Uhmmmm............we drafted him at 33. Do you realize how high that actually is?
My spelling and punctuation is horrible ... math on th other hand ... love me some math ... its logical and always ads up ... unlike stats math is accurate and reliable ...
So ya, ... i realize how high #33 is in the draft ...

Dude was a reach. Big time.
I agree he was a reach according to the talking heads and more than likely almost every if not every nfl teams draft boards ... if Dorsey and co had him ranked #1 on our board ... i said i was fine with taking an interior OLman cause u can never have enough OLman ... u may not agree with that draft strategy but i have no problem making OL a priority almost every year as part of your draft strategy ...
I also said I HOPE he works out ... i agree with u .. he was a reach ...
Just like almost every other pick we had in the first few rounds.
The only one I kinda like is Ward. I think we reached on him, but I think he can be very good and it as a huge need.
However, Mayfield was a huge reach. Corbett is a huge reach. Chubb was a reach. Even my man Ward was a reach, but again....I get that one.
My perception of what u said about Ward is u think he’s a reach but you understand it cause he was the best cover corner and that was prolly the worst position on the team at that point and Williams loves “man’ corners witch is what Ward is ... if thats correct, who could we have picked at 4 that wouldn’t have been a reach in your opinion ...
Not sure how Baker was a reach either ... every QB had questions ... EVERY ONE of them .. there was no Andrew Luck John Elway in this draft ...
Corbett ... i agree .... he was the one pick that reminded of past regimes where i just scrathched my head and said WTF ... but i’m fine with taking an OLman that high and qualified the parameters ...
I don’t agree on Chubb ... i think your gonna end up loving this kid ... lets hope i’m right on this one ...
I understand your take on Corbett and Chubb ... not sure why u think why Baker and Ward were reaches ... interested in seeing who u thought would have not been a reach at #4 ...
Same question for #1 .. who would have u considered to be legite #1 picks and not a reach ...