|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
The corporate overlords decided to be a bit generous with the peasant, and now they got her arguing to the death in favor of them.
This is exactly why corporations have all the power, and government has to bribe them in order to get anything done. They decided that she wasn't risky enough to stop insuring, and they'll still take her cash and she's ready to give it to them hand over fist! They decided to not insure me years ago before Obamacare happened. Now they don't have a choice.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Also drug free. No I don't know what 7% of your pay is and I don't care. I'm uninsured by choice as I'm young and healthy. I don't want to fund your medical bills when I get nothing in return, so I continue to save much more money than most and have more to lose under this plan than a lot of others.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
The corporate overlords decided to be a bit generous with the peasant, and now they got her arguing to the death in favor of them.
This is exactly why corporations have all the power, and government has to bribe them in order to get anything done. They decided that she wasn't risky enough to stop insuring, and they'll still take her cash and she's ready to give it to them hand over fist! They decided to not insure me years ago before Obamacare happened. Now they don't have a choice. Good job being a parasite to a profitable industry.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
I don't know how old you are, other than you are in your 20's, but for your sake I hope you get some ins. Even high deductible coverage.
I got crohns when I was 28.
There are lots of medical issues that can happen in your 20's believe it or not.
Don't risk it man. Hospital bills can wreck you.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
The corporate overlords decided to be a bit generous with the peasant, and now they got her arguing to the death in favor of them.
This is exactly why corporations have all the power, and government has to bribe them in order to get anything done. They decided that she wasn't risky enough to stop insuring, and they'll still take her cash and she's ready to give it to them hand over fist! They decided to not insure me years ago before Obamacare happened. Now they don't have a choice. Good job being a parasite to a profitable industry. Parasite to what? My company exists on it's own. And is successful. Which is quite difficult to do.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,237
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,237 |
Where does 7% get plucked from?
And at what threshold?
An additional 7% on earnings over $250K ? Over $500K ?
What would be the point of debating over a fictitious meaningless random BS number? How about arguing over whether a 1/2% increase would make it palatable? . . . sort of reminds me of the story of Churchill and his dinner conversation asking the lady sat next to him if she would sleep with him for a million dollars - except in reverse.
If the 7% has been explained I missed it.
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788 |
So they threw you some table scraps, and now you’re on hold?
Lolololololololol. It's cheaper than having my taxes jacked up 7%. And I'd probably vote for a moderate populist Dem. Because I can't stand Trump. But vote for a socialist? Not in a trillion years. I have a $5000 deductible. That’s before the insurance company kicks and and starts paying a portion of my bills. I’ll take a 7% tax increase. It’ll cost me less in the long run. Not true unless you are excessively unhealthy or traumatically injured. And need to spend 5K in deductible every single year for the rest of your life. A deductible only matters if you have an actual problem. And to have that high of a deductible means you are choosing the cheapest possible health plan from your employer with lowest coverage. Much like the rest of us, if you want better insurance than you need to choose a better health plan. Medicare for all won't change that. Medicare is a bare bones health program. So, with Medicare for all, not only will you be paying jacked up 7% in taxes, but you will also be getting a bare bones health plan that doesn't cover everything. What a deal. None of us know what medicare for all will end up looking like. Bernie wants it to cover everything including dental and eyes (glasses). The GOP version would be a voucher and a tax credit for the rich. I'll take Bernie's version or as close as we can get. No private insurance premiums, no copays, no deductibles, just extra tax. The by the time they negotiate drug prices and hospitals switch to a more preventative health care format, we'll all be better off than now by a long shot.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Where does 7% get plucked from?
And at what threshold?
An additional 7% on earnings over $250K ? Over $500K ?
What would be the point of debating over a fictitious meaningless random BS number? How about arguing over whether a 1/2% increase would make it palatable? . . . sort of reminds me of the story of Churchill and his dinner conversation asking the lady sat next to him if she would sleep with him for a million dollars - except in reverse.
If the 7% has been explained I missed it. This was the figure that came from Bernie's plan when he ran for President previously. I don't remember if he explicitly stated it on his website, but it was analyzed on a different, respectable website with charts and graphs and this is how it came to be.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
So they threw you some table scraps, and now you’re on hold?
Lolololololololol. It's cheaper than having my taxes jacked up 7%. And I'd probably vote for a moderate populist Dem. Because I can't stand Trump. But vote for a socialist? Not in a trillion years. I have a $5000 deductible. That’s before the insurance company kicks and and starts paying a portion of my bills. I’ll take a 7% tax increase. It’ll cost me less in the long run. Not true unless you are excessively unhealthy or traumatically injured. And need to spend 5K in deductible every single year for the rest of your life. A deductible only matters if you have an actual problem. And to have that high of a deductible means you are choosing the cheapest possible health plan from your employer with lowest coverage. Much like the rest of us, if you want better insurance than you need to choose a better health plan. Medicare for all won't change that. Medicare is a bare bones health program. So, with Medicare for all, not only will you be paying jacked up 7% in taxes, but you will also be getting a bare bones health plan that doesn't cover everything. What a deal. None of us know what medicare for all will end up looking like. Bernie wants it to cover everything including dental and eyes (glasses). The GOP version would be a voucher and a tax credit for the rich. I'll take Bernie's version or as close as we can get. No private insurance premiums, no copays, no deductibles, just extra tax. The by the time they negotiate drug prices and hospitals switch to a more preventative health care format, we'll all be better off than now by a long shot. So you say that nobody knows what it is, but it will be better by a long shot? LOL I have a bridge I will sell you. It will take you to the promised land of milk and honey. Everything glitters and is just as you imagine. Just vote for me and give me 7% of your income.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788 |
I don't know how old you are, other than you are in your 20's, but for your sake I hope you get some ins. Even high deductible coverage.
I got crohns when I was 28.
There are lots of medical issues that can happen in your 20's believe it or not.
Don't risk it man. Hospital bills can wreck you. Friend of mine is young and has crohns, he has to get transfusions of some sort for it every couple months to the tune of $10K a pop. He would be dead without insurance. He had a good scare transitioning from his mom's insurance to his own. He had a fork truck accident at work and was let go about a month into his insurance taking effect had to move his next transfusion up by a week to be covered or would have missed it. Medicaid said he made to much to help him out. Sad.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902 |
Insuring nurse’s is expensive. Yes I chose a bare bones plan to save money as I rarely need to use my insurance benefits... of course last month I screwed my back up badly. Cost me dearly at the ER. My deductible is nearly covered already this year. The thought/fear of being financially ruined by a medical diagnosis is real. I’ve seen it. Families shouldn’t have to wipe out all assets, inheritance, of their elderly parents, or what not, to cover their medical bills. Or to ‘spend down’ to assets less than $2000 to receive Medicaid. It’s criminal that we allow this to happen. Nursing homes are in the business of inheritance extraction. The care provided is laughable at most the places. Hell half of them don’t staff nurses 24 hours a day. Instead they rely on untrained/low skilled staff calling 911 for every fall, skin tear, minor injury. Passing the bill onto the tax payer. Meanwhile the facility owners keep staff low, profits high, and buy second or third homes. Profit needs to be removed from this equation. Period. Many of my co workers have family plans with crazy high premiums. Isn’t that a ‘tax’? Those premiums only account for part of their bill. When they do access their benifit they get hit with co-pays and leftover percentages that they have to cover. My guess is many of my co workers are being hit with regular bills that add up significantly over time. Ear infections, flu, stitches, etc things that most all kids end up with. You keep focusing on ‘taxes’. Isn’t being constantly inundated with high premiums and medical bills and co pays etc a ‘tax’ on our finances?
“Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”... part of our constitution. Isn’t having access to healthcare without fear of going broke covered under this? I think so.
You can make all the excuses you want. But the 5K deductible you complain about is the one you chose over having better coverage. That is the risk you took. But don't say it is the same or better than having 7% tax increases. Because 7K tax increase is a constant.
Having a random health problem is not a constant.People with actual constant health problems will choose better health insurance/more expensive/lower deductible plans because it saves them money in the long term. Hope you never need bypass surgery or cancer treatment or end up with diabetes and it’s related complications. You’ll wish it only costed you 7% of your income.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Insuring nurse’s is expensive. Yes I chose a bare bones plan to save money as I rarely need to use my insurance benefits... of course last month I screwed my back up badly. Cost me dearly at the ER. My deductible is nearly covered already this year. The thought/fear of being financially ruined by a medical diagnosis is real. I’ve seen it. Families shouldn’t have to wipe out all assets, inheritance, of their elderly parents, or what not, to cover their medical bills. Or to ‘spend down’ to assets less than $2000 to receive Medicaid. It’s criminal that we allow this to happen. Nursing homes are in the business of inheritance extraction. The care provided is laughable at most the places. Hell half of them don’t staff nurses 24 hours a day. Instead they rely on untrained/low skilled staff calling 911 for every fall, skin tear, minor injury. Passing the bill onto the tax payer. Meanwhile the facility owners keep staff low, profits high, and buy second or third homes. Profit needs to be removed from this equation. Period. Many of my co workers have family plans with crazy high premiums. Isn’t that a ‘tax’? Those premiums only account for part of their bill. When they do access their benifit they get hit with co-pays and leftover percentages that they have to cover. My guess is many of my co workers are being hit with regular bills that add up significantly over time. Ear infections, flu, stitches, etc things that most all kids end up with. You keep focusing on ‘taxes’. Isn’t being constantly inundated with high premiums and medical bills and co pays etc a ‘tax’ on our finances?
“Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”... part of our constitution. Isn’t having access to healthcare without fear of going broke covered under this? I think so.
You can make all the excuses you want. But the 5K deductible you complain about is the one you chose over having better coverage. That is the risk you took. But don't say it is the same or better than having 7% tax increases. Because 7K tax increase is a constant.
Having a random health problem is not a constant.People with actual constant health problems will choose better health insurance/more expensive/lower deductible plans because it saves them money in the long term. Hope you never need bypass surgery or cancer treatment or end up with diabetes and it’s related complications. You’ll wish it only costed you 7% of your income. Says the people on Medicare.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
One of the tax changes Bernie has in his plan, would be a 7.5% tax on employers. He also has a 4% tax increase on everyone. That said, I have no idea where Eve is getting her numbers or if they're correct.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902 |
Hospital bills can wreck you. Says the one that wants the status quo. ? PS Hospital bills can wreck you, insurance or not. That’s the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
I don't know how old you are, other than you are in your 20's, but for your sake I hope you get some ins. Even high deductible coverage.
I got crohns when I was 28.
There are lots of medical issues that can happen in your 20's believe it or not.
Don't risk it man. Hospital bills can wreck you. Friend of mine is young and has crohns, he has to get transfusions of some sort for it every couple months to the tune of $10K a pop. He would be dead without insurance. He had a good scare transitioning from his mom's insurance to his own. He had a fork truck accident at work and was let go about a month into his insurance taking effect had to move his next transfusion up by a week to be covered or would have missed it. Medicaid said he made to much to help him out. Sad. Yes, that's biological meds which are extremely expensive. 10K a pop is Remicade. 1300 a pop is Humira. All those tv commercials you see are for biologics. Which most ins companies don't cover because the price is ridiculous. But your Dr will try to push it on you anyways because big pharma pressures Drs. If you actually want to have those drugs, your Dr has to fight with your ins to cover it. Or you have to be a poor person to get into their low income programs. The middle class can't have those otherwise. It's a huge money making racket. I stopped going to my Dr because every time I went there he kept telling me I have to be on that. Despite me not having symptoms. And me being self employed and never knowing if I will have ins from year to year to cover it. (you can't start taking it then stop it, or your body will build up antibodies to it) So all I did was fight with that Dr and gave up going to him.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902 |
I don't know how old you are, other than you are in your 20's, but for your sake I hope you get some ins. Even high deductible coverage.
I got crohns when I was 28.
There are lots of medical issues that can happen in your 20's believe it or not.
Don't risk it man. Hospital bills can wreck you. Friend of mine is young and has crohns, he has to get transfusions of some sort for it every couple months to the tune of $10K a pop. He would be dead without insurance. He had a good scare transitioning from his mom's insurance to his own. He had a fork truck accident at work and was let go about a month into his insurance taking effect had to move his next transfusion up by a week to be covered or would have missed it. Medicaid said he made to much to help him out. Sad. Yes, that's biological meds which are extremely expensive. 10K a pop is Remicade. 1300 a pop is Humira. All those tv commercials you see are for biologics. Which most ins companies don't cover because the price is ridiculous. But your Dr will try to push it on you anyways because big pharma pressures Drs. If you actually want to have those drugs, your Dr has to fight with your ins to cover it. Or you have to be a poor person to get into their low income programs. The middle class can't have those otherwise. It's a huge money making racket. I stopped going to my Dr because every time I went there he kept telling me I have to be on that. Despite me not having symptoms. And me being self employed and never knowing if I will have ins from year to year to cover it. (you can't start taking it then stop it, or your body will build up antibodies to it) So all I did was fight with that Dr and gave up going to him. Thank you. Posts like this make the argument for socialized medicine for me. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Hospital bills can wreck you. Says the one that wants the status quo. ? PS Hospital bills can wreck you, insurance or not. That’s the problem. Not so much if you have insurance. But moreso if you have Medicare because it covers less than if you have private insurance.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
One of the tax changes Bernie has in his plan, would be a 7.5% tax on employers. He also has a 4% tax increase on everyone. That said, I have no idea where Eve is getting her numbers or if they're correct. Those numbers are fudged. My numbers are from the previous election. Those numbers will screw me since I don't have an employer. But, for the sake of good argument, we will go with them, and ignore all the people who are low income part time workers with no employer paid insurance, or are self employed. In what universe do you feel people will vote for a 4% tax increase (plus lower wage increases from employers to offset)? Nobody. None. Zero. Zilch. Oh sure, the socialists will love it. But mainstream America? Nope. Everyone is salty about fake Trump tax cuts. Do you really see them embracing 4% tax increases and no wage increases? Come on, be smarter than that.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
I don't know how old you are, other than you are in your 20's, but for your sake I hope you get some ins. Even high deductible coverage.
I got crohns when I was 28.
There are lots of medical issues that can happen in your 20's believe it or not.
Don't risk it man. Hospital bills can wreck you. Friend of mine is young and has crohns, he has to get transfusions of some sort for it every couple months to the tune of $10K a pop. He would be dead without insurance. He had a good scare transitioning from his mom's insurance to his own. He had a fork truck accident at work and was let go about a month into his insurance taking effect had to move his next transfusion up by a week to be covered or would have missed it. Medicaid said he made to much to help him out. Sad. Yes, that's biological meds which are extremely expensive. 10K a pop is Remicade. 1300 a pop is Humira. All those tv commercials you see are for biologics. Which most ins companies don't cover because the price is ridiculous. But your Dr will try to push it on you anyways because big pharma pressures Drs. If you actually want to have those drugs, your Dr has to fight with your ins to cover it. Or you have to be a poor person to get into their low income programs. The middle class can't have those otherwise. It's a huge money making racket. I stopped going to my Dr because every time I went there he kept telling me I have to be on that. Despite me not having symptoms. And me being self employed and never knowing if I will have ins from year to year to cover it. (you can't start taking it then stop it, or your body will build up antibodies to it) So all I did was fight with that Dr and gave up going to him. Thank you. Posts like this make the argument for socialized medicine for me. Lol You say this like the Government doesn't negotiate which Meds are acceptable or not when it comes to Medicare.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,902 |
I don't know how old you are, other than you are in your 20's, but for your sake I hope you get some ins. Even high deductible coverage.
I got crohns when I was 28.
There are lots of medical issues that can happen in your 20's believe it or not.
Don't risk it man. Hospital bills can wreck you. Friend of mine is young and has crohns, he has to get transfusions of some sort for it every couple months to the tune of $10K a pop. He would be dead without insurance. He had a good scare transitioning from his mom's insurance to his own. He had a fork truck accident at work and was let go about a month into his insurance taking effect had to move his next transfusion up by a week to be covered or would have missed it. Medicaid said he made to much to help him out. Sad. Yes, that's biological meds which are extremely expensive. 10K a pop is Remicade. 1300 a pop is Humira. All those tv commercials you see are for biologics. Which most ins companies don't cover because the price is ridiculous. But your Dr will try to push it on you anyways because big pharma pressures Drs. If you actually want to have those drugs, your Dr has to fight with your ins to cover it. Or you have to be a poor person to get into their low income programs. The middle class can't have those otherwise. It's a huge money making racket. I stopped going to my Dr because every time I went there he kept telling me I have to be on that. Despite me not having symptoms. And me being self employed and never knowing if I will have ins from year to year to cover it. (you can't start taking it then stop it, or your body will build up antibodies to it) So all I did was fight with that Dr and gave up going to him. Thank you. Posts like this make the argument for socialized medicine for me. Lol You say this like the Government doesn't negotiate which Meds are acceptable or not when it comes to Medicare. No they’ll instead negotiate with the drug manufacturers more realistic prices. Like every other country does. The ones with socialized medicine that is. As of now Pharma owns our government. No need to negotiate. Just gouge the sick.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
I don't know how old you are, other than you are in your 20's, but for your sake I hope you get some ins. Even high deductible coverage.
I got crohns when I was 28.
There are lots of medical issues that can happen in your 20's believe it or not.
Don't risk it man. Hospital bills can wreck you. Friend of mine is young and has crohns, he has to get transfusions of some sort for it every couple months to the tune of $10K a pop. He would be dead without insurance. He had a good scare transitioning from his mom's insurance to his own. He had a fork truck accident at work and was let go about a month into his insurance taking effect had to move his next transfusion up by a week to be covered or would have missed it. Medicaid said he made to much to help him out. Sad. Yes, that's biological meds which are extremely expensive. 10K a pop is Remicade. 1300 a pop is Humira. All those tv commercials you see are for biologics. Which most ins companies don't cover because the price is ridiculous. But your Dr will try to push it on you anyways because big pharma pressures Drs. If you actually want to have those drugs, your Dr has to fight with your ins to cover it. Or you have to be a poor person to get into their low income programs. The middle class can't have those otherwise. It's a huge money making racket. I stopped going to my Dr because every time I went there he kept telling me I have to be on that. Despite me not having symptoms. And me being self employed and never knowing if I will have ins from year to year to cover it. (you can't start taking it then stop it, or your body will build up antibodies to it) So all I did was fight with that Dr and gave up going to him. Thank you. Posts like this make the argument for socialized medicine for me. Lol You say this like the Government doesn't negotiate which Meds are acceptable or not when it comes to Medicare. No they’ll instead negotiate with the drug manufacturers more realistic prices. Like every other country does. The ones with socialized medicine that is. As of now Pharma owns our government. No need to negotiate. Just gouge the sick. I can agree to a point. The Govt does to a better job of negotiating prices than private ins does. Private ins prefers to just not cover it. However this doesn't mean that Govt will actually do that for biologics. Since there are many other cheaper drugs that treat the conditions that biologics cover. It's not like the Govt is going to magically buy you a Porsche med when they can give you a Toyota Corolla med. This is why Medicare doesn't cover much and in general people have to buy supplemental insurance to cover many many things. It would probably be a cold day in hell before the Govt buys you a biologic medication.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Can you post a link to your numbers? Considering that you think that the bill would just enroll people into Medicare, I think you are the one with the fudged numbers.
Also considering the US population will save 2 trillion dollars over 10 years, I bet they would like those numbers.
But for demographics, the exact people you listed. Those uninsured by their employer, those with high deductibles, those with high premiums. Pretty much your average American.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788 |
So they threw you some table scraps, and now you’re on hold?
Lolololololololol. It's cheaper than having my taxes jacked up 7%. And I'd probably vote for a moderate populist Dem. Because I can't stand Trump. But vote for a socialist? Not in a trillion years. I have a $5000 deductible. That’s before the insurance company kicks and and starts paying a portion of my bills. I’ll take a 7% tax increase. It’ll cost me less in the long run. Not true unless you are excessively unhealthy or traumatically injured. And need to spend 5K in deductible every single year for the rest of your life. A deductible only matters if you have an actual problem. And to have that high of a deductible means you are choosing the cheapest possible health plan from your employer with lowest coverage. Much like the rest of us, if you want better insurance than you need to choose a better health plan. Medicare for all won't change that. Medicare is a bare bones health program. So, with Medicare for all, not only will you be paying jacked up 7% in taxes, but you will also be getting a bare bones health plan that doesn't cover everything. What a deal. None of us know what medicare for all will end up looking like. Bernie wants it to cover everything including dental and eyes (glasses). The GOP version would be a voucher and a tax credit for the rich. I'll take Bernie's version or as close as we can get. No private insurance premiums, no copays, no deductibles, just extra tax. The by the time they negotiate drug prices and hospitals switch to a more preventative health care format, we'll all be better off than now by a long shot. So you say that nobody knows what it is, but it will be better by a long shot? LOL I have a bridge I will sell you. It will take you to the promised land of milk and honey. Everything glitters and is just as you imagine. Just vote for me and give me 7% of your income. If Canada can do it, so can we...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
There were charts from the previous election that said 7%.
Am I willing to go find them?
Probably not.
Google is your friend.
Otherwise, I'm going with that.
However since this is a new election there will be new numbers.
4% is still a laughable amount.
Nobody is going to vote for that.
The Dems will push for a moderate populist candidate similar to Obama.
Mark my words.
They don't want to hear your socialist crap any more than the rest of America does.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
And the Democrats will lose to Trump pushing out another Hillary.
Also the closest a Southerner has ever been to an American is when they were getting a bayonet through their rib cage imo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Irony. Recently the Canadians on my website were bitching up and down about the terrible healthcare in Canada. That it took waaaay to long to get their health problems addressed and it was waaaaayyy too expensive.
They wanted to leave Canada.
Sounds familiar.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
And the Democrats will lose to Trump pushing out another Hillary.
Also the closest a Southerner has ever been to an American is when they were getting a bayonet through their rib cage imo Well, Hillary was evil for her own reason and history. This is why people hated her. If the Dems pushed forward someone with a relatively clean record and upstanding moral character they could succeed. Let's be honest. How difficult is it to produce a candidate better than Trump? And not be a mental socialist?
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Also the closest a Southerner has ever been to an American is when they were getting a bayonet through their rib cage imo
Losing an argument much? lmao
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Losing a fake argument? perhaps. I've tried to find your 7% plan since you mentioned it. I've explained to you that M4A and Medicare are not the same thing. Yet you still tirelessly march on making up more stuff.
That said and jokes aside, because that was a joke. when has a Southerner ever been good for all America? The Clinton's? Maybe Carter. Another reason the Democrats lost to Trump is because they tried to cater to the South and ignored the Midwest, where labor is near its strongest.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Losing a fake argument? perhaps. I've tried to find your 7% plan since you mentioned it. I've explained to you that M4A and Medicare are not the same thing. Yet you still tirelessly march on making up more stuff.
That said and jokes aside, because that was a joke. when has a Southerner ever been good for all America? The Clinton's? Maybe Carter. Another reason the Democrats lost to Trump is because they tried to cater to the South and ignored the Midwest, where labor is near its strongest. The reason the Dems lost to Trump was because they were a divided party. They stonewalled Bernie and lost all those Bernie bros votes. Ask OCD if he voted for Hillary. Go ahead ask him. The Dems are going to lose again unless they can be united. I will say, I don't care much about Southern politics. I feel (and it has been repeatedly proven) that politicians in the South are corrupt. And same for the North. You can't deny that. It doesn't really matter where politicians are from. They are all power and money hungry.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
when has a Southerner ever been good for all America? Honey, you should spend some time in Atlanta, go to some AU games, have some good Southern soul food or Southern BBQ, see our culturally diverse communities. Learn our history. Yes, both MLK and Confederate. We are deep in pride and history and love for all of our neighbors. We are the model the Northern states should follow. There would be a lot less racial strife in this country. Mostly I think the rest of the country is jealous they don't live in the South. We have the best food and culture. And weather too. And everybody loves everybody. Neener Neener
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788 |
Irony. Recently the Canadians on my website were bitching up and down about the terrible healthcare in Canada. That it took waaaay to long to get their health problems addressed and it was waaaaayyy too expensive.
They wanted to leave Canada.
Sounds familiar.
I don't believe this. You are reaching to prove you point.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788 |
Losing a fake argument? perhaps. I've tried to find your 7% plan since you mentioned it. I've explained to you that M4A and Medicare are not the same thing. Yet you still tirelessly march on making up more stuff.
That said and jokes aside, because that was a joke. when has a Southerner ever been good for all America? The Clinton's? Maybe Carter. Another reason the Democrats lost to Trump is because they tried to cater to the South and ignored the Midwest, where labor is near its strongest. The reason the Dems lost to Trump was because they were a divided party. They stonewalled Bernie and lost all those Bernie bros votes. Ask OCD if he voted for Hillary. Go ahead ask him. The Dems are going to lose again unless they can be united. I will say, I don't care much about Southern politics. I feel (and it has been repeatedly proven) that politicians in the South are corrupt. And same for the North. You can't deny that. It doesn't really matter where politicians are from. They are all power and money hungry. So say it's Bernie vs Trump in the general, who you going to vote for between the two, no third party?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Irony. Recently the Canadians on my website were bitching up and down about the terrible healthcare in Canada. That it took waaaay to long to get their health problems addressed and it was waaaaayyy too expensive.
They wanted to leave Canada.
Sounds familiar.
I don't believe this. You are reaching to prove you point. You don't have to believe it, because I don't care. It's true. It happened on my website. Their cost of living is also extremely high. My Canadian game members complained extensively about this. You just buy into propaganda. Sheep.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
Losing a fake argument? perhaps. I've tried to find your 7% plan since you mentioned it. I've explained to you that M4A and Medicare are not the same thing. Yet you still tirelessly march on making up more stuff.
That said and jokes aside, because that was a joke. when has a Southerner ever been good for all America? The Clinton's? Maybe Carter. Another reason the Democrats lost to Trump is because they tried to cater to the South and ignored the Midwest, where labor is near its strongest. The reason the Dems lost to Trump was because they were a divided party. They stonewalled Bernie and lost all those Bernie bros votes. Ask OCD if he voted for Hillary. Go ahead ask him. The Dems are going to lose again unless they can be united. I will say, I don't care much about Southern politics. I feel (and it has been repeatedly proven) that politicians in the South are corrupt. And same for the North. You can't deny that. It doesn't really matter where politicians are from. They are all power and money hungry. So say it's Bernie vs Trump in the general, who you going to vote for between the two, no third party? I would vote for Trump for purely financial reasons. I think Trump is an idiot. But Bernie is a cancer.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788 |
Irony. Recently the Canadians on my website were bitching up and down about the terrible healthcare in Canada. That it took waaaay to long to get their health problems addressed and it was waaaaayyy too expensive.
They wanted to leave Canada.
Sounds familiar.
I don't believe this. You are reaching to prove you point. You don't have to believe it, because I don't care. It's true. It happened on my website. Their cost of living is also extremely high. My Canadian game members complained extensively about this. You just buy into propaganda. Sheep. I know the cost of living is higher, so is pay. But I've watched and read hours of videos and articles that that say their healthcare is better than ours by miles. Just the prevention focus makes it better from jump. You can call me "sheep" and "socialist all you want Eve, that won't change facts. And I wasn't saying you were lying, I just don't believe the canadians who told you this. You might wait for non urgent care there but emergency, and urgent care needs are met immediately just like here. An operation might be scheduled months out, but that is the same here. So yes, I don't believe it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,788 |
Losing a fake argument? perhaps. I've tried to find your 7% plan since you mentioned it. I've explained to you that M4A and Medicare are not the same thing. Yet you still tirelessly march on making up more stuff.
That said and jokes aside, because that was a joke. when has a Southerner ever been good for all America? The Clinton's? Maybe Carter. Another reason the Democrats lost to Trump is because they tried to cater to the South and ignored the Midwest, where labor is near its strongest. The reason the Dems lost to Trump was because they were a divided party. They stonewalled Bernie and lost all those Bernie bros votes. Ask OCD if he voted for Hillary. Go ahead ask him. The Dems are going to lose again unless they can be united. I will say, I don't care much about Southern politics. I feel (and it has been repeatedly proven) that politicians in the South are corrupt. And same for the North. You can't deny that. It doesn't really matter where politicians are from. They are all power and money hungry. So say it's Bernie vs Trump in the general, who you going to vote for between the two, no third party? I would vote for Trump Well there is the issue, You've lost your mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
I have no reason to lie.
I support Canadian laws about healthcare coming here, specifically price caps on meds and law of averages on meds. I feel this is far more important than Medicare for All and can do way greater good without upsetting the apple cart.
These were convos in my game's chatbox that I was lurking on.
I didn't prompt them.
They were just Canadians bitching about the healthcare there. They hate it.
They are young adults. So maybe life is harder for them?
You don't have to believe me. I don't care.
I just know the utopia you believe in doesn't exist.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Atlanta is beautiful. I've stayed there for a few months crashing at my cousin's pad in midtown. He sold it though when he left for Shanghai, but I still try to get down to the city once every year.
I love Atlanta, but it doesn't represent the South. It barely represents Georgia. What I love most about southern cities is that they're all different. It's not like the Midwest where everything was built around steel.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Socialism - another hot button
Fox/Right wing false narrative.
|
|