|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,818 |
I would be shocked if Dorsey acquired OBJ. It's not a necessary move. Plus if he doesn't draft WR in the first round, I'm not so sure he'd use the pick to trade for one...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,159
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,159 |
so maybe its AB and not OBJ, thus juice comments about getting your head right Steelers are not trading AB within the division unless it is for a ridiculous price. Dorsey isn't giving up a king's ransom for a 31 year old WR when he could land OBJ, which would be a better option at age 26 and cost less (trade wise).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
You have thing about receivers.
I like them...I don't have a "THING" like I'm prejudiced against WR or something.
I will tell you this - WR is the most OVER RATED Position out there. And I think Fantasy Football has made it so.
First and foremost...THEY ARE NOT A RARE FOOTBALL COMMODITY.
Over 30...THIRTY get drafted every year. And there are good ones from every round.
Once you have that QB the first thing you MUST and I cannot emphasize it more- MUST!!! Protect said QB you got to build that OL.
Colts got it and finally got Luck an OL and by the skin of their teeth maybe have finally saved their Franchise QB from being damaged goods.
Weapons around the QB - I have maintained that you need 5 solid WRs on a team. 1st and foremost must have great hands, run good routes and are overall just tough which is not a common character of a WR most of them are WIMPS. Why I like Landry, he is my perfect WR - tough! great hands and runs good routes.
yada yada, Rice and Irving. Both teams were Complete teams and would have won with or without those 2 WRs.
The Joe Thomas mention is total BS of course we never won with him here....We had freaking KIZER as our QB among many other MEDIOCRE QBs his best QB was a career backup in DA. So do I think we wasted a HOF player. 100% we did but it had nothing to do with the concept of what you need as a team to win.
We just sucked as a team...totally sucked.
You need to protect that Franchise QB cause he is so so important as we know. LT is the rarest of those who will protect. Of course it loses a lot if you do not have that Franchise QB. Not Joe's fault and the concept does not lose any value just cause of our History of Impudence.
But to accuse me of having a "THING" about WR. Why, so that my OPINION doesn't hold water. I hate arguments like that. Its like if I say something political and you call me a RACIST...so that you don't have to discuss the subject.
If you wish to OVER VALUE the position of WR go right ahead. Tell BB that not me.
I state Calvin and Julio cause they were the BEST WRs by far of their time. They even had decent QBs. But those best do not make a team. And like Joe Thomas if you don't have what is needed as A TEAM is goes to waste.
My point pure and simple is that what it takes to win a Championship at the WR position is not a RARE COMMODITY. You can amass 5 solid ones easily if you do your homework. And that is what you need to win a championship. Now if you wish to win your FANTASY LEAGUE and make some $$$$ then its a different story.
I ask you this question. If the 49ers and Cowboys of their dynasty years did not have Rice or Irving would they have been just an average team and not a dynasty?
So if I disagree with you I got a "THING" cause gosh forbid if I'm just football intelligent and correct about what I'm talking about.
you guys...smh
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
OP
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
left tackle is the most overrated position in formal. It used to be extremely important when your QB is taking 5 and 7 steps back and having him ignore that end. Now, most plays are in shotguns where the QB can see the field as the play develops. He's not blind to an end now.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
OP
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Gruden is such an idiot. I love it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870 |
You know my love will Not Fade Away.........
#gmSTRONG
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Getting rid of Zeitler would be a huge mistake. Our offensive line was great last year after Kitchens took over. Getting rid of good players to force unknown commodities into a starting spot isn’t wise. I will say that if Zeitler is part of a package to get a better player, I wouldn’t be as upset.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,477
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,477 |
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
I can't say if Corbett is going to a great OG or not but I know Zeitler IS so please leave him alone ...
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
J/C
I don't mind moving Zietler if we know Corbett is ready. I haven't seen Corbett play at all, so its a huge ? mark for me, and I would want to at least see some him in some action before I would trade a Pro Bowl Caliber G.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,341
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,341 |
J/C - I think moving Zeitler would be risky but I trust the guys in house to know what we have in Corbett. However, we would need some kinda depth. Where is Drango these days?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,477
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,477 |
There are some rumors about that going on....
At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847 |
I would hate that trade so much... why do we keep trying to get rid of good oline while paying for bad ones? heres a shiny new WR...but you won't have time to throw to him
Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Lots smoke coming out of Berea from a ton of different people:
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,159
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
OP
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Bring back the gieco greco imo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
What do you gotta give up to get OBJ? Just throwing it out there and I'm not sure I like it myself, but Duke and Zeitler?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
What do you gotta give up to get OBJ? Just throwing it out there and I'm not sure I like it myself, but Duke and Zeitler? Zeitler makes sense. Duke Johnson does not. Barkley is an every down back. I could see Ogbah and Schobert being involved.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
What do you gotta give up to get OBJ? Just throwing it out there and I'm not sure I like it myself, but Duke and Zeitler? Zeitler makes sense. Duke Johnson does not. Barkley is an every down back. I could see Ogbah and Schobert being involved. I could see Zeitler and Kirksey plus a 2nd round draft choice. I would make that trade. I get the Ogbah thing, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
What do you gotta give up to get OBJ? Just throwing it out there and I'm not sure I like it myself, but Duke and Zeitler? Zeitler makes sense. Duke Johnson does not. Barkley is an every down back. I could see Ogbah and Schobert being involved. I was thinking the same as well, but then remembered that Duke can also be lined up at WR.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
What do you gotta give up to get OBJ? Just throwing it out there and I'm not sure I like it myself, but Duke and Zeitler? Zeitler makes sense. Duke Johnson does not. Barkley is an every down back. I could see Ogbah and Schobert being involved. I was thinking the same as well, but then remembered that Duke can also be lined up at WR. Being able to line up at wide receiver and being a wide receiver are two different things.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
What do you gotta give up to get OBJ? Just throwing it out there and I'm not sure I like it myself, but Duke and Zeitler? Zeitler makes sense. Duke Johnson does not. Barkley is an every down back. I could see Ogbah and Schobert being involved. I could see Zeitler and Kirksey plus a 2nd round draft choice. I would make that trade. I get the Ogbah thing, too. I just don't think other teams would be willing to take on Kirksey's contract.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
No backis going to play every snap and get all the carries and receptions out of the backfield ... he’d have 450 - 500 touches per year if they did that ...
Just because Bark is and every down back doesn’tmean He’s going to play every down and get all the touches out of the position ... not feasible ...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
No backis going to play every snap and get all the carries and receptions out of the backfield ... he’d have 450 - 500 touches per year if they did that ...
Just because Bark is and every down back doesn’tmean He’s going to play every down and get all the touches out of the position ... not feasible ... Barkley had 352 touches (he was targeted 30 more times) last year as a rookie. He played 83% of the snaps. I agree that he can't take every snap, I just don't see a team valuing a backup running back very highly when the expectation is that they won't play much.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 |
The NFL is starting to feel like the NBA.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
The NFL is starting to feel like the NBA. The player movement (or discussion about player movement) is ultimately a good thing for the league on the grand scheme as it draws attention. The NFL will never go full NBA though. Elite QBs never leave the teams that drafted them in their prime, whereas the NBA's best players leave constantly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
What do you gotta give up to get OBJ? Just throwing it out there and I'm not sure I like it myself, but Duke and Zeitler? Zeitler makes sense. Duke Johnson does not. Barkley is an every down back. I could see Ogbah and Schobert being involved. I was thinking the same as well, but then remembered that Duke can also be lined up at WR. Being able to line up at wide receiver and being a wide receiver are two different things. Duke is a WR and also a RB. Between backing up Barkley, 2 back sets and just lining up at WR, he would be plenty useful to the Giants. Zeitler is the marquis player traded but Duke is a viable throw in if there are picks involved as well. And I still don't think that I like it. I can just imagine the following scenario a week after the trade being announced... 1) Hunt's suspension announced to be 10 weeks. 2) Corbett gets hurt washing his car or something. 3) OBJ hurts his hands punching a mirror because the guy on the other end was looking at him funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Yeah, the part about Kirksey's contract makes sense.
Last edited by Versatile Dog; 03/06/19 06:29 PM. Reason: Clarification
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I think OBJ is an elite receiver and one of the biggest difference makers in the league. I'd hate to give up Zeitler because we need a good OL for Baker, but man........acquiring OBJ would be huge for this franchise.
I also agree that Duke would be a throw-in. The Cowboys are overusing Zeke and Gurley is already suffering knee problems. While Barkley is a great back, it might be wise to give him some breaks.
I know for a fact that no one on the field takes the abuse that RBs do.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
I have two minds about this.
1) An elite QB (Baker) can elevate the play of the most ordinary WR to something special. So we should be able to do well with most average+ WR. So we can get by really well with lower talent.
2) OBJ is an elite WR and future HOFer. What happens if we pair him with Baker? OMG the world may explode!! Can we handle that rollercoaster? How do you say No?
Ok, 1 more thought for Bonus
3) Seems our front office wants to go No Holds Barred for the Superbowl and Dynasty. I'm not going to complain if this OBJ thing happens
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,108
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,108 |
peen, I think it's fairly evident that Diam was joking. Ok....cool. Sometimes I just read the printed words. Training I suppose.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,717
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,717 |
What if we give Zeittler and Duke, (or Kirksey, etc) and anything except our 1st round pick for OBJ?
I think I could get behind that.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,851 |
I guess I'm one of the few who are okay giving up Zeitler. I think Corbett would do just fine. Especially if Kitchens continues to focus on getting the ball out of Bakers hands quickly.
Crazy times. I don't think I've felt as excited about the launch of free agency/trades since the year we brought in LeCharles Bentley.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
OP
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
The NFL is starting to feel like the NBA.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,740
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,740 |
Not sure how I feel...I like Zeitler a lot...he is huge for our line, Baker, and O...
OBJ is very talented-dont get me wrong...However he does have his blowups and is a distraction at times...I definitely don't want to give up a 1st round pick and our elite RG for him...then again, what control do we as fans really have...none lol
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I don't think his blow-ups are bad. Big deal, he hit a kicking net. The horror.
I think it's all about perception. Some are not okay w/his antics while being okay w/crotch-grabbing, stare-downs, throwing the ball at a player, etc.
I don't think OBJ has ever been arrested, has he?
Football players are a different breed. Their not all going to be perfect little angels.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438 |
OBJ is a diva to be sure.
But as far as divas go, he has been tolerable for the Giants.
The only time I recall his antics being BAD was that time he repeatedly fought with the defender who was showing him up.
Sorry, I dont remember the team or player, just that OBJ was super unprofessional.
But that was the only time I recall him getting out of hand.
No Craps Given
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
For your amusement ...
ODELL BECKHAM WR, NEW YORK GIANTS
CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora reports the Browns, 49ers, and Raiders were the teams he heard "most connected" to a possible Odell Beckham trade at the Combine last week.
La Canfora, however, adds he talked to a source in Cleveland and was told there's "nothing cooking" on the trade front for the Browns and OBJ right now. Twitter was set ablaze Wednesday afternoon with an OBJ-to-the-Browns rumor, but there doesn't appear to be a whole lot to go on with it. Antonio Brown will be the first building block to fall in the wideout market. The Raiders are the favorites there, with some even calling it a "one-team race." The Niners aren't in on Brown, but OBJ is a different story. Somehow, Beckham is the more stable personality of the two between he and Brown at the moment and more than four years younger. OBJ could command multiple first-round picks for the Giants.
RELATED: Cleveland Browns, Oakland Raiders, San Francisco 49ers SOURCE: CBS Sports Mar 6, 2019, 7:10 PM
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Off-season Roster moves
|
|