DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Post your validated 2020 voter fraud cases here.

I will say this, since you are now about 450 posts in... I'm a progressive verging on socialist. My politics are based on what I think is the right and decent thing to do more often than not. I want to see everyone be fed, housed, clothed, have access to medical care and education as a basic right. We have to get over profits and bottom lines long enough to take care of the basic needs of every american that needs help first. In some cases, that might be government programs, and in other cases it might mean regulations. But in all cases, we should put people first and profits later IMHO. There are many other issues, but in my opinion, until we treat each of our citizens with the same basic dignity and respect that money buys those who can afford it now, we are going to continue to slowly disintegrate as a nation.

That all said, reading your posts from an opposition perspective, has been a welcome change to the non-rational posts of most of the boards Trump supporters. You seem to be very intelligent, put a lot of thought and detail in your posts, and have made some damn good points a time or two. Thanks for all of that. And when we inevitably disagree, I'll try to remember feeling this way before I lash out viciously to eviscerate your talking points in the future.

I think if someone alleges this massive fraud, it's on them to prove it... but I think there also needs to be some sort of timeline requirement to keep this train moving along. I think Trump is simply trying to stretch this out as long as possible for no other reason than to be a pita.

Verging on socialist? More like hardcore socialist. All he needs to know is the liberals on this forum are hysterical and lose their poo at the mere sight of the word "Trump". Yall are incapable of debate.

I'm not sure if you know what a socialist is?

Have you not ever read any of OCD's posts.

He is not a socialist -- except in the fake-republican definition where "every Democrat is a socialist".

He has humped Bernie Sanders for years.

Third, and most importantly, the Secretary of State should announce a full hand-count of every ballot cast in each and every county due to widespread allegations of voter irregularities, issues with voting machines, and poll watcher access.

Bull. if this isnt in the standard recount protocol it is not necessary.

Im not afraid of anything just dont base it on "wide spread allegations" when there were none. There was one moron trying to sell that crap why do we need to waste time babying him? That statement shouldn't be in the discussion.
.

Wide spread based on nothing but a whining president.

Georgia Secretary of State Announces a ‘Full, By-Hand Recount in Each County’

C-SPAN
Hannah Bleau

11 Nov 2020


Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) on Wednesday announced that the state will conduct a “by-hand recount in each county” in the Peach State.

“At 1 p.m. today, I will make the official designation of which race will be the subject of the RLA [risk-limiting audit]. At that time, I will designate that the RLA will be the presidential race,” Raffensperger announced, emphasizing that the RLA, in this case, will require a by-hand recount. Typically, an RLA involves officials examining “a statistically meaningful sample of ballots.”

“The audit is mathematically designed to catch anomalies that would arise from misconfigured machines, procedural errors, or intentional attack,” as NBC News reported.

However, due to the narrow margins, Raffensperger is requiring a “by-hand” recount in all 159 counties.

“With the margin being so close, it will require a full, by-hand recount in each county. This will help build confidence,” he said, adding that it will be “an audit, a recount, and a recanvass all at once.”

“It will be a heavy lift, but we will work with the counties to get this done in time for our state certification,” he continued.

“We have all worked hard to bring fair and accurate counts to ensure that the will of the voters is reflected in the final count and that every voter will have confidence in the outcome whether their candidate won or lost,” he added.

Raffensperger’s announcement follows a request from Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), who is leading the Trump campaign’s recount team in the Peach State.

In a November 10 statement, Collins formally requested a “full hand-count of every ballot cast in each and every county,” attributing the request to “widespread allegations of voter irregularities, issues with voting machines, and poll watcher access.”

His statement reads:

As we begin the recount process, there are three things we are formally requesting today from Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. First, there must be a full comparison of absentee ballots cast and in-person and provisional ballots cast throughout the state. Second, there must be a check for felons and other ineligible persons who may have cast a ballot. Third, and most importantly, the Secretary of State should announce a full hand-count of every ballot cast in each and every county due to widespread allegations of voter irregularities, issues with voting machines, and poll watcher access. We can — and we will — petition for this in court after statewide certification is completed if the Secretary of State fails to act, but we are hopeful he will preemptively take this action today to ensure every Georgian has confidence in our electoral process.”

President Donald Trump trailed former Vice President Joe Biden by roughly 14,110 votes as of Wednesday morning

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/...nt-each-county/

Verging on socialist? More like hardcore socialist. All he needs to know is the liberals on this forum are hysterical and lose their poo at the mere sight of the word "Trump". Yall are incapable of debate. Yall are shaking in your boots at the thought of a recount.

Well, I don't know all the reasons behind the lawsuits and whether they are saying their is some instances of mass vote tampering or not. If they have evidence, they only have to give that evidence to the judge.

But I am still concerned that people are okay with voter fraud. I don't see anyway of knowing the proportion of illegal votes. If it is possible for 1 out of 1 million ballots to be illegal, then what measures are in place that would prevent it from being 1 in 100 ballots?

I am not being facetious here either. I am ignorant on the internal controls used to protect the election process and legitimately curious how so many people can be so certain that there are not a large number of illegal votes.

There is nobody OK with Voter Fraud... NOBODY

I think a lot of people are okay with tolerating some small level of negligible fraud getting through the cracks as long as it remains negligible. The fact that we cannot provide reasonable assurance that it is negligible is worrying.

Serious question - what level of assurance would be enough for you?

I would say that fraud exceeding 1 in 1000 ballots is too high. That is way more than enough to flip an election. 1 in 10,000 is still higher than you would like to see because when combined with other errors and election issues it can have an effect on the election. Ideally, you would like to feel that the ratio of fraudulent ballots is below 1 in 100,000.

Hey fish, they are lying to you. I know that's hard for you to grasp, but they are lying to you bro.