DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Florida high school students walk out in support of second amendment, right to own guns

You mean the same person who told LeBron to shut up and play basketball? A shameless mouthpiece who attacks everyone who disagrees with her politics? That person? Maybe if she didn't play the part of a political shill and actually reported news you would have a point. She chose her path. She attacked teen agers and is paying the price.

I'm pro gun. I'm also free speech. I believe in the entire constitution. I don't pick and choose then attack everyone I disagree with.

And exactly how would you know?

I fail to see a difference with what they are doing with these kids and other forms of child abuse.

They will continue to try to justify it in the name of the cause.

I just explained it to you. You attack chidren who survived a mass school shooting over your political views. Disgusting.

You take these victims of a school shooting, organize their march, print their signs, line up the speakers and bus the kids to where they must stand. Then you tell them they are against guns and shut out any kids who disagree.

The abuse and shame is yours.

Fun fact about Laura Ingraham, who is a garbage human being and absolutely deserves every last bit of what Hogg is putting her through:

While serving as editor of the Dartmouth Review, she sent an undercover reporter to a meeting of campus gays and lesbians, for the sole purpose of learning which students were closeted. Ingraham then personally contacted the closeted students parents to inform them their child was gay. She then proceeded to publish a list of all their names in the Review.

She's a disgusting person and it's absolutely hilarious that she's getting what's coming to her right now, and that people are boo-hooing about her "life being ruined".

And you haven't taken a day off posting against me, This ain't healthy, son.

Game adults.

You're obviously not clear on who the adults are. Let me give you a hint. They don't attack school kids who survived a mass shooting over politics.

They also typically understand how search engines work.

Then don't make them your spokes person against peoples rights and let then in a huff call for a boycott because someone said you whined.

Don't use kids to do your dirty work that is child abuse.

I'm a strong supporter of the second amendment. I agree with nothing they say. However, I'm not going to attack "children" who "survived a mass shooting". I'll leave that to people who feel that's somehow alright to do.

You only support their use as pawns.
Shameful.

Only a fool would think that children watching bodies dropping around them wouldn't feel the way they do without any outside influences.

You poor snowflake.

Yeah, I've taken a few days off. Quite a few, in fact. All my posts are still here online.

Matter of fact, my very first post in this very thread received a 'like' from you.

No attack there... right?
You see... I have no problem with BOTH groups of kids exercizing their 1A.
You apparently favor only one.

Stop with the false narrative Pit.. NOBODY is attacking kids who survived a mass shooting.. Many other kids survived that shooting, do you see anybody saying a word about them?

Only the handful that chose to organize marches and take the microphone and announce their intention to bring down an entire political party, fundamentally change an amendment to the constitution, and start a revolution... the only ones getting any heat...

If you say so...

The boycott was due to Ingraham mocking Hogg because he didn't get into his preferred college, not because she said he "whined".

Imagine watching advertisers flee in horror after a 53 year old lunatic mocked a 17 year old in public for getting rejected from a college and thinking "that poor woman, this is so unfair!"

But why? We see people doing this every chance they get. Disagreeing with their beliefs is one thing. I don't have an issue with that. But these are kids. They're idealistic just like many of us were at their age. Many generations have somehow felt they were going to change the world.

But at least they're not gunning them down like they did at Kent State so I guess it's an improvement.

I just think it's ridiculous to use personal attacks against a bunch of kids who lived through this. Especially by what's supposed to be a bunch of mature adults that have never been on the receiving end of an AR-15.

Do you know this for sure? Or are you assuming?

May have been a different type of weapon...

There would be about ~20 people on this board boycotted on a regular basis if all it takes is saying someone whined.

If the shooter is 17, nobody says we should treat him like a kid... NOBODY. Try him as an adult and give him the strictest adult penalty.. almost everybody would agree with that, correct?

Well the minute you get out of the kid pool and decide to play in the big boy pool, (whether for good or for bad) you get treated like an adult.... sorry, that's just how it works. I didn't make the rules. I haven't said anything personally attacking these kids.. but anybody with half a brain knew this was coming...

I don't like the hate Pit, not directed at kids, not adults directing it at each other, not on social media for global consumption.. I don't like it. I would much rather have rational and civil discussions on actual issues... but I'm not sure that's possible on a large scale.. my point is not so much that the kids deserve it, as it is they shouldn't be surprised by it.

Once again, the boycott was over Ingraham - a 53 year old - publicly mocking a 17 year old for getting rejected from his college of choice.

1) Why on Earth would any advertiser want to be associated with a lunatic creep like that?

2) Why do you take issue with advertisers understandably distancing themselves from said lunatic and her creepy behavior?

No wonder you fit in with the kids...being told you whined isn't a life changing event. What they did to her was and even worse after she apologized.

You keep ignoring the fact that it wasn't calling someone a "whiner" that led advertisers to drop Ingraham like a hot rock, but because she publicly mocked a kid for getting rejected from a college.

I suspect you're ignoring it because it's quite obvious why advertisers wouldn't want to be associated with such creepy and awful conduct, and no one can argue with a straight face that they or any other brand should stick with or stand behind a 53 year old lunatic and her unhinged behavior.

Ingraham is a garbage human being, and always has been. She deserves every bit of this.

You've gone from posting links to a conspiracy theory website that until a few months ago was helmed by a neo-Nazi pedophile, to not understanding how Google works (or that one can search for e-mail addresses on it), and all in the name of arguing that it's unfair for a woman exhibiting bizarre and off-putting behavior to lose her advertisers. Batting 1.000 in this thread.

Let's raise the age to get a gun to 21 but also the age to vote to 21, the age a person in the military can handle a weapon to 21 and the age of consent to 21.

Get rid of bump stocks.

Students must wear clear backpacks.

Security guards at exits and entrances along with metal detectors.

They raised over $3,000,000 for the march why coouldn't they do the same to secure schools?

States report mental issues to the FBI to be put into the database for background checks.

Like some businesses students have a swipe in ID.

Just how did she mock a kid? What was said to be mocking?

This is her exact Tweet


There was also a link to an article by the Daily Wire, which you can find here...

LMGTFY

So, he got turned down/denied by 4 UC schools. Is that a fact? (it appears so). He got accepted by 3 other schools.

And?

And those in public relations and advertising tend to shy away from people in their 50's gloating over and taking glee in a teenager getting rejected from colleges.

9

The word "whine" other that that she repeated what Hogg had said himself so apparently he mocked himself and should have been taken off the air.

How did you determine gloating from a tweet?

"When the 53 year old maniac lady mocked a teenager for getting rejected from schools, she only did it the one time. I can't understand why people wouldn't want to be associated with her. It's the teenager who should lose his non-existent advertisers for the show he doesn't have."

So other than the word "whines" what was the mocking she repeated what he had stated which was the truth. Look up his comment to reporter.

She said he whined big deal. You are slandering her worse than what she said. You need to prove the "maniac" mocking you are doing.

When Ingraham sent an undercover reporter to a gay and lesbian group meeting, and then printed the names of all the closeted gay students in the school paper after personally calling all of their parents to out them, she was also repeating facts she had learned from a reporter.

Then, as now, there was a point to reporting those facts, and the points made exposed what a deranged loser she is.

Are you just stubbornly digging, or are you really obtuse enough to not understand why companies wouldn't want to be associated with a 53 year old so creepy and vile that they take joy in a teenager being disappointed that he got rejected from colleges he applied to?

.

Maybe he learned how to measure a man by SERVING IN THE MILITARY. I know you know nothing about such things so I mansplained for you.

I'm surprised you can find the time to type, moving goalposts as often as you have in this thread!