Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
BpG Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
https://www.npr.org/2019/02/07/691997301...ew-deal-outline


Quote:
he Green New Deal legislation laid out by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey sets goals for some drastic measures to cut carbon emissions across the economy. In the process, it aims to create jobs and boost the economy.
Amr Alfiky/NPR
Updated 4:30 p.m.

Whether it's a deadly cold snap or a hole under an Antarctic glacier or a terrifying new report, there seem to be constant reminders now of the dangers that climate change poses to humanity.

POLITICS
Ocasio-Cortez Talks About Ambitious Plan To Combat Climate Change
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., think they have a start to a solution. Thursday they are introducing a framework defining what they call a "Green New Deal" — what they foresee as a massive policy package that would remake the U.S. economy and, they hope, eliminate all U.S. carbon emissions.

That's a really big — potentially impossibly big — undertaking.

"Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us," Ocasio-Cortez told NPR's Steve Inskeep in an interview that aired Thursday on Morning Edition.

She added: "It could be part of a larger solution, but no one has actually scoped out what that larger solution would entail. And so that's really what we're trying to accomplish with the Green New Deal."

What is the Green New Deal?

In very broad strokes, the Green New Deal legislation laid out by Ocasio-Cortez and Markey sets goals for some drastic measures to cut carbon emissions across the economy, from electricity generation to transportation to agriculture. In the process, it aims to create jobs and boost the economy.

2018 Was Earth's Fourth-Hottest Year On Record, Scientists Say
ENVIRONMENT
2018 Was Earth's Fourth-Hottest Year On Record, Scientists Say
In that vein, the proposal stresses that it aims to meet its ambitious goals while paying special attention to groups like the poor, disabled and minority communities that might be disproportionately affected by massive economic transitions like those the Green New Deal calls for.

Importantly, it's a nonbinding resolution, meaning that even if it were to pass (more on the challenges to that below), it wouldn't itself create any new programs. Instead, it would potentially affirm the sense of the House that these things should be done in the coming years.

Lawmakers pass nonbinding resolutions for things as simple as congratulating Super Bowl winners, as well as to send political messages — for example, telling the president they disapprove of his trade policies, as the Senate did in summer 2018.


What are the specifics of that framework?

The bill calls for a "10-year national mobilizations" toward accomplishing a series of goals that the resolution lays out.

(Note: Ocasio-Cortez's office released an updated version of the bill on Thursday. The earlier version, which we had included in a prior version of this story, is still available here.)

Among the most prominent, the deal calls for "meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources." The ultimate goal is to stop using fossil fuels entirely, Ocasio-Cortez's office told NPR, as well as to transition away from nuclear energy.

In addition, the framework, as described in the legislation as well as a blog post — containing an updated version of "FAQs" provided to NPR by Ocasio-Cortez's office — calls for a variety of other lofty goals:

"upgrading all existing buildings" in the country for energy efficiency;
working with farmers "to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions ... as much as is technologically feasible" (while supporting family farms and promoting "universal access to healthy food");
"Overhauling transportation systems" to reduce emissions — including expanding electric car manufacturing, building "charging stations everywhere," and expanding high-speed rail to "a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary";
A guaranteed job "with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations and retirement security" for every American;
"High-quality health care" for all Americans.
Report: Global Warming Could Melt At Least A Third Of Himalayan Glaciers
GOATS AND SODA
Report: Global Warming Could Melt At Least A Third Of Himalayan Glaciers
Which is to say: the Green New Deal framework combines big climate-change-related ideas with a wish list of progressive economic proposals that, taken together, would touch nearly every American and overhaul the economy.

Are those ideas doable?

Many in the climate science community, as well as Green New Deal proponents, agree that saving the world from disastrous effects of climate change requires aggressive action.

And some of the Green New Deal's goals are indeed aggressive. For example, Ocasio-Cortez told NPR that "in 10 years, we're trying to go carbon-neutral."

According to Jesse Jenkins, a postdoctoral environmental fellow at Harvard's Kennedy School, that may be an unreachable goal.

What You Need To Know About The Democratic Socialists Of America
POLITICS
What You Need To Know About The Democratic Socialists Of America
"Where we need to be targeting really is a net-zero carbon economy by about 2050, which itself is an enormous challenge and will require reductions in carbon emissions much faster than have been achieved historically," he said. "2030 might be a little bit early to be targeting."

Similarly, removing combustible engines from the roads or expanding high-speed rail to largely eliminate air travel would require nothing short of revolutionizing transportation.

Likewise, some of the more progressive economic policies — universal health care and a job guarantee, for example — while popular among some Democrats, would also be very difficult to implement and transition into.

Likely 2020 Democratic Candidates Want To Guarantee A Job To Every American
POLITICS
Likely 2020 Democratic Candidates Want To Guarantee A Job To Every American
On top of all that, implementing all of these policies could cost trillions upon trillions of dollars.

Altogether, the Green New Deal is a loose framework. It does not lay out guidance on how to implement these policies.

Rather, the idea is that Ocasio-Cortez and Markey will "begin work immediately on Green New Deal bills to put the nuts and bolts on the plan described in this resolution."

And again, all of this is hypothetical — it would be tough to implement and potentially extremely expensive ... if it passed.

So did the idea of a Green New Deal start with Ocasio-Cortez?

Not at all.

POLITICS
Congressional Democrats Say Climate Change Is A Priority As They Control The House
While the Green New Deal has in the last year or so grown central to progressive Democrats' policy conversations, the idea of a Green New Deal itself is well over a decade old. Environmentalists were talking about it as far back as 2003, when the term popped up in a San Francisco Chronicle article about an environmentalist conference.

It gained traction with a 2007 New York Times column from Thomas Friedman, where he used the phrase to describe the scope of energy investments he thought would be necessary to slow climate change on a large scale.

The phrase was also used around President Barack Obama's 2009 stimulus, which had around $90 billion worth of environmental initiatives.

While the idea gained some currency in Europe and also in the Green Party, it wasn't until after the 2016 election that it really gained broad popularity on the left in the U.S. (Vox's Dave Roberts has a more thorough history here).

This latest iteration is different both in the political energy that it has amassed and the grand scope it is taking. While it was a product of the progressive activist community, Ocasio-Cortez has been perhaps the most visible proponent of the plan and has helped it gain nationwide attention.

So will it pass?

That looks unlikely.

Yes, there's some energy for it on the left — some House Democrats have already said they will support the bill. However, there are indications House leadership isn't prioritizing the idea as much as those more liberal Democrats would like — Speaker Nancy Pelosi frustrated Green New Deal proponents by not giving them the kind of committee they wanted to put the policies together.

After the deal's Thursday release, she also cast the plan as simply one of any number of environmental proposals the House might consider.

"It will be one of several or maybe many suggestions that we receive," Pelosi told Politico. "The green dream or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they're for it right?"

Concern About Global Warming Among Americans Spikes, Report Says
ENVIRONMENT
Concern About Global Warming Among Americans Spikes, Report Says
In addition, it's easy to see how the bill could be dangerous for moderate House Democrats, many of whom come from swing districts and may be loath to touch such a progressive proposal.

Among Republicans — even those worried about climate change — the package, with its liberal economic ideas, will also likely be a nonstarter.

"Someone's going to have to prove to me how that can be accomplished because it looks to me like for the foreseeable future we're gonna be using a substantial amount of fossil fuels," said Rep. Francis Rooney, R-Fla., co-chair of the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, speaking to NPR before the Green New Deal's text was released.

For his part, Rooney is in favor of a carbon tax, a policy he helped propose with a bipartisan group of lawmakers in November. Information from Ocasio-Cortez's office says that the Green New Deal could include a carbon tax, but that it would be "a tiny part" of the total package of policies.

Meanwhile, there's little chance of a Green New Deal getting a vote in the Republican-controlled Senate.

If it's not going to pass and it's not even binding, why is it worth even talking about?

It's worth talking about because it already is a politically powerful idea among Democrats.

Which Democrats Are Running In 2020 — And Which Still Might
POLITICS
Which Democrats Are Running In 2020 — And Which Still Might
Already, presidential candidates are being asked whether they support the idea of a Green New Deal, meaning it's easy to see the issue becoming a litmus test for some voters in both the 2020 congressional elections and the presidential election.

To more liberal Democrats, the prospect of such an ambitious economic and environmental package at the center of the 2020 campaign may be particularly energizing.

"I think it's like a really weird instinct that the Democratic Party develops to not be exciting intentionally," said Sean McElwee, co-founder of the progressive think tank Data for Progress. "Most of politics is getting people excited enough to show up and vote for you. And I think that a Green New Deal and Medicare-for-all — these are ideas that are big enough to get people excited and show up to vote for you."

Massive Starfish Die-Off Is Tied To Global Warming
SCIENCE
Massive Starfish Die-Off Is Tied To Global Warming
For her part, Ocasio-Cortez says that a policy like the Green New Deal could get voters excited enough to pressure their Congress members to support it.

"I do think that when there's a wide spectrum of debate on an issue, that is where the public plays a role. That is where the public needs to call their member of Congress and say, 'This is something that I care about,' " she told NPR, adding, "Where I do have trust is in my colleagues' capacity to change and evolve and be adaptable and listen to their constituents."

That said, it's easy to see how a Green New Deal litmus test could backfire on that front, endangering some Democrats — particularly in swing districts.

But it's not just about national politics. The national-level energy for a Green New Deal could boost efforts in cities and states. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, for example, has been pushing a Green New Deal in his state.

Aside from the politics, there's the fact that climate change remains an impending threat — one for which the world has yet to come up with a fix.

"It's a big legislation because it's a huge [expletive] problem! We're all going to die," said McElwee. "Every week it seems like the risks of climate change become more real, and the amount of devastation it is going to wreak upon humanity becomes larger, and that means we have to do bigger things."



Apparently to stop Climate Change, we need universal healthcare and universal basic income to those unwilling to work, healthy food etc. It is amazingly tone deaf to include socialism in your GREEN ENERGY proposal.

Most of her topical points I can understand the reason, albeit sometimes radical, limited airline travel etc. There is some good and some really off topic and dumb things in there.


Related:





Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
We certainly do need universal healthcare.

But the new green deal? Let's face it, politicians are like used care salesmen. The asking price isn't what they're really willing to sell the car for. They shoot for the moon but are willing to take much less.

At some point we have to start cleaning up the crap storm we have created. I'm not sure why some fight so hard against that.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489
Likes: 723
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489
Likes: 723
If anything, I appreciate her effort. Dunno if it will fly, but something has to be done. And yes, we can absolutely create a crap ton of jobs by going green.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
BpG Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
I just feel as thought conflating entirely separate issues doesn't help anything. It would be like me going to my boss and saying "look I need a new office because I've outgrown mine and I also need a company car."

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
Maybe. But you could also see it as both issues need to be addressed in order to do your job properly. So to that extent the two are intertwined.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,398
Likes: 280
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,398
Likes: 280
I'm sure there might be some decent stuff in it that I can agree with but she lost me, and evidently the person who tweeted about it as well, with economic security for those UNWILLING to work.

If you are able but unwilling to work, you deserve to starve.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,565
Likes: 123
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,565
Likes: 123
Originally Posted By: DCDAWGFAN
I'm sure there might be some decent stuff in it that I can agree with but she lost me, and evidently the person who tweeted about it as well, with economic security for those UNWILLING to work.

If you are able but unwilling to work, you deserve to starve.


Why should the working pay for those unwilling to work. Dumb. dumb, dumb!


Romans 10:9 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
BpG Offline OP
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Likes: 26
Not sure who is getting the money or anything but Netflix just bought the rights to an AOC documentary for 10 million dollars.


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
Netflix paid NOTHING in federal or state taxes in 2018 despite posting record profits of $845million - and even got a $22million rebate

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...22m-REBATE.html

And once again Mexico didn't pay for it. The American tax payer did.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489
Likes: 723
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489
Likes: 723
obviously the only way to rectify the problem is to give them another tax cut.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,413
Likes: 446
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,413
Likes: 446
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Netflix paid NOTHING in federal or state taxes in 2018 despite posting record profits of $845million - and even got a $22million rebate

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...22m-REBATE.html

And once again Mexico didn't pay for it. The American tax payer did.


Did you read the comment section of that article you posted? dwkeller did a decent job of explaining it. BUt it IS complex, no doubt.

I have this odd feeling that if netfliz did something illegal, the IRS would be all over it.

Don't fault the company, fault the tax laws, which it appears netflix followed.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,991
I guess with this deal, the government will give me that pony I never got from Santa.

Has socialism ever worked anywhere in this world? No planes, no cars. 100% green energy? I guess they must have found the magic fairy dust. I hope those of you up north will enjoy cleaning the frost off your solar panels every day. Just imagine all the train tracks everywhere, or will they force everyone to live in cities. At least when they cull all the livestock to prevent farts, it should be a huge cookout, of the last meat you'll ever have.

I haven't seen such fantasy writing in a long time.


[Linked Image from s2.excoboard.com]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DCDAWGFAN
I'm sure there might be some decent stuff in it that I can agree with but she lost me, and evidently the person who tweeted about it as well, with economic security for those UNWILLING to work.

If you are able but unwilling to work, you deserve to starve.

[media:tweet]https://twitter.com/jules_su/status/1094074083531243520?s=09[/media]

Apparently the "unwilling to work" line is alt right propaganda.

The actual text of the deal calls for the economic security of ALL Americans. I assume that'll be either a UBI or an investment portfolio for all Americans.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
The Socialist That Could
Kimberley A. Strassel

February 07, 2019

The Republican Party has a secret weapon for 2020. It’s especially effective because it’s stealthy: The Democrats seem oblivious to its power. And the GOP needn’t lift a finger for it to work. All Republicans have to do is sit back and watch 29-year-old Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez . . . exist.

AOC, as she’s better known, today exists largely in front of the cameras. In a few months she’s gone from an unknown New York bartender to the democratic socialist darling of the left and its media hordes. Her megaphone is so loud that she rivals Speaker Nancy Pelosi as the face of the Democratic Party. Republicans don’t know whether to applaud or laugh. Most do both.

For them, what’s not to love? She’s set off a fratricidal war on the left, with her chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, this week slamming the “radical conservatives” among the Democrats holding the party “hostage.” She’s made friends with Jeremy Corbyn, leader of Britain’s Labour Party, who has been accused of anti-Semitism. She’s called the American system of wealth creation “immoral” and believes government has a duty to provide “economic security” to people who are “unwilling to work.” As a representative of New York, she’s making California look sensible.

On Thursday Ms. Ocasio-Cortez unveiled her vaunted Green New Deal, complete with the details of how Democrats plan to reach climate nirvana in a mere 10 years. It came in the form of a resolution, sponsored in the Senate by Massachusetts’ Edward Markey, on which AOC is determined to force a full House vote. That means every Democrat in Washington will get to go on the record in favor of abolishing air travel, outlawing steaks, forcing all American homeowners to retrofit their houses, putting every miner, oil rigger, livestock rancher and gas-station attendant out of a job, and spending trillions and trillions more tax money. Oh, also for government-run health care, which is somehow a prerequisite for a clean economy.

It’s a GOP dream, especially because the media presented her plan with a straight face—as a legitimate proposal from a legitimate leader in the Democratic Party. Republicans are thrilled to treat it that way in the march to 2020, as their set-piece example of what Democrats would do to the economy and average Americans if given control. The Green New Deal encapsulates everything Americans fear from government, all in one bonkers resolution.

It is for starters, a massive plan for the government to take over and micromanage much the economy. Take the central plank, its diktat of producing 100% of U.S. electricity “through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources” by 2030. As Ron Bailey at Reason has noted, a 2015 plan from Stanford envisioning the goal called for the installation of 154,000 offshore wind turbines, 335,000 onshore wind turbines, 75 million residential photovoltaic (solar) systems, 2.75 million commercial solar systems, and 46,000 utility-scale solar facilities. AOC has been clear it will be government building all this, not the private sector.

And that might be the easy part. According to an accompanying fact sheet, the Green New Deal would also get rid of combustion engines, “build charging stations everywhere,” “upgrade or replace every building in U.S.,” do the same with all “infrastructure,” and crisscross the nation with “high-speed rail.”

Buried in the details, the Green New Deal also promises government control of the most fundamental aspects of private life. The fact sheet explains why the resolution doesn’t call for “banning fossil fuels” or for “zero” emissions across the entire economy—at least at first. It’s because “we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast” (emphasis mine).

This is an acknowledgment that planes don’t run on anything but fossil fuel. No jet fuel, no trips to see granny. It’s also an acknowledgment that livestock produce methane, which has led climate alarmists to engage in “meatless Mondays.” AOC may not prove able to eradicate “fully” every family Christmas or strip of bacon in a decade, but that’s the goal.

Finally, the resolution is Democratic math at its best. It leaves out a price tag, and is equally vague on what kind of taxes would be needed to cover the cost. But it would run to tens of trillions of dollars. The fact sheet asserts the cost shouldn’t worry anyone, since the Federal Reserve can just “extend credit” to these projects! And “new public banks can be created to extend credit,” too! And Americans will get lots of “shared prosperity” from their “investments.” À la Solyndra.

At least some Democrats seem to be aware of what a danger this is, which is why Ms. Pelosi threw some cold water on the Green New Deal this week. They should be scared. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is a freight train gaining speed by the day—and helping Republicans with every passing minute.

Write to kim@wsj.com.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,938
Likes: 114
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,938
Likes: 114
Love it, how everything gets lost when someone mentions the very few who are “unwilling” but whatever.

I’m convinced the GOP sheep just don’t want financial security, housing, healthcare, clean water, clean air, and healthy food for all of us.


A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
– Jackie Robinson
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Love it, how everything gets lost when someone mentions the very few who are “unwilling” but whatever.

I’m convinced the GOP sheep just don’t want financial security, housing, healthcare, clean water, clean air, and healthy food for all of us.


They love their alt-right propaganda too much

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,670
Likes: 673
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,670
Likes: 673
j/c

CHS, Perfect:
Caves are supposed to be dark, cold, and damp.

Last edited by OldColdDawg; 02/09/19 11:34 AM.

Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
Who do you think gets the money? It a story about her so she should be the recipient, Lets see if she offers 90% of her earnings in taxes because as she puts it its the "Tippity Top".

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Riley01
Who do you think gets the money? It a story about her so she should be the recipient, Lets see if she offers 90% of her earnings in taxes because as she puts it its the "Tippity Top".


God Bless your brain

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
J\C
I guess these non-taxpaying huge capitalistic corp. get a pass by the lib sheep by enriching socialist darlings like the obamas and the aoc,s etc. IMHO

Last edited by Riley01; 02/09/19 12:20 PM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Riley01
J\C
I guess these non-taxpaying huge capitalistic corp. get a pass by the lib sheep by enriching socialist darlings like the obamas and the aoc,s etc. IMHO


rofl

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489
Likes: 723
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489
Likes: 723
cons calling people socialist has completely lost its bite. this aint the cold war anymore. especially since news is starting to come out that people in the middle class are actually paying more this year in taxes than previous years, and the wealthy got huge savings.

at this point, its becoming more of a derogatory term to call someone a conservative than a socialist.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,741
Likes: 928
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,741
Likes: 928
Quote:
IMHO

rofl

1. There is nothing about your opinion that's even remotely close to humble.

2. There is nothing about your opinion that's even remotely close to informed.


carry on, with your bad self.


"too many notes, not enough music-"
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 126
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 126
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Love it, how everything gets lost when someone mentions the very few who are “unwilling” but whatever.

I’m convinced the GOP sheep just don’t want financial security, housing, healthcare, clean water, clean air, and healthy food for all of us.


Then there is the liberal talking point of "you don't blindly support our legislation, so you hate all of these things"


It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 126
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 126
I disagree with the article. You got the socialists on one side promising free stuff. On the other side you have Trump spewing hate and saying stupid things. I don't see how the democrats are not in complete control of the government after 2020.

Promising free stuff and vilifying the rich have become a popular thing. Anyone who wants to punish the evil rich people will rack up the votes.


It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
They're idiots with no plans for the future. I'm sure the Democrats will screw it up thumbsup

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,797
Likes: 1346
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg

Don't fault the company, fault the tax laws, which it appears netflix followed.


I don't fault the company at all. I fault the politicians that pass laws that create this situation and the voters who continue to support the politicians that just gave big business yet another huge tax break which further exasperates the state of affairs. You know, because big business "needed it".


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Releases Green New Deal Outline

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5