majority:


Definition Source

bro did you see what 40 said before he edited it in the other thread?

he said the biggest threat in america is white liberal/progressives.

i almost spilled my yak when i read that. (im sure someone will urban dictionary that).

Do you have to be White or Christian to be a good person in this country?

Do you have to act white or Christian, as you do describe Latinos, to be a good person in this country?

Will we ever get serious 40, and not the troll version of 40?

Do people with gardeners reinforce indentured slavery?

Bro, Dude, whatever, I told you I dropped it in the wrong thread but if you look up a couple of posts you will see I put it over here where it belongs dude, bro, whatever.

So you think Latino's are only good for gardening?
You have a lot to learn. They are a great people.

Did you learn this from your latino gardener whom you pay 50k a year to garden?

'Sad moment' when John Kelly showed he'll support Trump 'no matter what': Adm. Mike Mullen

http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/admiral-mike-mullen-51388867?yptr=yahoo

listen to what this dude is saying.

This should bring some perspective to those who think Trump surrounding himself with generals is somehow a good thing.

He was a hard working, dedicated American just like every other Latino/American I have had the pleasure of knowing and he was worth every penny of the $15,000 he charged me per year.

He started his own small business just like so many other Latino Americans do. They have been a real boon to our economy during hard times.

Having a Latino/White American Majority running this Nation in the future will help to make America Great Again.

so now it went from 50k to 15k?

odd cause you said you lived on the east coast before, but recently you implied that you were voting for moore.

It was always 15, you Liberals, as always, were given and inch and took it a mile.

Second, I never said I was voting for da Judge, I only said, "Well, you know who I will be voting for."

That meant I don't have a horse in this race since I don't live in Alabama. Just another inch you took a mile.

You do understand you're not describing a majority, right?

This is also amazingly ironic from someone wanting a border wall to prevent undocumented workers from entering the country.

"Well, you know who I will be voting for." implies that you live in Alabama and will be voting for moore.

I do understand that you insinuated Latino Americans are only good for gardening.

Bro, dude, whatever, only you can comprehend that statement to mean that.

Just like PDF comprehends someone not answering a stupid question is a YES!

Dude, bro, whatever, did you see Rocket dis Latino Americans?

Man o Man.

well if you changed 'will' to 'would', then i'd get it.

but you didn't. thus, your sentence implies you live in alabama and will be voting for moore.

Also, you only mention nice things about latino's when it's in relation to your gardener.

every other time, its "They're leeching illegals and need to be deported", or something along those lines. also, something something ms-13 blah blah blah.

You never declared that your gardener was Latino. You're the oen filling in that blank, bub.

I think you once claimed your gardener was African American too, right?

Time to whip up the search machine.

I'll be back.

1000 posts about life in Virginia and you still don't get I can't vote in Alabama? What do you think I am a Democrat?

well seeing as they found voting fraud from trump supporters, i think you're a trump supporter.

So silly. Look it up.

You make a bigoted statement about Latino Americans a now you try to Troll it all away. Pathetic.