DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Chief Justice Rebukes Schumer Over Comments

I see all that basic math hasn't helped your cognitive distortions.

We would rather see you do that too.

You should actually try that some time.

So trump saying two SC justices should recuse themselves from cases involving him is the same thing as Chuckles threatening two judges about how he presumes there going to rule in a case in front of the sc right now ...

Other than in TDS world ... how is that the same thing? ... and I’m the one with a cognitive distortion issue ... ...

Please please please help me see what it is i am missing here ... cause the facts back me 100% on this one ... unless of course TDS has taken over your cognitive reasoning capability ... like we all don’t know the answer to that one ...

COCO PUFFS on this one ...

Trump demagogue syndrome?

I'm telling you all right now, if I contract the Coronavirus, I'm going to not wash my hands at all. Then I'll attend every MAGA Rally I can get to.

That will make you the new, "enemy of the people".

March 7, 2020

Gun Owners of America uses Alinsky tactics against Sen. Chuck Schumer

By Andrea Widburg



Saul Alinsky may have written his Rules for Radicals to give leftists an advantage in the battle for America’s soul, but that doesn’t mean that the rules aren’t tactically wise. On Friday, Gun Owners of America (“GOA”) decided to put into play several of those rules when it asked to have Sen. Chuck Schumer “red-flagged” as a potentially dangerous person.

GOA’s request focuses on the fact that, on Wednesday, while speaking to protesters at a Planned Parenthood rally outside of the Supreme Court, Schumer sent a direct message to Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh:

I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.

Schumer claimed, of course, that the words weren’t a threat and that he never intended them to be. Speaking on the Senate floor, he explained that they were just the way Brooklyners talk and, in any event, it was all the Republicans’ fault that anyone got upset:

Of course, I didn’t intend to suggest anything other than political and public opinion consequences for the Supreme Court, and it is a gross distortion to imply otherwise. I’m from Brooklyn. We speak in strong language. I shouldn’t have used the words I did, but in no way was I making a threat. I never, never would do such a thing, and Leader McConnell knows that. And Republicans who were busy manufacturing outrage over these comments know that, too.

Maybe people in Brooklyn do speak that way, but Chief Justice Roberts made it clear that he did not understand the words to be mere tough-guy rhetoric. Instead, he took the unusual step of issuing a sharp reprimand against “threatening statements” that were “dangerous”:

Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter.

Empty apologies and toothless reprimands were not enough for the fine people at GOA, though. Instead, consciously or not, they remembered a few key Rules for Radicals:

4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

[snip]

8. “Keep the pressure on.”

[snip]

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

With that in mind, on Friday GOA sent a letter to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo asking that he enforce New York’s newly enacted “Red Flag” law. That law, as Cuomo’s website states, “prevents individuals who show signs of being a threat to themselves or others from purchasing or possessing any kind of firearm.”

The letter repeats Schumer’s speech and Chief Justice Roberts’ description of it as “threatening” and “dangerous.” GOA notes that one of the statutory factors for issuing a red flag order is “a threat . . . directed toward . . . another person.” 2019 NY CPLR § 6342.

Moreover, it turns out that federal law also makes illegal Schumer’s conduct. Thus, GOA informs Cuomo that 40 U.S.C. § 6134 makes it unlawful to “make a harangue or oration, or utter loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court Building or grounds.” Schumer made his speech on Supreme Court grounds.

You can and should read the whole letter here. You will enjoy it. In addition to the letter, GOA filled out an Application for a Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order, which you can see here.

This is New York state’s opportunity to prove that the law in New York applies both to rich and poor, powerful and weak. Will anyone be surprised if New York fails this test?

A copy of the letter can be seen at link.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/202...ck_schumer.html

Boo Hoo ....Chuck Schumer spoke up...oh the humanity!


Funniest thread Evah. Chuck Schumer spoke his mind. And they all get triggered.

Talk about weak. Can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen ladies.

#snowflakes

Remember that time that Donald Trump said that Sotomayor and RBG should recuse themselves from anything that has to do with him? And remember that time when John Roberts spoke up about it to Trump?

Oh wait, Roberts was asleep at the switch on that one.

60 million unwanted children not brought into the world under circumstances that would have likely caused them and society as a whole much strife. Bullet(s) dodged.

Well we all know bullets and guns killing people is okay.

Yes, they will do anything to keep murdering the babies.

150,000,000 correct? Poor uncle Joe

Crickets lol

Now that half the US population has been terminated, free healthcare should be a breeze

I’d rather have a president misspeak than to hear trump’s delusional, nonsensical, narcissistic, word salad every time he opens his face hole...

What president misspoke?

Are you referring to the ex Vice President perhaps?

Crazy Joe...possibly the dem nominee lol

[quote] What president misspoke {/quote]

You just read (I assume) what Trump said and the only question you have is "what president misspoke?" Seriously

Must be they speak the same language.

Can you imagine...150,000,000 million people? Who would have thunk it? That should free up a lot of funding for Uncle Joe to spend on the best lawyers in the land for kiddo and probably him as well. Perhaps he really didn’t know where the millions came from...it is Uncle Joe after all

Yet you support a dementia patient now.

No comparison and you know it. You hate him and his policies, but the man certainly doesn’t suffer from mental decline...once again, even if you don’t like him or his policies and quirks, it doesn’t fit your dementia agenda

Chuck U Schumer should have been jailed for his thuggish comments.

Chuck U Chucky!

I will probably get banned again now lol

He needs to get "chucked" at the next election, but he probably won't.

Nah, someone got really vulgar with me and nothing happened when I reported it. If they ban you for that little thing, that would be double standards.

He is?

Did you know, Chuck Schumer’s Name Literally Means “Good For Nothing”, “Vagabond”? It's true!

I did not realize that, but very understandable...he is good for nothing

Still the fake outrage. Hilarious.

It's a fake as your outrage over Trump.

I agree with you, 100%. There are several others on here that can't differentiate between their hatred of Trump, and facts. I just wish you wouldn't quote the person you did, as that allows me to see his crap, and what aboutisms.

And as fake as your non outrage over Barr lying to the world about the Mueller report and being called out by a federal judge who says Barr can't be trusted with regard to any public comment or ruling on the Mueller report.

Some me one time you've ever seen me post a thing about Barr.

No need to attempt an objective conversation with this dude. Don’t waste your time

Referring to MG not you Tulsa