|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Dawg Talker
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235 |
Hear me out on this... Let's say at #1 we take 1. OB Sam Darnold - CLE Then picks #2 and #3 play out like this... 2. RB Saqoun Barkely - NYG 3. DE Bradley Chubb - IND Now at #4 we could have a bidding war on our hands for others looking to trade up to take a QB. My question is this... Do we gain MORE leverage on the other teams by outright drafting Josh Rosen ( or another QB in this position ) as opposed to choosing to trade the pick while on the clock? If the answer is yes, this might give other teams who want Rosen a ton of time to outbid each other for either Darnold or Rosen. Thoughts? 
Cleveland Browns, Space Browns ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/iVP5Po2.png)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693 |
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/hfMNC7T.jpg) "I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski "Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield #gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448 |
I have advocated a QB draft for some time now . What I had in mind was QB #1 AT #1 ( OR 4 ) all on Dorsey ; and then one in the latter rounds . I have a couple that I like . I would not mind trading Kizer if there was a decent offer .. All of this is predicated on signing a Vet to start the season with .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,678
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,678 |
Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,575
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,575 |
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002 |
There is no way it happens that we take two QBs but I could see us making a nice trade from 4 in that scenario. It's why I would take Barkley at #1 and a QB at #4.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Dawg Talker
|
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235 |
There is no way it happens that we take two QBs but I could see us making a nice trade from 4 in that scenario. It's why I would take Barkley at #1 and a QB at #4. I also like the idea of taking Barkley at #1 and a QB at #4. I'd be happy with any of the below. Barkley at #1 Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield at #4 My question was simply do we gain more leverage by taking the QB over trading the pick, not sure if everyone is actually reading my post or just reading the title of the thread.
Last edited by CleVeLaNd_sTrife; 03/03/18 05:08 PM.
Cleveland Browns, Space Browns
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002 |
There is no way it happens that we take two QBs but I could see us making a nice trade from 4 in that scenario. It's why I would take Barkley at #1 and a QB at #4. I also like the idea of taking Barkley at #1 and a QB at #4. I'd be happy with any of the below. Barkley at #1 Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield at #4 My question was simply do we gain more leverage by taking the QB over trading the pick, not sure if everyone is actually reading my post or just reading the title of the thread. I would be fine with trading back, so long as, we left ourselves in a position to draft Mason ahead of the Steelers and pick 22 is not involved ^^.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
No, that would be stupid and we won't do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
NO!!! 
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
I can't imagine a worse idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
I don't care as much about winning in April as if there was a way to win in September-October-November-December-January and in the playoffs.
If they want to draft 11 quarterbacks, and it gets them to winning when it counts, I don't think league rules prohibit it.
Could they just move the NFL draft up to Februrary 1st,
The speculation for weeks on end is turning into something bad.
Get it over with already.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,339
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,339 |
No. Pick one, then get Minkah or Bark
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Dawg Talker
|
|
OP
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235 |
I get the sense that most of you are reading the headline of my thread and replying as opposed to reading my actual post.
My question is this...
Do we gain MORE leverage on the other teams by outright drafting Josh Rosen ( or another QB in this position ) as opposed to choosing to trade the pick while on the clock?
Cleveland Browns, Space Browns
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
We will already have our two QBs...AJ McCarron n our drafted QB. One will be traded in the future.
I however am joining the ranks of Barkley at #1 n get our choice of Rosen, Darnold or Mayfield at #4.
Just our humble future!
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!
GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
I get the sense that most of you are reading the headline of my thread and replying as opposed to reading my actual post.
My question is this...
Do we gain MORE leverage on the other teams by outright drafting Josh Rosen ( or another QB in this position ) as opposed to choosing to trade the pick while on the clock?
No. If anything we lose leverage because teams know we have to make a trade.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2018 NFL Season 2018 NFL Draft Should We Take 2 QB's At #1 and
#4?
|
|
