Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
edromeo #1419469 03/12/18 06:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: edromeo
J/c

If the Browns take a QB at pick #4 they gotta listen to offers at pick #4


huh? Do you mean, if the Browns take a qb a pick #1?

Yes, they have to listen to offers at 4. But, I hope for a lot. Especially if Barkley is there. I'm also warming up to the idea of Bradley Chubb. I like Ogbah, but a rotation of Chubb, Garrett, and Ogbah would be pretty nuts.


The Chiefs had two stud DE's, made their defense mighty formidable


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
eotab #1419482 03/12/18 06:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,249
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,249
yeah baby.

That is my plan.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Yeah, i meant pick #4 thanks will correct.

edromeo #1419505 03/12/18 07:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253
Originally Posted By: edromeo
J/c

If the Browns take a QB at pick #1 they gotta listen to offers at pick #4


Why!!!

Isn't it better to get a great player than trade down for a couple of average players?

Dawg Duty #1419509 03/12/18 07:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Isn't it better to get a great player than trade down for a couple of average players?


For us, generally it would be.


It's why I told the Bills fan I met today, that if they're looking to trade up they probably have a better shot at number 3 than number 4

But it never hurts to listen. A good deal is a good deal. And most everyone has a price

Last edited by PeteyDangerous; 03/12/18 07:10 PM.

UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Dawg Duty #1419511 03/12/18 07:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Originally Posted By: edromeo
J/c

If the Browns take a QB at pick #1 they gotta listen to offers at pick #4


Why!!!
Your against listening to offers?

Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Isn't it better to get a great player than trade down for a couple of average players?
You listen to offers if you have a cluster a players with equal grades and you trade down to stay in that same range of players then you aren't trading down from great players to average players. You're trading down to stay in the range of great players while acquiring more draft picks.

bonefish #1419519 03/12/18 07:38 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 320
G
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
G
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 320
The Browns are in need of quality playmakers. Stay at 4 and take the highest player on their board. Tired of trading down only to see players we could have had become stars while we can't win.


I just want a winner. We need players who can be part of the solution not part of the problem.
bonefish #1419543 03/12/18 08:42 PM
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 94
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 94
The Bills have just traded Cordy Glenn and the 21st pick to the Bengals for the 12th pick. So this means the Bills have pick 12 and 22 in the first round. They have to be thinking that they need to vault into the top 4 to get a quarterback.

Personally, I would absolutely take the quarterback at 1 that we want, and then at 4, trade the 4th overall to Buffalo for #12, 22, 2nd rounder, and get our 3rd rounder back. There are just so much potential there. At 12 you could possibly get a Ward, Derwin James or offensive tackle, and at 22 get whichever of these positions you didn't get at 12.

I really like the class this year, and I have said for a while, that with the draft capital we have this year, I would like to spin it all into 4 first rounders this year!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,210
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,210
Knowing the most important position is the QB..Then the second most is pass rusher then the third should be DB.

I'm not all sold on any of these QB's being a #1 or #4. I really think these guys will drop in the draft..

I'm also thinking to build the D up in this draft.. trade down from 1 to 2 or 3 and get Chubbs with 2nd or 3rd pick.

Then either take a guy you like at 4 or trade back to 6-7 for Fitzpatrick..

could we then have picks that would have us get guys like Josh Jackson..Jaire Alexander or Denzel Ward available to grab ?

Nick chubb and Josh Allen one of them could be available with the second round picks ..

DeisleDawg #1419583 03/12/18 10:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
I'm not seeing what you're seeing. I wouldn't be surprised if the QBs go very quick.

I also think we need more for our offense than defense. With Garrett, Ogbah, Jamie Collins, Christian Kirksey, Larry Ogunjobi, and Joe Schobert, we have a lot of picks and money wrapped up on the defense.

Just for balance sake, I don't think I'd want to draft two defensive players at the top.


QB at 1. After that, at four, I'd like Saquon Barkley. Bradley Chubb is close behind. If neither are available, Fitzpatrick with an eye on a trade down wouldn't be bad.


EDIT: I agree about Nick Chubb though. In a deep RB class, he doesn't get talked about much, but he'd be a great compliment to go with Duke Johnson

Last edited by PeteyDangerous; 03/12/18 10:17 PM.

UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
edromeo #1419584 03/12/18 10:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Dorsey said we are listening to offers for #1, Im sure we will listen for our #4.

There is going to be a great talent for us at #4...Chubb or Barkley will be there. For us to trade it has to be a lot. We got 5 of the top64...we dont need quantity we will go for the quality!


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
bonefish #1419593 03/12/18 10:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
Originally Posted By: bonefish

The Bills are going to make a move at quarterback.

They will either go after Bradford and or move up in the draft.


Benjamin Allbright Verified account
@AllbrightNFL
Keep an eye on #Buffalo and the #Colts as trade partners.

Tweet

Dawg Duty #1419597 03/12/18 10:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Originally Posted By: edromeo
J/c

If the Browns take a QB at pick #1 they gotta listen to offers at pick #4


Why!!!

Isn't it better to get a great player than trade down for a couple of average players?


Average picks are also picked a pick four.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,469
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,469
Originally Posted By: PeteyDangerous
I'm not seeing what you're seeing. I wouldn't be surprised if the QBs go very quick.

I also think we need more for our offense than defense. With Garrett, Ogbah, Jamie Collins, Christian Kirksey, Larry Ogunjobi, and Joe Schobert, we have a lot of picks and money wrapped up on the defense.

Just for balance sake, I don't think I'd want to draft two defensive players at the top.


QB at 1. After that, at four, I'd like Saquon Barkley. Bradley Chubb is close behind. If neither are available, Fitzpatrick with an eye on a trade down wouldn't be bad.


EDIT: I agree about Nick Chubb though. In a deep RB class, he doesn't get talked about much, but he'd be a great compliment to go with Duke Johnson


I think he's talking about Bradley Chubb, DE NC State


The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
edromeo #1419637 03/13/18 04:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Originally Posted By: edromeo
Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Originally Posted By: edromeo
J/c

If the Browns take a QB at pick #1 they gotta listen to offers at pick #4


Why!!!
Your against listening to offers?

Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Isn't it better to get a great player than trade down for a couple of average players?
You listen to offers if you have a cluster a players with equal grades and you trade down to stay in that same range of players then you aren't trading down from great players to average players. You're trading down to stay in the range of great players while acquiring more draft picks.


Is that feasible in this draft though?

How deep do you go before the STUDS drop off?

I only see THREE Can't Miss Guys in this draft.

Barkley
Chubb
Fitzpatrick

Need to look deeper into what could be available at 12 and 22.

Don't like missing out on STUDS.

Give me our 12+ year QB and a STUD.

Now, if Buffalo talks 12, 22 and their 2019 1st rounder? I'm all ears.

Gotta look at possible combination at 12 and 22.

cfrs15 #1419638 03/13/18 04:39 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
1
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Originally Posted By: edromeo
J/c

If the Browns take a QB at pick #1 they gotta listen to offers at pick #4


Why!!!

Isn't it better to get a great player than trade down for a couple of average players?


Average picks are also picked a pick four.


But those not taken return nothing. We need to pick...

kwhip #1419639 03/13/18 04:46 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Originally Posted By: kwhip
How deep do you go before the STUDS drop off?

I only see THREE Can't Miss Guys in this draft.

Barkley
Chubb
Fitzpatrick
I've heard several say that Quentin Nelson is the best player in this class, which is odd for a LG. I would include his name. And while Fitz has been discussed a lot here, I'm not sure there is much drop off between him and James. Ward at CB and Raquan Smith at LB might be considered studs too. Then, of course, you have to figure in the QB hungry teams looking to grab QB if there is a run at the top. And there are almost always teams who reach for needs which might knock a stud down the board.

I'm not advocating trading down, I like #1 and #4, but I think there will be players worth considering further down the draft.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
bonefish #1419644 03/13/18 05:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316
W
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
W
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316
so, I am 100% convinced Indy will trade with someone, probably Jets or Broncos so they can still get Chubb or Barkley. I'm 50% convinced Giants will as well and most likely the same two teams.

Browns go QB at 1, sorry Sequon-truthers
QB goes # 2 (Giants or trade up from Broncos, Jets, Zona, Miami, Bills)
QB goes # 3 (Indy trade down - Broncos, Jets, Zona, Miami, Bills)

Browns trade back to 5 or 6 and take Chubb...I just don't believe the FO values a RB that high. That being said, I'm happy if we walk away with Barkley, Fitzpatrick or Chubb


I'm coming home, I'm coming home, tell the world I'm coming home
bonefish #1419678 03/13/18 08:40 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,469
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,469
If Joe Thomas retires, we may need to go with Mike McGlinchey

ANALYSIS
STRENGTHS Very fluid athlete with background as tight end. Natural movements and able to make cross-face and cut-off blocks. Uses tight, controlled settle steps to help promote balanced, centered contact at the point of attack. Good bender. Strikes and rolls his hips up under him. Advanced technician. Experienced and successful in gap and zone schemes and can play either tackle spot. Works hips double teams hip to hip and has well-timed climbs to linebackers. Quality down-blocker who gets movement and push with leg churn. Works to sustain. Pass sets with excellent posture. Weight is generally dispersed properly throughout his kick slides. Punch placement is adequate. Plays with adequate mirror. Instinctive and searches for trouble brewing with twists and blitzes. Named a team captain in consecutive years.

WEAKNESSES Below average core strength. Needs more mass on his frame. May not have leg drive to move anchored space eaters. Inconsistent at containing opponents as base blocker. Needs to sustain and finish at a better rate. Power ends can stack and discard him. Allows pad level to rise as move blocker. Pass slide is a little restricted in terms of gaining ground. Tends to deaden feet at punch allowing speed rushers access to his edge if his punch falls flat or misses entirely. Will lean into some blocks as mechanism to boost power. Will uncork his punch a shade too early at times for fear of losing the "hands first" battle. Can be bounced back into pocket by stiff stab moves.

DRAFT PROJECTION Round 1

not a glamorous pick .. but a necessary pick... He won't be there in the second round...


The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
Halfback32 #1419698 03/13/18 09:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: Halfback32
If Joe Thomas retires, we may need to go with Mike McGlinchey


not a glamorous pick .. but a necessary pick... He won't be there in the second round...


I've brought this up, a trade back into round 1 (which I love because it gives us the ability to fifth round option, then we can franchise tag if need be).

But folks who know Notre Dame seem to say the guy just isn't athletic and will be a journeyman RT in the NFL.

So I've cooled off on this idea


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
bonefish #1419701 03/13/18 09:40 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,092
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,092
I still think that we take Barkley at 1 and either take Josh Allen at four or move up to take him at 3.. Just my opinion


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,469
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,469
Originally Posted By: PeteyDangerous
Originally Posted By: Halfback32
If Joe Thomas retires, we may need to go with Mike McGlinchey


not a glamorous pick .. but a necessary pick... He won't be there in the second round...


I've brought this up, a trade back into round 1 (which I love because it gives us the ability to fifth round option, then we can franchise tag if need be).

But folks who know Notre Dame seem to say the guy just isn't athletic and will be a journeyman RT in the NFL.

So I've cooled off on this idea


Maycock has him rated as the top Tackle in the draft.


The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
Damanshot #1419728 03/13/18 10:36 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: Damanshot
I still think that we take Barkley at 1 and either take Josh Allen at four or move up to take him at 3.. Just my opinion


Josh Allen at 3 yikes, that would hurt...

3rd round?

Last edited by rastanplan; 03/13/18 10:36 AM.
Halfback32 #1419765 03/13/18 11:27 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316
W
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
W
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316
Mayock also rates everyone from Notre Dame high


I'm coming home, I'm coming home, tell the world I'm coming home
Halfback32 #1419819 03/13/18 12:51 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
I don't think we will find a LT replacement in this 2018 draft...actually Drango will do better than any rookie we drafted in this season if that is the case. Although I'm hoping JT will join us this season and get in the playoffs.

Which he has not experienced!

I am curious on taking a look at this kid:
Chukwuma Okorafor 6-6 320 4.82 Western Michigan SR
for a mid round pick???

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
1oldMutt #1419834 03/13/18 01:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: 1oldMutt
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Dawg Duty
Originally Posted By: edromeo
J/c

If the Browns take a QB at pick #1 they gotta listen to offers at pick #4


Why!!!

Isn't it better to get a great player than trade down for a couple of average players?


Average picks are also picked a pick four.


But those not taken return nothing. We need to pick...


This doesn't make sense.

bonefish #1419835 03/13/18 01:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,249
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,249
Quarterbacks!!!

It is beginning to look like quarterbacks go 1, 2, 3.

There are a bunch of teams in the market. And the quarterbacks in this draft are going to be attractive enough for team in the market to move up.

Browns at one: Haslam mission statement to Dorsey get your quarterback.

The Giants at two: As tempting as Barkley is; I think they go quarterback.

Eli is 37. He will be UFA in 2020. He was benched last year. He is a player with diminishing skills. The Giants have no plans to be drafting second again. Eli is the perfect guy to groom a player like Allen. Who will be ready in one or two years.

Colts at three: The Colts need players. They have no pass rush. Their OL is poor. They need a RB. The only way to address more than one problem area; trade out.
They will be the target for a bunch of QB needy teams.
Bills, Jets, fins, Cards, Broncos. Two QB's already gone. Panic. The fight for number three.

Browns at four: We will get offers depending upon which guy is left. But I really believe Barkley is there.

Not sure if we take Barkley, Fitz, or Chubb. Or if we trade out it depends with who and if we can still get our target.

The Browns fourth pick is Gold.

There is zero reason to take Barkley at one.

bonefish #1419855 03/13/18 01:23 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
bonefish

Browns at four: We will get offers depending upon which guy is left. But I really believe Barkley is there.

Not sure if we take Barkley, Fitz, or Chubb. Or if we trade out it depends with who and if we can still get our target.

The Browns fourth pick is Gold.

bonefish We could trade down with the Jets to #6 and still get one of those 3 + some nice picks thumbsup


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
eotab #1419857 03/13/18 01:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
Kolten Miller - UCLA at the beginning of the second round, possibly.

bonefish #1419859 03/13/18 01:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
I also believe that Barkley and Chubb will be there at 4. I also believe that Dorsey may go Chubb over Barkley, if that is the case.

Hammer #1419885 03/13/18 01:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: Hammer
I also believe that Barkley and Chubb will be there at 4. I also believe that Dorsey may go Chubb over Barkley, if that is the case.



I never thought I would say this but I agree with this now, he has been checking out veteran DE's for a while now and can you Imagine Garrett and Chubb along with Ogbah and Nassib ... shocked


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
bonefish #1419887 03/13/18 01:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316
W
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
W
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,316
Originally Posted By: bonefish
Quarterbacks!!!

It is beginning to look like quarterbacks go 1, 2, 3.

There are a bunch of teams in the market. And the quarterbacks in this draft are going to be attractive enough for team in the market to move up.

Browns at one: Haslam mission statement to Dorsey get your quarterback.

The Giants at two: As tempting as Barkley is; I think they go quarterback.

Eli is 37. He will be UFA in 2020. He was benched last year. He is a player with diminishing skills. The Giants have no plans to be drafting second again. Eli is the perfect guy to groom a player like Allen. Who will be ready in one or two years.

Colts at three: The Colts need players. They have no pass rush. Their OL is poor. They need a RB. The only way to address more than one problem area; trade out.
They will be the target for a bunch of QB needy teams.
Bills, Jets, fins, Cards, Broncos. Two QB's already gone. Panic. The fight for number three.

Browns at four: We will get offers depending upon which guy is left. But I really believe Barkley is there.

Not sure if we take Barkley, Fitz, or Chubb. Or if we trade out it depends with who and if we can still get our target.

The Browns fourth pick is Gold.

There is zero reason to take Barkley at one.



Agree 100%...hoping Bills trade up to 3 which forces Jets or Broncos to trade up and we still get one of the top 2 or 3 non-QBs by only going back 1-2 spots. Obviously I'm not a Sequon-truther but would not be disappointed if we took him


I'm coming home, I'm coming home, tell the world I'm coming home
wojo_dew #1419910 03/13/18 02:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: wojo_dew
Agree 100%...hoping Bills trade up to 3 which forces Jets or Broncos to trade up and we still get one of the top 2 or 3 non-QBs by only going back 1-2 spots. Obviously I'm not a Sequon-truther but would not be disappointed if we took him


I'm just hoping these trade ups happen well before the draft (like when the Rams and Eagles traded up) so that we get a sense of what is going on.

Hammer #1419913 03/13/18 02:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
Originally Posted By: Hammer
I also believe that Dorsey may go Chubb over Barkley, if that is the case.


I agree. I definitely think Dorsey would go Chubb over Barkley and I have absolutely no problems with that.

I think he'd take Ward and Fitz over Barkley as well.

cfrs15 #1419928 03/13/18 02:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
I'm just hoping these trade ups happen well before the draft (like when the Rams and Eagles traded up) so that we get a sense of what is going on.


I'd hope so, but I kind of doubt it. There'd be more than 3 QBs in play and we don't even know who we are going to pick


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
cfrs15 #1419961 03/13/18 02:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
I'm just hoping these trade ups happen well before the draft (like when the Rams and Eagles traded up) so that we get a sense of what is going on.


It's possible.......

Charles Robinson Verified account
@CharlesRobinson
A league source tells Yahoo Sports the Buffalo #Bills will explore trade scenarios to move into the top five picks in the #NFL draft (QB-needy #Jets hold 6th pick). Talks are expected to materialize after first week of free agency and intensify at the Orlando owner's meetings.

Tweet

Milk Man #1419980 03/13/18 03:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: Milk Man


It's possible.......

Charles Robinson Verified account
@CharlesRobinson
A league source tells Yahoo Sports the Buffalo #Bills will explore trade scenarios to move into the top five picks in the #NFL draft (QB-needy #Jets hold 6th pick). Talks are expected to materialize after first week of free agency and intensify at the Orlando owner's meetings.

Tweet


I guess, but would anyone move to three or four without knowing who the QBs are going to be before them?

I mean, I guess the Eagles and Rams did their thing with Goff and Wentz, but this would be even bigger.


UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: PeteyDangerous
Originally Posted By: Milk Man


It's possible.......

Charles Robinson Verified account
@CharlesRobinson
A league source tells Yahoo Sports the Buffalo #Bills will explore trade scenarios to move into the top five picks in the #NFL draft (QB-needy #Jets hold 6th pick). Talks are expected to materialize after first week of free agency and intensify at the Orlando owner's meetings.

Tweet


I guess, but would anyone move to three or four without knowing who the QBs are going to be before them?

I mean, I guess the Eagles and Rams did their thing with Goff and Wentz, but this would be even bigger.


I don't see any of these actually happen until that pick is on the clock. The parameters worked out ahead of time, sure, but the execution only when that pick is up and it is known who is there and who isn't.

If someone has two QBs ranked the same at the top and honestly does not care which one they get, then trading to #2 makes sense.

Buffalo trading to #5 to get ahead of the Jets makes no sense until pick #5 is on the clock. If they do it early, then the Jets have time to jump ahead of them.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Originally Posted By: CapCity Dawg
Originally Posted By: PeteyDangerous
Originally Posted By: Milk Man


It's possible.......

Charles Robinson Verified account
@CharlesRobinson
A league source tells Yahoo Sports the Buffalo #Bills will explore trade scenarios to move into the top five picks in the #NFL draft (QB-needy #Jets hold 6th pick). Talks are expected to materialize after first week of free agency and intensify at the Orlando owner's meetings.

Tweet


I guess, but would anyone move to three or four without knowing who the QBs are going to be before them?

I mean, I guess the Eagles and Rams did their thing with Goff and Wentz, but this would be even bigger.


I don't see any of these actually happen until that pick is on the clock. The parameters worked out ahead of time, sure, but the execution only when that pick is up and it is known who is there and who isn't.

If someone has two QBs ranked the same at the top and honestly does not care which one they get, then trading to #2 makes sense.

Buffalo trading to #5 to get ahead of the Jets makes no sense until pick #5 is on the clock. If they do it early, then the Jets have time to jump ahead of them.


Exactly. Everything depends on if their QB is there when they have a good opportunity to trade up.

They will value the QBs differently and thus value the trade up differently.


Either way, I bet we see the top four QBs going early. Jackson mid-first and Rudolph late first.


There's just a lot of QB needy teams and then there's teams that will need QBs soon like the Steelers and Chargers and Saints

Last edited by PeteyDangerous; 03/13/18 04:14 PM.

UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: PeteyDangerous
Originally Posted By: CapCity Dawg
Originally Posted By: PeteyDangerous
Originally Posted By: Milk Man


It's possible.......

Charles Robinson Verified account
@CharlesRobinson
A league source tells Yahoo Sports the Buffalo #Bills will explore trade scenarios to move into the top five picks in the #NFL draft (QB-needy #Jets hold 6th pick). Talks are expected to materialize after first week of free agency and intensify at the Orlando owner's meetings.

Tweet


I guess, but would anyone move to three or four without knowing who the QBs are going to be before them?

I mean, I guess the Eagles and Rams did their thing with Goff and Wentz, but this would be even bigger.


I don't see any of these actually happen until that pick is on the clock. The parameters worked out ahead of time, sure, but the execution only when that pick is up and it is known who is there and who isn't.

If someone has two QBs ranked the same at the top and honestly does not care which one they get, then trading to #2 makes sense.

Buffalo trading to #5 to get ahead of the Jets makes no sense until pick #5 is on the clock. If they do it early, then the Jets have time to jump ahead of them.


Exactly. Everything depends on if their QB is there when they have a good opportunity to trade up.

They will value the QBs differently and thus value the trade up differently.


Either way, I bet we see the top four QBs going early. Jackson mid-first and Rudolph late first.


There's just a lot of QB needy teams and then there's teams that will need QBs soon like the Steelers and Chargers and Saints
This means there is a very good chance Barkely will be there at 4.

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2018 NFL Season 2018 NFL Draft The Fourth

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5