Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
cfrs15 Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
good


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,583
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,583
What's a Steve Wilks?

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Wow, that's clever. Never heard that before.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,202
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,202
couldn't this just go into the existing thread about Kitchens staff ? it's an expected hire..nothing official yet.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Yeah, especially since we were already discussing it.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Originally Posted By: cfrs15


I guess that his preference is a base 4-3


[Linked Image]

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
good


What's so good about it? We get rid of a guy that had decades of experience as a DC for a guy with ONE YEAR in that position. How are we better now than we were? The ONLY good thing about this hire is he runs a 4-3. Aside from that, he is basically a rookie at the job. MAYBE he will be good at it. I'm not a big fan of maybe when it comes to this team. Maybe very seldom works out for us.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,583
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,583
Originally Posted By: guard dawg
Wow, that's clever. Never heard that before.

Again I ask...What's a Steve Wilks?

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,313
Apparently, it is Defensive Coordinator for the Cleveland Browns.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: guard dawg
Wow, that's clever. Never heard that before.


Down boy! It's good to see SuperBrown posting. It means all is right in the World... nanner


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Scott Petrak
@ScottPetrak

Can confirm #Browns have reached agreements with OC Todd Monken, DC Steve Wilks and associate head coach/OL coach James Campen.


#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 190
B
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
B
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 190
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
good


What's so good about it? We get rid of a guy that had decades of experience as a DC for a guy with ONE YEAR in that position. How are we better now than we were? The ONLY good thing about this hire is he runs a 4-3. Aside from that, he is basically a rookie at the job. MAYBE he will be good at it. I'm not a big fan of maybe when it comes to this team. Maybe very seldom works out for us.


The man has been coaching for over 20 years in college/pro football which included a year as a head coach in college and 5 years as a DC in college. I don’t know how you can call him a rookie. He has been coaching defense since the 90s...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,506
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,506
Originally Posted By: Pdawg
Scott Petrak
@ScottPetrak

Can confirm #Browns have reached agreements with OC Todd Monken, DC Steve Wilks and associate head coach/OL coach James Campen.




We also carried over Henry at WR, Lindley ..... probably at QB, and I believe Clyde Simmons at DL ..... along with DeWayne Walker at DB ... to go along with Priefer on special teams. Man, that's a great foundation to a new staff. We have reportedly been trying to hire Stump Mitchell ... who would be another great hire.

So, we still need a LB coach and TE coach.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: SuperBrown
Originally Posted By: guard dawg
Wow, that's clever. Never heard that before.

Again I ask...What's a Steve Wilks?

Steve Wilks


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,085
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,085
Ready to start some winning. Still liked some GW here. I hope these are great hires. Any of these guys gonna have serious draft needs. I don't think Dorsey has us to the luxury of BPA yet. We need some pieces and some tacklers.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
Everything I have read from sources outside the team or local media indicates we put together a strong team.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Yes. We should still be playing football this time next year.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Aside from that, he is basically a rookie at the job.

Except for the fact that he isn't...A side from the fact that my Uncle has male parts, basically he is my Aunt. Come on man. Basically he isn't - He has coached Defense since 2006 and was the right hand man of Ron Rivera where he went so did Wilks...mostly specializing in the DB of the defense and but did a lot more so much so that after one year as the DC in NC he was hired as an up and coming HC for the Zona but in one year where this was probably the most untalented team in the NFL he was let go. So back to his specialty of defense.

I think it was reported that Wilkes base D is a 3-4...and yet he came up the ranks in a 4-3 defensive scheme. Was that just a miss print regarding the base 3-4 D is what Wilks does???

I don't remember Kuechely being in a 3-4??? or Ron Rivera being a 3-4 guy.

I think his one year stint as HC has taught him a lot and he will be able to Game plan and teach execution a lot better than before. But it is a wait and see thing. We know he can handle the D without a need of help form Kitchens.

I think he will adapt his Defense strictly to the personnel that we have now and in the near future. Dorsey has not balked at this hire. Wilks is relatively young and should be able to get us in a proper direction without too much change.

Execution is the most important thing not the philosophy



Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Ron Rivera is mostly a 4-3 guy, though if I remember, did use the 3-4 as defensive coordinator of the Chargers. He was one of the rare guys to truly implement the idea of coaching to the players you have. Though these days, there are a lot of hybrid defenses. For example, the Patriots switch effortlessly between 3 and 4 man lines, though not true 3-4/4-3s as they rarely stay in base defense.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Steve Wilks is definitely a 4-3 guy. In fact, he was criticized in Arizona for running a 4-3 when the personnel was arguably better suited for a 3-4. It would make no sense to take a defense like the Browns (built for 4-3) and run a 3-4, so there's little reason to worry about something like that.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Originally Posted By: Haus
Steve Wilks is definitely a 4-3 guy. In fact, he was criticized in Arizona for running a 4-3 when the personnel was arguably better suited for a 3-4. It would make no sense to take a defense like the Browns (built for 4-3) and run a 3-4, so there's little reason to worry about something like that.




This might actually be a concern. You want your coordinator to adapt to the personnel. Everyone seems up in arms about whether we go with 3-4 or 4-3 and that we may reboot the defense and clean house or some crap. Stop it.

The defense as well as any position (except QB) is always evolving. Get rid of this guy and get that guy, etc.

We ran a lot of 3-4 last year and sounds like hardly anyone noticed. I think I saw somewhere it was near 40%? Someone like Genard Avery might even be better suited for a 3-4.

Use the personnel you have and adapt. Try not to make things that aren't. I would be mildly concerned about the defense after reading this about Wilks.



Take a look at this sack by Garrett....


Link


I only see 2 linemen, 4 LBers, and probably 5 DBs. I would imagine Randall is the player we cannot see? Kirksey and Avery drop in coverage. Kindred and Peppers blitzing...

Things aren't always going to be 3-4 or 4-3...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,622
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,622
Just trusting Dorsey to make sure these are the right guys. I don't know much about any of them.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,660
Originally Posted By: Haus
Steve Wilks is definitely a 4-3 guy. In fact, he was criticized in Arizona for running a 4-3 when the personnel was arguably better suited for a 3-4. It would make no sense to take a defense like the Browns (built for 4-3) and run a 3-4, so there's little reason to worry about something like that.


Yes, his defense in Arizona was a year of transition that helped to lead to their demise.

This was a concern of mine, with a coaching change from the staff that ended the season, (mainly on offense) and as history is our witness, with changing of the schemes there is always a transition period, perhaps not as much as years past, when things where a bit more in balance, but still a step back none the lest.

The transition with Wilks defense should be mostly with the verbiage.


[Linked Image]

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted By: devicedawg
Originally Posted By: Haus
Steve Wilks is definitely a 4-3 guy. In fact, he was criticized in Arizona for running a 4-3 when the personnel was arguably better suited for a 3-4. It would make no sense to take a defense like the Browns (built for 4-3) and run a 3-4, so there's little reason to worry about something like that.




This might actually be a concern. You want your coordinator to adapt to the personnel. Everyone seems up in arms about whether we go with 3-4 or 4-3 and that we may reboot the defense and clean house or some crap. Stop it.

The defense as well as any position (except QB) is always evolving. Get rid of this guy and get that guy, etc.

We ran a lot of 3-4 last year and sounds like hardly anyone noticed. I think I saw somewhere it was near 40%? Someone like Genard Avery might even be better suited for a 3-4.

Use the personnel you have and adapt. Try not to make things that aren't. I would be mildly concerned about the defense after reading this about Wilks.



Take a look at this sack by Garrett....


Link


I only see 2 linemen, 4 LBers, and probably 5 DBs. I would imagine Randall is the player we cannot see? Kirksey and Avery drop in coverage. Kindred and Peppers blitzing...

Things aren't always going to be 3-4 or 4-3...

Good points. A lot of the concern over 4-3 vs 3-4 really comes down to scheme and principles and not whether the 4th guy puts his hand in the grass or not. So 3-4 has often got lumped in with 2-gap principles even though that's not necessarily the case. People think of the old Patriots style 3-4 that was brought to Cleveland with Crennel and Mangini, where the 3 down linemen are responsible for 2 gaps each.

This is opposed to a more traditional 4-3 approach, where each lineman is responsible for 1 gap. This is where Garrett's edge rushing really shines, where Ogunjobi can shoot the gaps, etc.

Again, this is really conflating different concepts, but it's where a lot of the confusion comes in. If you have a guy like Genard Avery, he can act as a sort of hybrid defensive end/linebacker but even if he's standing up, the concepts don't change much. I actually wonder how often this came into play. 40% seems awfully high but I wasn't exactly doing film breakdowns if you know what I mean.

We don't have the size in the front 7 to run a traditional 3-4, 2 gap type scheme-- not at defensive end, not at linebacker.

Going forward, it'll be interesting to see how Steve Wilks uses the personnel, including players who aren't here yet. I'm sure he wowed Kitchens with his vision.. we just have to see it play out. I want a 4-3 but am not at all opposed to utilizing some hybrid concepts, which are pretty common in the league these days.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,448
I look for us to draft a DT early and a LB at some point. And I expect Ogbah and Garrett to be moved around quite a bit


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Originally Posted By: BirdDawg81
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
good


What's so good about it? We get rid of a guy that had decades of experience as a DC for a guy with ONE YEAR in that position. How are we better now than we were? The ONLY good thing about this hire is he runs a 4-3. Aside from that, he is basically a rookie at the job. MAYBE he will be good at it. I'm not a big fan of maybe when it comes to this team. Maybe very seldom works out for us.


The man has been coaching for over 20 years in college/pro football which included a year as a head coach in college and 5 years as a DC in college. I don’t know how you can call him a rookie. He has been coaching defense since the 90s...


He was a DC in the PROS for ONE year. That's it. But hey, it's awesome. As long as our D kicks ass. Period. No on the job training. He's SO great? Then I better see it on Sundays.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,563
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Originally Posted By: BirdDawg81
Originally Posted By: Spiritbro77
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
good


What's so good about it? We get rid of a guy that had decades of experience as a DC for a guy with ONE YEAR in that position. How are we better now than we were? The ONLY good thing about this hire is he runs a 4-3. Aside from that, he is basically a rookie at the job. MAYBE he will be good at it. I'm not a big fan of maybe when it comes to this team. Maybe very seldom works out for us.


The man has been coaching for over 20 years in college/pro football which included a year as a head coach in college and 5 years as a DC in college. I don’t know how you can call him a rookie. He has been coaching defense since the 90s...


He was a DC in the PROS for ONE year. That's it. But hey, it's awesome. As long as our D kicks ass. Period. No on the job training. He's SO great? Then I better see it on Sundays.


What, exactly, was Gregg doing so well that you would have kept him over Wilks?

Wilks, in his one year of being a DC, totally transformed that Panthers defense. He was better than McDermott and whoever was in that position this year.

Gregg, for all his bluster, is a relic. I believe him to be a much better Head Coach than DC. Because I thought his defensive schemes were too complex and left too many holes.


you had a good run Hank.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
It's getting very deep in this forum.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
1
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
It's getting very deep in this forum.


The perpetual whining choir is warming up...God forbid we get good and they have nothing to wring their hands and gnash their teeth over.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I like the hires. Cry over that, Mouth.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,674
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I like the hires. Cry over that, Mouth.




I agree. I think both the hires are solid.


I take outside opinion closer than local media stuff, and everything says they are solid hires.

I wanted to keep Gregg, but am not going to rip anyone simply because my guy wasn't chosen.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
1
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
1
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,767
[quote=Versatile Dog]I like the hires. Cry over that, Mouth. [/quote

Not sure I get who this post is aimed at. Mine sure wasn't aimed at you...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,144
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,144
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I like the hires. Cry over that, Mouth.


He was agreeing with you. notallthere


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
This might actually be a concern. You want your coordinator to adapt to the personnel.

Well actually its not a concern cause the fact is our Personnel has been centered on a 4-3 Defense.

Btw I know a lot of posting about LB...LB...LB...

we are forgetting one thing, the player that showed THE MOST PROGRESS on the D was Avery, I think that kid is going to be a GREAT OLB, SAM, he played the edge great, he can sack/blitz and he gets in good position dropping back into zone. He just got better and better. We get Kirksey back and Avery I think will continue to progress and become an outright STUD!!!

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I like the hires. Cry over that, Mouth.


I thought it was rather clear that he was not insinuating that you were whining, he actually was agreeing with what you were insinuating about posters??? Thought your bite was not necessary especially towards an Old Mutt... laugh

Anyways back to the HE BETTER THIS AND THAT IS NOT GOOD...yada yada. Oh and so you know Vers this was not directed to you. Relax not everyone is attacking you all the time

Fact is Grateful Dead posted that KITCHENS' hire of Wilk was because of the fact that he utilizes the talent that he has and is not a square peg in a round hole guy. So all the worries being spoken are for naught wink

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
N
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
N
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,964
I do like Avery at LB. I think we will be better with Collins gone, he seems to me to be a guy who takes too many plays off. I see a lot of lack of effort from him. Schobert is solid if unspectacular.

CB is my big worry. That second concussion of Wards was not a big hit, and he was GONE. Zegura mentioned he was standing nearby and dude did not know where he was, for quite some time. The run D needs a stout DT, maybe get Shelton back for cheap, but the passing game is where the yards are given up. We were missing one of our two starting CB for most of the season, we need more talent here.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Biggest team need is at Dt,quality and depth are lacking. Our backers wouldn't be missing as many tackles if the backs weren't already in a full Sprint when they broke the line. One good DT and nothing for backup won't work in this do division.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
I'm not sure why people still are talking about Shelton and Meder like they were Ted washington and bruce smith. They were marginal guys..hence the reason they didn't catch on anywhere else. I do agree the positions are a need..But I think we'll go get our own guys


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns to hire Steve Wilks as defensive coordinator

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5