Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
MICHAEL COHEN PURGES DONALD TRUMP FROM TWITTER PROFILE AMID FLIP RUMORS

http://www.newsweek.com/michael-cohen-do...ersonal-1008542

This is an interesting move. Means very little to most people but to the twitter-head President this might be considered a shot across the bow.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
What will the tea leaves say tomorrow?


#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
By the way #Resisters are holding Mueller's hand, I think they've moved on to palm reading.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Indeed. I bring it up because I believe the american public is getting very impatient. That's a bipartisan view, not solely one placed on Hill republicans getting on soapboxes to pretend interest in saving taxpayer money.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
I don't understand the impatience other than desperation to rid ourselves of Trump. The Mueller investigation has already produced more indictments and guilty pleas in much less time than white water, Benghazi, or HRC's emails. This is a productive investigation, being thoroughly conducted at a fairly rapid pace! How long did the Water Gate Investigation take? Or the Clinton Investigations?


Last edited by OldColdDawg; 07/05/18 02:19 PM.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Productive is fine but people want to find out what happens in the end, kinda like Season 5 of Breaking Bad. I also think in today's climate of 24/7 news people get inundated with more information and tend to appear less patient because of it.

Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
I don't understand the inpatients


What's your rationale for this? tongue


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
Originally Posted By: gage
Productive is fine but people want to find out what happens in the end, kinda like Season 5 of Breaking Bad. I also think in today's climate of 24/7 news people get inundated with more information and tend to appear less patient because of it.

Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
I don't understand the inpatients


What's your rationale for this? tongue


auto-correct... wink

All fixed, thanks for pointing that out.

Last edited by OldColdDawg; 07/05/18 02:19 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,390
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
I don't understand the impatience other than desperation to rid ourselves of Trump. The Mueller investigation has already produced more indictments and guilty pleas in much less time than white water, Benghazi, or HRC's emails. This is a productive investigation, being thoroughly conducted at a fairly rapid pace! How long did the Water Gate Investigation take? Or the Clinton Investigations?



How many indictments have there been regarding the stated purpose of the investigation? You know...Trump's alleged collusion with Russia to sway the election.

We KNOW that Hillary was in contempt of Congress and committed espionage. Comey verified those crimes occurred and inexplicably said "no one" would prosecute that case...and the crooked AG swallowed her tongue after the infamous tarmac meeting with Slick. That does not make HRC innocent.

We KNOW that Hillary and her cronies colluded with the DNC to defeat Bernie. Yet no one was indicted for a crime. But we KNOW it happened.

We KNOW that Russia meddled in our most-recent Presidential election...and we KNOW Obama knew it and chose to do nothing.

OJ was found not guilty of killing his wife in the criminal trial...that doesn't mean he didn't commit the crime.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,188
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,188
Quote:

How many indictments have there been regarding the stated purpose of the investigation? You know...Trump's alleged collusion with Russia to sway the election.


All of them point to Russian meddling. No where in the document to appointing Mueller mentions colussion. Typical GOP labeling and false narratives to get everyone off track.. We know your games.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
I don't understand the impatience other than desperation to rid ourselves of Trump. The Mueller investigation has already produced more indictments and guilty pleas in much less time than white water, Benghazi, or HRC's emails. This is a productive investigation, being thoroughly conducted at a fairly rapid pace! How long did the Water Gate Investigation take? Or the Clinton Investigations?



How many indictments have there been regarding the stated purpose of the investigation? You know...Trump's alleged collusion with Russia to sway the election.

We KNOW that Hillary was in contempt of Congress and committed espionage. Comey verified those crimes occurred and inexplicably said "no one" would prosecute that case...and the crooked AG swallowed her tongue after the infamous tarmac meeting with Slick. That does not make HRC innocent.

We KNOW that Hillary and her cronies colluded with the DNC to defeat Bernie. Yet no one was indicted for a crime. But we KNOW it happened.

We KNOW that Russia meddled in our most-recent Presidential election...and we KNOW Obama knew it and chose to do nothing.

OJ was found not guilty of killing his wife in the criminal trial...that doesn't mean he didn't commit the crime.


Purpose of the special counsel included all crimes he may uncover. The Russians were indicted for interfering, and there is more to come. But keep on thinking Trump done nothing.

Don Jr. sought the help of the Russians to get dirt on Hillary, we already know that much. But others also worked with Russia to help Trump. Stone with WikiLeaks and Cambridge Analytica. Bannon and his access to Briebart data worked with with Cambridge Analytica. Manafort and Kushner hired Cambridge Analytica. Cambridge Analytica is directly tied to the Russian hackers and Oligarchs.

That's just one set of things that are going to go bad for these guys when Mueller is ready.

Last edited by OldColdDawg; 07/05/18 04:33 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
Cohen hires Clinton Lawyer and close political ally! You can't make this crap up! lol


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799


If Trump will leave this guy who has served him loyally for over a decade flapping in the wind, how can any rational Trump supporter think Trump really has their back?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,300
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,300
Is that swamp drained yet? Let's vote early.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,390
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
I don't understand the impatience other than desperation to rid ourselves of Trump. The Mueller investigation has already produced more indictments and guilty pleas in much less time than white water, Benghazi, or HRC's emails. This is a productive investigation, being thoroughly conducted at a fairly rapid pace! How long did the Water Gate Investigation take? Or the Clinton Investigations?



How many indictments have there been regarding the stated purpose of the investigation? You know...Trump's alleged collusion with Russia to sway the election.

We KNOW that Hillary was in contempt of Congress and committed espionage. Comey verified those crimes occurred and inexplicably said "no one" would prosecute that case...and the crooked AG swallowed her tongue after the infamous tarmac meeting with Slick. That does not make HRC innocent.

We KNOW that Hillary and her cronies colluded with the DNC to defeat Bernie. Yet no one was indicted for a crime. But we KNOW it happened.

We KNOW that Russia meddled in our most-recent Presidential election...and we KNOW Obama knew it and chose to do nothing.

OJ was found not guilty of killing his wife in the criminal trial...that doesn't mean he didn't commit the crime.


Purpose of the special counsel included all crimes he may uncover. The Russians were indicted for interfering, and there is more to come. But keep on thinking Trump done nothing.

Don Jr. sought the help of the Russians to get dirt on Hillary, we already know that much. But others also worked with Russia to help Trump. Stone with WikiLeaks and Cambridge Analytica. Bannon and his access to Briebart data worked with with Cambridge Analytica. Manafort and Kushner hired Cambridge Analytica. Cambridge Analytica is directly tied to the Russian hackers and Oligarchs.

That's just one set of things that are going to go bad for these guys when Mueller is ready.


So...the answer is 'nothing'. Got it.

Special counsel is NOT given free reign to search out any and all crimes they may discover. This country doesn't work that way. Although Obama's FBI had no issue doing just that. There is an investigation with a stated purpose - with a great deal of leeway available. A federal judge has already admonished Mueller for his fishing expedition. So far, all Mueller has found is dirt from guys in Trump's circle...no collusion reported.

We already KNOW that Obama KNEW about Russian meddling in the election and chose to do nothing because he was certain HRC would win. No investigation.

We already KNOW that Hillary colluded with the DNC to ace-out Bernie. No investigation.

We KNOW that HRC committed espionage...thousands of times. Where is the trial?

Where is the focus and outrage over things that ACTUALLY HAPPENED? I already know the liberal answer...or shall I say non-answer. Just opening the eyes.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,799
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
I don't understand the impatience other than desperation to rid ourselves of Trump. The Mueller investigation has already produced more indictments and guilty pleas in much less time than white water, Benghazi, or HRC's emails. This is a productive investigation, being thoroughly conducted at a fairly rapid pace! How long did the Water Gate Investigation take? Or the Clinton Investigations?



How many indictments have there been regarding the stated purpose of the investigation? You know...Trump's alleged collusion with Russia to sway the election.

We KNOW that Hillary was in contempt of Congress and committed espionage. Comey verified those crimes occurred and inexplicably said "no one" would prosecute that case...and the crooked AG swallowed her tongue after the infamous tarmac meeting with Slick. That does not make HRC innocent.

We KNOW that Hillary and her cronies colluded with the DNC to defeat Bernie. Yet no one was indicted for a crime. But we KNOW it happened.

We KNOW that Russia meddled in our most-recent Presidential election...and we KNOW Obama knew it and chose to do nothing.

OJ was found not guilty of killing his wife in the criminal trial...that doesn't mean he didn't commit the crime.


Purpose of the special counsel included all crimes he may uncover. The Russians were indicted for interfering, and there is more to come. But keep on thinking Trump done nothing.

Don Jr. sought the help of the Russians to get dirt on Hillary, we already know that much. But others also worked with Russia to help Trump. Stone with WikiLeaks and Cambridge Analytica. Bannon and his access to Briebart data worked with with Cambridge Analytica. Manafort and Kushner hired Cambridge Analytica. Cambridge Analytica is directly tied to the Russian hackers and Oligarchs.

That's just one set of things that are going to go bad for these guys when Mueller is ready.


So...the answer is 'nothing'. Got it.

Special counsel is NOT given free reign to search out any and all crimes they may discover. This country doesn't work that way. Although Obama's FBI had no issue doing just that. There is an investigation with a stated purpose - with a great deal of leeway available. A federal judge has already admonished Mueller for his fishing expedition. So far, all Mueller has found is dirt from guys in Trump's circle...no collusion reported.

We already KNOW that Obama KNEW about Russian meddling in the election and chose to do nothing because he was certain HRC would win. No investigation.

We already KNOW that Hillary colluded with the DNC to ace-out Bernie. No investigation.

We KNOW that HRC committed espionage...thousands of times. Where is the trial?

Where is the focus and outrage over things that ACTUALLY HAPPENED? I already know the liberal answer...or shall I say non-answer. Just opening the eyes.


Wrong.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,903
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,903
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
I don't understand the impatience other than desperation to rid ourselves of Trump. The Mueller investigation has already produced more indictments and guilty pleas in much less time than white water, Benghazi, or HRC's emails. This is a productive investigation, being thoroughly conducted at a fairly rapid pace! How long did the Water Gate Investigation take? Or the Clinton Investigations?



How many indictments have there been regarding the stated purpose of the investigation? You know...Trump's alleged collusion with Russia to sway the election.

We KNOW that Hillary was in contempt of Congress and committed espionage. Comey verified those crimes occurred and inexplicably said "no one" would prosecute that case...and the crooked AG swallowed her tongue after the infamous tarmac meeting with Slick. That does not make HRC innocent.

We KNOW that Hillary and her cronies colluded with the DNC to defeat Bernie. Yet no one was indicted for a crime. But we KNOW it happened.

We KNOW that Russia meddled in our most-recent Presidential election...and we KNOW Obama knew it and chose to do nothing.

OJ was found not guilty of killing his wife in the criminal trial...that doesn't mean he didn't commit the crime.


Purpose of the special counsel included all crimes he may uncover. The Russians were indicted for interfering, and there is more to come. But keep on thinking Trump done nothing.

Don Jr. sought the help of the Russians to get dirt on Hillary, we already know that much. But others also worked with Russia to help Trump. Stone with WikiLeaks and Cambridge Analytica. Bannon and his access to Briebart data worked with with Cambridge Analytica. Manafort and Kushner hired Cambridge Analytica. Cambridge Analytica is directly tied to the Russian hackers and Oligarchs.

That's just one set of things that are going to go bad for these guys when Mueller is ready.


So...the answer is 'nothing'. Got it.

Special counsel is NOT given free reign to search out any and all crimes they may discover. This country doesn't work that way. Although Obama's FBI had no issue doing just that. There is an investigation with a stated purpose - with a great deal of leeway available. A federal judge has already admonished Mueller for his fishing expedition. So far, all Mueller has found is dirt from guys in Trump's circle...no collusion reported.

We already KNOW that Obama KNEW about Russian meddling in the election and chose to do nothing because he was certain HRC would win. No investigation.

We already KNOW that Hillary colluded with the DNC to ace-out Bernie. No investigation.

We KNOW that HRC committed espionage...thousands of times. Where is the trial?

Where is the focus and outrage over things that ACTUALLY HAPPENED? I already know the liberal answer...or shall I say non-answer. Just opening the eyes.



I’d be fine with investigations on these things...after we deal with the criminal syndicate that’s currently running our country. Neither Obama or Hillary are currently creating policy. trump is.


[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Cohen Likely to Cooperate as Attorneys Leave Case

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5