Yep, coming around to making him a Cleveland Brown for sure.
Me Too ... Maybe Barkley 1 and QB 4?
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Think I heard them say he has around 40 catches on the season. Unless that is on 65 targets, I'd say he can catch
You guys blow me away with how you talk about QB'S, WRS and RBs, and yet you ask a question like this.
Barkley is a RB with WR hands.
That isn't aimed at you, Peen.
Frustrating.
Why in the world would someone you’ve never spoken to, asking a clearly innocuous question, frustrate you so?
Because some of you are clamoring for taking a RB #1 overall and you don't even know if he can catch a football.
So because I posted “he’s quick”, being that today is the first time I’ve seen him play, and asked a question in general to the board, “can he catch”, I’m advocating drafting him #1 overall?
Evil Knievel didn’t make a leap that large over the Snake River Canyon.
Yep, coming around to making him a Cleveland Brown for sure.
Me Too ... Maybe Barkley 1 and QB 4?
If we had a coach who actually ran the ball, I might ....I say might consider it.
With Hue, he'd waste the guy
I posted some numbers earlier....maybe this thread, maybe another. We run the ball well right now....he doesn't call run plays enough.
We don't pass the ball well, yet he calls pass plays. The guy is a idiot.
Why waste a pick on a player he won't use? If you take a kid like Barkley, you need to ride him 20-25, maybe 30 times a game.
Hue gives it to him 12 times a game and would start talking about him like he just talked about Crow saying he needed bigger gains.
Barry Sanders or John Riggins would have never made it with Hue.
Sanders had a bunch of 2-3 yard carries and 2-3-4 25 or more yard gains to end up with 140 yards.. Riggins went in to the half with 40 yards on the ground, but at games end, he had a lot of 7-8-12 yard gains in the 2nd half to end up with 140 yards gained.
Hue would have wasted both of those guys to chuck it all over the field, even with a inferior QB.
Last edited by Ballpeen; 12/30/1707:15 PM.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
Dorsey needs to talk with Hue and find out exactly why we ran the ball so infrequently. If the answer is anything other than because Hue thinks our Rb's suck, then I don't see how you can take any Rb that high. (Assuming Hue is the HC next year)
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
Barkley decided to go to war with his teammates, instead of worrying about his health for the combine/draft
And absolutely shined today. Thats the kind of players we need.
Warriors.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Man, that 92 yard run was electric ... he's special
not sure if we'll end up with him, but he'll be a RB like Gurley. I like that he can catch too
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
JMHO, all QBs have BIG question marks, availability, play ability, would they play here....Bark is a beast, he changes our O and how we been doing scoring points. I'd take him number one. And I KNOW that is blaspheming. You have to have real threats, Gordon is one, if he stays, Bark would be two....I haven't seen him trip over his feet all year. Go Browns!!!!
"You've never lived till you've almost died, life has a flavor the protected will never know" A vet or cop
I have been saying it for awhile...Barkley is the BEST player in the entire draft...I don't think the Browns can afford to pass on BPA as bad as we are...we are NOT QB away from competing.
I think you sign a FA(McCarron, Cousins, etc) take Bark at #1 and if a QB falls at 4 then you take one...Once the combine is over and Barkley is cemented as the BPA(this years Myles Garret) you don't overthink it...you turn in the damn card and walk away with a home run.
one of the QB's we like will fall to our pick at #4 because they are not as highly rated as Bark, One could argue a guy like Mayfield or Allen will be there at #4 and both of those guys need to sit a year, but they could be our Qb of the future and they don't have the injury questions Rosen has.
Were going to have to develop a QB like it or not. Barkley is probably the ONLY GUY in the draft that could potentially play at a Pro Bowl level year one...all the QB's are a year or two away...Rosen may be slightly above average as a rookie, but the other guys will need time.(I think they will end up being better then Rosen longterm though)
Either we take BPA at one, or we trade out for a haul...I don't care who ends up being BPA, it may not be Barkley but whomever is slatged as BPA is who we take regardless of position. Anything short of that, and Dorsey is a fool and he won't last here just like his predecessors didn't...I don't think Dorsey is dumb enough to pass on BPA though, especially not huge talent.
I don't want to take Fitzpatrick. I am pretty sure that at some point in training camp he is going to get asked an innocent question about his transition to the NFL and he is going to answer without thinking that the practices at Alabama were harder and more intense.
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
I don't want to take Fitzpatrick. I am pretty sure that at some point in training camp he is going to get asked an innocent question about his transition to the NFL and he is going to answer without thinking that the practices at Alabama were harder and more intense.
Alabama cornerbacks don't back peddle, so Gregg Williams will have no problem playing him 20 yards back at all times.
I don't want to take Fitzpatrick. I am pretty sure that at some point in training camp he is going to get asked an innocent question about his transition to the NFL and he is going to answer without thinking that the practices at Alabama were harder and more intense.
Alabama cornerbacks don't back peddle, so Gregg Williams will have no problem playing him 20 yards back at all times.
Where do you get this BS from?
Ok. A Bama CB slated to be a surefire Top 10 pick never practices a Back Pedal. Smfh
I don't want to take Fitzpatrick. I am pretty sure that at some point in training camp he is going to get asked an innocent question about his transition to the NFL and he is going to answer without thinking that the practices at Alabama were harder and more intense.
Alabama cornerbacks don't back peddle, so Gregg Williams will have no problem playing him 20 yards back at all times.
Where do you get this BS from?
Ok. A Bama CB slated to be a surefire Top 10 pick never practices a Back Pedal. Smfh
Nick Saban hasn't coached back pedaling since he was the DC here. He's talked about it a lot.
Former Alabama and current Cincinnati Bengals cornerback Dre Kirkpatrick caused something of a stir when he told the media that he “never backpedaled at Alabama.” Apparently, this is something Bengals coaches value, as Kirkpatrick had to learn to backpedal. Some fairly questioned whether this was hyperbole — How do you not teach defensive backs to backpedal? — but, although he does teach backpedaling, Saban very specifically focuses on other techniques.
As Saban tells it, he used to teach backpedaling until he was with the Cleveland Browns with Bill Belichick. The ownership signed the legendary Everson Walls, who, much to the dismay of the young defensive backs coach, Saban, ran about a 4.8 forty yard dash and simply could not, under any circumstances, backpedal. He was awkward, couldn’t accelerate, and there were other guys on the roster much better at backpedaling.
Walls also, however, was being paid significantly more than his coach, and it was clear from the ownership that Walls would be starting. He also, it must be said, was still a great player, and just happens to still rank 10th on the all time list of most interceptions in NFL history. So Saban began teaching his now famous “shuffle” technique, rather than the traditional backpedal. There’s a good deal to it, and it can adjust depending on the receiver’s exact release, but essentially it is a three-step shuffle technique, at which point the defensive back may break on a short route or can turn and run and play the receiver down the field.
Complementing this is that Alabama’s cornerbacks spend about 90% of the game in a press coverage position, from which they either stay in press or can bail to a zone or off-man position. They do this because it threatens the offense and helps take away screens and quick passes, and they feel that if a defense doesn’t press it’s a huge advantage to the offense who is simply throwing routes on air. I have to say that having excellent corners like Saban has had at Alabama helps, but, as more of an offensive guy, I would much prefer my corners to show a lot of press (even if they bail a lot) and use the shuffle technique as opposed to the backpedal. There’s nothing easier than seeing a bunch of corners lined up at seven yards backpedaling at the snap; you can run just about anything at that, and they simply will not be able to react quickly enough.
I was reminded of this as I have spent a little time catching up on the games from the past few weeks. Of special note was the tremendous job Alabama’s Dee Milliner did against Michigan in week one. Other than a few extremely poor throws/reads, for the most part Denard Robinson’s throws were on the money, but Alabama and Milliner in particular shut down Michigan’s receivers, who were simply not up to the challenge. Watch and judge for yourself.
And next time you hear someone talk about defensive backs backpedaling, you can tell them you know of what is, at least in the view of many (though certainly not all) coaches, a better way.
You gonna tell me Gregg Williams plays a 46 defense while you're at it?
There is no reason in the world to draft a RB because Hue Jackson will never run the ball. All we heard the last offseason was how he was going to change and run the ball more. He lied. Now, if he hires an OC, which I doubt because his ego won't let him, but IF he does I would be OK with taking a stud RB. A running game is the very best thing you can have to support a rookie QB. If we had run the ball this year like we should have Kizer would have had a better time of it.
Fitzpatrick over Barkley. It's not even a question.
Yes it is a question, and a good one. Barkley could transform a moribund offense into a potent one, or didn't you notice what Zeke did for the Cowboys and what Fournette did for the Jags? How about what Gurley did for the Rams?
Last edited by Dave; 01/04/1806:57 PM. Reason: added Gurley