Boofing is NOT anal sex. Boofing is, as PDF stated earlier, taking drugs or alchohol anally to speed ups it’s uptake into the bloodstream.
Kavanaugh was butt chugging beers with his buddies. Or he was using illicit drugs anally. Period.
You and PDF seem to be the experts on "Boofing", but can a word mean different things in different eras and different locations?
You can live in denial all you choose. Look up boofing online. It is what it is. It’ll always be what it’s always been. ...unless you’re a kayaker. Then it has a different meaning. But I don’t think the Kav-man and his brohs were kayakers. I think they were drunks....and he’s now also a liar.
Yet you have no proof . Unlike Obama being a drunk and doper. No wonder he thought there are 57 states!
Your what-about-ism game is weak. I’m not here to discuss Obama. I’m here to talk about Kavanaugh and his drunken boofing days...and his lies to cover up his drunken boofing days.
The GOP is just SLEAZY! Kavanaugh fits right in. Good luck ladies, the MEN in power treat you like second class citizens with no rights to your own bodies or basic protection from predators.
Boofing is...taking drugs or alchohol anally to speed ups it’s uptake into the bloodstream.
Why?
"Hey, honey! I got a raise at work."
"Let's break-out the Jose Cuervo colonic tonight."
Hey, what's the difference between a rectal and oral thermometer?
The taste.
Why? I have no idea. It’s not my thing. Not even in my drunkest college days was boofing a consideration. That said, I’d heard of it. I knew what it was. Why do college kids do a lot of the ‘weird’ things they do? Just look at what weird crap has surfaced over the years that passed as frathouse pledge hazing, or campus streaking, going to cold late fall football games covered with body paint and no shirt, drinking to excess, experimenting with drugs. etc. For the attention, the thrill, or in this case the buzz, I guess.
The Kavster knows full well what boofing is. He also knows he’s lying about it now.
Maybe the current meaning of a word or phrase is one thing, but it meant something entirely different in the time the calendar was written.
I drank as much as anyone I knew back in my day, and I never once heard of someone shooting alcohol up their backside.
Beer bongs? Yep. Butt bongs? Not a chance. Maybe lighting farts.That's about it, though.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
I literally just gave you an example from my personal experience where Boof meant butt sex and I never knew any other explanation of the word until this thread.
Lying about his drinking, probably. Lying about devils triangle....maybe.
This one, for a fact has been known to have been about anal.
I have no idea what your group of friends did, but we never even considered such a thing.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
I literally just gave you an example from my personal experience where Boof meant butt sex and I never knew any other explanation of the word until this thread.
Lying about his drinking, probably. Lying about devils triangle....maybe.
This one, for a fact has been known to have been about anal.
OK you have experience in it I don't. Words can mean different thing in different times and locations.
He either passes or fails the interview. Is it more intense than other interviews? Most certainly, but shouldn't it be?
Things have changed my friend. Corporations these days look at your credit record, your social media and are willing to exclude candidates for almost anything they find suspicious. An interview is a process that concludes with you either getting a job or not getting a job. That's exactly the same thing that happens here.
The Republicans played this perfectly. I have to give them credit for that. They limited the scope of the investigation to ten people. It was enough to appease many and should allow Kavanaugh to advance to the Supreme Court. Well played!
One thing you haven't seen me do is accuse Kavanaugh of guilt. I haven't and won't do that. So please don't lump me in with those that do.
But the best thing the GOP could have done is to claim they take the accusations of every woman seriously and let the FBI investigation go forward. After having their hand forced by Jeff Flake they did that. It would have been much better had they taken that initiative without having their hand forced but at least they finally gave in.
The man still looked like an unhinged politically biased nut job during the senate hearings but that's never stopped the GOP from supporting someone so far so I doubt that will stop them now.
But yes, any process that is considering you for a job, that in the end results in you either getting a job or not getting a job is an interview of sorts. You don't have to like that, but it is what it is.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
I literally just gave you an example from my personal experience where Boof meant butt sex and I never knew any other explanation of the word until this thread.
Lying about his drinking, probably. Lying about devils triangle....maybe.
This one, for a fact has been known to have been about anal.
OK you have experience in it I don't. Words can mean different thing in different times and locations.
Not really. New hip slur words happen all the time the old slur words stay the same and mean the same, they just aren't used much anymore. But nice spin bro.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
I literally just gave you an example from my personal experience where Boof meant butt sex and I never knew any other explanation of the word until this thread.
Lying about his drinking, probably. Lying about devils triangle....maybe.
This one, for a fact has been known to have been about anal.
OK you have experience in it I don't. Words can mean different thing in different times and locations.
Not really. New hip slur words happen all the time the old slur words stay the same and mean the same, they just aren't used much anymore. But nice spin bro.
What you do to yourself is on you, if that's your thing go for it.
I literally just gave you an example from my personal experience where Boof meant butt sex and I never knew any other explanation of the word until this thread.
Lying about his drinking, probably. Lying about devils triangle....maybe.
This one, for a fact has been known to have been about anal.
OK you have experience in it I don't. Words can mean different thing in different times and locations.
Not really. New hip slur words happen all the time the old slur words stay the same and mean the same, they just aren't used much anymore. But nice spin bro.
I used this word as a child in the 80's, I didn't use it last week. In fact the last time I heard it was probably in the early 90's.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
I get that it MAY have had a different meaning, but I have HEARD of Boof being anal sex. Until this hearing I literally had NEVER in my 35 years on this planet heard of sticking booze up your ass referred to as boofing.
Sure that is anecdotal, but I know for a FACT that when I was a child in the 80s, my brother and friends used to use this word to describe how gay one another were (not actually gay but kids who had been raised slightly homophobic)
I would also add that slang was sometimes local, or regional. Slang used on the west coast could mean something completely different as it would to someone in the midwest, or on the east coast .... in the north, or in the south.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Cosko is charged with publishing restricted personal information, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, witness tampering, second degree burglary, and unlawful entry. The complaint says that five senators were doxxed. Fox News learned Wednesday that Capitol Hill police were investigating additional doxxing incidents, including one involving Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.
While it was not clear what the motivation was behind the posting of personal information, Graham, Lee and Hatch have been outspoken defenders of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh amid sexual assault allegations against him. The doxxing began on Thursday, and came moments after Graham had scorched Senate Democrats in a fiery speech for what he called “an unethical sham” in their treatment of Kavanaugh.
Poor post. Victim blaming that she didn't reveal a sexual assault that happened to her. You're part of the reason why victims don't report.
And, I will add this: Determining someone to be guilty based on only words, and no proof whatsoever, is killing your 'case'.
I remember when you tried to molest me. A while ago. Somewhere. I think it was Sunny and 75. I'm not clear on the details, really. It was at a party where you got drunk. I only had 1 beer. But I don't remember anything.........nothing, other than you attempted to molest me.
BAM! You are not hire able any where.
I believe you Arch. CHS should have his life ruined and family embarrassed.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Kavanaugh's former classmates, 'drinking buddies' call on Senate to vote 'no' on confirmation
A group of former Yale University students who referred to themselves "drinking buddies" with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh are calling for the Senate to vote against his confirmation.
The former classmates of Kavanaugh's— Charles Ludington, Lynne Brookes and Elizabeth Swisher — wrote in an op-ed for the Washington Post on Thursday that they spoke out publicly because of what they felt like were dishonest statements from Kavanaugh during a Fox News interview and during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.
"We each asserted that Brett lied to the Senate by stating, under oath, that he never drank to the point of forgetting what he was doing," they write.
"We said, unequivocally, that each of us, on numerous occasions, had seen Brett stumbling drunk to the point that it would be impossible for him to state with any degree of certainty that he remembered everything that he did when drunk."
The three write that they "disrupted" their own lives by coming forward about Kavanaugh's alleged drinking.
"None of this is what we wanted, but we felt it our civic duty to speak the truth and say that Brett lied under oath while seeking to become a Supreme Court justice," they write, adding that they believe telling the truth is a "moral obligation for our nation’s leaders."
"No one should be able to lie their way onto the Supreme Court," they add, before concluding that they believe "that Brett neither tells" the truth or is an embodiment of courage.
"For this reason, we believe that Brett Kavanaugh should not sit on the nation’s highest court," they write.
The op-ed comes a week after Kavanaugh testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding claims from Christine Blasey Ford that he sexually assaulted her during a high school party in the 1980's.
Kavanaugh has fiercely denied the accusation.
Kavanaugh said during his testimony that while he “likes beer,” he never has blacked out from drinking.
In addition to Ludington, Brookes and Swisher, Jamie Roche, who shared a dorm with Kavanaugh at Yale, wrote in an op-ed for Slate on Wednesday that Kavanaugh "baldly" lied under oath about his drinking habits.
The Senate is set to move ahead with a procedural vote on Kavanaugh's nomination on Friday.
Kavanaugh does not belong on Supreme Court, retired Justice Stevens says
(Reuters) - Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens said on Thursday that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh does not belong on the high court because of “potential bias” he showed in his recent Senate confirmation hearing.
Speaking to an audience of retirees in Boca Raton, Florida, Stevens, 98, said he started out believing that Kavanaugh deserved to be confirmed, “but his performance during the hearings caused me to change my mind.”
Stevens cited commentary by Harvard University law professor Laurence Tribe and others suggesting Kavanaugh had raised doubts about his political impartiality when he asserted that sexual misconduct accusations he faced stemmed from an “orchestrated political hit” funded by left-wing groups seeking “revenge on behalf of the Clintons.”
Kavanaugh had spent more than three years working for Ken Starr, the independent counsel who investigated Democratic President Bill Clinton in the 1990s.
Kavanaugh also testified last week that allegations against him were being fueled by “pent-up anger” over the 2016 election of President Donald Trump, who nominated Kavanaugh to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed on Thursday, Kavanaugh said he “might have been too emotional at times” in his testimony. Kavanaugh wrote that his testimony “reflected my overwhelming frustration at being wrongly accused.”
Some critics have argued that Kavanaugh’s highly partisan remarks so compromised his ability to appear politically fair-minded that he would be forced to recuse himself on many cases to preserve the court’s integrity.
Stevens said he, too, has come to believe that Kavanaugh, a U.S. appellate judge, “demonstrated a potential bias involving enough potential litigants before the (high) court that he would not be able to perform his full responsibilities.”
“I think there’s merit in that criticism, and that the senators should really pay attention to it for the good of the court. It’s not healthy to get a new justice who can only do a part-time job,” Stevens said.
Stevens, a lifelong Republican and appointee of President Gerald Ford who ended up as a generally liberal voice on the court by the time he retired in 2010, spoke at an event hosted by a Palm Beach Post reporter. Video of his remarks was shown by the C-SPAN television network.
Stevens acknowledged praising Kavanaugh and one of his rulings on foreign campaign contributions in his 2014 book “Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution.”
Stevens went on to say that his change of heart on Kavanaugh’s fitness for the high court was “for reasons that have really no relationship to his intellectual ability or his record as a federal judge. He’s a fine federal judge.”
Asked whether questions raised about Kavanaugh’s credibility during the hearings should be disqualifying, Stevens said, “Not necessarily.”
Stevens also said political leaders and the court have failed to repair the nation’s confidence in the judicial branch’s separation from the president and the legislature.
“I think it’s worse, I regret to say it,” he said.
The U.S. Senate is scheduled to vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation on Friday.
An FBI report to the Senate Judiciary Committee concluded an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh by California psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford and former Yale classmate Deborah Ramirez.
If Kavanaugh is innocent of these specific allegations which I doubt he is, the chances are high that he's still a sexual assaulting drunken lying rapist from the descriptions of his school age character and what we seen in the hearings. He's UNFIT for SCOTUS.
Yes, because sexual assualters that are drunkin stupers and rapist (remember, funny those goalpost have moved) just STOP acting like that after H.S. Cosby, Weinstein, Weiner, priest, Sandusky, etc.....notice a theme, they don't stop their behavior just randomly as you are claiming the judge has. Its sad, because you are a smart dude, but so blinded by partisan hate you cant see the craziness of this.
Another funny point, you have lambasted the right on here for two years for questioning the FBI, but as soon as they come out say "nothing to see here" on Kav, you instantly posted that they are corrupt and didn't do their job. LOL. I see three fingers pointing back at you a lot.
I am guessing his post was deleted, but are we all going to just ignore rockys disgusting post about BBQ'ing and then posting a picture of a black guy on fire?
I have said some pretty off the wall things in my time, but come on everyone. This isn't his first time. I am formally calling for a lifetime ban.
. Unlike Obama being a drunk and doper. 
No wonder he thought there are 57 states!
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/PortlandDawg/banner.jpg)
Not really. New hip slur words happen all the time the old slur words stay the same and mean the same, they just aren't used much anymore. But nice spin bro.
