One is an old man who has early on set dementia which is actually kind of sad. The other is a bitter, angry old man who is in love with Karl Marx. Oh what a quandary we've gotten ourselves into.
I may be alone and that is okay, but I am very perturbed that the Dems are not supporting Warren. We will never win the working class w/a guy like Bernie. Biden has a chance, but the dude is such a phony and unstable.
Swish tried to explain it to me, but I just don't get why Warren wouldn't be our best bet?
One is an old man who has early on set dementia which is actually kind of sad. The other is a bitter, angry old man who is in love with Karl Marx. Oh what a quandary we've gotten ourselves into.
One is an old man who has early on set dementia which is actually kind of sad. The other is a bitter, angry old man who is in love with Karl Marx. Oh what a quandary we've gotten ourselves into.
So glad we have Trump, THANK GOD!
And who is your candidate? Trump? A guy who bullies people. A guy who gets on twitter and sounds like a late-night drunk? A guy who has divided the country? A guy who caters to big business?
Once again, both presidential candidates are going to suck ass! Bernie and Trump. Probably similar to a movie tag, such as Milo and Otis.
One is an old man who has early on set dementia which is actually kind of sad. The other is a bitter, angry old man who is in love with Karl Marx. Oh what a quandary we've gotten ourselves into.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Edit: why do you keep editing your post over and over? Say what you mean. Don’t be scared.
Last edited by Swish; 03/02/2010:55 AM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
And orange isn’t a skin tone. It’s a bad spray tan.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
they are HIGHLY skeptical of another white dude with a savior complex.
That says it all right there. Something or someone new/different scares them, so they double down on the devils they know. Sounds like republicans to me.
i made a joke and you decided to dissect the comment like we're in a lab.
lol man youre stiff.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
as soon as you deal with racism in your trash ass religion, then ill get right on it.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
does Pete's supporters go to Klobuchar, Biden, Warren, or Bernie.
it was crazy cause Pete didnt even have all that much support from the LBGT community. it will be interesting how the votes turn out tomorrow.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
unfortunately i can see Tulsi trying to run 3rd party and screwing everything else, since she's a republican in Dems clothing.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Using your logic, the Democratic Party is racist, because Southern Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act in the 60s. So if your argument is that Christianity is racist because some Christians were racist, then the same is true for the Democratic party
i also think Bloomberg might end up throwing cash toward bernie during the generals.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
No I’m actually laughing. Christianity is racist because some “professed” Christians in US History were racist, you argue. Well now replace the words “Christianiity” and “Christians with Democratic Party and Democrats, and then think Southern Democrats in 1960’s, and by your logic the Democratic Party is racist and anti civil rights
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Swish is speechless. He just found out that in accusing my religion, he accused his party of racism, if you follow what he said to its logical conclusion
oh im not speechless, its just pointless arguing with a guy who got triggered by:
i hate orange people lol
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
oh im not speechless, its just pointless arguing with a guy who got triggered by:
i hate orange people lol
I am not triggered, I am amused. Since you are a person who uses stereotypes and faulty generalizations that when applied the other way condemn your entire party
The orange thing was nothing. Your argument that Christianity is racist is hilarious, because when your argument is applied to the Democratic Party, it can be said that Democrats are anti civil rights
i never argued that the democrats didnt have a racist past.
and thats whats funny about it. i know they have a racist past. youre the one got butthurt about my comments toward christianity.
you cant even point to a single exchange where i denied such a past, and yet here you are: butthurt that i once again knocked your religion.
you're spreading a false narrative over something that was never claimed. think about how hilariously dumb that is.
i hate orange people lol
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/PortlandDawg/banner.jpg)
