Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
House approves jam-packed $1.3 trillion spending bill

By Mike DeBonis and Erica Werner March 22 at 10:34 AM

The House on Thursday passed a sweeping $1.3 trillion spending bill that makes good on President Trump’s promises to increase military funding while blocking most of his proposed cuts to domestic programs and placing obstacles to his immigration agenda.

The 2,232-page bill, which was released just before 8 p.m. Wednesday, would keep government agencies operating through September. Congressional leaders muscled the bill through the chamber, tossing aside rules to ensure careful deliberation of legislation to meet a Friday night government shutdown deadline.

The bill includes dozens of miscellaneous provisions, ranging from crucial fixes to the recent GOP tax bill to a measure on employee tips to language codifying that minor-league baseball players are exempt from federal labor laws. The spending bill is widely expected to be the last major legislation that Congress will pass before the November midterm elections, which has increased pressure to jam the bill full of odds and ends.

The bill passed on a 256-to-167 vote after leaders of both parties hailed the compromise. At the White House, Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney said Trump would sign the bill.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said it fulfilled Trump’s governing agenda, including by increasing military spending and funding a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.


PowerPost
Follow @powerpost
Get The Daily 202 Newsletter
PowerPost
House approves jam-packed $1.3 trillion spending bill
0:55
House passes spending deal
Embed
Share
The House passed a $1.3 trillion spending bill on March 22 that would fund the government through September. (U.S. House of Representatives)

By Mike DeBonis and Erica Werner March 22 at 10:34 AM Email the author
The House on Thursday passed a sweeping $1.3 trillion spending bill that makes good on President Trump’s promises to increase military funding while blocking most of his proposed cuts to domestic programs and placing obstacles to his immigration agenda.

The 2,232-page bill, which was released just before 8 p.m. Wednesday, would keep government agencies operating through September. Congressional leaders muscled the bill through the chamber, tossing aside rules to ensure careful deliberation of legislation to meet a Friday night government shutdown deadline.

The bill includes dozens of miscellaneous provisions, ranging from crucial fixes to the recent GOP tax bill to a measure on employee tips to language codifying that minor-league baseball players are exempt from federal labor laws. The spending bill is widely expected to be the last major legislation that Congress will pass before the November midterm elections, which has increased pressure to jam the bill full of odds and ends.

The bill passed on a 256-to-167 vote after leaders of both parties hailed the compromise. At the White House, Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney said Trump would sign the bill.

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said it fulfilled Trump’s governing agenda, including by increasing military spending and funding a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

1:20
Congress reaches spending deal
Embed
Share
Negotiators in Congress on March 21 reached an agreement on a $1.3 trillion spending bill, keeping government agencies operating through September. (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

“This bill starts construction on the wall,” he told reporters. “It funds our war on opioids. It invests in infrastructure. It funds school safety and mental health. But what this bill is ultimately about, what we’ve fought for for so long, is finally giving our military the tools and the resources it needs to do the job.”

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called the bill “a tremendous victory for the American people,” one that keeps domestic agencies robustly funded while turning away Trump’s push for more border wall and immigration enforcement money.

“If you want to think you’re getting a wall, just think it and sign the bill,” she said.

But there were plenty of grumbles in all corners of Capitol Hill about the rapid process that has left lawmakers and aides poring through text to see exactly what the bill will do. House GOP leaders waived their own rules requiring any bill coming to the floor to be posted for at least three days, and none of the more than a dozen lawmakers surveyed Thursday said they had read the entire bill.

“There’s no way humanly possible to read 2,232 pages,” said Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who is opposed to the bill. “Sometimes they jam you, but they pretend to give you three days to read it. All the veneer is off now.”

Even Democrats who planned to support the compromise railed about the speed of the bill’s consideration.

“No matter what you think about the bill, this process is something we have to stand up and say is unacceptable,” Rep. Jim McGovern (R-Mass.) said on the House floor.

House Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) acknowledged the circumstances were not ideal.

“There was a good, hard work put into this, and the answer is we are going to move forward and take care of funding our military properly and the rest of the government,” he said. “I, like you, see the frailties in what we do, and they’re enormous and they’re gaping holes, but we had to do what we had to do.”

Besides the looming deadline, one consideration prompting the quick vote, congressional aides said, was the Friday funeral for the late Rep. Louise M. Slaughter (D-N.Y.). Dozens of members are planning to fly to Rochester, N.Y., for the service.

Other lawmakers are set to leave on official delegations abroad as soon as Friday, aides said, taking advantage of the two-week congressional break for Easter and Passover.

Ahead of the vote, House leaders were confident that the compromise would gain enough bipartisan support to get the bill through the chamber on Thursday — much as a precursor budget agreement generated brief fury only to pass on a comfortable bipartisan vote in the pre-dawn hours.

“The members know what is at stake,” House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) said late Wednesday after leaving House meetings during which his whip team began counting votes for the bill. “We have to pay our troops and support our president.”

Attention now turns to the Senate, where unanimous consent from all members would be needed to waive procedural rules and set up votes before the Friday midnight deadline.

That means any one senator could delay the proceedings and force a brief shutdown, much as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) did in February, when he held up consideration of the previous budget bill.

Paul said Wednesday that he had not decided how he would handle the new bill, telling reporters that he would wait to read it first. But he made clear that he was unlikely to be pleased by its contents.

“I think it is safe to say that there are many voices in the Senate, including many Republicans, who are not real happy about having a thousand-page bill crammed down our throat at the last minute without time to read it,” he said. “It’s a really terrible, rotten, no-good way to run your government.”

On Thursday morning, Paul tweeted that it had taken more than two hours to print out the bill so he could review it.

The bill’s release was delayed for two days as leaders haggled over provisions sprinkled throughout the bill.

One hotly litigated matter concerned funding for the Gateway program, a major New York-area infrastructure project. At Trump’s behest, Republicans succeeded in eliminating some provisions favoring the $30 billion project, which includes building a new rail tunnel under the Hudson River. But project backers said it would still be eligible for hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds.

The dickering played out for hours Wednesday, even after top congressional leaders left a morning meeting on a snowy Capitol Hill declaring that a deal was at hand.

Democrats pressed particularly hard to block Trump’s requests to fund a new wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and to beef up immigration enforcement capacity.

The bill includes $1.6 billion in funding for construction of a border wall, but that number is far short of the $25 billion in long-term funding that the administration sought. Democrats also won tight restrictions on how that money can be spent.

Trump declared victory for his priorities in a tweet late Wednesday: “Got $1.6 Billion to start Wall on Southern Border, rest will be forthcoming. Most importantly, got $700 Billion to rebuild our Military, $716 Billion next year . . . most ever. Had to waste money on Dem giveaways in order to take care of military pay increase and new equipment.”

One late-breaking deal involved gun laws. Democrats agreed to add bipartisan legislation to improve the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) for gun buyers, while Republicans agreed to add language making clear that federal funds can be spent on research into gun violence — clarifying a long-standing restriction that has been interpreted as preventing such research.

The package also includes a fix for a provision in the new tax law that favored farmer-owned cooperatives over traditional agriculture corporations, threatening the viability of some corporations by shifting sales to cooperatives. In exchange for agreeing to the fix sought by Republicans and farm groups, Democrats won an increase in a low-income housing tax credit.

Omitted was a health-care measure sought by GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine) and Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), which would have allowed states to establish high-risk pools to help cover costly insurance claims while restoring certain payments to insurers under the Affordable Care Act. Trump, who ended the “cost-sharing reduction” payments in the fall, supported the Collins-Alexander language. But Democrats opposed it because they claimed it included language expanding the existing prohibition on federal funding for abortions.

While a Democratic push to win provisions protecting special counsel Robert S. Mueller III did not succeed, the bill does include hundreds of millions of dollars to combat potential interference from Russia or others in the November midterm elections. The federal Election Assistance Commission will receive $380 million to dole out to states to improve their election-related cybersecurity. And the FBI is set to receive $300 million in counterintelligence funding to combat Russian hacking.

The legislation also incorporates the Taylor Force Act, named after an American who was killed by a Palestinian in 2016. The measure curtails certain economic assistance to the Palestinian Authority until it stops financially supporting convicted terrorists and their families.

Robert Costa, Ed O’Keefe, Josh Dawsey and Seung Min Kim contributed to this report.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost...m=.6c0c19f01bd2



2,232 pages? Can you imagine all the BS in this thing? OMG

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
so much for spending cuts. conservatives got sold another dream by the GOP.

over, and over, and over again.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
Originally Posted By: Swish
so much for spending cuts. conservatives got sold another dream by the GOP.

over, and over, and over again.


Dude, this was bipartisan. Both sides are chest thumping and that's what has me saying 'wait a minute here'... 2,232 Pages? What is hidden in this?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
the Dems never have been about spending cuts. so thats to be expected. not saying thats good, but thats to be expected.

the republican keep preaching about spending cuts.

so where are the cuts? how many times have we increased military spending?


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,881
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,881
I didn't even read your article and I can say this: There isn't a single member of the house that read that bill. R's, D's, I's. Doesn't matter.

What matters is, each person that voted FOR it was assured they got their pork included.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
I want to know what the tweaks were to the Tax bill... more for the rich?

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
J/C

Anything Pelosi is for, needs shut down immediately. JMO

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,123
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,123
Typical, the GOP always increases spending right up until a dem is in the WH. Then they are against it.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,889
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,889
To be quite honest, both parties blame each other more for how they spend than the fact they spend it.

But yeah, the whole fiscal responsibility mantra is a sham.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
This Bill is terrible and the President is caught between a rock and a hard place.

America needs to fund the Military as men are dying due to old equipment in need of repair or replacement. Mad Dog is warning us, it is the worst situation he has ever seen.

If the President signs it, the Military will be saved but his base is going to be angry as this Bill is the Swamp at its worst. The Deficit will grow.

If he doesn't sign it, the government shuts down and the Military suffers.

The Bill can not pass without the Democrats and they will kill it if Schumer doesn't get his Tunnel and everyone else their pork.

We will see what happens here.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,889
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,889
When he signed a more than one billion dollar tax cut it's a little late to blame the other side for a growth in the deficit.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: 40YEARSWAITING
This Bill is terrible and the President is caught between a rock and a hard place.

America needs to fund the Military as men are dying due to old equipment in need of repair or replacement. Mad Dog is warning us, it is the worst situation he has ever seen.

If the President signs it, the Military will be saved but his base is going to be angry as this Bill is the Swamp at its worst. The Deficit will grow.

If he doesn't sign it, the government shuts down and the Military suffers.

The Bill can not pass without the Democrats and they will kill it if Schumer doesn't get his Tunnel and everyone else their pork.

We will see what happens here.
I think this bill just shows you that there are RHINOS and DINOS on both sides, willing to let American soldiers and Americans suffer over political points and pet projects. Its disgusting, and big reason why trump was elected.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
odd.

i spent 8 years active. i didn't see any of us suffer, financially speaking.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
j/c

Rand Paul has been tweeting as he's been reading. some interesting stuff (https://twitter.com/RandPaul)

Quote:
page 550:

$9 billion for Govt Services Admin that oversees federal properties

Fed government spends $1.7 billion a year to maintain 770,000 empty buildings while continuing to buy new properties.


Quote:
Page 240 good news for states rights:

no funds will be spent to prevent any state’s medical marijuana initiatives.

Thank you Congr. Rohrbacher


Quote:
o $1m for the Cultural Antiquities Task Force
o $6.25m for the Ambassadors Fund for Cultural Preservation
o $20m for Countering Foreign State Propaganda
o $12m for Countering State Disinformation and Pressure
o $5m for Vietnam Education Foundation Grants
o $2.579m for Commission on Security and Co-operation in Europe
o $15m to USAID for promoting international higher education between universities
o $51m to promote International Family Planning and Reproductive Health
o $7m promoting International Conservation
o $10m for UN Environmental Programs
o $1m for the World Meteorological Organization
o $218m for Promoting Democracy Development in Europe (yep..the birthplace of democracy needs promoting)
o $25m for International Religious Freedom
o $10m for disadvantaged Egyptian Students
o $12m for Scholarships for Lebanon
o $20m for Middle East Partnership Initiative Scholarship Program
o $12m in military funding for Vietnam
o $3.5m in nutrition assistance to Laos
o $15m in Developmental assistance to China
o $10m for Women LEOs in Afghanistan

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Senate just passed the spending bill 65-32.

Whoever voted for this needs to be seriously loooked at come election time. This is outrageous.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
Bernie’s healthcare plan cost less.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Originally Posted By: clwb419
j/c

Rand Paul has been tweeting as he's been reading. some interesting stuff (https://twitter.com/RandPaul)



Rand Paul is the only decent dude left in politics. He doesn't follow any party line. He just speaks the truth.


No Craps Given
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
Screw Rand.

He wouldn't have voted for the Civil Rights Act.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Originally Posted By: RocketOptimist
Screw Rand.

He wouldn't have voted for the Civil Rights Act.


Prove it.

You just hate him because he has an R next to his name.

When he is not really even an R. He is an L.


No Craps Given
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433


Enjoy the receipt. He wouldn't have voted for it.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
I guess we are listening to two different things?

Exactly what does he say that says he wouldn't support the Civil Rights Act?

Be specific.


No Craps Given
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
I missed the part where he said "Yes" to the question he was asked.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
And when was this filmed?

2011?

About when Hillary called blacks "Super Predators"?

And what party voted for her?

Oh yeah.


No Craps Given
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Please do come up with something from the present day to justify your hatred.

Thanks.


No Craps Given
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
It's okay. We all lose, sometimes.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Yeah, you lose when you try to go into the past.

And forget your party's failings.

Hillary and her Super Predators.

Bernie and his sex fantasies about raping women.


When you decide to live in the here and now, let me know.


No Craps Given
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
You support a dude who wouldn't vote for Civil Rights. He has yet to walk back or clarify further comments when asked about this.

I support a dude with an awful self-admitted terrible attempt at satire.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Riiiiiight.

You support a dude who got caught fantasizing about raping women and tried to walk it back.

It's nice to know you support misogynist hateful pigs.

And you cannot refute one single thing Rand posted about this current bill.

Not one. Because living in the present is too hard for you.

That's the ultimate truth.

It would mean you would have to give up some of your hatred.

Everything that drives you is hatred from the past.

Everything.

You will never get past it because you are blind.

Anyways. It's 3:30 in the morning and I must sleep.

I leave you and your hate to stew in your own juices.


No Craps Given
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
O
OCD Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,717
Rand and Bernie are both cool... Bernie is cooler.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
So anyway

How many times are we gonna increase the military budget? This is pathetic.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
M
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
Originally Posted By: Swish
So anyway

How many times are we gonna increase the military budget? This is pathetic.


When we have a functioning Millennium Falcon, we can quit then.


WE DON'T NEED A QB BEFORE WE GET A LINE THAT CAN PROTECT HIM
my two cents...
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Until the Military is back up to strength and soldiers no longer die from equipment failure.

"I have never seen the Military suffer as much as they have in the last 8 years. Sequestration budget cuts have destroyed the Military's readiness capability. $650 Billion Dollars for the Department of Defense is welcomed news to those who are fighting this war. More equipment, more training, better readiness, I am just very excited the President has fulfilled another campaign promise to set aside sequestration cuts and to rebuild the Military.

-Lindsey Graham

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
accidents happen from equipment failure all the time. this isn't anything new.

a lot of time its user error.

man you're getting played and feeding into the military industrial complex.

or you're just a warhawk.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
I will continue to rely on those who have a clue.
Lindsey Graham has often been a critic of President Trump
and even he says you have no clue.

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
President Trump is now threatening to Veto this Bill.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
lindsey graham brown noses whenever he cans. please stop.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: EveDawg
Riiiiiight.

You support a dude who got caught fantasizing about raping women and tried to walk it back.

It's nice to know you support misogynist hateful pigs.

And you cannot refute one single thing Rand posted about this current bill.

Not one. Because living in the present is too hard for you.

That's the ultimate truth.

It would mean you would have to give up some of your hatred.

Everything that drives you is hatred from the past.

Everything.

You will never get past it because you are blind.

Anyways. It's 3:30 in the morning and I must sleep.

I leave you and your hate to stew in your own juices.
what's funny, is that if someone says 1 thing you disagree with, you cannot agree with anything else they ever say the rest of the their life anymore. lol

some think that because someone may have said something inappropriate once, that means anything else they state or say is not incorrect, no matter the content.

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: Swish
lindsey graham brown noses whenever he cans. please stop.
agree, graham is about the biggest fence sitter in Washington IMO. I personally cant stand him.

Doesn't mean he is wrong on this point though.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
He is though.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: Swish
He is though.
General Mattis disagrees with you. I think the current SOD and former commandant of the Marine Corps has a little more insight to the needs of the military than you may.

That would be like saying the 2nd day intern at Apple knows what more about the current R&D than the CEO. Ill stick with the CEO's vision for the company's future.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus House approves jam-packed $1.3 trillion spending bill

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5