DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Trump mocks wind power: 'When the wind doesn't blow, just turn off the television'

MGH - Did YOU, specifically, FAIL to read my comments on solar panels, IN THIS THREAD, or did YOU, specifically, FAIL TO UNDERSTAND the meanings of the words involved?

If you would like to discuss the clear and obvious differences in scalability over time with memory architecture and physical means of storing energy on a large scale, I am perfectly capable of having that discussion in depth and in detail. YOU, however, are not. Did you cover magnetic bubble storage in your grasping at headlines?

OCD, people test lots of idiotic, stupid ideas every single day, the vast majority of them waste a lot of other people's money demonstrating that their idea was both stupid and idiotic, just like the dumbass suggestion you made about shooting nuclear waste into space, because you have not spent the slightest time, effort, or energy doing any research or reading or accessing in any way the thoughts of those far smarter than your minimal level who have determined, repeatedly, for over 50 years and in many, many published papers, that this in not only not remotely cost-effective, much less even possible, but that it also demonstrates a severe risk of causing fatal levels of radiation poisoning to MILLIONS of people and making huge areas of land uninhabitable for THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

Since you do not think, or seek out accurate information in any recognizable way, you have probably not even conceived the concept that just shooting this crap beyond Earth orbit is NOT SUFFICIENT, it would require a dedicated monitoring team DECADES to manage the multiple, slingshot orbital paths necessary to get this crap out of the freaking solar system, a feat which humanity has only recently accomplished and which task covered almost half a century.

It takes a truly remarkable level of chutzpah to try and tell me I don't know what I am talking about when you clearly have no clue on issues I had detailed knowledge of in the third grade.

Do you have the guts to discuss the cost numbers given in the article? No, you don't. You kvetch, and whine, and moan, and throw insults and names like a small child. I have no interest in the total waste of time you represent. Grow up, and make an effort to at least resemble somebody who just might, with diagrams and pictures, have some faint idea of what a clue might be.

Hey now whats wrong with us grumpy old men. It was my idea to have them hire me to fart into front of the wind turbines. I can supply enough energy to run the state for months on end.

MGH - Did YOU, specifically, FAIL to read my comments on solar panels, IN THIS THREAD, or did YOU, specifically, FAIL TO UNDERSTAND the meanings of the words involved?

If you would like to discuss the clear and obvious differences in scalability over time with memory architecture and physical means of storing energy on a large scale, I am perfectly capable of having that discussion in depth and in detail. YOU, however, are not. Did you cover magnetic bubble storage in your grasping at headlines?

OCD, people test lots of idiotic, stupid ideas every single day, the vast majority of them waste a lot of other people's money demonstrating that their idea was both stupid and idiotic, just like the dumbass suggestion you made about shooting nuclear waste into space, because you have not spent the slightest time, effort, or energy doing any research or reading or accessing in any way the thoughts of those far smarter than your minimal level who have determined, repeatedly, for over 50 years and in many, many published papers, that this in not only not remotely cost-effective, much less even possible, but that it also demonstrates a severe risk of causing fatal levels of radiation poisoning to MILLIONS of people and making huge areas of land uninhabitable for THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

Since you do not think, or seek out accurate information in any recognizable way, you have probably not even conceived the concept that just shooting this crap beyond Earth orbit is NOT SUFFICIENT, it would require a dedicated monitoring team DECADES to manage the multiple, slingshot orbital paths necessary to get this crap out of the freaking solar system, a feat which humanity has only recently accomplished and which task covered almost half a century.

It takes a truly remarkable level of chutzpah to try and tell me I don't know what I am talking about when you clearly have no clue on issues I had detailed knowledge of in the third grade.

Do you have the guts to discuss the cost numbers given in the article? No, you don't. You kvetch, and whine, and moan, and throw insults and names like a small child. I have no interest in the total waste of time you represent. Grow up, and make an effort to at least resemble somebody who just might, with diagrams and pictures, have some faint idea of what a clue might be.

i wonder how much of the issues can be solved simply by cleaning up after ourselves.

bro, we're such a disgusting species, we have a ring of trash orbiting the planet.

There's only one drawback to your system: everyone East of your wind turbine experiences what it's like to live downwind of a feed lot.

[rim shot]

A LOT of the problem can be solved that way when it comes to the pollution of our water and land.

But when it comes to our air, only turning away from fossil fuels can do that. As long as we continue to burn fossil fuels bellowing emissions from our cars, our factories and the thick , black smoke of coal keep flowing into the atmosphere, we can't clean up our air.

It's an odd thing. Air and water are the two most critical ingredients to human life. Yet people think rolling back regulations that protect them both is somehow progress. Thinking that investing money to clean them up is government wasteful spending.

Trump's EPA rolls back Obama-era coal ash regulations

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-s-epa-rolls-back-obama-era-coal-ash-regulations-n892586

Like allowing coal ash to be dumped back into our waterways is progress?

I'm also curious if some sort of "carbon collector" could be created to "filter" the greenhouse gases that have already been released. .....

That's a great point if they weren't destroying the rain forest and killing off so many trees. But you can't keep killing trees and adding pollution into the air and call that a solution.

That's a great point if they weren't destroying the rain forest and killing off so many trees. But you can't keep killing trees and adding pollution into the air and call that a solution.

Are you having fun? First you tried to attack based on the fact that battery storage wasn't used. Then after you were proven wrong you switched to "Well now they'll want more tax money" to... what's next arch?

They would be Brazilians.

Come on man, Arch is coming along, He managed to get his ass handed to him and he was able to not scream out " but what about Hilary????"

Reading the thread kind of reminded of watching The Office and seeing Michael Scott continue to embrasse himself. its funny as hell, but also kind of makes you cringe just a little

Claiming people didn't comprehend it isn't really a valid excuse.

sorry bro but i definitely want to see scientist clone a mammoth.