Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,245
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,245
https://dawgpounddaily.com/2019/09/21/offensive-line-not-blame-cleveland-browns/

interesting read.

The Cleveland Browns offensive woes to start the 2019 season has created curiosity about what’s to blame, but the offensive line is far from the issue.
The Cleveland Browns are still looking to find their offensive identity after struggling in the first two games of the season. The offense has not been crisp and has lacked explosive plays that were a common theme during the second half of 2018.

The passing offense itself has been problematic for Cleveland. Despite having several weapons, Baker Mayfield has struggled to get the ball in the hands of those weapons. Whether it be inaccuracy or routes not developing fast enough, Mayfield’s had a tough time getting the ball to his receivers.


00:16 / 00:30

SKIP AD

Mayfield has also been forced to scramble out of the pocket often as the Browns offensive line has had issues limiting pressure. However, the offensive line is not fully to blame for the pressure getting to Mayfield, as they have been one of the best pass blocking groups in the NFL.


Jake Trotter
✔
@Jake_Trotter
Crazy stat from first two weeks. The No. 1 OL in pass block win rate (holding pass blocks for at least 2.5 seconds)? The Cleveland Browns.

200
10:08 AM - Sep 20, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
57 people are talking about this
The offensive line was one of the biggest concerns for the Browns in 2019 because of the uncertainty at both tackles and at right guard. But for the most part, the offensive line has played well. The lone exception would be Chris Hubbard, who has had a problematic start to the season.

Although Mayfield has been sacked eight times this season, which is already more than during the final eight games last season, it has largely happened because of Mayfield holding onto the football too long.


Mayfield waiting for routes to develop or looking for shots downfield instead of taking what is given to him underneath with his checkdowns has hindered Cleveland’s offense. And it’s also taking its toll on Mayfield because he is taking many more hits than he did last season.

POWERED BY STUBHUB
Freddie Kitchens and Mayfield have both acknowledged the quarterback is holding onto the football longer than he needs to. It would not be surprising that when the Browns offense takes the field against the Rams, Kitchens makes a concerted effort to use a quick passing attack to get the ball out of Mayfield’s hand.

NEXT: Cleveland Browns have a loaded Week 3 injury report
But with a lot of focus being put on the offensive line because of the pressure getting to Mayfield, it is fair to say they are not the problem. It may not seem like it, but the Browns offensive line has done well with their initial protections of Mayfield.


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,245
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,245
I meant to post a different article feel free to merge this with the Offensive stuff. sorry about that.


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,483
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,483
i’ve Seen and read such conflicting things on our OL .. To my eyes, we’ve done a good enough job up front to move the ball. Baker is really not being pressured any more than some other QBs that I see.

I think our big problem is scheme and Baker’s poor play


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I have maintained that it's very hard for fans and media members to evaluate the OL. A dude gets sacked and the OL messed up according to most folks.

I haven't looked it up lately, but most NFL offenses want the ball to get out of the qbs hand in 1.8 to 2.1 seconds. We've seen the numbers when Baker gets rid of it in 2.5 seconds or less and when he holds it for longer than that.

Think about this. Hell, even try it. Take your phone out and go to the stopwatch. Start it and then stop it at 2.5 seconds. Then, clear it and start it again. Stop it at 3.1 seconds. Do you think you would be able to tell if there was a significant difference between the two times if you were actively watching a qb drop back in a real game? LOL....neither would I. Yet, that difference is often the difference between a sack or a clean pass attempt.

I think fans and media members undervalue and under appreciate a qb's processing speed more than any other attribute. I also think it is either the most important or second most important attribute a QB can have. The other would be accuracy.

People like us would be totally lost behind an offensive line and trying to read NFL coverages. It would just be a blur for almost every one of us. It's a very rare skill to be able to process things so quickly. There are guys who are really good at it and then there are guys like Brees and Brady who are amazing at quickly processing such a complex and chaotic scene. It's truly remarkable.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,375
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,375
Was just listening to WEEI local sports talk show Boston and the announcers were saying Baker is overrated and the Browns have the worst or one of the worst O-lines in football. I certainly don't agree about Baker because he's still learning and although our O-line isn't the best I don't think we are anywhere near the worst. They all think their experts here because of Brady and the Pats. Would love to see my Browns beat them good when they play.

Last edited by Homewood Dog; 09/24/19 01:10 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,632
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,632
My eyes are the only test I need to say that his line is 'a' or 'the' weak spot.

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 320
G
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
G
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 320
Our oline is not good enough. I agree there are other areas including Baker that have contributed to our lack of offense as well.
Kitchens poor play calling along with Higgins being injured and a lack of a reliable tigh end are other factors that have contributed to the oline having to hold their blocks longer than they are capable.
I would love to see us sign and use a fullback which I think would help but I guess that doesn't fit our scheme.
Oh well. Baker needs to make quicker reads and more check downs I guess.
Here's an idea Freddie. Lets run the ball more and use more play action while letting our defense and special teams carry us. Might not be sexy enough for some fans but what ever it takes to win.

Last edited by Glw12; 09/24/19 05:44 PM.

I just want a winner. We need players who can be part of the solution not part of the problem.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I had a feeling my post would be completely ignored. It doesn't fit the narrative. rolleyes

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
1) Hubbard has had a bad 3 weeks.
2) Bitonio had (understandably) a bad week against the Rams.
3) Our LG has looked less than average.
4) Greg Robinson has looked average.
5) Tretter had a bad 1st week. He actually had a pretty awesome game against the Rams.

All that being said, our biggest problem is a scheme that runs too many deep routes and QB that refuses to check down for some reason.

We can win a lot of games with this o-line if that is fixed.

Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 174
A
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
A
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 174
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I had a feeling my post would be completely ignored. It doesn't fit the narrative. rolleyes

I'm not sure what the "narrative" is, but here are some of my thoughts and a question I would appreciate your comments on, Versatile.

Thought: This past off-season, the Browns switched to an offensive scheme that emphasizes deeper passing routes and a vertical passing game.

Thought: Such an offensive scheme requires a stout offensive line that can hold pass blocks for a longer period of time.

Thought: For the entire off-season, the offensive line has had three serious question marks at right guard and both tackle positions.

Question: Was this a case of epic stupidity by the Browns offensive "brain trust"? Perhaps I am being way too simplistic and shallow, but I have to ask if this vertical passing offensive scheme is a terrible mismatch with the current O-Line personnel. It seems quite obvious, but I feel that I am missing something.

If I am missing something(s), then what am I missing?


Edit: I am not dismissing Baker having his own problems this year and instead blaming everything on the O-Line. I just want to achieve clarity about what O-Line / Offensive scheme mismatch issues actually exist, if they do. Once that is resolved, I am happy to discuss various Baker Mayfield problems and bad playcalling problems.

Last edited by AaigSuckinDawg; 09/24/19 09:07 PM.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
1) Hubbard has had a bad 3 weeks.
2) Bitonio had (understandably) a bad week against the Rams.
3) Our LG RG has looked less than average.
4) Greg Robinson has looked average.
5) Tretter had a bad 1st week. He actually had a pretty awesome game against the Rams.

All that being said, our biggest problem is a scheme that runs too many deep routes and QB that refuses to check down for some reason.

We can win a lot of games with this o-line if that is fixed.


Too late to edit. But Bitonio hasn't looked less than average other than last game. I meant Kush.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
I see many things and what I believe to be our biggest disadvantage is continuity.

As most of you know last season Hue was given the ax and most everyone blamed him for our lack of success, and while I believe there is much truth to that theory I believe lack of continuity is our biggest enemy.

For me I would have played these guys in pre season, I know the pre season is 3/4 speed but time playing together especially against teams like the Rams and Titan's puts us at a huge disadvantage. The lack of time in pre season I believe has worked against us. The double whammy is it didn't save us from injury either.

Baker has lost his safety blanket in Higgins and that has been a big negative and trading away Zietler has been a big negative. I won't argue that Vernon has bolstered the D Line but it weakened the O line and it created a continuity issue on the line. That and the competition at RG lingering to the end of camp all have worked against us.

It will get better unfortunately the start of our schedule has been and will be tough. At some point like a light switch it will all fall together, and then look out.

But continuity is our greatest enemy I think the talent is there now it just needs to blend together. Oh and play calling while I admit a draw on 4th and 9 is odd, its also gutsy, and it might have worked then what?

The 4 calls on the 4 were all good calls Baker missed the open receiver every time. I think he is pressing and just needs to relax a bit.

Also I think defenses are loading up the back end for several reasons mostly because Baker has proven that he will try to push the ball down the field when there are open plays underneath. When and I pray its soon he starts taking the underneath plays defenses will have to start balancing things out. But as long as he insists on pushing the ball down the field their going to load up on the back end.

JMHO


BTTB

AKA Upbeat Dawg

Can't believe I am in a group that is comprised of the best NOT just fans but people on the planet.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,483
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,483
Good points about continuity and Baker’s reluctance to check the ball down .. that was one of my worries when we acquired OBJ: that we will try to change things to force it down the field (last year we did a good job of spreading it out IMO)

The continuity thing won’t be solved until we actually work through this stuff; unfortunately, that’ll mean we’ll be like 1-6 or 2-7 and the season will be over


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I think the issues are multi-faceted. You should check out the Offensive Scheme thread. It answers many of the questions/situations you brought up. You should also check out the OP in this thread. It addresses the OL is indeed doing a good job. It talks about both Baker and Freddie saying that Baker is holding the ball too long. It brings up that other guys are open and Baker is looking for bigger plays. It does talk about Hubbard's struggles, but he didn't even play last game.

If you don't want to read that thread and OP in this thread, I would say that the scheme is part of the problem. The RT is part of the problem. Baker holding onto the ball is part of the problem. And that Baker abandoning clean pockets and moving into pressure is part of the problem.

I guess I got a little frustrated earlier when the OP detailed what was happening and how I tried to explain how hard it is for fans and media member to detect if the OL is playing good/bad and if the qb is holding onto the ball too long and right after that I read about how someone's eye says the OL is the problem. Whatever...

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
Good points about continuity and Baker’s reluctance to check the ball down .. that was one of my worries when we acquired OBJ: that we will try to change things to force it down the field (last year we did a good job of spreading it out IMO)

The continuity thing won’t be solved until we actually work through this stuff; unfortunately, that’ll mean we’ll be like 1-6 or 2-7 and the season will be over


I think things have gotten better the defense at this point has really come around in fact I think they are on the verge of being dominant.

For sure the offense is lagging behind but their not that far away either close doesn't cut it I know!

I think will be just fine I really do.


BTTB

AKA Upbeat Dawg

Can't believe I am in a group that is comprised of the best NOT just fans but people on the planet.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,687
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,687
Originally Posted By: Brown to the Bone
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
Good points about continuity and Baker’s reluctance to check the ball down .. that was one of my worries when we acquired OBJ: that we will try to change things to force it down the field (last year we did a good job of spreading it out IMO)

The continuity thing won’t be solved until we actually work through this stuff; unfortunately, that’ll mean we’ll be like 1-6 or 2-7 and the season will be over


I think things have gotten better the defense at this point has really come around in fact I think they are on the verge of being dominant.

For sure the offense is lagging behind but their not that far away either close doesn't cut it I know!

I think will be just fine I really do.


If people want to accuse me of derailing a thread after this post, then I'll be guilty as charged.

But you brought up a really good point about the defense. It seems they're starting to come together nicely... but moreso, last game showed that the bread and butter of this D is going to be the line. That Dline can (and should) be dominant game in and game out. Injuries very well could change that narrative, but even with the ENTIRE $&#@'ING secondary out of the game, the D put together a very good outing.

I'm kinda hoping that, as the year goes on, our DC gets the secondary dialed in and sorta 'turns them loose', if that makes sense. Secondary is playing kinda weird, given the talent they have back there.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,024
I don't think it's hard to detect if the OL is playing good or not. I think it's rather easy. It's clear that our OL is fine and that Baker is the issue. Anything contrary to this is defending the QB because he's the QB.

At this point, this is all we can hope for --

1. Baker gets better this season.
2. Freddie gets better this season.
3. If neither or only one of those happen, we have to hope that the organization stays the course in the offseason. I think the continuity that BTTB speaks of is very real.
4. Baker works hard this off season to really understand how to play the position. Last year he was playing with house money and no pressure. It is in all Browns fans best interest to hope last year was not a false positive. This includes Knight of Brown who seems to take great joy in wanting to be right that Baker sucks. I don't understand this because it's the worst possible outcome for any and all fans of the team.

The season is over if we lose on Sunday if we lose because Baker is still making the same mistakes that he made weeks 1-3. You will have 4 weeks of evidence of an outmatched coach and an outmatched QB who cannot fix issues during the week. It will take an off season to get them corrected.


LOL - The Rish will be upset with this news as well. KS just doesn't prioritize winning...
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,687
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,687
I'm sorry if I'm just parroting the same thing in each thread.

1. Baker's play is an issue, for sure. But he is the QB... he is OUR GUY (FQB), and he's a second year player. There's an argument to be made, in this case, for "defending the QB because he's the QB". He's not gonna get swapped out anytime soon (Exhibit A: our QB depth chart).

2. Freddie does need to get better. I'm not sure what that looks like right now, but I'd love for him to give the same treatment to this offense (whoever's offense it is) as he did to Haley's last year. I think we'll have to rack up a couple more losses to get to that point, though.


I think this offensive line is good enough to support a successful offense, but not if these long-developing plays are going to be a staple of said offense. If the offensive scheme requires the line to hold blocks for longer, then the line is going to be a weakness.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
This is a more complete article about the subject. I will copy and paste it, but it would be better to click on the link so you can see the chart and video.

Quote:

ClutchPoints



Cleveland Browns: The Offensive Line isn’t the Problem, Baker Mayfield is

by Sam Penix
September 25, 2019

The Cleveland Browns were getting Super Bowl hype prior to the 2019 NFL season. Three weeks in, the team is 1-2, and the offense is a disaster. 49 points have been scored in three games, 23 of those against the New York Jets sans Quinnen Williams and C.J. Mosley. The offensive line and head coach Freddie Kitchens are being blamed at the moment, and while both are part of the problem, neither is the biggest issue for the team right now; that would be quarterback Baker Mayfield.

After a great rookie season, Mayfield was expected to take a step forward in year two. After all, the Browns retained Kitchens, who engineered a brilliant offensive gameplan over the final eight games of 2018, hired offensive coordinator Todd Monken, who led a prolific passing attack in Tampa Bay, and added Odell Beckham Jr., one of the NFL’s premier wide receivers.

Things got off to a great start, as the Browns marched down the field and scored with ease on the starters’ lone drive in the first preseason game. But in the third preseason match, the offense struggled mightily.

That game ended up being indicative of regular season performance. Cleveland scored a touchdown on its first possession of 2019 against Tennessee, but did nothing else that afternoon, losing 43-13. Monday Night Football went much better, as the Browns pounded New York 23-3, although the offense was still out of rhythm. And despite a valiant effort from a banged up defense, Cleveland fell to the Los Angeles Rams, 20-13 in Week 3.

There are a number of disturbing trends with Mayfield that must be fixed if the Browns hope to come out of this gauntlet of games against good opponents with their playoff hopes still alive. But even though it’s clear Mayfield is not playing well, there are still many who would first blame the OL and Kitchens.

The line was considered to be an area of weakness heading into the season, and for good reason. First-round bust Greg Robinson was starting at left tackle, journeyman Eric Kush was replacing Kevin Zeitler, and Chris Hubbard was on the right side. But through three games, the OL is the least of Cleveland’s offensive issues. Keep in mind that these numbers are including last week’s game, where the line had to deal with the best player in football for 60 minutes.

The Browns rank third in the NFL in pass block win rate at 66%. A pass block win is defined as the offensive lineman holding his block for 2.5 seconds. Robinson, Joel Bitonio, and J.C. Tretter all rank within the top 10 at their respective positions with a 96% PBLKWR. That’s quite impressive, and means that for the most part, Mayfield should have enough time to throw the ball. The unit isn’t elite, but it also doesn’t have to be.

Kitchens was one of the NFL’s most creative playcallers in 2018, and that creativity seems to have disappeared so far this season. The Browns aren’t using motion, and long-developing vertical routes have become a staple, but Mayfield has been unable to get the ball to his targets on those plays. RPOs were very effective against Los Angeles, but the team moved away from them.

Some of Kitchens’ playcalling decisions have been questionable at best; RB draw on fourth and nine, not handing off to Nick Chubb on four straight plays at the five-yard-line, etc. But while Kitchens’ scheme may not be as electrifying as it was last year, it’s still getting guys open and giving Mayfield good opportunities to move the ball; he just isn’t taking advantage of them.

In 16.5 games (16 starts), Mayfield has completed 372 of 595 passes for 4,530 yards, 30 touchdowns, and 19 interceptions. Solid numbers, especially considering the situation he stepped into. But this season, he’s completed just 57% of his passes for 805 yards, three scores, and five picks. Skewed by the terrible fourth quarter against the Titans, but nonetheless poor. Mayfield has shown his pinpoint accuracy at times, but he’s not nearly as consistent as he should be. Basic stats don’t tell the whole story, however.

According to Pro Football Focus, Mayfield is responsible for four sacks, six hurries and 10 pressures so far this season. In all of 2018, he was charged with five sacks, three hits, seven hurries, and 15 pressures. His pocket awareness is extremely low right now. He doesn’t trust his line and scrambles out of the pocket to his right at the first sign of pressure, even if the pocket is still clean and he could have just stepped up into it. In Madden, he would have the paranoid QB sense pressure trait.

For reference, Baker finished last season with 18 marks in this advanced category. Bailing from the pocket throws off the receivers from their routes and forces them to work back across the field toward Mayfield, all in the amount of time that it takes a defender to close in on the QB.

Plenty of unnecessary incompletions have occurred because of this. When Mayfield actually goes through his full drop without scrambling, he often plants his back foot beyond where the tackles are ending their pass sets, meaning edge rushers have an easy arc to Mayfield, causing him to either be sacked, or step up and then scramble right again.

Even when Mayfield isn’t running around or taking sacks, he’s been ineffective from within the pocket. He’s missing open receivers, like Jarvis Landry on third-and-goal from the five against LAR. Or plays like these:

Mayfield is not seeing the field well right now. He isn’t anticipating his receivers getting open. And he isn’t reading the defense well. He’s getting confused by disguised coverage. Defenses are blitzing him less and dropping seven men into coverage, forcing Mayfield to pick them apart until he inevitably decides to roll right. This is one area where Kitchens can help out his young QB; by using more motion, the Browns can force the defense to reveal at least a bit of what they’re intending to do on a given play. This is a perfect example of motion working to Mayfield’s advantage:

As the tight end moves from right to left, the linebackers shift to the right; Mayfield can now infer that the TE will be matched up in man coverage. Jarvis Landry clears out the safety, and, as the play action clears the pocket for Mayfield, he is able to deliver a perfect throw right on time to Ricky Seals-Jones. This needs to happen much more often, whether it’s a TE, WR, or RB moving around.

Mayfield also must get the ball out quicker, and that’s another spot that can be helped by scheme. At one point against the Rams, Mayfield was 13 of 15 when throwing under 2.5 seconds, and 3/21 when throwing after 2.5 seconds. That’s a stark contrast, and a trend that has followed him since last season. Running more RPOs like the team did in the first half of Sunday night’s game will help with this.

But Mayfield also has to be able to sit in the pocket, diagnose a defense, and deliver the ball downfield. Otherwise, he won’t last long as a starter. But we’ve seen him do that time and time again; he just has to get back to doing that.

This is in no way meant to be a hit piece on Mayfield. He’s absolutely still the Browns franchise QB and an above average NFL QB. He’s just not playing like it right now for a number of reasons. And he’ll be the first person to admit that he isn’t playing up to par and needs to improve in order for his team to win. Mayfield’s fantastic rookie season wasn’t a fluke, but it’s up to him to prove it.


https://clutchpoints.com/cleveland-browns-the-offensive-line-isnt-the-problem-baker-mayfield-is/


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,653
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,653
A controversial heading for the article, no doubt will create some issues for posters.

It also seems somewhat skewed against Baker stats are quoted for the offensive line saying they're not to blame, but then only sights the performance of three of the offensive line. If either one of the other two people on the line fail at their job, then bake is going to be under pressure regardless of how well those three do. So that is grossly misleading in my opinion. Also the article pays no regard to a reference to a vertical passing game that takes longer to develop. We've discussed this I think most are on board Baker has a lot of room for improvement, in multiple areas... accuracy, reading the defense, taking the underneath open short receiver, and not running from a relatively clean pockets. But to suggest that all of the issue is on Baker and none of it is on the OL or play-calling is just wrong

Last edited by mgh888; 09/25/19 02:20 PM.

The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Did you actually click on the link and read the entire article? Your analysis of it doesn't seem to match-up. That was a good article that did question the playcalling and did say that the OL was not elite, but it used factual stats to support their claims.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
that was a good read. thanks

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I had a feeling my post would be completely ignored. It doesn't fit the narrative. rolleyes
I think a lot of it is bakers holding on to the ball. I don't think people are saying hes not and its SOLELY the oline.

But we can definitely improve (especially the right side) the line with better talent. With the right scheme they can hold the 2.5 or less. But there are going to be times - either it be baker holding the ball, or as we have discussed, the play needing to develop downfield that they will be needed to hold for longer, and this current line just cannot.

I think both are correct.

Baker is holding the ball too long and the line is not able to hold for the time we need.

Watch a few plays with Goff from last week. He had all day to throw on certain plays. We have not had that one time this year. they can hold 2.5, but that's about it.

They need to hold longer on occasion as well.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,296
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,296
Originally Posted By: mgh888
A controversial heading for the article, no doubt will create some issues for posters.

It also seems somewhat skewed against Baker stats are quoted for the offensive line saying they're not to blame, but then only sights the performance of three of the offensive line. If either one of the other two people on the line fail at their job, then bake is going to be under pressure regardless of how well those three do. So that is grossly misleading in my opinion. Also the article pays no regard to a reference to a vertical passing game that takes longer to develop. We've discussed this I think most are on board Baker has a lot of room for improvement, in multiple areas... accuracy, reading the defense, taking the underneath open short receiver, and not running from a relatively clean pockets. But to suggest that all of the issue is on Baker and none of it is on the OL or play-calling is just wrong


I think the article is well-written and the title very misleading. That doesn't take away from the points he makes...because they are pretty good...including the criticism of Baker. It's interesting that he chose that title and then told us how well 60% of the OLine was playing...without mentioning the other 40%. If you were getting back to health after an injury/surgery and your doctor asked how you feel...and you said 60% of you normal self...that could be a problem.

All of the symptoms he mentioned come to this quote at the end:

"But Mayfield also has to be able to sit in the pocket, diagnose a defense, and deliver the ball downfield. Otherwise, he won’t last long as a starter. But we’ve seen him do that time and time again; he just has to get back to doing that."

Like many Browns "issues" over the years...there are so many things in play that 'could' be the problem that pinning 'it' down to one thing - without consideration of the other things - is almost impossible.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I am not being combative, but I thought Baker generally had more time to throw than Goff in that game. I haven't researched it, though. Thus, I could be mistaken.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,483
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,483
J/c
I think our OL has been good enough with pass pro ... let’s not forget that Baker is running to the right when there’s nothing there yet too ... that comes across to the average viewer as a poor OL


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
The title was bad. And it was a very good article. I don't know if this is still the case, but back in the day when I knew about such things, the reporters would write the articles and the editor would write the title. That might explain some things.

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 450
B
1st String
Offline
1st String
B
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 450
Hey guys, don't know how masny remember me, but I was once known as rab, rabid, or rabidfan. lol It's been a long time since I've been here.

Anyways, to add my two pennies to this topic, I don't believe the OL was that bad in the first two games, of course, we can really set aside the Jets game since we won. The Titans game was a host of bad penalites and undiscipline the likes that I've never seen, plus, I also believe Baker was keying in on OBJ maybe a bit too much and he's been holding the ball a bit longer than he should be.

Now, as for the Rams, when I heard the amount of starters out, I was sure we'd get throttled, but we didn't, and credit that to a strong depth on defense and the DC. However, as well as the depth on DC played, the depth on OL was not so good, and I'm being kind. Baker was having to run for his life and sometimes he may have done so a bit earlier than needed but that's likely to losing trust in his line, however, I will give the OL credit for one thing, they did NOT allow Aaron Donald to takeover and destroy any chance of doing something.

Another issue was the lack of a safety valve WR for Baker, missing Njoku and Higgns really hurts, maybe not such a good idea to have traded DJ? Just a thought. I don't know the injury report but our OL needs to play well against the Ravens if we're to have any chance of winning. Baker needs to spread the ball around and we should try to establish a run game, which we've been good about doing under Kitchens.

Our D is still gonna have to play like they did against the Rams, can't take any time off, it's back to work and time to take care of business. Though I will say, Freddie's playcalling may need to be tweeked a bit, I'd really like to NOT see anymore 4th and 9 draw plays. ugh lol

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Welcome back, but the analytics of the Rams' game don't match up w/your claims.

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 450
B
1st String
Offline
1st String
B
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 450
Thanks Versitile, by all means, elaborate. What I saw was Baker scrambling around a lot, I'm sure some of it was on him, but some of it had to be the OL, even if they held Donald in check, for the most part.

I also saw Baker, at times, hold the ball too long, which I've seen a fair amount of that this season, so far.

I'm guessing you mean my offensive claims, since the D and ST played pretty well.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Sorry for not being clear. Much of your post was spot on. My apologies. I was simply talking about Baker having to run for his life. He had time to throw and he left some clean pockets that led to him being pressured.

Again, welcome back and your post was a good one. I apologize for not acknowledging that and for not being more clear.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I am not being combative, but I thought Baker generally had more time to throw than Goff in that game. I haven't researched it, though. Thus, I could be mistaken.

Perhaps but because of creative route trees, play calling, and defensive lapses, Goff threw a number of passes to guys who were WIDE WIDE WIDE open.. like, running all alone wide open. Baker rarely seems to get that option.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I think he does have guys open. He and Freddie even said that he did. I don't think they would lie about that.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,217
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,217
welcome back!!

Did you want your old account?


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 450
B
1st String
Offline
1st String
B
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 450
First, No need to apologize Versitile, just a friendly discussion, but thanks for elaborating, I was curious as to what you meant. lol

Second, Thanks PPE, if you can get me my old account, I'll gladly take it. I forgot all my login info. LOL

By the way, is Jules and AtomicDawg around anymore?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,217
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,217
Jules is around, but I haven't seen Atomic posting in a while frown
Hope she's at least lurking smile

I'll try to dig up your account.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Offensive line not to blame for Cleveland Browns offensive woes

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5