DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Trump commutes Roger Stone's sentence

Unless the conviction is overturned on appeal.

Believe him? ABSOLUTELY! He did a great job of proving Trump was guilty as charged in the impeachment! Even the republicans that voted to keep Trump admitted that.

Hell I wish he would run for POTUS, I'd vote for him just to make guys like you cry.

Btw, how is Trump commuting this sentence any different from governors releasing felons so they don't catch the wu-flu?

Now I'm sure you only see the world through your left eye. Where's his evidence? The impeachment was a party line vote. They never produced any evidence.

Those weren't the governors criminal co conspirators to the best of my knowledge. Trump and Stone are long time cohorts and both crooks of the highest magnitude.

LOL, RINO 'Pierre Delecto' Romney's opinion is just that...a fraud's opinion!

So what's your view on how and where the virus originated from? China and the WHO knowing about it months in advance? China giving wishy washy answers?

How are you going to hold them (China) accountable? They can't be trusted on anything. That's where you should be directing your anger.

In addition, I hope you're not expecting Biden to lead with dignity or respect. His 75 year track record in government shows otherwise.

I hold trump accountable. Countless other country’s leaders took the virus seriously and lead their countries to safety (relative to the times). trump’s complete lack of leadership has lead us to where we are. Period. This is no longer on China. This is #trumpvirus.

When you call a virus that is killing 130,000 Americans a silly name like
wu-flu it kinda hurts your credibility. This is similar to trump calling everyone he dislikes childish names. We deserve a president that doesnt act childish on a daily basis. And that is a fact no one can deny. He calls people he dislikes derogatory made up nick names. Our president should be an example to every one and lead with dignity and respect. WE DESERVE THAT! Would you teach your children to behave like trump?

Hurts my credibility? What a laugh. I said about two years ago that we should have better border controls to stop diseases from entering the country during the zika panic, and I was called a racist. I said i got my info from my wife, who worked as a virologist for the federal government, and you questioned her credibility. I have no credibility with half the members on this board because I'm not part of the liberal hive mind groupthink. Seems I was right, even though it wasn't this current virus. I hope their outbreak of bubonic plague isn't ignored over "racial equality".

There is no way that woman should have served on the jury, much less as the foreman.

You guys still believe schiff? The guy that lied to the American people for years about "mountains" of evidence he had on Trump? The best he could produce was a bunch of 'I have no knowledge of that' in secret interviews with democrats. As for the appeal, we'll see what happens.

So let me see if I get this straight. You're saying "Only trump lovers and his supporters should have been on any jury that was involved in association to Trump"?

Where were you when all the republicans were investigating Hillary. Who by the way failed.

So let me see if I get this straight. You're saying "Only trump lovers and his supporters should have been on any jury that was involved in association to Trump"?

Where were you when all the republicans were investigating Hillary. Who by the way failed.

Your article is from The Hill. That's not a valid news source.

I wasnt talking about the virus I was talking about a childish president please comment on the my comments below.

And that is a fact no one can deny. He calls people he dislikes derogatory made up nick names. Our president should be an example to every one and lead with dignity and respect. WE DESERVE THAT! Would you teach your children to behave like trump?

You mean the process and possible penalty is different. The fact that you seemed to have no objection to partisanship in one example but do in the other example is exactly the same.

You see, in every jury of 12 people you are going to have people with strong political beliefs within that jury. What you are proposing is that because one member of a jury has strong political leanings against Trump, the other 11 people who voted guilty couldn't do their job. Had the jury foreman have been a staunch Trump supporter would you be holding the same objection? Because you sure didn't seem to object when Republicans were investigating hillary.

That doesn't hold water.

You mean the process and possible penalty is different. The fact that you seemed to have no objection to partisanship in one example but do in the other example is exactly the same.

You see, in every jury of 12 people you are going to have people with strong political beliefs within that jury. What you are proposing is that because one member of a jury has strong political leanings against Trump, the other 11 people who voted guilty couldn't do their job. Had the jury foreman have been a staunch Trump supporter would you be holding the same objection? Because you sure didn't seem to object when Republicans were investigating hillary.

That doesn't hold water.

Yet some of those Republicans who refused to vote to remove him admitted he was guilty. You still don't grasp that do you?

Jurors are supposed to do their duty as jurors in an impartial way. You have shown nothing that indicates that didn't happen. And it still doesn't account for the 11 others jurors who agreed that he was guilty.

You have submitted the very definition of grasping at straws.

Which republicans? It seems they said one thing in time, and voted something else. Kinda like those politicians that tell the press one thing and vote another, right obummercare opponents?
Did they say that before they saw schiffs evidence "I have no knowledge of that"? How a jury votes is everything, right? Isn't the Senate the jury for impeachment trials? You're trying to have things both ways.

I'm talking about what some Republican senators said after they voted not to remove Trump from office. They said they would let the elections decide it even thought they felt the case had been proven. Do you actually keep up with what's going on or do you only read conspiracy web sites?

Oh, and didn't Romney vote guilty?

That's how people with common sense get treated in the Republican party these days.