Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
V
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
V
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
If the offer was:

Cle- OBJ and the #2 overall
NYG- #1 overall

I start to think about it. Anymore than that I think the answer would be no.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,532
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,532
Originally Posted By: vadawgfan07
If the offer was:

Cle- OBJ and the #2 overall
NYG- #1 overall

I start to think about it. Anymore than that I think the answer would be no.


I make that trade and never look back contingent on a new contract.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,857
No question, he's a great player.. But as Jimmy Donovan says, he comes with a lifetime subscription for Tylenol LOL

he's a different animal....

Not sure I'd mess with that..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
Originally Posted By: cfrs15


Benjamin Allbright Verified account
@AllbrightNFL
Someone was getting sold a bill of goods yesterday. I talked with several people who said the Giants ARE shopping Beckham.

They just want more than what's being offered.

Tweet

I still wouldn't want to give up in trade what the perceived cost would be to acquire him.


Different position, and the trade took place at a different part of the season .... but people said that the Pats wanted a 1st plus a lot more for Garoppolo. He wound up being traded for just a second.

The enormous contract/guarantees that Beckham will demand lowers the number of places he can go. How many people can afford a $15 million contract? It appears that there are about 15 or so teams that could handle a $16 million deal.

One is the Pack, and they need to get that QB os theirs handled .... whatever his name is .... wink

The Texans don't have the draft capital to trade .....

So, that leaves, realistically, 13 teams with which to trade. Beckham has to sign off on the trade, because he would have to sign a new deal at the time of the trade. Where does he want to go?

It will be interesting to watch.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
I am not advocating for us trading/paying for OBJ ... but imagine this as our offensive weapons at once:

Josh Gordon and Odell Beckham at WR
Jarvis Landry in the slot
Duke Johnson in the slot
Saquon Barkley at RB


I mean, on paper that looks dangerous and as dangerous could get. Shouldn't ever be a problem for a QB finding one of them guys to throw to.

But it'll never happen.

1. Doubt we go after Barkley in the draft
2. Doubt Gordon makes it to preseason let alone regular season
3. We don't give away that many assets for one Beckham when Landry is going to want/need paid and I like Landry over Beckham. Productive yet way less of an annoyance. Gordon if he's seriously turned around and can play like we know is going to want $ too, and I'd take a cleaned up Gordon over ANY WR in the NFL lol.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
The #1 overall pick shouldn't even be in this discussion. We've had an unsettled QB situation for so long, and we earned this #1 pick through a lot of misery. Put the QBs through all the paces and pick THE guy you think has the best chance to be elite.

The difference between #1 and #2 is substantial. To give up the #1 guy for a headcase like Odell Beckham is crazy.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,960
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,960
My thought is you have to think about a) what you have b) your time table and c) where you want to be.

Currently:
Gordon: Soon to be 27, 6'3" 225 lb Gordon has a lot of questions. Gordon is still playing under his rookie deal due to off the field issues. The Browns can now evaluate Gordon over the course of a full season, and he will again be a restricted free agent in 2019. Not only that, but the Browns’ tender for Gordon will check in somewhere around $540,000. By all comparisons, Gordon is a steal at this cost for 2-years or a minimum of one depending how he does this year.

Landry: Landry, 5' 11" and 203 lbs, is seeking a contract in the area of 58 million for 4-years. At 25, Landry, a slot receiver, has been to 3 straight Pro Bowls. At almost 16 million this year under the franchise tag, the Browns could play a wait and see or save a couple of million this year and give him the deal. The deal would be about 10th in range around the league. The question is, do we pay a proven playmaker or go cheap on a rookie not knowing if he will achieve Pro Bowl level or not?

Coleman: At 23, Coleman has a cap number of a little over 3 million in 2018 and 2019. He has only 56 receptions for 718 yds receiving with 5 TD's in 2 years. Add into the fact that Coleman has a problem with drops and has missed 13 of the 32 games played during this time. With Landry playing the slot, that means Coleman and Gordon are the wideouts. At 5'11" 185 lbs, can Coleman get off the line?

Beckham: At 25 and 5'11" 198 lbs, Beckham is a proven commodity at WR and one of the best in the league. True, Beckham's contract demands are extreme but when was the last time the Browns had one of the leagues best receivers? To compare, Antonio Brown has a 4-year 68 million dollar deal. Considering Beckham is coming off an injury, the Browns could offer something in this range and get him under contract.

So is Beckham worth the cost and how do we get him? Absolutely, Beckham is worth the cost. Even if the Browns decided to wait until next years free agency, the cost then for a top 5 receiver is going to be similar - guaranteed. First, Coleman is a bust and grossly over paid for what he has and will deliver to the Browns. Second, Gordon is a question mark at least until next year. As of now, we have no idea if Gordon is going to demand a payday until he proves himself. That said, between Gordon and a newly signed Landry, the Browns would only have 29 million invested in 2 players over the next 2-years. Third, assuming we draft a QB #1, our QB cost as a whole will be much lower that the going average for teams over the next 4-years. Forth, the Browns would be putting 3 Pro Bowlers on the field at the WR position.

How do we get Beckham? As it stands now, the NY Giants have only about 7.6 million in cap space. That's a huge issue if they are planning to resign Beckham. The Browns have over 70 million in cap space so Beckham's cost is not going to break the bank. I also don't believe the Giants are looking to get a QB since most of their moves have been a win now mode.

I do not think you can get Beckham without a 1st round pick. However, I believe this years draft has to high a ceiling for the Browns to get cute. That said, I'd offer:

2019 1st round pick
2018 2nd round pick #35
Corey Coleman (as stated above) or Duke Johnson (who is expendable with Hyde and Barkley)

With this trade, the Browns assemble the best WR team in football with a TE in Njoku that can stretch the field. The Browns get their QB at #1 and the Browns get Barkley at #4 since I'm confident the Giants are going to draft Chubb. Even if the Giants trade out of the #2 slot, I'm pretty confident that trade would be with a team QB hungry like Buffalo. Just food for thought, the Browns have the opportunity to lock up all the starting skilled positions on offense except for Gordon for the next 4 years for less than 45 million with 3 being current or past Pro Bowlers. For comparison, Pittsburgh skilled positions will cost them close to 45 million next year as does Atlanta. The difference is we won't have the majority invested in the QB position (assuming the rookie starts in year 2 and Taylor is released).


Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I'm staying out of the debate about acquiring OBJ, but I really liked reading your post. It was informative, logical, and articulate.

Nice job.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,330
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,330
N-O...NO. No need for this clown, his contract demands and his often injured playing status. Take the circus somewhere else. Chump.


After 55 years, I'm walking away from this dumpster fire. Good luck to everyone who continues to hang on. You'll need it.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: The Beast
N-O...NO. No need for this clown, his contract demands and his often injured playing status. Take the circus somewhere else. Chump.


Often injured?

He played 12 games his rookie year (and had 1305 yards).
He played 15 games his second year (and had 1450 yards).
He played 16 games his third year (and had 1367 yards).
He missed most of 2018 because he was seriously injured.

OBJ is probably the best receiver the league has seen since Calvin Johnson. He works hard and is plays hard on the field. If the price is right every team in the league should be after him. The Giants would be idiots to trade him (especially considering they are going to try and get one more year out of Eli and then go with a new QB, who would benefit greatly from a player like Beckham).

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
T
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
T
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Originally Posted By: 442Dawg
Originally Posted By: PeteyDangerous
Originally Posted By: BpG
The Browns haven't had a player with this much talent on offense since Jim Brown. He is a gigantic douche on and off the field but I don't care, he is absolutely if not THE, one of the top 5 most dynamic offensive players in the league.


We've got Josh Gordon. Who's plenty dynamic.

I'd rather sign him a babysitter than sign OBJ. Better deal and enough balls to go between Josh and Jarvis


Besides the fact that Gordon can't be relied upon, consider this:

Imagine the nightmare defensive coordinators would have game-planning against OBJ, Gordon, Landry, Duke, and Njoku... Could possibly throw Coleman in there too.


At this point, I'd give them Coleman and the #1 for OBJ and the #2. We get rid of a middling player who can't stay healthy, we get one of the best WR in the game (when healthy) and we still get a chance to draft Darnold (or whomever).

That's a deal the Giants would have to think about because, in any other scenario, they would be giving up a first, a second, possibly a third and a future first (or two), for a chance to move up to #1. With this all they give up is the #2 this year and keep all their other picks. A GM would be a fool not to take something like that.

We can figure it out when OBJ gets here what we are going to do with him. Will we let him play out his rookie deal and if he dazzles, then we sign him to an extension? Or will we pay him up front with clauses to guard against future stupidity? Either way he's not getting an extention immediately. He's got too much baggage and immaturity. You put him in Cleveland, which is the anti-New York (In terms of exposure) and it could humble him to the point that he remembers what he plays this game for.

Point blank, I'll tell you this. I bet OBJ would be a different person if he never made that legendary catch. If he weren't thrust into the world stage as a rookie, this might all be moot because he'd just be an good WR not a Fantastic WR with issues. He never got a chance to be humble now the only way for him to go back will be to come to a place like Cleveland. He may want to stay in NYC but he needs a Cleveland to bring him back to earth.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
j/c

I'm just wondering who really believes they'll try to trade him?

I mean the man is under contract. He can SAY he'll sit out if they don't make a deal with him. But really? lol

He'll play. To give up his annual salary and not play would make him an idiot. The Giants will call his bluff and he'll suit up.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
T
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
T
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Originally Posted By: Haus
The #1 overall pick shouldn't even be in this discussion. We've had an unsettled QB situation for so long, and we earned this #1 pick through a lot of misery. Put the QBs through all the paces and pick THE guy you think has the best chance to be elite.

The difference between #1 and #2 is substantial. To give up the #1 guy for a headcase like Odell Beckham is crazy.


But how can there be a substantial difference between two picks right next to each other when the draft itself is not a 100% certainty? If we could see the future and know for a fact that who we would take at #1 is head and shoulders above #2, then your point is valid but you cannot honestly say this.

If that were the case then every #1 in history would have become a bonafide superstar. EVERY ONE. And we all know for a fact that that's not true. Can the #1 be a servicable player? Sure. Can they be a star? Sure. Is it at all guaranteed? Nope...not in the slightest.

So the difference between #1 and #2 is inconsequential. The only thing that is certain is the compensation we'd get for trading the #1. That is guaranteed to be very, very substantial. Goff and Wentz are two notable examples. Their teams gave up the farm for each of them. And if we traded from #1 to #2, we'd get the farm plus a pretty well thought of player, no matter which QB we get.

But saying there's a difference is ludicrous.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
If the #1 drafted player is great and the #2 draft pick fails, your point is moot.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
T
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
T
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
j/c

I'm just wondering who really believes they'll try to trade him?

I mean the man is under contract. He can SAY he'll sit out if they don't make a deal with him. But really? lol

He'll play. To give up his annual salary and not play would make him an idiot. The Giants will call his bluff and he'll suit up.


He's probably making enough money in endorsements that his football money is nothing in comparison. So I don't think him sitting out will have any effect whatsoever on his status.

I think any player is able to be traded, if the trading team gets the right compensation. You can't be in business if you got feelings for one player. That'll kill you.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
Oh you they can trade him. But they won't. Heck my theory seems far more logical than the crap I've been reading. lmao


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
T
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
T
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
But that's a HUGE what if. HUGE.

And that only becomes a moot point after the fact. Right now, nobody knows anything.

We could pick Darnold and he could break his neck leaving the stage on Draft night. Then that #2 pick looks really good.

Crazy scenario, I realize but unless you got a crystal ball, nobody knows anything.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
That's a two way street.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
T
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
T
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
No, I don't think they will trade him either. I think they'll pay him. But they'll listen to the offers.

We know they are at least gonna do that much. They'd be fools not to, if for anything to see what the market says he's worth right now coming off an injury.

More than likely, they'll get some offers that aren't worth taking and they'll bite the bullet. Then they'll come on the TV and claim they were never serious about trading him.

I bet Dorsey would trade M. Garrett if he could get enough compensation for him. It's what GM's are born to do. But again, it's a gambler's game. Roll the dice and hope for the best.

That's what makes this time of the year so fun!

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Good post.

The only thing I may disagree with is the Giants.

Mara and the organization in general has always been conservative and planned for the future.

They have had the opportunity already to move out the second spot.

As tempting as Barkley, Nelson, or Chubb would be they can secure a quarterback replacement for Eli who's contract ends in 2 years.
He is 37. He was benched for poor play.

If they don't plan now to replace him with the second pick in this draft; they could be in the woods for ten years at that position.

Eli may still deliver. But they are not the type of organization who is all about today at the expense of tomorrow.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
I swear Browns fans have Stockholm syndrome when it comes to the draft. They have been abused so long that they have fallen in love with draft picks.


Take a question mark at #4 or take a one of a kind talent in a trade.......give us the draft pick!! ugh

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,732
So let me get this straight. If someone is willing to overpay and give them a kings ransom to trade for him, they may do it. And you want that to be us?


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,538
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,538
Originally Posted By: BpG
I swear Browns fans have Stockholm syndrome when it comes to the draft. They have been abused so long that they have fallen in love with draft picks.


Take a question mark at #4 or take a one of a kind talent in a trade.......give us the draft pick!! ugh


But that's not the deal is it ... that's a tiny snapshot of the picture.

OBJ = Elite talent. Yes. But also a drama queen - actually he might be the #1 drama queen in the entire NFL. Injury prone (missed at least a game in 3 out of 4 years. He played in 4 games last year). He has off the field issues. He wants to be P.A.I.D. . . .

Seems to me it's you that has Stockholm syndrome? Because the Browns have screwed up so many drafts you assume we are going to do so again.... Chubb, Minkah and Barclay are all going to be elite talents at positions the Browns need an upgrade at - they might all be there at #4 ... 2 of them will be for sure.

I don't want the distraction and carnival. No way no how.... I hope OBJ goes to a great team and it implodes.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,854
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,854
I would trade the Giants Josh Gordon and pick # 64 for Odell Beckham.


Romans 10:9 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Originally Posted By: BpG
The Browns haven't had a player with this much talent on offense since Jim Brown. He is a gigantic douche on and off the field but I don't care, he is absolutely if not THE, one of the top 5 most dynamic offensive players in the league.

100% in


Okay, but where will he be in 5 years.
I'm actually more of a fan of that Derrelle Reevis was brought in by "somebody' for the playoffs last year, than would be of getting the final waining days of a guy who I never really understood how he was very good in the first place.

So no, No OBJ, a market like Cleveland, they'd probably fleece the bottom line, and the franchise would be paying for it for years.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,984
Damn my Cleveland buddy is talking like the OBJ thing is almost a done deal! I hope he is wrong. You guys hearing this in Cleveland news?


Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Originally Posted By: BADdog
Damn my Cleveland buddy is talking like the OBJ thing is almost a done deal! I hope he is wrong. You guys hearing this in Cleveland news?


No.


#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I will say this..........

My family is mostly Steeler fans. Many of their friends are too. Some of them were over this afternoon.

My wife made a joke about the Browns and my son and others quickly curtailed her by saying that the Browns might get OBJ.

The argument [from Steeler fans] was that OBJ, Gordon, Landry, Duke, Barkley, Duke, and Njuko was scary good and even Tyrod Taylor could succeed w/that group.

Sometimes, it's wise to listen to one's enemies.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Wisdom: You can't fix everything in one offseason.

Dorsey: Hold my beer.


#gmstrong
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
jc

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...-odell-beckham/

Quote:
Report: Giants asked for two first-round picks for Odell Beckham

Giants co-owner John Mara said on Tuesday that the Giants are not “shopping” wide receiver Odell Beckham, but said he can’t stop teams from calling about a trade and said there was no “100 percent guarantee” that Beckham will remain on the team.

Wednesday brings a report about what the Giants have told any teams that have inquired about acquiring the wide receiver. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the Giants have asked for “at least” two first-round picks in return for Beckham in any trade.

That’s a high price tag for any player and would fit Giants General Manager Dave Gettleman’s comment that you don’t “quit on talent,” although Josh Norman and Steve Smith might dispute how strictly Gettleman sticks to that mantra.

The price tag is especially high for a player coming off a season-ending ankle injury who is heading into the final year of his contract. That doesn’t mean that one of the other 31 teams in the league won’t be willing to pay it, but it would seem to make a trade unlikely.

A 4th and 7th for Jarvis Landry, an uber-talented receiver who is going to need a new contract? Solid trade.

Two first round picks for OBJ? rofl

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
They will never get 2 1st's maybe 1 but a couple 2nd's ...


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Hype increases value. Even if it is in a phantom way.


#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Haus
jc

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...-odell-beckham/

Quote:
Report: Giants asked for two first-round picks for Odell Beckham

Giants co-owner John Mara said on Tuesday that the Giants are not “shopping” wide receiver Odell Beckham, but said he can’t stop teams from calling about a trade and said there was no “100 percent guarantee” that Beckham will remain on the team.

Wednesday brings a report about what the Giants have told any teams that have inquired about acquiring the wide receiver. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the Giants have asked for “at least” two first-round picks in return for Beckham in any trade.

That’s a high price tag for any player and would fit Giants General Manager Dave Gettleman’s comment that you don’t “quit on talent,” although Josh Norman and Steve Smith might dispute how strictly Gettleman sticks to that mantra.

The price tag is especially high for a player coming off a season-ending ankle injury who is heading into the final year of his contract. That doesn’t mean that one of the other 31 teams in the league won’t be willing to pay it, but it would seem to make a trade unlikely.

A 4th and 7th for Jarvis Landry, an uber-talented receiver who is going to need a new contract? Solid trade.

Two first round picks for OBJ? rofl


OBJ is much better than Landry.

OBJ has 313 catches for 4424 yards in 47 games, Landry has 400 catches for 4038 yards in 64 games.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,418
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Haus
jc

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...-odell-beckham/

Quote:
Report: Giants asked for two first-round picks for Odell Beckham

Giants co-owner John Mara said on Tuesday that the Giants are not “shopping” wide receiver Odell Beckham, but said he can’t stop teams from calling about a trade and said there was no “100 percent guarantee” that Beckham will remain on the team.

Wednesday brings a report about what the Giants have told any teams that have inquired about acquiring the wide receiver. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the Giants have asked for “at least” two first-round picks in return for Beckham in any trade.

That’s a high price tag for any player and would fit Giants General Manager Dave Gettleman’s comment that you don’t “quit on talent,” although Josh Norman and Steve Smith might dispute how strictly Gettleman sticks to that mantra.

The price tag is especially high for a player coming off a season-ending ankle injury who is heading into the final year of his contract. That doesn’t mean that one of the other 31 teams in the league won’t be willing to pay it, but it would seem to make a trade unlikely.

A 4th and 7th for Jarvis Landry, an uber-talented receiver who is going to need a new contract? Solid trade.

Two first round picks for OBJ? rofl


OBJ is much better than Landry.

OBJ has 313 catches for 4424 yards in 47 games, Landry has 400 catches for 4038 yards in 64 games.


OBJ also has had better QB play.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Haus
jc

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...-odell-beckham/

Quote:
Report: Giants asked for two first-round picks for Odell Beckham

Giants co-owner John Mara said on Tuesday that the Giants are not “shopping” wide receiver Odell Beckham, but said he can’t stop teams from calling about a trade and said there was no “100 percent guarantee” that Beckham will remain on the team.

Wednesday brings a report about what the Giants have told any teams that have inquired about acquiring the wide receiver. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the Giants have asked for “at least” two first-round picks in return for Beckham in any trade.

That’s a high price tag for any player and would fit Giants General Manager Dave Gettleman’s comment that you don’t “quit on talent,” although Josh Norman and Steve Smith might dispute how strictly Gettleman sticks to that mantra.

The price tag is especially high for a player coming off a season-ending ankle injury who is heading into the final year of his contract. That doesn’t mean that one of the other 31 teams in the league won’t be willing to pay it, but it would seem to make a trade unlikely.

A 4th and 7th for Jarvis Landry, an uber-talented receiver who is going to need a new contract? Solid trade.

Two first round picks for OBJ? rofl


OBJ is much better than Landry.

OBJ has 313 catches for 4424 yards in 47 games, Landry has 400 catches for 4038 yards in 64 games.


OBJ also has had better QB play.


Are we sure about that? Look at what happened to Eli when OBJ was hurt.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,292
I don't want him. Low character.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,301
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,301
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Haus
jc

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...-odell-beckham/

Quote:
Report: Giants asked for two first-round picks for Odell Beckham

Giants co-owner John Mara said on Tuesday that the Giants are not “shopping” wide receiver Odell Beckham, but said he can’t stop teams from calling about a trade and said there was no “100 percent guarantee” that Beckham will remain on the team.

Wednesday brings a report about what the Giants have told any teams that have inquired about acquiring the wide receiver. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the Giants have asked for “at least” two first-round picks in return for Beckham in any trade.

That’s a high price tag for any player and would fit Giants General Manager Dave Gettleman’s comment that you don’t “quit on talent,” although Josh Norman and Steve Smith might dispute how strictly Gettleman sticks to that mantra.

The price tag is especially high for a player coming off a season-ending ankle injury who is heading into the final year of his contract. That doesn’t mean that one of the other 31 teams in the league won’t be willing to pay it, but it would seem to make a trade unlikely.

A 4th and 7th for Jarvis Landry, an uber-talented receiver who is going to need a new contract? Solid trade.

Two first round picks for OBJ? rofl


OBJ is much better than Landry.

OBJ has 313 catches for 4424 yards in 47 games, Landry has 400 catches for 4038 yards in 64 games.


OBJ also has had better QB play.


Are we sure about that? Look at what happened to Eli when OBJ was hurt.


Bottom line. Would you give up two 1st round picks and a 50+ million contract for him?


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: FATE
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Haus
jc

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...-odell-beckham/

Quote:
Report: Giants asked for two first-round picks for Odell Beckham

Giants co-owner John Mara said on Tuesday that the Giants are not “shopping” wide receiver Odell Beckham, but said he can’t stop teams from calling about a trade and said there was no “100 percent guarantee” that Beckham will remain on the team.

Wednesday brings a report about what the Giants have told any teams that have inquired about acquiring the wide receiver. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the Giants have asked for “at least” two first-round picks in return for Beckham in any trade.

That’s a high price tag for any player and would fit Giants General Manager Dave Gettleman’s comment that you don’t “quit on talent,” although Josh Norman and Steve Smith might dispute how strictly Gettleman sticks to that mantra.

The price tag is especially high for a player coming off a season-ending ankle injury who is heading into the final year of his contract. That doesn’t mean that one of the other 31 teams in the league won’t be willing to pay it, but it would seem to make a trade unlikely.

A 4th and 7th for Jarvis Landry, an uber-talented receiver who is going to need a new contract? Solid trade.

Two first round picks for OBJ? rofl


OBJ is much better than Landry.

OBJ has 313 catches for 4424 yards in 47 games, Landry has 400 catches for 4038 yards in 64 games.


OBJ also has had better QB play.


Are we sure about that? Look at what happened to Eli when OBJ was hurt.


Bottom line. Would you give up two 1st round picks and a 50+ million contract for him?


Nope. As I've said above. If I were the Rams? In a heartbeat.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
FACT: The Browns are NOT getting OBJ.
FACT: Some fans want every famous name player who comes available.
FACT: Some fans need to settle the hell down.
FACT: Some fans will be pissed by this post.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
kid is a great WR.

1.But nobody has won a championship cause of a WR.

2. We would have to sign him for 20mil a year, for a WR saywhat

3. They were saying a first n second in this years draft plus a first next season, for a WR saywhat


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Would you want OBJ and what would it take to get him?

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5