Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
I think taking away their right to drive


There is no such thing.

What is happening is they are denying the privilege of legally driving to people who are unable to prove that they reside here legally.





Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
Their children do. Most illegals have jobs and are paying taxes.

Undocumented immigrants are paying their taxes today, too

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/15/us/taxes-undocumented-immigrants/index.html

Actually billions of dollars in taxes.

Look, I wish there weren't illegals here. I wish everyone would come here legally. But one thing I'm sure of. With over 11,000,000 of them here, that ship has sailed.

And yes, when I had a paper route, worked for farmers and was very young, I worked close enough to walk and ride a bike to work. But don't you think you're being just a tad silly to think that most people these days can do that and support a family?

I'm trying to take a reasonable look at the problem as it stands. Not try and make the current situation even worse.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
Yeah, i mixed up right with privilege. My mistake. But my point still stands. We will actually be losing tax dollars by doing this.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Quote:
Most illegals have jobs and are paying taxes.
So it sounds like some would rather illegals just pay taxes, and get no rights then. . . I am confused. You see, in one hand, a group is saying that illegals do not receive benefits. Then on the other hand, when it suits their story - they do receive benefits.

How are they paying taxes without a SSN? I always wondered this.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
I sincerely doubt it. Not having a drivers license isn't going to stop them from driving.

They already entered and reside in the country illegally.... why on earth would not having a driver's license prevent them from driving?


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Their children do. Most illegals have jobs and are paying taxes.

Undocumented immigrants are paying their taxes today, too

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/15/us/taxes-undocumented-immigrants/index.html

Actually billions of dollars in taxes.

Look, I wish there weren't illegals here. I wish everyone would come here legally. But one thing I'm sure of. With over 11,000,000 of them here, that ship has sailed.

And yes, when I had a paper route, worked for farmers and was very young, I worked close enough to walk and ride a bike to work. But don't you think you're being just a tad silly to think that most people these days can do that and support a family?

I'm trying to take a reasonable look at the problem as it stands. Not try and make the current situation even worse.



I find it absolutely unreasonable to accept that the difficulties they face due to being here illegally warrant everyone else adopting changes to OUR laws to accommodate them to make things easier on them after they violated laws to be here in the first place.

That is not how things work. That is not how you become part of a society and a new country.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
Because the moment you get pulled over there's trouble. It may not stop them. But then you just opened another can of worms. Paying to keep them in jail while losing tax money they would be paying by working.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
Well all we have to do is change 11,000,000 million people. You do realize they ended prohibition because they simply couldn't enforce it and wanted the tax money right? wink


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Because the moment you get pulled over there's trouble. It may not stop them. But then you just opened another can of worms. Paying to keep them in jail while losing tax money they would be paying by working.


So, your response to people coming here illegally, the people you wish weren't here illegally, is to shrug your shoulders and aid them in hiding the fact that they are here illegally.

Freaking brilliant.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Well all we have to do is change 11,000,000 million people.


We don't change anyone; starting with ourselves.
It is not incumbent upon us to accommodate them with special treatment in any way, ever.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Well all we have to do is change 11,000,000 million people. You do realize they ended prohibition because they simply couldn't enforce it and wanted the tax money right? wink


Your last few responses sound an awful lot like your solution to the problem is to legally mandate giving up on the problem.

That's not a solution, that's a capitulation.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
I try to be reasonable. They aren't going anywhere. As it is you either want them to at least be paying taxes until it all gets sorted out or you don't. It's not so much about giving them aid. It's about making it easier for them to work and pay taxes which helps every tax payer. Taking money out of the tax base isn't a productive way of going about things any way you look at it.

Costing the court system and jail system while losing that tax money is a double whammy. Sometimes one can bite their nose off to spite their face.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Quote:
It's not so much about giving them aid.


Regardless of imagined intent, it remains that this is the precise effect.

And, we've covered the tax argument.... no taxes are being lost because it is NOT going to stop them from driving. Pretending that it will is just disingenuous. And tiresome.


They are not going away - that much is true.
That is NOT, in any way, an argument or justification for simply throwing in the towel and giving in. It does not indemnify them, it does not validate their presence, it does not justify attempts to legitimize them.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
but the government has a long history of throwing the towel in and giving in, regardless on if you agree with them doing it or not.

the government had a REALLY good argument and justification for throwing in the towel during prohibition.

it didnt freaking work. same thing with the drug war.

and lets not forget, they threw in the towel in the 80's under republican jesus.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
i mean bro, we were all like "we dont negotiate with terrorist"

and now look. we're about to make a deal with the freaking taliban.

if that aint throwing in the towel, and having a good justification for it, i dunno what is.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
J/C

Anyone want to answer the question I posted?

"How are they paying taxes without a SSN? I always wondered this."

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: Swish
but the government has a long history of throwing the towel in and giving in, regardless on if you agree with them doing it or not.

the government had a REALLY good argument and justification for throwing in the towel during prohibition.

it didnt freaking work. same thing with the drug war.

and lets not forget, they threw in the towel in the 80's under republican jesus.
The government works for its citizens. If the citizens do not want prohibition, the government is to vote that way.

when the majority of America wants open boarders and no immigration laws, they can vote that way. Last poll I saw, the majority of voters and citizens want boarders and laws.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Originally Posted By: willitevachange
J/C

Anyone want to answer the question I posted?

"How are they paying taxes without a SSN? I always wondered this."


you never heard of an ITIN? and you worked in banking? jesus dude....


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Originally Posted By: willitevachange
Originally Posted By: Swish
but the government has a long history of throwing the towel in and giving in, regardless on if you agree with them doing it or not.

the government had a REALLY good argument and justification for throwing in the towel during prohibition.

it didnt freaking work. same thing with the drug war.

and lets not forget, they threw in the towel in the 80's under republican jesus.
The government works for its citizens. If the citizens do not want prohibition, the government is to vote that way.

when the majority of America wants open boarders and no immigration laws, they can vote that way. Last poll I saw, the majority of voters and citizens want boarders and laws.


look i want snowboarders too bro but kinda hard to have slopes in Texas.

also, the majority of the american people want a lot of things that we never get, and DONT want a lot of things that we always seem to get.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
also, the tax counter is a bit odd to me.

we pay taxes on everything we buy. are illegals somehow exempt from taxes when they pay for a product in target or walmart that im not aware of?

when they pay the transaction feeds at western union or such, are those fees not going toward taxes?

we pay taxes on anything we purchase, and so does illegals.

again, as everybody should've seen in my first post, i dont think we should be giving them L's.

but all the other arguments based around this specific topic is....lol.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,960
Likes: 768
So, that's now just the answer to everything, then?
Because it has happened with other subjects, that is how we should handle everything?


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
that certainly seems to be the government's way of handling things.

but then thats the thing. i mean you brought up justifications and arguments, right?

so lets take it step by step. we're knee deep in the prohibition era. what would Purp had done differently than the governments solution of saying "screw it, make it legal"?

and you can't go "i wouldnt had prohibited it to begin with". youre knee deep in the peak of prohibition. what do you do?

and why would it work?


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
j/c:

I've always marveled about how upset some folks get about folks moving to a new location in order to pursue a better opportunity. I am fairly confident that most of our ancestors moved here from another land and stole it from the indigenous. Hell, we not only tried to work in this area, but we murdered them en masse and stole almost everything they had...........whether it be land or culture.

The second thing that draws my attention is how people complain about the cost of fruit and vegetables, yet want to keep out the people that are desperate enough to cultivate them.

Most folks are too good for service jobs, but not the illegal immigrants They work their asses off for peanuts.

My conclusion is that that many folks are short-sighted due to their ingrained biases.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,699
Likes: 675
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,699
Likes: 675
Wow Vers, it seems like you and I either 100% agree on something or 100% disagree. I happen to agree with this post.


Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
j/c:

We are outraged about foreign people having the audacity to want to drive in across "our" land, yet........

Quote:
Chief Joseph: The Tragic Journey That Led to His Famous Surrender

On October 5, 1877 Chief Joseph and his tribe the Nez Perce surrendered to the U.S. Army. Learn about the tribe’s way of life and their final act of defiance.

B. Myint
Updated:
Jun 17, 2019
Original:
Oct 4, 2015

Icons of the Wild West: Chief Joseph



It was called the Nez Perce War, but for the native people of the Wallowa Valley, it was a fight for survival. In 1877 the federal government pressured the Nez Perce to give up millions of acres of their homelands to the feed the gold rush. Refusing to be forced onto a reservation, a band of about 700 men, women, children, and elders treked 1,400 miles from what is now eastern Oregon, crossing through Idaho, Montana and Wyoming in an attempt to reach Canada. Along the way, they faced exhaustion and starvation while battling 2,000 U.S. soldiers.

Sadly, they never reached their goal. Just 40 miles shy of the Canadian border, the group found themselves surrounded by the U.S. Army. By then, the frigid weather, dwindling supplies, and endless miles of merciless terrain had taken its toll. On this day in 1877, the war ended when Chief Joseph surrendered to U.S. General Nelson A. Miles, famously uttering: "From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."
Nez Perce Warrior Photo



They call themselves Nimipu, the real people. Long before white settlers ventured into their territory, the Nez Perce occupied an estimated 28,000 square miles. Experts at breeding horses, they climbed atop their appaloosas and roamed across the vast stretches of grasslands west of the Rocky Mountains. Throughout the year, they would travel to where food was most available; crossing the Bitterroot Mountains to hunt buffalo, salmon fishing in the Columbia River, and harvesting camas root near the Clearwater River.

Named Nez Perce by French Canadian fur traders, the tribe had peaceful relationships with outsiders. When Lewis and Clark first met the Nez Perce in 1805, the weary and hungry explorers were greeted with a meal of buffalo, dried salmon, and camas bread. The tribe enjoyed strong relationships with members of their expedition, exchanging gifts and passing on local knowledge, such as canoe building.



But eventually those relationships began to fray. Although they had welcomed traders, missionaries, and explorers, the Nez Perce soon felt the oncoming tidal wave as more whites began to appear, attracted by the rich resources of their ancestral home. Chief Joseph once remarked: “It has always been the pride of the Nez Perce that they were the friends of the white men. But we soon found that the white men were growing very rich very fast and were greedy to possess everything the Indian had."

In 1855, the chiefs grudgingly signed a treaty with the U.S. government, giving them a reservation that included most of their traditional homelands. But soon after, gold was found within their territory -- a tragic discovery for the Nez Perce. Tens of thousands of Americans rushed to their reservation, in violation of the treaty. The U.S. government pressured the tribe to sign a new treaty, which took away 90% of the land away from the tribe. Some groups complied. Others, including Chief Joseph’s group, did not. Forced to leave the land of their ancestors, the group was relocated to Idaho. Along their journey, three young Nez Perce warriors, were believed to have massacred a band of white settlers. Fearing retaliation by the U.S. Army, the chief helped lead one of the great retreats in American military history.

Although it was a victory for the U.S. Army, for the Nez Perce the war was a tragedy. Forced to leave the land of their ancestors, the group journeyed through unforgiving wilderness for over three months. Many were killed, horses were lost, and members of the tribe were eventually taken prisoner or sent into exile.

Even today, Chief Joseph's famous surrender speech immortalizes him as a great leader during a deeply tragic time:







I am tired of fighting. Our chiefs are killed. Looking Glass is dead. Toohoolhoolzote is dead. The old men are all dead. It is the young men who say, "Yes" or "No." He who led the young men [Olikut] is dead. It is cold, and we have no blankets. The little children are freezing to death. My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food. No one knows where they are -- perhaps freezing to death. I want to have time to look for my children, and see how many of them I can find. Maybe I shall find them among the dead. Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired. My heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands I will fight no more forever.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
j/c:

I've always marveled about how upset some folks get about folks moving to a new location in order to pursue a better opportunity. I am fairly confident that most of our ancestors moved here from another land and stole it from the indigenous. Hell, we not only tried to work in this area, but we murdered them en masse and stole almost everything they had...........whether it be land or culture.



Just to play devil's advocate.

I'm pretty sure the indigenous people fought back best they could at the time.
I'd even be willing to bet that some tribes were more of an attitude that they'd be willing to share the land, if the white man wouldn't just force everything to be his way.

Sounds a lot like the current events.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted By: Swish
Originally Posted By: willitevachange
J/C

Anyone want to answer the question I posted?

"How are they paying taxes without a SSN? I always wondered this."


you never heard of an ITIN? and you worked in banking? jesus dude....


I don't think you know what a ITIN is, or they are not used for identification or purposes of work authorization - or used to be allowed for a banking account. But keep on keeping on. smile


Nice try though. thumbsup

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
edit: i saw your trash ass post before you edited cause you knew you were dead wrong lmfao

Many immigrants have ITINs. People who do not have a lawful status in the United States may obtain an ITIN. In addition, the following people are lawfully in the country and must pay taxes but may not be eligible for a SSN and may obtain an ITIN:

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.o...ion-number-itin

Can an illegal immigrant get an ITIN number?
The IRS created the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) program in 1996 to provide a way for foreign nationals to pay taxes on money earned in the United States. But what about people who are not in the country lawfully? Even if you didn’t enter the country through legal means, you’re still required to report earnings and pay your fair share, and the way you do that is by filling out an ITIN application.

https://www.itin-w7-application.com/faqs/can-illegal-immigrant-get-itin-number

again, you work in banking and dont know how the ITIN works?

sad.

wanna know how i know? when i was stationed in germany, my wife needed an ITIN number so i can file tax returns. which means somebody like you in the industry you worked in shouldve known how it works.

so yes, they use ITIN's to pay taxes in this country.

ALSO, i listed multiple ways illegals pay taxes; from shopping to purchasing services.

ALSO, they contribute to our taxes by generating income for the companies that they work for. they contribute to our GDP, and:

If all undocumented immigrants were deported today, next year’s Social Security trust funds would have approximately $13 billion less for benefit payouts. It’s a considerable loss of dollars, especially when it’s projected that the Social Security funds will be depleted by 2034.

According to New American Economy, undocumented immigrants contributed $13 billion into the Social Security funds in 2016 and $3 billion to Medicare. Three years prior, the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration, Stephen Goss, wrote a report that estimated undocumented immigrants contributed $12 billion into Social Security.

https://www.marketplace.org/2019/01/28/u...and-receive-no/

lol, educate yourself. because you clearly arent educated on the topic.

Last edited by Swish; 02/28/20 09:45 AM.

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Quote:
again, you work in banking and dont know how the ITIN works?
There is not a single bank I have worked for in 10 years, that have allowed just ITINs to be used for opening a bank account. Banks do not deal with tax laws, in fact - I am required to pronounce this anytime I receive a question when it comes to taxes. "Mr. Member, I have to advise to consult a tax professional for that question."

Your big banks may (AMEX, Chase, Citi), but I would venture that the VAST majority of your local banks, savings and loans, and credit unions do not - unless you are in a sanctuary I would assume.

IN the 10 years I have been in banking, if you have ITIN, you must provide PROOF of legal right to be in the US along with it. H1B VISA for example. Along with proof of being in the country legally, you must provide valid physical residential address, and additional government issued photo identification. (see why the driver's license thing is a concern thumbsup


So no, I would not deal with ITINS as it pertains to illegal immigrants in banking, as NO BANK I have worked at has ever knowingly allowed an illegal to have a bank account using an ITIN.

Quote:
undocumented immigrants contributed $13 billion into the Social Security funds in 2016 and $3 billion to Medicare.
Those are pretty big numbers there, Tex. I wonder - what was the net after amount after you factor in how much illegals received in various welfare programs?

No one knows technically - but :

.....a 2007 report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office examined 29 reports on state and local costs published over 15 years in an attempt to answer this question. CBO concluded that most of the estimates determined that illegal immigrants impose a net cost to state and local governments

***What I find hilarious, is that the main argument you guys are making is that illegals pay alllll this money into the system, and receive little benefits (which is debated, as I showed above they impose a net cost).

But lets say they pay more than they take.

What you are arguing, is that "why do we want them to be citizens, we are getting money off them!"

Now, does that sound humane? So you and others are advocating that we just let these poor illegal families pay into the system, over and over again, to receive no benefits from it. What shame you people are. You ought to be disgusted you want to treat people like that, to use them simply for the added revenue they are producing.

You see, most of us would rather them be legal citizens, to enjoy and receive all the benefits our great country has to offer. While some of you rather them stay slave to the current tendencies of being nothing more than a dollar to you. tsktsk




Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
well, silly me for thinking your bank would require you to understand how the ITIN works, regardless on if you accept it or not for illegals.

also, according to regs, illegals can use their foreign ID cards as proof of identification when opening accounts. so having a US drivers license isnt gonna have that much of an impact in accounts being opened.

lets move on from that. but i hope you now understand that illegals DO pay taxes by way of ITINs now.

state and local governments having a net negative impact from illegals is something i wont argue with.

however, the counter point is this: how many of those states already struggle with their own legal population? we have a ton of states who take in more federal money than they pay out. so for some states its a net negative. there's a lot of states in this country who need illegals simply to produce for their GDP, or they'd be worse off than they are now.

what about the country as a whole? if you take into all the factors, both good and bad, whats the result?

i dunno if there's been a credible study on that. i would love it the government did it.

and please dont come with this "humane" BS, willit. you support deregulation and such that has devastated our communities by rich people taking jobs from the US and giving them to foreigners thousands of miles away.

the humane thing IS to keep them here, because its SAFER for them here than where they come from, where they are at severe risk of getting murdered by cartels and women and children being human trafficked, which happens all the time.

i would like them to be legal citizens as well, but unfortunately the way the immigration system is set up....that aint gonna happen anytime soon. so the next best thing is to...kick the can down the road.



“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
I am perfectly ok having a discussing, but making it a piss in match it not something I care to really do. Tired of the "gotcha" post on here. So lets both stop the snarky back and forth and discuss like adults - as I think you and I agree with more than you might think in general.

Quote:
however, the counter point is this: how many of those states already struggle with their own legal population?
This is absolutely a problem in a LOT of areas, and a lot of HEAVILY RED and HEAVILY BLUE areas. Its also been funny to me, that it seems like the cities and areas that are VASTLY right or left - are typically the areas that have problems financially. Weird huh?

Think about the ironies below:

Bumpile alabama probably has the highest rate of Obama care receipients and have a ton of welfare abusers, yet scream about them all the time.

LA I would argue has this issue as well, and the left screams about wealth inequality, yet their flagship city has the largest wealth inequality probably in the world. lol.

But back to your statement quoted above, why add to it?

Quote:
there's a lot of states in this country who need illegals simply to produce for their GDP, or they'd be worse off than they are now.
I don't like this line of thinking. Not arguing its false, but I truly do not want the reason to have illegal immigrants here simply because "they produce for their GDP".

Pitt and I discussed before, I believe BUSINESS' should be highly penalized for the use of illegal immigrant labor. Its taking advantage of people, plain and simple.

Quote:
and please dont come with this "humane" BS, willit
I addressed that above, I was taking a shot at a gotcha moment at you. We go back and forth, I know your a decent guy though. I know your a family man. It was a low blow, I apologize for that.

Quote:
you support deregulation and such that has devastated our communities by rich people taking jobs from the US and giving them to foreigners thousands of miles away.
I will differ on this, I believe that REGULATIONS are the reasons business are taking their work outside of the country. Needless red tape, attorney's, and idiotic guidelines have made business very costly to conduct in the US. Sure, there are other reasons to factor - there is never a single reason for anything - but its a big reason.

I will give you an example. I am in banking. Lets look at the Frank Dodd Act. In theory, it has a lot of great parts. Prevents banks from getting too big to fail, etc. I will even admit it did some good. But the problem with that act, was that it put a VERY large expense on banks to adhere to the guidelines set in it. Banks had to rewrite policy, adjust their lending guidelines, rework their products, hire attorneys, litigation fees, etc. So your smaller banks - they really couldn't afford this. Thousands if not more went under, and then you were left with - well, mainly the too big to fail banks lol.

Now, I don't believe that there should be 0 regulations, either. I am for common sense regulations.

Quote:

the humane thing IS to keep them here,
I have never once argued that we deport the illegal immigrants here. I think there is a big misconception with a lot of people on the board that argue against illegal immigration. Although I am against illegal immigration, I absolutely understand you cannot just pick up 11 million people and boot them out, you literally physically cannot, even IF I wanted to do that. lol.

We have to come up with a way to figure that out. either by giving them a pathway to citizenship, or allowing them become citizens X where they have just about the same rights - minus the right to vote. Because lets face it, for the left and right politicians, that's the issue. While we sit here an argue whats best to do for THEM as a people - they are arguing how to make it so it benefits keeping them in power.

Quote:

i would like them to be legal citizens as well, but unfortunately the way the immigration system is set up....that aint gonna happen anytime soon. so the next best thing is to...kick the can down the road.
This is answered as part of my above reply.

I am tired of kicking the can down the road man. That literally is what both sides want. They just want to keep kicking so you, me, clem, 40, all keep on keeping on fighting back and forth while they all pretend to care about "what is right". Im gonna let you in a secret, bro.

While we are arguing on this board, they are on TV fighting back and forth - I would not be surprised in ol' Nancy and trump turn the camera off, have a glass of whiskey together and laugh as they all count the money they are getting together.

You see, most people see left and right politicians. I see one group working together to keep us all down and fighting while they abuse the power we give them.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 68,198
Likes: 1367
Originally Posted By: willitevachange
The government works for its citizens. If the citizens do not want prohibition, the government is to vote that way.

when the majority of America wants open boarders and no immigration laws, they can vote that way. Last poll I saw, the majority of voters and citizens want boarders and laws.


If that's the criteria you wish to use, you're not going to be happy with the new gun laws. wink


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,494
Likes: 728
Im fine with moving on. You’re a cool dude so let’s save the pettiness for those who deserve it.

I don’t want to kick the can down the road either, but we have very few people advocating for change that will actually make a difference.

We have to a variable payment system for green cards. We can’t expect people from central/South America to have the same amount of disposable income as somebody from a Western European country. It’s a lot easier to shell out 2400+ for a European than it is for latinos from South America. Trump adding the public charge policy is fine.

But overall his administration is trash on this, as every other presidents has been.

As far as businesses go.....it’s complicated. We have to remember, it’s not like our own fellow Americans are oh so noble. We got people who straight refuse to do the work, and won’t do it even if you pay them 15 a hour because of some sense of entitlement. And even you would agree that the entitlement in this country transcends race and class.

Business have a lot of responsibility as well in this situation, as in some industries it has driven down wages, but overall, some of these companies are in the “if I don’t hire illegals, I can’t operate my business” cause we got clowns who ghost interviews now in this country, nevermind actually show up for work.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Republicans introduce bill to pull funds from states that give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5