Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,347
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,347
Originally Posted By: PastorMarc
Why? It protects the owner and the team, and gives Williams the opportunity he is looking for to prove himself otherwise I would look elsewhere ... JMHO


The owner doesnt need protection. Give him a 3 year deal show confidence in him. He can fire him anytime he wants. The owner will not be hurt by the loss of the money.


Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521

If this were my decision I would not look to McDaniels.

Not because of Denver but also the fiasco with the Colts.

In addition the Pat's always make coordinators look good. Charlie Weiss comes to mind let alone all the others who have not fared well.

McDaniels was the guy who made Tebow a first round choice.

But beyond all that I don't believe he is a guy who can lead an entire locker room. This is unqualified. Just my take on the man I see him as a arrogant snob.

He may relate to some but I don't see head coach material.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Quote:
I don't believe he is a guy who can lead an entire locker room


This would be my concern. Disrupting the chemistry with ego-driven decision making. Coming into a locker room that Baker has clearly already made his own.

But I can't rule him out as possibly being a great mentor for Baker, and good for our offense, possibly our team. Philosophically, GW's "Practice as hard as you play" approach is similar to Belichick's, but his "Culture trumps strategy" philosophy is miles apart. A coach that approaches scheming and preparation with equal weight may be something the committee is looking for and something that could help the team succeed.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521

Dorsey has been clear on what he wants.

Not just what he envisions for the team. You have to believe that Dorsey has to like the guy and be able to work with him.

McDaniels has been steered away from a position that is "run" by the owner.

Haslam does run the team. He has stated that Dorsey is in charge of the search. However, Haslam will have to give his blessing.

I don't see a fit. I just don't. Not do I want the guy.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521
Dan Campbell seems like he could be a strong candidate.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Five black head coaches fired this year. Only two remain.

http://www.espn.com/videohub/video/clip/_/id/25655399/categoryid/4823314

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521

This topic was also discussed on Aftermath.

Charlie Casserly had some interesting comments. He is on some kind of Board and has worked with the NAACP.

It was a round table discussion with Steve Wyche and others.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
I used to have a Napoleon themed chess set. The kings looked like McDaniels.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
wonder who they are gonna pursue in FA/trade as far as QB's?

Flacco? Carr? no way they can stay with bortles, or it doesnt matter what changes they make.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Swish
wonder who they are gonna pursue in FA/trade as far as QB's?

Flacco? Carr? no way they can stay with bortles, or it doesnt matter what changes they make.


They basically have to move on from Bortles. I've wondered if they can use a draft pick to move his contract like the Texans did with Osweiler (the Jaguars have negative cap space right now). I'd guess they'd be in on all the veteran QBs. There are basically no good options at this point though.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,468
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,468
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Five black head coaches fired this year. Only two remain.

http://www.espn.com/videohub/video/clip/_/id/25655399/categoryid/4823314



Maybe they all sucked? I don't think that this was the year owners decided to fire black coaches.


They made it to the head coach position. Head coaches have been fired after a few years for a long time.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
One of the things that was being discussed in those shows this morning was how the coaches are taking the blame for poor front offices.

A few guys asked "how many GMs are being fired today?

I was wondering the same thing. Let's look at the Cardinals. They signed Bradford to big dollars and also paid Glennon pretty good money. They then draft Josh Rosen in the first round.

Meanwhile, they had the worst OL in football this year. Whose fault is that. The HC? One and done? Really?

I'm very thankful that the Browns got rid of the FO guy last year and brought in a real GM who is very good at evaluating talent and then evaluated the coach after some talent was brought in.

I feel the Browns are ahead of the other teams in regards to where they got rid of the inept FO guy first and have a good one in place and can now focus on the hiring the right HC for the team.

I'm not sure they will hire the right guy, but I like our odds better than a team like the Cardinals.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Flacco might make sense for JAX, but only if they can pull off an Osweiller type trade to dump Bortles' contract


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,521

The Cardinals were brought up in that light.

The pipeline was brought as well.

There is a lot that goes into it. They went over the Rooney rule in depth.

We are in a good position. No guarantees but I like were we are.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Bortles plus some stuff for Winston?

Bortles plus some stuff for Manning?

They don't need a great QB.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
What about Flacco or Teddy in Jacksonville?

Or Flacco w/the Giants?

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
What about Flacco or Teddy in Jacksonville?

Or Flacco w/the Giants?


Sure, but they are going to have to clear some cap space. Both guys will probably get close to $30 mil

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Bortles plus some stuff for Winston?

Bortles plus some stuff for Manning?

They don't need a great QB.


The Bucs GM, who drafted Winston, says that the new coach has to work with Winston. He’s not going anywhere. Manning might be worse than Bortles at this point. Bridgewater is probably the most intriguing option.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Yeah, Winston is staying put in TB


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Bortles plus some stuff for Winston?

Bortles plus some stuff for Manning?

They don't need a great QB.


The Bucs GM, who drafted Winston, says that the new coach has to work with Winston. He’s not going anywhere. Manning might be worse than Bortles at this point. Bridgewater is probably the most intriguing option.


Giants said the same thing about Manning, but that all changes after a team drafts a QB.

Manning is the same mediocre QB that everyone overrated for years. He just doesn't have a line now. Bridgewater would be the same problem in that Jax needs to clear cap space and that would be hard to do unless Bortles is involved in the trade.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
I'm not sure that Jon Gruden is all in on Derek Carr. I could see him in Jax or with the Giants for the right deal.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Dave
I'm not sure that Jon Gruden is all in on Derek Carr. I could see him in Jax or with the Giants for the right deal.


Bortles, Fournette, 2nd rounder?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Bortles plus some stuff for Winston?

Bortles plus some stuff for Manning?

They don't need a great QB.


The Bucs GM, who drafted Winston, says that the new coach has to work with Winston. He’s not going anywhere. Manning might be worse than Bortles at this point. Bridgewater is probably the most intriguing option.


Giants said the same thing about Manning, but that all changes after a team drafts a QB.

Manning is the same mediocre QB that everyone overrated for years. He just doesn't have a line now. Bridgewater would be the same problem in that Jax needs to clear cap space and that would be hard to do unless Bortles is involved in the trade.


Bridgewater is a free agent.

We all know how this is going to end. . .

with Sam Bradford as the starting QB for another team somehow.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
I know. One they can't afford unless somebody else takes on Bortles.

Bradford will get $50 mil a year from somebody, somehow.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,948
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,948
Why does anyone think that another team would take on the Bortles contract? (not to mention his brokenness as a QB)


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
I don't think they would, unless the Jags attached a crazy amount of picks/players combo


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
Why does anyone think that another team would take on the Bortles contract? (not to mention his brokenness as a QB)


Osweiler.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
Why does anyone think that another team would take on the Bortles contract? (not to mention his brokenness as a QB)


Osweiler.


This. We take Bortles contract along with a second round pick. Too bad we didn’t have Taylor under contract. We could offer him up.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
what if the Jags say to the Colts or Jets (or someone else with cap space and a need at RB)

Take Fournette, Bortles and their contracts and a mid round pick


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
what if the Jags say to the Colts or Jets (or someone else with cap space and a need at RB)

Take Fournette, Bortles and their contracts and a mid round pick


They should be able to move Fournette for something valuable.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
For as much as we got criticized for the osweiler trade, I don't think there are many teams who would consider doing it. Though it did yield us Nick Chubb, so guess we win.


Is buttcheeks one word?
Or should I spread them apart?
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Jester
For as much as we got criticized for the osweiler trade, I don't think there are many teams who would consider doing it. Though it did yield us Nick Chubb, so guess we win.


Who criticized us? I thought most people applauded the move.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,111
Some criticized ... namely Bill Polian IIRC


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Jester
For as much as we got criticized for the osweiler trade, I don't think there are many teams who would consider doing it. Though it did yield us Nick Chubb, so guess we win.


Who criticized us? I thought most people applauded the move.


Really? We got made fun of by most of the sports talk shows, both tv and radio


Is buttcheeks one word?
Or should I spread them apart?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
Seems like on here it was split about 50/50


Is buttcheeks one word?
Or should I spread them apart?
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Jester
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Jester
For as much as we got criticized for the osweiler trade, I don't think there are many teams who would consider doing it. Though it did yield us Nick Chubb, so guess we win.


Who criticized us? I thought most people applauded the move.


Really? We got made fun of by most of the sports talk shows, both tv and radio


Sorry, I don’t really focus too much on that type of stuff. Most articles I read at the time were pretty favorable.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,468
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,468
Worked before....we have the money.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,112
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Jester
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Jester
For as much as we got criticized for the osweiler trade, I don't think there are many teams who would consider doing it. Though it did yield us Nick Chubb, so guess we win.


Who criticized us? I thought most people applauded the move.


Really? We got made fun of by most of the sports talk shows, both tv and radio


Sorry, I don’t really focus too much on that type of stuff. Most articles I read at the time were pretty favorable.


Bill Polian was the most vocal. He was completely outraged that we we would do something that is done in the NBA. That's not how the NFL works. That's what happens when you have a baseball guy running things.

Then we got mocked for paying osweiler $16 million and he wasn't even on our roster.


Is buttcheeks one word?
Or should I spread them apart?
Page 5 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum NFL Coaching News ....

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5