Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,206
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,206
Originally Posted By: bonefish

He was Belichick before Belicheck was born.



He is who Belichick hopes to be.
Belichick idolized/idolizes Paul Brown.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198

I heard Jim Brown say that the game passed Paul Brown by and he was glad Blanton Collier got the job.

I doubt that. You don't accomplish what Paul Brown did and and then let the game pass you. He was a very intelligent man and full of pride. He was fully aware of the changes the game was going through.

I believe Jim and Paul were two men who would not bend to another's will. In fact I believe Paul planned to trade Jim. That was why he drafted Ernie Davis.

We will never know the full truth. Speculation on my part.



Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Quote:
In fact I believe Paul planned to trade Jim. That was why he drafted Ernie Davis.


I recall a conversation I had with an old timer about 25 years ago who claimed that when they traded Bobby Mitchell for Ernie Davis it was with the idea that they would trade Jim Brown to the Baltimore Colts for Johnny Unitas. It never made any particular sense to me that they would trade a future HOF talent (Mitchell) for a guy (Davis) who, although great in college, was redundant to JB. Teams didn't rotate RBs in those days, and Jim was still relatively young in '62.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I think what Jim Brown meant by that comment was that Paul Brown's coaching style was not right for the times. I don't think he was talking about his football knowledge, but instead, he was referring to the changing times and that you couldn't treat grown men like boys. Paul Brown was a great football coach, but he was a narrow minded man in social matters.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198

I don't know. I was in high school at the time.

But I have listened to Paul speak on numerous occasions. I do know he held no prejudice toward black players. Given his record for bringing black players to the team like Marion Motley when other teams did not.

I did hear him talk about players and the respect he had for those who were vets from WWII. The emphasis he placed on intelligence and classroom. The detail he put into the playbooks.

Those were different times. It was a boss/employee environment.

Paul Brown was at heart a teacher. If he came to the game today. I think his approach would still be x and o's.

In the end you are kind of a product of your times. Hard not to be because it is your frame of reference. In many ways Paul Brown reminded me of my father.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,915
Jim Brown by a huge margin on offense.
On defense, Clay Matthews. I loved how he played the game.


#BlackLivesMatter #StopAsianHate
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
I don't think the Paul Brown/Jim Brown issues was primarily racial. Marion Motley, Bill Willis, and others provide evidence of that. From what I understand Paul Brown was an authoritarian and did not tolerate deviation from his control of all aspects of the team. This would have been a problem for Jim Brown who definitely had his own ideas about training, practice and game day. Just two alpha males in different leadership roles in the same organization. Clashes were inevitable.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198

I don't think race had a thing to do with it.

As I stated two men who would not bend to another's will.

Bobby Mitchell told a bunch of stories about their interaction.

Paul did not want different rules for different players. He tolerated Jim because of his talent. He also knew the ego inside Jim.

That was IMO why he drafted Ernie Davis.

In any respect I have held Paul Brown with the utmost esteem.

Lombardi gets more praise. Not that he doesn't deserve praise. But to me Paul was the guy who forged the game of football.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I never mentioned race. I have read about the subject and Jim Brown did not mean that PB didn't know Xs and Os. It was about how he treated grown men.

Last edited by Versatile Dog; 06/24/19 06:52 PM.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198

I know you didn't mention race. Guard did but he said that it was not an issue.

Lombardi treated everyone the same; like dogs.

As I stated the time was different. It was a boss/employee relationship.

And the boss was all powerful. Chuck Knoll was no different and of course he learned from Paul Brown.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Yes Bone, a good summation. It was a different era.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Near the beginning of the thread somebody pointed out that the selection ought to include special teams. I didn't make a pick then so...

Either Metcalf or Cribbs hhhmmm?

Ok, Cribbs because he's not going to just return kicks. He's going to stop returns also.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,289
F
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
F
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,289
I tried to think of one before I read any posts. Also not sure my choice are necessarily a weakness, at east not one of them.

My first choice was Jim Brown on offence but then thought that was too easy.

So my next favorite exciting player was Greg Pruitt. I loved to watch him run. Incredibly strong for 18olbs. Pretty sure he won the weightlifting in the 1970s superstars competition.

Defense I have to go with Minnifield of Dixon. Loved how they would shut down premiere NFL receivers.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198

For all the young people who were not around when Jim Brown played it is hard to explain how dominate of a player he was.

I was born in Cleveland. Moved away and came back at age 12 that was 1960.

Jim Brown was incredible. Today the game is dominated by quarterbacks. That is understandable. Runners have been devalued. Short careers and easily available.

JB was not viewed that way. He was unstoppable. His career numbers tell a part of the story. But they do not tell the whole story. During his career instead of number 32 on his back they should have just put a big target. Every team knew he was coming. They planned for it. It made no difference. He would get his 100 yards. He would average 5.2 yards a carry.

There is no comparison to be made today. No back is going to get 20 to 30 carries a game.

He was something to see.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,883
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,883
Me not choosing JB had nothing to do with how I perceive him. It’s more to do with our current roster and today’s game. Chubb and Hunt can produce what we need of them... and then some. Thomas in his prime was as good as anyone. Certainly better than what we currently have. I chose Turner as I see him as a huge defensive threat in today’s passing league. As much as I like Clay I think Turner’s play in the secondary could give us our Ed Reed type enforcer our D needs.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,289
F
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
F
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,289
Originally Posted By: bonefish

For all the young people who were not around when Jim Brown played it is hard to explain how dominate of a player he was.

I was born in Cleveland. Moved away and came back at age 12 that was 1960.

Jim Brown was incredible. Today the game is dominated by quarterbacks. That is understandable. Runners have been devalued. Short careers and easily available.

JB was not viewed that way. He was unstoppable. His career numbers tell a part of the story. But they do not tell the whole story. During his career instead of number 32 on his back they should have just put a big target. Every team knew he was coming. They planned for it. It made no difference. He would get his 100 yards. He would average 5.2 yards a carry.

There is no comparison to be made today. No back is going to get 20 to 30 carries a game.

He was something to see.


Absolutely. Defenses were designed to stop the run & most QBs called their own plays and it was a lot of 2 runs and then a pass on third down. Passing offenses were stone age compared to today and defenses could clothesline a WR crossing the middle.

Jim Brown took a lot of extra hits that would assure penalty flags today. Not sure if I remember this correctly but I am pretty sure never missed a single play due to pain or injury, only for substitution.

Also think about this, he retired immediately after being named MVP, 1,500 yds rushing, 17 TDs in 14 games. He averaged 5.2 yards per carry for his career. 4 of his 9 seasons only lasted 12 games. When he retired he was more than 2,500 yds ahead of the next closest, Joe Perry and he played nearly twice as many seasons as Jim.

Something else I just thought of, blocking was so much more restricted then. You could not extend your arms or grab the player you were blocking. Holes did not stay open long.

Anyway, that is why I did not list him because it was too obvious.

I also agree Jim did not like how Paul Brown was so controlling. He felt he was a grown man who did not need to be treated like a HS player with strict rules. I heard Bobby Mitchell in an old interview talk about how PB yelled at him because he was Jim's roommate on the road and they would be late for the bus or meetings (because of Jim, not Bobby) etc and PB could not yell at Jim.



Last edited by FORTBROWNFAN; 06/25/19 05:18 PM.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,317
I was lucky enough to be alive when JB was a Brown. My mom bought me a Browns uni with S & H Greenstamps when I was 8 years old. The jersey was generic. My sister cut out the numbers 3 & 2 from some yellow cotton scraps we had around the house and sewed them on the back of that jersey. The year was 1963. Maybe if you could combine the running talents of OJ Simpson and Marshawn Lynch with the receiving talent of Sequan Barkley you might come close to embodying Jim Brown, maybe. The world extraordinary is inadequate to describe his play.

But the 2019 Browns have good to above average running backs. In my opinion, I'd add old school help elsewhere.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,198

This is bring old school back. But that will be different for all.

It would be rude on my part to try and debate a choice.

I was just trying to put JB in context for those who did not get to see him play.

Each era has their stars. But for those who saw JB play it is difficult to put him into context today. It was a different time and the game was played differently.

The only guy that comes to mind is Wilt Chamberlain. When I think of dominance.


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: PortlandDawg
Joe Thomas
Eric Turner

Read the whole thread and nothing makes more sense to me than this.... a lot of good answers and things to consider, but I'd still go with this.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
R. L. (Stonewall) Jackson
Don Rogers
Dick (Bam Bam) Ambrose
Thom Darden


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,996
Yeah JB is the obvious. I’d still pick up Paul Warfield, Lou Groza, and Gary Collins.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Without a doubt in my mind.
Jim Brown

Added to our Offense - the space we will be making??? Our offense would be UNSTOPPABLE...

Defense: Two guys popped up for me.
Eric Turner, the other Don Rogers.
Both taken much too early. Turner with stomach Cancer
and Rogers after defensive rookie of the year honors on a Cocaine over dose the day before his wedding. I can only assume part of his bachelor party and he did way too much as we know how that can occur. He was an amazing player one of the best ever if you can say that after one season.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,102
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,102
Quote:
Don Rogers


wow.
Haven't thought about him in years.
what a dynamic player.


"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,206
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,206
I'm just slightly surprised that none of the ladies have said Jim Bundren.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Fair Hooker and Michael Dean Perry.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
ok, ! Joe Thomas, everyone likes him, ...

If I could bring Old School back, (taking nothing away from Joe Thomas,)

I Bring back Tony Jones LT, 1994-95,

For about the 5th time on this board, I'll reitireate, that Joe Thomas just wasn't as dominant as Tony Jones, and I propose that the Denver Broncos don't win either ,but especially the first of their two Super Bowls in, back to back around 1997,

He Neutralized Reggie White the entire flippin game! Without the fact Tony Jones went left the Browns/whomever, and went to the Broncos to replace their retiring LT, but then that retiring LT came out of retirement.

But Tony Jones isn't going to be in the Hall of Fame, and Joe Thomas will, I'm guessing.

Everyone can list Joe Thomas, but Tony Jones was the better player, even if it was the Bellichic and Saban coached Browns, If I'm bringing just one of them back, I'm picking the more dominant guy in my opininion.

And Someone from the teams I watched in the 80's but there's too many to narrow it down.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum If you could bring Old School Back...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5