What you trump concubines forget is for many of us trump is so loathsome he’s easy to hate. It takes no energy to fully despise such an awful human. I don’t have to even think about it. Or exert any energy. It’s just natural for anyone that can see him for what he is. A fraud of a human. You all act like it’s hard, or takes effort.
It takes hatred ... hatred is not healthy no matter how easy it comes ... u oughta know that ..
I loathed O as much as y’all do Trump but i never hated the guy and gave him credit when i thought he did something good ...
trump brings thousands of jobs back to this country and y’all can’t even give him credit for that ... y’all argue its an extension of O’s economy .. u have any clue how stupid it is to to think that for those of us that have an ounce of business sense ... There’s a reason the market took off election night ... I actually gave O credit for his limp along economy ... thats what it was ...
He’s given more money to historically black colleges than O did ... he has created opportunity zones that are bringing jobs back to the inner cities to help all the unfortunate folks living in those situations ... he got the first step act through .... ZERO CREDIT FOR ANY OF THE ABOVE ...
Its one thing to dislike him like i did O ... its another thing to hate trump so much u can not give him credit for anything ... U have to IGNORE an awful lot to not give Trump credit for many things he’s done .... U can’t even be intellectually honest when it comes to him ... and your proud of being a closed minded bigot ... something y’all say u hate and fight against ...
You may have not liked President Obama’s policies but he wasn’t a trash human. trump is garbage. A lying, cheating, scumbag of a human. I don’t like his policies but I loathe him as a human. Have since he made my skin crawl in the 80’s. I may have been a teen but I could see him for the snake he was, and still is.
You still haven't figured out who the deep state is have you? Let me give you a hint. You supported it with your vote in 2016 and it seems you plan to do it again.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
I don't give a damn who they vote for as long as Trump loses. And you guys trying to push this poor poor Flynn crap are full of it. Barr is a sleazy scumbag and just let Flynn off the hook for crimes. He was next to treasonous talking to the Russians and putting the fix in on our elections. AND don't give me crap about that didn't happen because it damn well did and you know it. Stone is another that should hang for treason.
When we finally rid ourselves of this orange ignorant wannabe tyrant and return law and order to the land, he and Barr will probably both go to jail unless they get a mercy pardon.
I truly feel sorry for you. Living with all that hate has to be tough.
Ive felt sorry for him for awhile now ... the hate runs so deep he doesn’t even see it ... its not healthy ...
I agree. To have that much hate built up. I feel sorry for him also. He needs to seek help.
Now they are zeroing in on Obama. If they prove O was dirty someone will have to throw a net on OCD and other lefties on here.
I 1000% dare Trump to go after Obama legally. I love the site of pitchforks in the morning. Lying whiny GOPer idiots and their conspiracy theory excuses.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
I 1000% dare Trump to go after Obama legally. I love the site of pitchforks in the morning. Lying whiny GOPer idiots and their conspiracy theory excuses.
Oh Trump will for sure go after Obama i there is anything there. Trump and GOPERS are not afraid of Liberals and I doubt they have many pitch forks..
I 1000% dare Trump to go after Obama legally. I love the site of pitchforks in the morning. Lying whiny GOPer idiots and their conspiracy theory excuses.
Oh Trump will for sure go after Obama i there is anything there. Trump and GOPERS are not afraid of Liberals and I doubt they have many pitch forks..
You have no idea how outnumbered you are and how much smarter the other side is because ignorance is bliss.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
I 1000% dare Trump to go after Obama legally. I love the site of pitchforks in the morning. Lying whiny GOPer idiots and their conspiracy theory excuses.
Oh Trump will for sure go after Obama i there is anything there. Trump and GOPERS are not afraid of Liberals and I doubt they have many pitch forks..
You have no idea how outnumbered you are and how much smarter the other side is because ignorance is bliss.
Out numbered by soccer moms and people jammed together in inner cities. East and West coast sissys. PFFT
Skeptical judge could hold up Trump administration's bid to clear Flynn, legal experts say Jan Wolfe 4 MIN READ
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration’s bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said.
The Department of Justice on Thursday told U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington it wants to drop the case against Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, following a pressure campaign by the Republican president and his political allies.
While judges typically sign off on such motions, Sullivan could refuse and instead demand answers from the DOJ about who requested the sudden about-face, said Seth Waxman, a former federal prosecutor now at the law firm Dickinson Wright.
“If Judge Sullivan wanted to he could conduct an inquiry and start asking a lot of questions,” said Waxman.
Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general who served as an adviser to Trump during the 2016 election campaign, had been seeking to withdraw his 2017 guilty plea in which he admitted to lying to the FBI about interactions with Russia’s ambassador to the United States in the weeks before Trump took office.
Flynn’s lawyers, both in court and in public, had argued that he was ambushed as part of a plot by biased investigators and that the case should be dismissed. Trump said in March that he was considering a pardon for Flynn.
The Justice Department said in a court filing on Thursday it is no longer persuaded that the FBI’s January 2017 interview with Flynn that led to the charges was conducted with a “legitimate investigative basis” and does not think Flynn’s statements were “material even if untrue.”
While the judge still has to rule on the submission, elated supporters of Flynn said there was no way Sullivan could force the department to prosecute if it did not want to. But the judge could stop Flynn from withdrawing his guilty plea and impose sentence. In that case, Trump could pardon Flynn.
The judge is unlikely to sign off on the request as a pro forma matter, said Channing Phillips, the former acting U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia during the Obama administration, adding that with Sullivan “nothing is pro forma.”
“I can guarantee you, he is going to question the prosecutors,” Phillips said in a phone interview. “He is going to want to understand exactly the basis for this motion ... You have a new attorney general. You have a new U.S. attorney. You have new prosecutors who take a different position. But the facts haven’t changed.”
Sullivan, 72, was appointed to the federal bench in 1994 by former Democratic President Bill Clinton and is known for an independent streak, often delivering strong rebukes of conduct he views as unjust.
In 2009, Sullivan excoriated the Justice Department over its high-profile corruption prosecution of former Senator Ted Stevens, saying prosecutors had concealed evidence in their quest to secure the Alaska senator’s conviction.
Sullivan has shown no such sympathy for the defense in the Flynn case, however.
“I am not hiding my disgust, my disdain for this criminal offense,” the judge said at a December 2018 hearing.
“Arguably,” Sullivan told Flynn, “you sold your country out.”
What’d i say that wasn’t true ... please tell me what i said that isn’t true ... I’ll make it easy for u ...
- i said he brought back thousands of jobs ... it actually tens of thousands ... is that not a fact? ... u may not like the ways he accomplished but fact is he’s brought back tens of thousands of jobs ..
- was O’s not a limp a long economy? ... did the market not surge the day after the election ... why was that? ..
- did he not give historically black colleges more money than ever before more than making up for O’s cuts ... not 100% O cut there funding but I’m pretty sure ...
- is he not creating equal opportunity zones all over the country in inner cities that have no jobs in them ... is that a lie or is it an excuse for something?
- did he not pass the first step act ... something O, Bush nor Clinto could get passed ... thats 24 years of failure to start correcting some of the flaws in our penal system ...
Please tell me what of the above is not true or is an excuse for something ...
Other than the fact i stated 100% facts and made zero excuses for Mr. President Pit nailed it ... great job Pit ..
See - facts don't matter no matter how many dozens times I post them.
I don't know about the rest of the items - but this one here - Trumps economy and Obama's were on virtually IDENTICAL trajectories. F.A.C.T proven with D.A.T.A .... the same data for each president not some single day or week or whackadoodle manipulation. But yeah ... I know #factsdontmatter
The more things change the more they stay the same.
This week saw two major legal developments: The government withdrew its prosecution of General Michael Flynn and the transcripts of the secret basement depositions by the Schiff House Committee on Intelligence were finally made public. Altogether they show a scandalous miscarriage of justice and media malpractice, which continues to this day, instigated by Barack Obama.
1. The Flynn Case
This week the Department of Justice announced that it was withdrawing its prosecution case against General Flynn. Former president Obama leaked his talking points to the ever-compliant press flacks and former officials, claiming that there was no precedent for such a dismissal, a claim that was false, to which he added another falsehood -- that Flynn had been charged with perjury.
Having the new script in hand, this nonsense was repeated ad nauseam on TV, some press, and the new media.
Law Professor Jonathan Turley swatted it back. (I urge you to clip and save this because this echo chamber may well have convinced those with whom you are related or converse with and it will come in handy.):
Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley
President Obama is being quoted on Flynn, saying, "There is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free." It is a curious statement. First and foremost, Flynn was not charged with perjury...
Second, we now know Obama discussed charging Flynn under the Logan Act which has never been used successfully to convict anyone and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Third, this reaffirms reports that Obama was personally invested in this effort. Finally, there is precedent.
There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals....
The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case. That was requested by President Obama's own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan. How is that for precedent?
Once again, Obama makes a statement about law which is demonstrably false. In fact, not once to my recalling has he ever made a statement about the law that is correct.
As to the facts, you simply cannot count on media reports, so I will link for you the Government’s Motion to withdraw the case.
As you read it you will see that once specially appointed U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen finally found the documents long hidden from the defense and court in the bowels of the FBI and DoJ, the government had little choice but to withdraw the case.
A number of analyses -- by people who do know enough not to simply rewrite Obama press dictation -- provide an accurate and chilling account of the persecution of Flynn. The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel and the Federalist’s Margot Cleveland certainly provided the most accurate and readable of the accounts.
Strassel reminds us that the scandal had two parts. The “indefensible probe of the Trump campaign,” and Robert Mueller’s coverup of the Bureau’s wrongdoing. I urge you to read the entire article. Here are the highlights, which are well documented.
1. “According to Justice department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the FBI knew by January 2017 that the dossier’s primary Russian source had disavowed the allegations and the FBI has failed to validate a single claim.”
2. The government earlier this year admitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that applications “which spanned Mr. Mueller’s appointment and the [Rosenstein] scoping memo” lacked probable cause and should never have been made. The Mueller tasking memo gave him authority to investigate “abuses of ancient or rarely enforced laws” and “potential crimes” never or rarely enforced.
3. Former FBI director James Comey leaked his memo of conversations with the president specifically to force the appointment of a special counsel to hide his own “egregious errors.” “The Mueller probe -- led by the very people who had made those errors -- then spent two years ‘investigating’ bogus or derivative claims, keeping secrets, and giving the escapade a fiction of legitimacy.”
Margot Cleveland provides a clear timeline of the events in the Flynn case. It shows, among other things, how the Obama administration played the media to achieve its goals of getting Flynn and Attorney General Jeff Sessions out of their way to carry out their coup attempt. Among her key points are these:
Documents recently (and very tardily) turned over by the government support Flynn’s claim that his guilty plea had been coerced by threats to prosecute his son. The evidence demonstrates that the FBI agents who interviewed him did not believe Flynn had lied to them about a conversation with the Russian ambassador, which in any case was a perfectly legal transition team communication. But had he, in any event, done so, the relevant statute requires that the lie, to be prosecutable, had to be material. It was not and could not have possibly influenced the conversation. Unsealed documents also reveal that there was no basis whatsoever for the interview. As Cleveland says, “There was no legitimate ongoing investigation at the time of the interview.” It was, in fact, what is known as a “perjury trap,” a trap that the documents reveal was at the direction of the top officials of the FBI (“the 7th floor”).
She explains what a “perjury trap” is: “the government’s use of its investigatory powers to secure a perjury indictment on materials which are neither material nor germane to a legitimate ongoing investigation.” (As an example, if the FBI is investigating a car stolen last night and you are asked where you spent Christmas in 2015 and you lie about that, it really isn’t material to the car theft case.) Sometimes this may be difficult to establish, but it isn’t here because it was in the Director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division Bill Priestap’s own handwriting.
Professor Cleveland details, as well, the special counsel and prosecutors’ repeated violations of Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order to timely provide all exculpatory material to the defendant. These materials were provided only after the attorney general’s designee Jensen found them.
Not least of the government’s problems with pursuing this case is the obvious failure to turn over the 302 summary, the notes of the agents who interviewed Flynn. (302s are an archaic method of retaining interview notes and should be replaced with video recordings, as they are always ripe for mischief and inaccurate reporting.) In this case, they weren’t turned over because Lisa Page and Peter Strzok substantially revised them, “changing the content and context of Flynn’s statements and making it appear than Flynn had lied when he had not.”
And now to January 5, 2017. Mollie Hemingway at the Federalist ties the Flynn case dismissal to the Obama White House meeting on January 5, 2017.
“It was at this meeting,” she writes, “that Obama gave guidance to key officials who would be tasked with protecting his administration’s utilization of secretly funded Clinton campaign research, which alleged Trump was involved in a treasonous plot to collude with Russia, from being discovered or stopped by the incoming administration.”
To advance this goal, her timeline reveals that on January 5 Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI head James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Joe Biden, and Susan Rice met with Obama in the Oval Office. Afterwards, Yates and Comey were asked to stay and Obama “gave his guidance about how to perpetuate the Russian collusion theory investigations,” mentioning Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador. In so doing, it’s clear that he had independently surveilled those telephonic communications. Clapper, Comey, and Yates all denied briefing him about those. (It’s clear there was another source of his information -- likely British intelligence illegally looped into the spying on Trump operation.)
On January 6, Comey gave a misleading briefing to the incoming president on “Russian interference,” telling him he was doing so “because CNN was looking for any reason it could find to publish a story about Russia having compromising information on him, and he wanted to warn him about it.”
Four days later CNN published the Russia claims “after a high-level Obama intelligence officer leaked” the fact of the Comey briefing. It was their handle, “credulously accepted by CNN reporters Evan Perez, Jim Sciutto, Jake Tapper, and Carl Bernstein.” A trick to legitimize the fake dossier and promote a lie that Russia was blackmailing Trump.
Days later, someone else leaked to David Ignatius (Washington Post) that Flynn was being investigated for a Logan Act violation, and he gobbled at the same rancid kind of bait that CNN had.
Leaks to the similarly credulous Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller (Washington Post) were used to mislead Flynn into believing he was no longer being targeted, as Comey manipulated Flynn the next day into a perjury trap interview. The plotters were still unable to achieve their goal of getting Flynn out of their way. This conducting of selective leaks to an adoring, credulous press continued until Flynn had been fired. By mid-May Sessions had recused himself from oversight after Comey was fired -- also with press assistance. That evolved into Mueller’s special counsel role, a role incompetently performed by a seemingly cognitively impaired but tall, well-coiffed man whom they apparently thought would add a touch of legitimacy to a monstrously corrupt enterprise.
In sum, the January 5 plot was a success. “[T]here was no longer any chance of Trump loyalists discovering what Obama holdovers at the FBI were doing to get Trump thrown out of office.”
If you still cling to the slightest notion of Russian collusion, this week, despite Congressman Adam Schiff’s bottling up the transcripts of the basement secret depositions taken long ago, they were finally released.
Schiff lied about the information gleaned in these depositions for over two years. So did other official confederates of the Obama administration and their media buddies. You can see for yourself. Under oath, every one of them swore they had no credible evidence of any “Russian collusion” with the Trump campaign.
This week saw two major legal developments: The government withdrew its prosecution of General Michael Flynn and the transcripts of the secret basement depositions by the Schiff House Committee on Intelligence were finally made public. Altogether they show a scandalous miscarriage of justice and media malpractice, which continues to this day, instigated by Barack Obama.
This week saw two major legal developments: The government withdrew its prosecution of General Michael Flynn and the transcripts of the secret basement depositions by the Schiff House Committee on Intelligence were finally made public. Altogether they show a scandalous miscarriage of justice and media malpractice, which continues to this day, instigated by Barack Obama.
OBAMAGATE !!!
Drip!Drip!Drip!!!!
Romans 10:9 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thy heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
Oh how cute! The GOPers think they found a scandal... Hillary's emails! Pffft... Obamagate! lmao Now prosecuting actual criminals is a bad thing... the GOPers know no low too low to go. Barr is human scum. Trump is a lying narcissistic slob that is trying to will himself into becoming king. The circle smirk crew would do just about anything to help him...
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
I don't understand how anyone can not be appalled, disgusted and maybe even frightened after spending at least 3 minutes researching the Flynn case.
Framed, set-up and extorted. That happened. Whether one is a Trump supporter or hater shouldn't matter. What "they" did to that guy is made-for-TV-movie unbelievable.
This week saw two major legal developments: The government withdrew its prosecution of General Michael Flynn and the transcripts of the secret basement depositions by the Schiff House Committee on Intelligence were finally made public. Altogether they show a scandalous miscarriage of justice and media malpractice, which continues to this day, instigated by Barack Obama.
Satire from The Borowitz Report Bill Barr Tests Negative for Integrity By Andy Borowitz May 8, 2020
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In a test result that he called “a tremendous relief,” the Attorney General, Bill Barr, has tested negative for integrity, Barr confirmed on Friday. Barr submitted to the test after learning that he had come into contact with career Justice Department prosecutors who were found to be integrity carriers.
“When I learned that there were still people at the Justice Department with integrity, I was understandably furious,” Barr told reporters. “I told them to go home at once.” Barr said that he was putting into place new protocols that would require Justice Department employees to be tested for integrity before entering the building.
“I thought that anyone with integrity had already left the Justice Department, but apparently I was mistaken,” he said. “It’s better to be safe than sorry.” Although he was elated to learn that he had tested negative for integrity, Barr said that he shuddered to think how close he came to contracting the dreaded virtue.
“Having integrity would have made it impossible for me to work for President Trump,” he said.
Todd: You brought up Bill Barr. Peggy Noonan, I want you to listen to this Bill Barr answer to a question about what will history say about this. Wait until you hear this answer. Take a listen.
[Clip from CBS begins]
Herridge: When history looks back on this decision, how do you think it will be written?
Barr: Well, history is written by the winners, so it largely depends on who’s writing the history.
[Clip from CBS ends]
Todd: I was struck, Peggy, by the cynicism of the answer. It’s a correct answer, but he’s the attorney general. He didn’t make the case that he was upholding the rule of law. He was almost admitting that, yeah, this is a political job.
Here is the transcript from CBS, showing that Barr specifically addressed the rule of law (altered for format, and emphasis added):
Herridge: When history looks back on this decision, how do you think it will be written? What will it say about your decision making?
Barr: Well, history is written by the winner. So it largely depends on who’s writing the history. But I think a fair history would say that it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law. It helped, it upheld the standards of the Department of Justice, and it undid what was an injustice.
Watching TV today, they had a clip of Mike Pence saying that Flynn lied to him and the President did the right thing.
That was back in January of 2017.
Fast forward to Last Friday, Pence says It's the FBI's fault. He would welcome Flynn back into to the admin.
Pence is just as bad a liar as Trump...
In January of 2017 we/he were not privy to the details of the FBIs actions with Flynn.
That makes for a completely different story...and a completely different opinion of Flynn's plea..now that the dirty-play has been exposed.
But Pence is a liar...
Are you aware of the numerous Obama henchpeople who said one thing under oath (or recorded govt conversation) and then said a completely different story to the clowns at CNN/MSNBC? How about Adam Schiff and his "in plain site evidence". Those people are the liars.
A guy changing his opinion on a suspect's guilty plea after the set-up and extortion is exposed is nowhere near a lie.
So Flynn lies to the vice president which isn't a crime so Trump fires him. Flynn lies to the FBI which is most certainly a crime, pleads guilty to it and both Barr and Trump says it isn't a crime and he was "tricked into lying".
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
This week saw two major legal developments: The government withdrew its prosecution of General Michael Flynn and the transcripts of the secret basement depositions by the Schiff House Committee on Intelligence were finally made public. Altogether they show a scandalous miscarriage of justice and media malpractice, which continues to this day, instigated by Barack Obama.
OBAMAGATE !!!
I see where President Trump tweeted OBAMAGATE!!! this morning.
So Flynn lies to the vice president which isn't a crime so Trump fires him. Flynn lies to the FBI which is most certainly a crime, pleads guilty to it and both Barr and Trump says it isn't a crime and he was "tricked into lying".
It would appear that you are woefully uninformed of what has recently been exposed in the Flynn matter.
Todd: You brought up Bill Barr. Peggy Noonan, I want you to listen to this Bill Barr answer to a question about what will history say about this. Wait until you hear this answer. Take a listen.
[Clip from CBS begins]
Herridge: When history looks back on this decision, how do you think it will be written?
Barr: Well, history is written by the winners, so it largely depends on who’s writing the history.
[Clip from CBS ends]
Todd: I was struck, Peggy, by the cynicism of the answer. It’s a correct answer, but he’s the attorney general. He didn’t make the case that he was upholding the rule of law. He was almost admitting that, yeah, this is a political job.
Here is the transcript from CBS, showing that Barr specifically addressed the rule of law (altered for format, and emphasis added):
Herridge: When history looks back on this decision, how do you think it will be written? What will it say about your decision making?
Barr: Well, history is written by the winner. So it largely depends on who’s writing the history. But I think a fair history would say that it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law. It helped, it upheld the standards of the Department of Justice, and it undid what was an injustice.
Wait. They altered, or left out stuff?
Seriously? The same news agency that, investigating GM pickups and fires, tested, over and over, trying to get a gm truck to explode into fire, and failed to do so by the way. Failed so bad, they ended up rigging a rocket engine (the kind many kids had to launch a back yard rocket) to the gas tank to prove a point? They failed, as video shows. The fire started before any collision.
The same news agency that lied about W?
The same news agency that has lied since forever?
George and Treyvon, and the altering and editing of the audio to make George look bad?
Are you telling me that NBC edited comments to make someone they don't like look bad?
That can't be. All we have to do is look at.............oh, wait. Yup, they do suck as a news source.
Obama's Bloodiest Scandal Reemerges as Mexico Demands an Apology for Operation Fast and Furious
@KatiePavlich
Posted: May 11, 2020
The Mexican government is still waiting for an apology for Operation Fast and Furious, an illegal and secret gun running scheme implemented during the Obama administration.
"Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said his government would send a diplomatic note to Washington for information on the 2009-2011 operation known as ‘Fast and Furious,’ a topic that has resurfaced in recent days amid a debate over historic U.S.-Mexico cooperation on security and possible corruption under previous administrations," Reuters reports.
During the operation from 2009-2010, thousands of AK-47s, .50 caliber rifles and other weapons were purposely allowed by ATF and Department of Justice officials to be purchased illegally by straw buyers at gun stores in the United States and trafficked over the border into Mexico. ATF officials sat by as thousands of guns "walked." They argued this was done to trace weapons to the upper echelons of Mexican cartels, but out of thousands of firearms, only two were rigged with GPS devices that died within hours of crossing the border.
On December 14, 2010, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, a former police officer and U.S. Marine, was shot and killed while on a BORTAC mission near Rio Rico, Arizona. The weapons left at the scene were obtained through Operation Fast and Furious.
Terry's family has been repeatedly lied to about the circumstances of his death. ATF and DOJ officials moved quickly to cover up the scandal behind how his murderers got their guns.
It wasn't until Terry was killed that knowledge of the program came into public view. ATF agent John Dodson, who opposed the operation internally, became the first whistleblower to speak out.
The Mexican government was also left in the dark as thousands of guns were used to kill hundreds of civilians. A .50 caliber rifle from the program, a weapon often used by Mexican cartels to take down helicopters, was found in drug kingpin El Chapo's hideout.
A report from 2011, released by then House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, showed "ATF and DOJ 'failed to share crucial details of the Operation Fast and Furious with either their own employees stationed in Mexico or representatives of the Government of Mexico.' Specifically, personnel in Arizona denied ATF agents working in Mexico information directly related to their jobs and everyday operations."
In June 2012, Eric Holder became the first sitting attorney general to be voted in civil and criminal contempt by the House of Representatives for refusing to turn over documents related to the case. Despite memos addressed to directly to Holder about the operation, Holder repeatedly claimed he learned about it in the news. President Obama also claimed not to have knowledge of the operation despite making gun trafficking to Mexico a top priority. White House National Security Adviser Kevin O'Reilly was also briefed regularly on the operation by senior ATF officials in the Phoenix field office.
Trump and the GOP are going to do all they can to convince voters that Putin and Russia are the GOP's "GOOD GUYS" and if they helped to get Trump elected...that's ok and the Russians should not be held responsible for their interference into America's election process.
Trump, Barr and Moscow Mitch will attempt to re-write the history books, by claiming Russia and Putin did not deserve the sanctions enacted by the Obama administration.
Remember this, if Russia could, they would attack the USA and attempt to defeat the United States by using technology to render the USA's Nuclear Arsenal "inoperable" and no longer a threat to "the GOP's MOTHER RUSSIA".
There is no doubt that Trump admires the Russian dictator, Vladimir Putin. Trump admires Putin's power and wealth as "the dictator" of Russia and sees himself as a Putin follower, ready to sell America down the river for a chance to be selected as one of Putin's underlings.
How long will " the GOP's support a PRO RUSSIA agenda that allows Donald Trump to control and dictate the GOPs future under the RWings guru, Vladimir Putin ?
You ready to support and salute Vladimir Putin's agenda to act as the USA's "NEW LEADER"?
I'm almost afraid to click some of the links you post for fear of the hackers exploiting GOPer fears... This sites claims to be the number one source for conservative media for the last 25 years in their VIP 'fund us' pitch... then there are links to other media family sites that are basically more of the same tripe in different wrappers plastered all over the lower page banner. Just hate and propaganda against the left. It really is no wonder GOPers are so jaded to any factual reporting.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
The Republican party under Trump has abandoned all of its morals and principles it may have had in its previous incarnations. This is now a party of fear mongering idiots lead by a fear mongering idiot that would all be more than happy to hide under the skirt of mother Russia. Reagan is rolling in his grave and if he could still sign the form would become a dem or independent immediately.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
You "Moscow Mitch lovers", now is the time to come clean and admit your support for the GOP's Putin agenda.
If you are a Republican, this is your opportunity "to SHINE" and pledge your support for Trump/Putin/and the GOP agenda that believes Putin and Russia are just "Republican Good Guys", wrongly labeled by the Obama administration.
So, what do you Republicans say...your Pledge of Allegiance to the GOP's Mother Russia and Vladimir Putin...OR A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ?
Can't have it both ways, gop boys and girls...time to choose...you either support the Trump agenda that believes Vladimir and Russia are "GOP Good Guys"...or you support The USA.
Bro I know you mean well but you can't effectively attack their patriotism to open their eyes because they have sold their souls in effort to support Trump's presidency. Nothing matters, there are no norms or standards that can change that. They've watched fascism and white supremacy rise. They've watched their guy kotow to Putin live on TV in Helsinki. They've perverted justice in the courts and the Senate. They've propagandized the news cycles and shouted down, denied, attacked, and demonized truth tellers and whistle blowers. There is literally NO LOW they will not go to in order to provide their sycophantic support for Trump.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
You "Moscow Mitch lovers", now is the time to come clean and admit your support for the GOP's Putin agenda.
If you are a Republican, this is your opportunity "to SHINE" and pledge your support for Trump/Putin/and the GOP agenda that believes Putin and Russia are just "Republican Good Guys", wrongly labeled by the Obama administration.
So, what do you Republicans say...your Pledge of Allegiance to the GOP's Mother Russia and Vladimir Putin...OR A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ?
Can't have it both ways, gop boys and girls...time to choose...you either support the Trump agenda that believes Vladimir and Russia are "GOP Good Guys"...or you support The USA.
We should have a contest to see who is the wackiest lefty on here.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/PortlandDawg/banner.jpg)
![[Linked Image from s2.excoboard.com]](http://s2.excoboard.com/forums/25521/user/302752/484538.gif)
