Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
CHSDawg #1396025 01/22/18 12:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Please don't say what I'm saying..when I kept it rather simple. There was a post made with a play of Lamar Jackson regarding his accuracy and all I was saying was that its dangerous to take one play and try to state this is who he is.
I stated a fact of what I saw in that play. There was not a breath of pressure. Easy to set the feet and make a correct decision and have separation because of the time in the pocket.
Reminded me of Lienhart who looked so so amazing at USC thought a sure thing but he was not.

As that is all I said. Example given and I think it was important to note that there was no pressure. Hard to evaluate in those conditions.

I don't think his athleticism will have similar results in the NFL. We got 300+ lbser that will pursue him with more speed then some of the LBs that he ran from. When they hit him he will be smushed and often.

He is not Cam Newton who barely can take the hits. But gets away with it. He is not consistent with his accuracy. I cannot evaluate him watching his highlights. If you do you will be wowed. The kid won the Heisman and was up for it a second year. He has amazing highlights. It is how will he transition to the NFL game. Again he just is not that accurate to have the similar results in the NFL. Accurate is not a stat of Completion %...Accurate you have to see on tape. Game Tape not highlights.

What I think of him...he is a perfect QB to take at #22.
Not cause of a lack of height but because a lack of QB skills translated to the NFL Game.

Does it mean he cannot be a starter in the NFL...no of course not. Just the odds go way down. Is he better than Kizer?
I think so. But that means he would probably upheave our #3 QB.

If we had #1 and # 15...I think he could be at least in the conversation. But we don't, we got #1 and #4...so I don't think he is much of a guy to look at. We would be silly to not take a QB #1 or #4. I think this GM is all about getting us a QB.

Now I can see us signing Cousins in FA which would eliminate the need of a QB at #1 or #4 where a Lamar Jackson in BPA scenario later in the draft comes along...ok in that case he is relevant.

My wish if we don't take QB in that type of scenario at #1 or #4 I hope we somehow walk away with Mayfield, not Jackson,
not Rudolph...but Mayfield.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
bonefish #1396039 01/22/18 12:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,132
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,132
I just can't agree with your QB preferences this draft eotab sorry. Just can't.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Its ok...don't want anyone bowing down to my evaluation. Just I know I'm right...lol laugh tongue


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1396107 01/22/18 01:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
I have no clue what anyone sees in this dude when he’s not running the ball ..

He can’t hit the broad side of a barn ... hes gonna be a BIG TIME BUST if someone reaches for Mr. Innacurate ...




bonefish #1396204 01/22/18 04:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851
So does anyone think Jackson will be available in the 2nd round?


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
bonefish #1396210 01/22/18 04:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
If I'm Jacksonville I'm jumping all over Lamar Jackson if he does drop, which I don't think he will.

DiamDawg #1396212 01/22/18 04:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
I have no clue what anyone sees in this dude when he’s not running the ball ..

He can’t hit the broad side of a barn ... hes gonna be a BIG TIME BUST if someone reaches for Mr. Innacurate ...


Diam. The dude is questioned by many as to whether he will even PLAY QB in the NFL.

And I'm one of them. If that means anything? Lol

bonefish #1396245 01/22/18 05:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,132
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,132
I'm sure protruding 5200 yards of offence in one year is nothing the Browns would find useful. I mean it would keep us from drafting in the top 10! Oh, the agony!


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
kwhip #1396254 01/22/18 05:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: kwhip
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
I have no clue what anyone sees in this dude when he’s not running the ball ..

He can’t hit the broad side of a barn ... hes gonna be a BIG TIME BUST if someone reaches for Mr. Innacurate ...


Diam. The dude is questioned by many as to whether he will even PLAY QB in the NFL.


Anyone who thinks Lamar Jackson can't play QB in the NFL doesn't understand how the NFL works in 2018.

(I am mainly talking about Bill Polian.)

kwhip #1396260 01/22/18 05:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I'm sure protruding 5200 yards of offence in one year is nothing the Browns would find useful. I mean it would keep us from drafting in the top 10! Oh, the agony!
Josh Allen passed for only 200 more yards then Jackson gained on the ground. Lamar had ~1800 more passing yards and 3400 more total yards. Jackson had more total yards last year then Allen had in his career.

--------------------------------------------------------------

I think its laughable that some think Lamar Jackson should move to WR because of supposedly deficient accuracy yet turn around and claim that Josh Allen should go #1.

By that logic Josh Allen should move to TE.
Rosen should go work for Lehman Brothers.
Sam Darnold should open a surf shop and go to film school.

Its just a silly way to discuss QBs.

Last edited by edromeo; 01/22/18 05:55 PM.
edromeo #1396324 01/22/18 07:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,316
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,316
Darnold #1 - not Allen.

edromeo #1396346 01/22/18 08:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
How’s RG3 doing? .....

rofl ....




DiamDawg #1396414 01/22/18 10:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
j/c:

I really don't want to argue w/all of the qb experts in here, but I think accuracy is huge and I don't think Lamar is very accurate.

Cue the posts where I don't know what I'm talking about...

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,132
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,132
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
j/c:

I really don't want to argue w/all of the qb experts in here, but I think accuracy is huge and I don't think Lamar is very accurate.

Cue the posts where I don't know what I'm talking about...


Well it's not like your wrong. His college completion percentage is just under that gold 60% that you look for. There are definately some issue there.

The thing is, does his ability to run the ball outweigh 2 to 4 missed throws per game? I mean when you get down to it that is what it amounts to. I think the answer is yes. Especially if you can fix his technique and bring up his accuracy which I think is VERY doable if he can get signed to a team and they let him sit a year or two.

He is worth a late 1st round to 2rd pick at the least if your a team that can provide that situation for him. If we signed Cousins or Smith we could provide that kind of environment. Definitely not the pick at #1 overall though.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
edromeo #1396678 01/23/18 02:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
There is nothing silly about Accuracy when talking about QBs. If you all think he will be a weapon running the ball as he has been in college...talk about silly. He won't last as he will be broken physically.

QB? WR? well those days are gone, but its comes up mostly when a QBs major weapon has been his running skills. As I just read about his running yardage being somewhere close to Allen's passing yardage...who cares about that stat? really?

And who hear in this board has once stated that we should take Allen at overall #1. Don't make up stuff to make your premise more intelligent.

We just saw an amazingly skilled QB this past season who can be taught and improve but suck at being consistently ACCURATE...why even think about drafting another who has the same problems. Just cause they are a little better. Accuracy will always be an issue with Lamar Jackson. And if he runs like he did in college he will soon find out there 300 lb DL who run faster than some 200 lb Safeties he faced!

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
bonefish #1396691 01/23/18 02:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
lol imagine being worried that defensive linemen will catch Lamar Jackson, but still be enamored with Baker Mayfield.

CHSDawg #1396699 01/23/18 02:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
lol imagine being worried that defensive linemen will catch Lamar Jackson, but still be enamored with Baker Mayfield.


What an ignorant statement...sorry don't mean to insult you but you did it to yourself. Do you actually think Mayfield's chief asset is his running ability to get yardage...yes, the kid is tough and will get some yardage at times. But he is not a "RUNNING QB" he can move around in a pocket. The kid's asset is his amazing ACCURACY and natural ability to play the game as a QB not as a Runner.

To even make that statement was pretty ridiculous and has not relevancy at all.

Btw Lamar Jackson is a thinner 211 while Mayfield is a more thicker 220 and if you watched the kid Mayfield takes some big time hits and keeps on ticking. So even your ridiculous statement doesn't even hold merit on the physical basis of your original intent... smh can you be so far off... lol laugh

Why don't you delete that statement which I think was a certain did on me personally as I have promoted Mayfield a lot and yes,
I would give anything to have him on our team and I would throw up if we put our apples into the Jackson basket to bring us out of mediocre football.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
eotab #1396706 01/23/18 03:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
I'm not going to delete the truth. Just because it riled up your feathers, doesn't mean it's ignorant. In fact, it really just means you're ignorant. I don't think Baker's chief asset is his scrambling ability, mainly because it's so bad against NFL competition. His accuracy has a lot of questions too. Is he able to throw into tight windows? It didn't look that way against Georgia in the second half. A lot of what Baker does good is scheme dependent, which isn't a knock as executing a scheme is very important.

Also, if you're going to spout off about prospects, you might want to watch the games. Lamar Jackson has faced much more talented and physical defenses within the ACC, teams that have multiple 1st round picks on the defensive side of their team opposed to The Big 12 who has zero 1st round talent on defense. If you watched Baker and Lamar's games you would notice that multiple times throughout the Ohio State and Texas game. Not to mention his injury history over his career. Lamar Jackson never came out of a game in his collegiate career and has never even be injured. I know you want a thicczaddy but Baker ain't the one, he's thicc, but soft.

Instead of responding, I hope you take some time to watch their games instead of going off of radioshow talking points.

CHSDawg #1396710 01/23/18 03:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,921
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,921
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
In fact, it really just means you're ignorant.
You possibly shouldn't say that?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
In fact, it really just means you're ignorant.
You possibly shouldn't say that?


Where's the lie though?

CHSDawg #1396764 01/23/18 05:04 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Otay good luck with your football thoughts...I'll just take my ignorant self out of this convo...


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
I agree that accuracy is a very important trait when evaluating QBs.

I think Lamar is a natural thrower of the ball and has natural accuracy. To put context to my view...I would say he's not as accurate as Rosen but I think he's more accurate then Allen. Discussions on accuracy can quickly delve into subjectivity without any objective measures. So i'll just say that imo he has enough accuracy that its not an issue.

Ian Wharton took the time and charted some of the top prospects in terms of accuracy and Jackson came out tied with Darnold, ahead of Allen and behind Rosen and Mayfield. Caveat that should go without saying but i will still mention is that like with any metric you still have to take into account other factors like scheme and pass protection (spread offense/well protected etc) that could effect the results.

I look forward to how he throws it at the combine and if/when PFF puts out their accuracy charting like they did last year for the top prospects (like they did last year with Mitch/Watson that charted their actual ball placement).


Last edited by edromeo; 01/23/18 06:55 PM.
CHSDawg #1396846 01/23/18 07:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
His accuracy has a lot of questions too. Is he able to throw into tight windows? It didn't look that way against Georgia in the second half. A lot of what Baker does good is scheme dependent, which isn't a knock as executing a scheme is very important.
Agreed.

I definitely think Baker is accurate. I'm not sure he's as accurate as his reputation or numbers indicate, but he's accurate. From watching his tapes he's often throwing to receivers with very good separation and clean pockets and relatively 'easier' throws then some other prospects make. For example he's not being asked to throw 12-15 yard comebacks from the far hash to the opposite sideline or throw second level anticipation based in breaking routes. I don't mean any of this as knock either, not saying that he can't make those throws with accuracy either. Just because a prospect doesn't display it often on film doesn't mean they can't do it.


Last edited by edromeo; 01/23/18 07:06 PM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,740
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,740
Originally Posted By: HotBYoungTurk
So does anyone think Jackson will be available in the 2nd round?


It's possible, at this point he's not cemented into the first round..

He will rise, or at least should shine in workouts...which will push him up...

He's a QB...whom always go much higher, as it is the most sought after spot.

Still too early, but I expect him to go round 1...If round 2, he'll be scooped up quickly...

edromeo #1396958 01/23/18 09:18 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I'd love to reply on his accuracy, but you will get mad and start accusing me of weird crap again. So yeah ed, you're right...............Lamar is an accurate qb.

bonefish #1396968 01/23/18 09:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
M
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
Running QB's are never a good thing in the NFL. They always get hurt. Were I he, I'd be making the transition to WR.


WE DON'T NEED A QB BEFORE WE GET A LINE THAT CAN PROTECT HIM
my two cents...
MrTed #1396981 01/23/18 10:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
He’s not a running QB. He’s a QB with a nasty ability to run.

I swear people act like he didn’t have a better passing year than some of the other QBs.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Swish #1396984 01/23/18 10:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Alright Swish......let's make a bet. I take Rosen. You take Lamar. We give them 5 years. We bet $1,000 on who is better by using the QBR.

Cool?

Swish #1396985 01/23/18 10:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
M
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
Originally Posted By: Swish
He’s not a running QB. He’s a QB with a nasty ability to run.

I swear people act like he didn’t have a better passing year than some of the other QBs.



Never watched a full game, only a few highlight reels, and couldn't even get through all of those because he did more running than he did throwing.


WE DON'T NEED A QB BEFORE WE GET A LINE THAT CAN PROTECT HIM
my two cents...
MrTed #1396989 01/23/18 10:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
j/c:

I want to clarify something. I have no problem w/dual threat QBs.

In fact, I prefer them.

My issue w/Lamar is two-fold.

I think he is inaccurate. I also question his reads and anticipation.

MrTed #1396990 01/23/18 10:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Then watch a full game. A few of them. And observe the bad O line play.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Swish #1396991 01/23/18 10:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
His OL was way better than Rosen's.

MrTed #1396992 01/23/18 10:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: MrTed
Originally Posted By: Swish
He’s not a running QB. He’s a QB with a nasty ability to run.

I swear people act like he didn’t have a better passing year than some of the other QBs.



Never watched a full game, only a few highlight reels, and couldn't even get through all of those because he did more running than he did throwing.


I suggest that you watch a full game or a cut up of all his pass plays. Highlights will give you the running plays, because it's so much more entertaining to see him scramble for 10 yards than make a 10 yard pass.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
That’s highly debatable.

And the argument can be made that Rosen had better play makers, and Lamar certainly played against tougher competition


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Swish #1396995 01/23/18 10:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Bro, Rosen's supporting talent was awful. He did have one good WR, but man, the dude was under quick pressure all the time.

CHSDawg #1397014 01/23/18 10:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,921
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,921
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Originally Posted By: MrTed
Originally Posted By: Swish
He’s not a running QB. He’s a QB with a nasty ability to run.

I swear people act like he didn’t have a better passing year than some of the other QBs.



Never watched a full game, only a few highlight reels, and couldn't even get through all of those because he did more running than he did throwing.


I suggest that you watch a full game or a cut up of all his pass plays. Highlights will give you the running plays, because it's so much more entertaining to see him scramble for 10 yards than make a 10 yard pass.


So, I just did this. Vs. Florida St. What I saw in that game was a running qb. with some, SOME, accuracy issues in the passing game. I also saw some happy feet in the pocket.

Now, when I say a 'running qb', I understand that it may simply have been the o he was running. On read options, he kept the ball just about every time. And truthfully, to me those looked like good reads for the most part.

But even in the pocket, he bailed fairly quick without much pressure often times.

That was just 1 game.

Does anyone have any suggestions on a different game I should watch, that shows he's not a running qb? That shows his accuracy in the passing game?

Like I said, I've only watched the 1 game in it's (Louisville's offense) entirety. But, from that 1 game, my takeaway is he's a runner than can throw, but has some accuracy issues. Not terrible, but certainly not great. And, if he runs that often in the nfl, he'll be broken, sooner than later.

Any other games I should watch?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
arch, we don't get along..........but that was a very good post w/honest questions. I know you hate me, but I do know some football and here is my advice.

Don't just watch cut-ups that focus on one, two, or even three plays. That can be deceiving. My advice is to watch live games as much as you can. Obviously, the season is over and that is now impossible [I am just saying to do that moving forward] but now I would suggest watching every freaking video out there on each guy you are interested in evaluating. Read all of the scouting reports.

Take all of that information and formulate an opinion. You don't have to be correct, but at least it will be educated. It sounds like that is what you are interested in and that is really cool......and rare.

I scouted for two years and believe me.............the more info you can obtain, the better your analysis will be.

And again........I don't like this idea of just showing a play or two to evaluate a qb. I say you watch as much as you can and get a feel for the conditions of each game. That will give you a much better look.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,921
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,921
Several things:

I wasn't aware we didn't get along. smile

As I said, I watched the 'whole' louisville vs. Fl. St. game - but it was only every Louisville offensive play.

The last time I really dug into this was prior to the Browns drafting Weeden. What I saw in watching most of his games was exactly what he was when he was playing for the Browns.

I am NOT a scout, nor have I ever been one. My 'eye' test has served me well throughout my life, not just in football.

I'd just like to hear from those endorsing Jackson what other games I should watch.

Look, I don't get paid to scout/analyze, so I'm probably not going to watch every Louisville game.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Okay, then I would suggest watching his games against his toughest opponents.

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,316
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,316

Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2018 NFL Season 2018 NFL Draft Lamar Jackson

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5