DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Devin Nunes Sues Twitter for Allowing Accounts to Insult Him

Twitter Terms of service

Part 4 - Using The Services
Our Services evolve constantly. As such, the Services may change from time to time, at our discretion. We may stop (permanently or temporarily) providing the Services or any features within the Services to you or to users generally. We also retain the right to create limits on use and storage at our sole discretion at any time. We may also remove or refuse to distribute any Content on the Services, suspend or terminate users, and reclaim usernames without liability to you.

In consideration for Twitter granting you access to and use of the Services, you agree that Twitter and its third-party providers and partners may place advertising on the Services or in connection with the display of Content or information from the Services whether submitted by you or others. You also agree not to misuse our Services, for example, by interfering with them or accessing them using a method other than the interface and the instructions that we provide. You may not do any of the following while accessing or using the Services: (i) access, tamper with, or use non-public areas of the Services, Twitter’s computer systems, or the technical delivery systems of Twitter’s providers; (ii) probe, scan, or test the vulnerability of any system or network or breach or circumvent any security or authentication measures; (iii) access or search or attempt to access or search the Services by any means (automated or otherwise) other than through our currently available, published interfaces that are provided by Twitter (and only pursuant to the applicable terms and conditions), unless you have been specifically allowed to do so in a separate agreement with Twitter (NOTE: crawling the Services is permissible if done in accordance with the provisions of the robots.txt file, however, scraping the Services without the prior consent of Twitter is expressly prohibited); (iv) forge any TCP/IP packet header or any part of the header information in any email or posting, or in any way use the Services to send altered, deceptive or false source-identifying information; or (v) interfere with, or disrupt, (or attempt to do so), the access of any user, host or network, including, without limitation, sending a virus, overloading, flooding, spamming, mail-bombing the Services, or by scripting the creation of Content in such a manner as to interfere with or create an undue burden on the Services. We also reserve the right to access, read, preserve, and disclose any information as we reasonably believe is necessary to (i) satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, (ii) enforce the Terms, including investigation of potential violations hereof, (iii) detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues, (iv) respond to user support requests, or (v) protect the rights, property or safety of Twitter, its users and the public. Twitter does not disclose personally-identifying information to third parties except in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Too tired. It is your Constitution too, look it up.

I don't have to. Because I'm well aware that there was no internet when the Constitution was written.

Doesn't make it legal.

They could also say "We reserve the right to discriminate against certain races of people."

Someone should actually read through the entire Twitter Terms of Service and see what they say on the subject.

It won't be me.

By law, a business owner has the right to refuse service to some customers, but you can't discriminate against customers based on factors such as race, religion, sex or national origin.

And because of Nunes lawsuit you may be adding political persuasion to that.

Still won't stop them banning hate speech. And I also think that it's highly doubtful you political brand is protected, lmao. Imagine, "I'm from the onion Party, we want everyone to cry" so you can't ban me for being hateful... Wait that's the alt right so we already know that won't fly.

Nunes' suit is just to stop them from taking down Russian bots for 2020 anyway. That's the truth behind the lie... See libs can make crap up and have conspiracy theories too.

lmao @Nunes. Twitter is absolutely destroying him right now. @NunesCow went from 7500 followers to 350K+ this morning.

Others are nailing Google too...

EU regulators hit Google with $1.7 billion fine for blocking ad rivals

“Google has cemented its dominance in online search adverts and shielded itself from competitive pressure by imposing anti-competitive contractual restrictions on third-party websites. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules,” Vestager said in Brussels.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/20/eu-vestager-hits-google-with-fine-for.html

Good thing we aren't a bunch of socialists like they are in Europe.

Google will fight this and the fine will be very little for a company like them. All google has to do is threaten to cut off services to the UK with it's search engine, ad services, and multiple platforms... They will crap their pants.

But you guys keep saying that as a private company, they can do what they please.

Guess not, unless they want to pay for that privilege.

And now you're trying to compare the laws in the EU to the laws in America. And trying to claim that bringing a law suit is the same as winning one.

You just move the goal posts to something that has zero meaning here.

I'm glad we aren't a socialist nation like they are.

Boo Hoo Nunes...... welcome to the digital world you helped evolve. Twits own Twitter and you’re one of them.

Hell, they're just following their fearful leader.

Trump sued Bill Maher for saying that he would donate $5 million to a charity if Trump could prove he wasn't the "the spawn of his mother having sex with an orangutan."



He actually sued Maher for 5 million dollars. Of course it was one of those frivolous lawsuits the right claims they hate so much, but people should have seen Trump's fragile ego coming long ago.

Now Nunes is following suit.

Clarence Thomas backs Trump's call for changing defamation law to ease suits against media

Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion released Tuesday, called for reversing decades of jurisprudence that has made it harder for public figures to sue media outlets and other organizations for defamation -- restrictions that were premised, he said, on a series of "policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law."

Thomas' opinion comes against the backdrop of President Trump's repeated calls to make it easier to sue for defamation. Last weekend, Trump reacted to a "Saturday Night Live" skit about his southern-border emergency declaration by asking on Twitter, "How do the Networks get away with these total Republican hit jobs without retribution? Likewise for many other shows? Very unfair and should be looked into."


And last December, Trump wrote on Twitter: "Isn’t it a shame that someone can write an article or book, totally make up stories and form a picture of a person that is literally the exact opposite of the fact, and get away with it without retribution or cost. Don’t know why Washington politicians don’t change libel laws?"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clarenc...ians-like-trump

Thin skinned narcissist.

They hurt my wittle feewings!

Upcoming Devin Nunes speech sparks a cattle call of sorts — even mooing
By Bryant-Jon Anteola The Fresno Bee (TNS) Mar 21, 2019 Updated 14 min ago 0

FRESNO, Calif. — Rep. Devin Nunes might want to watch out for cows.

They could be coming the politician’s way during an upcoming speaking engagement.

After a post circulated about Nunes’ scheduled appearance as a keynote speaker next month in Fresno, social media lit up Wednesday evening with suggestions that people attend the speech dressed up as a cow and “moo” at him.

“I’m not saying it would be hilarious if folks in Fresno showed up to this event just to moo. I’m not saying that at all,” tweeted television producer Andy Lassner, who has 359,000 Twitter followers.

The suggestions that troll Nunes, R-Calif., specifically with cow references come just two days after the news that he filed a lawsuit against Twitter and several of its users, and sought after $250 million in damages.

Among the Twitter users named in the lawsuit was the parody account “Devin Nunes’ cow,” which went from having 1,200 followers Monday to more than 542,000 as of Wednesday. Nunes’ official account, in comparison, has 396,000 followers.

The lawsuit accuses Twitter of hiding, punishing or “shadow-banning” posts with a conservative bent.

Nunes will be the featured speaker for the Lincoln Reagan Dinner, hosted by the Fresno County Republican Party, on April 11 at Pardini’s in northwest Fresno.