DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Ohio man in custody after kneeling on crying White child's neck, praising Black Lives Matter

Looks like The Black Lives Matter movement is full of racists. Your going to kneel on the neck of a two year old toddler just because they are white?

Wow....I can't say what I think should happen to this guy because I would get banned, but angry isn't even close to describing how I feel right now looking at that picture....

me too.

This is just sickening.

Dude is straight up trash.

This is not politics - this is finding a whack job and using it to try to tarnish something that it has absolutely nothing to do with.

Everyone can agree that this is flat out disgusting.

When I first saw this I was trying to see if it was real, so I was searching the web for major news articles.

CNN? No
MSNBC? No
Until this just now, I hadn't even seen Fox run it and all of this came out maybe 2 days ago.

The only place I found it covered by blue check twitter was the "Washington Times"?? A publication I had never even heard of. It's not surprising but very frustrating.


This man and his girlfriend are obviously mentally ill. I just will never understand this level of attention grabbing being such a dire need in this Snapshat, instagram society.

This is politics because it was done in the name of politics.

Arguing this isn't politics is just another in the long line of not being able to call a spade a spade due to partisanship. Black Lives Matter, the organization is a political organization. They speak on policy, they donate to politicians and they protest for social and economic reasons.

This guy will get what's coming to him for doing that kid this way and it is damn shameful deplorable behavior.

That said, I don't recall you posting threads about all the white guys that knelt on somebody's neck for a photo during the protests. YOU using this as some sort of gotcha for the BLM movement is pure BS on your part. This guy doesn't represent anything but human trash.

So is it mental illness as you indicated or is it politics?

/thread

Are you suggesting that a mentally ill person cannot be political?

?! There is plenty of proof that is not true right here in DTPP.

I'm not sure. But every time some whacko shoots up a school that's the first thing those against any sort of gun regulations scream. "He was mentally ill!"

Or are you trying to state that it seems rational to try and paint a movement based on someone who is mentally ill?

I'm not quite sure what it is you're trying to say here.

I'm not trying to say anything.


[*]This person, anyone who abuses a child in this manner is mentally ill.
[*]BLM is a political movement

Two different posts. Sort of like:

[*]Mentally Ill
[*]Guns

Only related through the act of one person(s).

I hope you can see by the quoted part above why that appeared to require some clarity.

Ok where did a Dr say this person is mentally ill?

He looks like a typical Blm violent deviant to me.

Only that's not what a "typical" BLM person acts like. Do you need the definition of the word typical?

They do act like that. Go look at all violent videos Memphis posts.

They are deviants.

No, they don't. When all you look at is the violence, that's the picture that gets painted in your mind. The vast majority of all protests and protestors are non violent.

I guess you think the wall of mom's and the mayor of Portland who have all been gassed by Trump's henchmen were violent protestors too?

Maybe you should take a look for yourself into how many protests are going on verses how many are violent before you cast stones. That or you can continue to believe what you're being spoon fed by others.

There have been protests daily here in Nashville and you don't hear a word about them. Why? Because they're peaceful.

As of July 7th there had been 10 straight days of protests held in Atlanta with zero arrests.

https://www.ajc.com/news/breaking-news/a...6gKwjaazx2pVkK/

Open your eyes for a minute.

You are looking at one city with a narrow lens. How many protestors are there in Portland that aren't violent?

Peen, it's odd how you yourself said 80% to 90% of them were non violent and now you've decided to become a lurker liking a post that says the opposite of your very own words. Sad really.

We disagree. This is contrived "noise" - it is not even controversy. Everyone can agree this guy is a piece of trash. Everyone.

Politics or something political would be when you have someone try to defend this guys actions and position.... When someone posts something asinine Trump says or one of his policies that rolls back decades of environmental protections, you get folks that support and stick up for Trump. No-one's doing that here - even his momma would crack him in the head for that dumb schtick.

Blah blah blah

I look at the violence because its important and should not be swept under the rug. As it does terrible things to communities and local business.


IF you want a true picture of protestors then you have to look at all aspects. Including the deviants. To develop an opinion.

I get that the violence isnt convienent for you and your opinion, but too bad who cares.

quoted for emphasis ... this guy has nothing at all to do with BLM. In addition to your comments and link, I posted a link earlier today that showed the cities and countries worldwide where MILLIONS of supporters have protested and demonstrated solidarity with BLM around the planet. . . . the few hundred or thousand violent protesters [1] Are probably mostly nothing to do with BLM ... [2] are a tiny tiny tiny fraction of 1% of the masses that came out for BLM.

Cry me a river. This heinous act is political by nature. It represents Blm. You can say it doesnt, but every single person who sees it will think it does. Get your kind in line.

Just think all the sports teams that stand behind the kneelers support this guys agenda and his politics sad. ....SMH

So now you are the expert on how many are violent and non violent? I was just trying to agree with you where I had the chance.

My personal feeling is about 70% resort to violent means. I was just trying to leave my personal feelings out of it in an effort to have a fair and balanced conversation.

If you are out there tonight, you have bad intentions.


I don't want to see people shot, but it is headed there.

sick... I hope there something more to the mother... i read she was encouraging it and didn't think it was a big deal... i dunno... anyone sticking their knee on a crying toddler has serious issues... hope the biological dad gets full custody

Did you cry a river over me?

I think of this guy the same as I think of child molesters. They should track him with a tombstone.

why would that happen?

Do you have that on loop on your youtube app?

It seems fitting.

No, but I do like Joe Cocker - and Ella Fitzgerald did a nice version too.

I'm too lame to listen to it.

Regardless of what people viewing may or may not think it is, the fact is that the a-hole who did this is the one who believes that is what BLM is about. He's not trying to tarnish the organization or movement, he's trying to push it forward. He got the idea from somewhere. My guess is that he didn't get it from attending a Trump rally or watching Fox News.

I think the dancing between when BLM is the organization and when it is the movement just adds a layer of dishonesty to the whole thing. Dawgs on here easily throw out accusations of trying to misrepresent what its all about. It's not correct, but I can at least understand the basis for their accusations in a forum such as here.

But I'm curious as to how they explain these interviews with the families of the little kids who've been killed over the last few weeks? These families are calling out Black Lives Matter. I don't know how political they are, but they aren't coming across as MAGA hatters to me. They aren't drawing a distinction between the organization or the movement. They bought in to the literal words Black Lives Matter. They bought in to the idea that this organization and movement is the face of the modern Civil Rights movement. They believed they were part of that.

And what did they get in return when they needed it most? People like Don Lemon telling Terry Crews that BLM is only about police brutality and that he should go start his own All Black Lives Matter movement if he's so concerned about these kids.

How... callous. Cavalier. Cold.

Too many people have fooled themselves into thinking that Black Lives Matter means the same as Black Lives Have Intrinsic Value. Neither the organization nor the movement believe the latter.

If an organization or a political party (or individual politician) is going to be judged on the worst, craziest sicko out there .... then lets revisit this guy shall we?

https://www.npr.org/2019/08/05/748420957...a-gets-20-years

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/26/politics/cesar-sayoc-white-van-stickers/index.html

It's funny, because at the time I remember myself and many others saying it would be unfair to judge Trump and the Republicans based on the actions of this man, despite the very obvious connection of him targeting those Trump decried as being the enemy of the people etc....

And I am sure .... "" Cesar is the one who believes that this what TRUMP is about. He's not trying to tarnish the organization or movement, he's trying to push it forward. He got the idea from somewhere""

Ok. But what does any of that have to do with the thread topic?

Those don't count because Ngo posted them.