DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus As Trump soars higher, Dems reach their lowest point yet

I hear there are Fake News video's going around showing Nan Nan as being drunk.

They should leave that alone as she does just fine without the help.

You're getting worse in your smack talk

Fair and Balanced warned me about the Fake Vids...

Manipulated videos of Nancy Pelosi edited to falsely depict her as drunk spread on social media

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fake-pelosi-videos-trump-doctored

Funny how they omitted that the President's lawyer shared the video and defended sharing the video. How balanced and fair they are!

Fair and Balanced also said...

A three-minute clip of Pelosi speaking event with the Center for American Progress from Wednesday was uploaded on Facebook by a group called "Politics WatchDog" was viewed over 1.8 million times with nearly 40,000 shares. The video shows her frequently slurring her words and her voice sounding garbled. Copies of the clip had also been found on Twitter and YouTube, which the latter had removed.

According to a report from The Washington Post, experts believed the original video was slowed down to 75 percent from the original speed and that her pitch was also manipulated in order to present her under the influence.

Computer science and digital forensics expert Berkeley Hany Farid said there was "no question" the video had been tampered with.

I read it. So fair and balanced was citing the "Fake News WaPo" and omitted that the President and his lawyer fell for it?

Fair and balance to whom?

No, Fair and Balanced quoted WAPO as having scientifically found the tapes to be doctored.

1.8 million people viewed them with 40,000 shares.
If one of the President's Attorneys was one of them, he was fooled too.

Don't forget that they omitted that the President's lawyer and the President fell for it. I wonder why they didn't report that. Would you happen to know why your fair and balanced media left that out?

1.8 million people viewed them with 40,000 shares.
If one of the President's Attorneys was one of them, he was fooled too.

Don't you think that's pretty vital information to share?

Also, what do you mean by "if"? He did it. He even attempted an apology.




Maybe if you had a good news source that focused on covering issues you wouldn't be this confused

I am not confused, I didn't hear about the Attorney till you mentioned it so I said "if".

You are not being very Fair and Balanced in your reporting.

You were confused. Maybe if you listened to someone else besides Fox News, you would've learned something

"Fair" and "balanced" aren't values one can ascribe to themselves

Fair and Balanced are excellent values for a person to have.

I tried listening to other Networks and read Newspapers but they lied to me for going on 3 years now.

No Collusion- FOX from day one.

If I listened to the others, I would look as foolish as many of the posters here. No thanks.

Fair and balanced are great attributes to have. However, like attractiveness, humbleness, honor and humor, if you have to say you are these things, then you're likely not. They're characteristics people define you by, not ones that you can define yourself by.

You've been reading Fox and Breitbart for a decade now, which really explains why you are the way you are. I would suggest having a healthy media diet consisting of multiple sites, not just one or two. Although the recent discovery of you not posting in Pure Football in over 4 years, makes it hard for me to think that you're capable of doing such a thing.

And while a few libs on here are tying their clown shoes, you've already got the outfit and shoes on and are currently painting your face. So don't worry, everyone thinks you're foolish enough

40 bad mouths Pelosi because he secretly wants to get in her depends.

No, I don't read Breitbart. Had to copy and paste it because I wasn't even sure how to spell it.

FOX has yet to let me down.

Can't say that for any of the others.

"Fair and balanced are great attributes to have. However, like attractiveness, humbleness, honor and humor..."

Oh please, you are embarrassing me with such praise.

Oh YEA, as far as posting in "Pure Football" is concerned, I read Pure Football and they have plenty of wise people over there that know the score and don't need my input. Not like over here with the clueless.

They let you down all the time, it's why you get trampled on this forum.

"If one of the President's Attorneys was one of them, he was fooled too."

Lmao how could you be so clueless! Oh yeah. Fox News.

Also, I wouldn't describe you as any of those words. I don't even consider you as a human, you're more like a Russian troll bot the way you just copy and paste articles.

I copy and paste NEWS ARTICLES so you will know what I say is not just me saying it but has been proven by others.

Spewing insults at people is not Trampling them, it only shows ignorance. It is not Fact and it means nothing.

I give you my opinions and back them up with sources on almost everything I post.

Just a few of the things we on the Right have been called by those on the Left because they can not debate truth...

Deplorable
Racist
Islamopobe
Fascist
Terrorists
Bigot
Extremist
Traitor
Zealot
Haters
Xenophobe
Russian Bots

Those are just the arrows of the Clueless.

Your list omitted my favorite:




"FOXd00p." ©

You copy more than articles. The sad thing is that you don't even cite your sources half the time.

You don't have opinions, you have talking points, which is why your words sway in the wind from week to week.

Also, cry me a river. No one insulted you nor are your hands clean. You've called multiple people foolish and clueless in this thread. You're like Trump in the way you cry like a colicky child.

More arrows of the clueless.

I wouldn't call your posts "arrows" more like Nerf bullets. But yes, you can be clueless.

"If one of the President's Attorneys was one of them, he was fooled too."

You really need to work at being more Fair and Balanced in your posts as I am one of the few people on the Right who will still talk with you guys in this Board.

So many have simply "rolleyes" and moved on.

Everyone would prefer it if you didn't respond tbh

Please do not presume to speak for me, CHS.
Speaking personally, I have loved 40¢'s posts from the first day he ever came here.

His posts are a daily serving of fat, soft lobs over the middle of the plate... and they're always snuggled deep inside my wheelhouse.

I allow him days of humiliation-free posting because Tom Hanks was right:
"There's no crying in baseball."


But on those days when I simply cannot resist any further....
...I find it great sport to send one of his softballs over the left field fence, the R&R HOF... and 150 yards into Lake Erie.

I never tire of that roar I hear when my swat (eventually) splashes down near the Wm G. Mather exhibit.


Unlike you, I actually WANT him to stick around.
A craftsman can never have too many 'useful tools' at his disposal, you know?

Are those not synonymous with Trumpian or GOPer?

Yep, he's an easy target.

So will I be called to testify before Congress over this investigation?

Those aren't soft balls, they're rotting fruit hanging on such a low branch that a midget would find out of their strike zone.

Replying to 40 is like going to the driving range. Fun for an hour, but ultimately a useless endeavor.

I don't think Congress has any more investigations over the consequences of eating lead paint. But I am glad you spent all night thinking of that response.

Walking away would be a better come back than going non verbal

What can one say to a crazy statement except

So that's how we're supposed to communicate with you? Duly noted

I'm not surprised your side was duped once again by Russian bots.

Lol.....you must think you’re the roger stone of dt.

Consumers are the most confident about their job prospects in nearly 2 decades

-Data released by The Conference Board shows 47.2% of consumers polled in May thought jobs are “plentiful.”

-That’s up from 46.5% in April and the most confident consumers have been on the labor market since January 2001, according to Bespoke Investment Group.

-“The main reason consumers remain so confident in the face of macro headwinds is that the job market remains so strong,” analysts at Bespoke say.

Trade tensions between China and the U.S. have dimmed economic growth prospects a bit in the eyes of economists, but U.S. job seekers are growing more confident regardless.

Data released Tuesday by The Conference Board showed 47.2% of consumers polled in May thought jobs are “plentiful.” That’s up from 46.5% in April and the most confident consumers have been on the labor market since January 2001, according to Bespoke Investment Group.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/28/consumer...-2-decades.html

Zoom Zoom Zoom
Soaring!

That 47.2% is about the same percentage that can pay ALL of their bills and living expenses with enough left over to save and/or do the extra things that make life more than just existing. Those who can handle a $500 emergency.

The over half that are not in that situation don't share your enthusiasm for trump economics.