She's 1000 times more credible and respectable than the crap sources you post. Maybe you would like her if she believed in the make believe world you live in... or cuckooville as I like to refer to it.
She's 1000 times more credible and respectable than the crap sources you post.
Even the left-wing Steven Colbert took time to mock the waste of air and airtime Rachel Maddow. "Cuckooville" is a very good reference to 'The Young Turks' channel you always use as a source.
She's 1000 times more credible and respectable than the crap sources you post.
Even the left-wing Steven Colbert took time to mock the waste of air and airtime Rachel Maddow. "Cuckooville" is a very good reference to 'The Young Turks' channel you always use as a source.
Just so I understand, if Colbert makes fun of Trump, he's terrible, but if he makes fun of Maddow, he's credible! Asking for a friend named Karen
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
Just can't believe Rudy yesterday... Yikes.. According to him, practically the entire world tried to undermine the Trump re-election.
And then, he began to melt on camera....It would be truly sad if it weren't so damn funny.
I used to have a lot of respect for Rudy. As a big city mayor, he handled 9/11 about as well as anyone could. He seemed to do everything right. I even thought that maybe someday, he could run for Senate or House or even maybe the Presidency..
How far he has fallen.
Once again, the truth is, if Trump touches it, it dies.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Trump lawyers filed a motion in Pennsylvania to clarify they only want to block the state from certifying results of the presidential elections, not any other races on the same ballot
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Probably because thousands of ballots for Biden were received with no down ticket votes being made.
In Ohio, a voter can choose to vote for as many down ballot candidates they want to vote for. If a voter chooses to only vote of a candidate for president and ignore the rest of the candidates, that does not disqualify their vote in any way.
Probably because thousands of ballots for Biden were received with no down ticket votes being made.
In Ohio, a voter can choose to vote for as many down ballot candidates they want to vote for. If a voter chooses to only vote of a candidate for president and ignore the rest of the candidates, that does not disqualify their vote in any way.
You think this happened with trump votes? Are all trump voters highly informed on all aspects of the ballot and have formed educated opinions on every issue on the ballots and voted on each and everyone based on their thorough understanding of facts?
Georgia Has Certified It's Election Results (Declaring Biden the Winner)
"When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God." Leviticus 19:33-34
This is the future: Al la carte news... served up with your own personal bias as the daily chef.
It explains why 90% of the conversations this board has hosted have gone they way they have.
I agree. CNN is the worst thing that ever happened to the new media. That isn't because they are left leaning. It's because it changed the news in to a ratings show designed to cater to segments of the population.
In the "old" days Walter Cronkite and say Huntley Brinkley were reporting the same stories with pretty much the same story line. Sure, they wanted ratings, but they weren't slanting the news to cater to various demographics. Today, you can watch CNN or Fox and get totally different news. It's 90% Op-Ed on those networks.
Back in the day, many times the last minute of the broadcast was dedicated to op-ed, and was clearly stated as such. The News anchor didn't make that broadcast, it was the executive producer or someone with a similar title. It was viewed as critical that the anchor was viewed as non biased.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
I’m not on the left so I don’t purport to answer for that side, but I’m curious to see what you’re talking about. If you’re talking about impeachment when they did it, yeah that was dumb, really dumb. It’s still nowhere near as dumb as what’s going on right now.
Also, one wrong doesn’t justify another...something that keeps getting said and falling on deaf ears.
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
Trump’s Disgraceful Gambit By THE EDITORS November 20, 2020 10:49 AM
The Rudy Giuliani–led press conference at the RNC yesterday was the most outlandish and irresponsible performance ever by a group of lawyers representing a president of the United States.
If Giuliani’s charge of a “national conspiracy” to produce fraudulent votes in Democratic cities around the country wasn’t far-fetched enough, attorney Sidney Powell ratcheted it up with the allegation that Communist-designed election machinery was used to change the vote from a Trump landslide to a narrow Biden victory. An obvious question is why, if you can manipulate the vote count via machine, you’d need to bother with old-fashioned fraudulent ballots. Powell’s story is that the surprisingly strong Trump turnout “broke the algorithm” of the corrupted machines, and then the fraudulent ballots were desperately hauled in to make up the difference.
This is lawyering worthy of the comments section of Breitbart News.
If there’s serious evidence for any of this, Giuliani and co. need to produce it immediately. Waving around affidavits at a press conference without allowing anyone to examine them doesn’t count.
The claims by the Trump team and its allies in court have been as far-reaching as possible and still haven’t come close to supporting the kind of feverish charges made yesterday afternoon. These cases have been dismissed or were whittled down until, as Andy McCarthy has noted, in Pennsylvania the Trump team isn’t even challenging enough ballots to come within hailing distance of overturning Joe Biden’s 83,000-vote lead — although we understand that the team is now attempting to file yet another amended complaint that would revive previously abandoned fraud charges and add still more.
The same is true in Michigan. Since courts generally won’t consider fraud claims that don’t involve enough votes to make a difference in an outcome, this is a major blow against the Trump litigation strategy. Giuliani tried to spin the Trump team’s withdrawal of its suit in Michigan as a big win — the litigation, in his telling, is no longer necessary because the team got the remedy it was seeking, namely a delay in the certification of the vote in Wayne County. In reality, the Wayne County vote was certified earlier in the week, even if the two Republicans on the board of canvassers now say they regret their vote.
This magazine has always taken voter fraud seriously, and we hope that any that occurred in this election is exposed and prosecuted. But it’s important to recognize that the broad contours of the 2020 presidential vote make sense. At the RNC press conference, Giuliani made much of how the count switched against Trump after he established initial leads on Election Night in key states. Yet this was expected and a function of the fact that same-day ballots strongly favoring Republicans were counted first, and early votes strongly favoring Democrats were counted last.
Across the country, the basic picture is the same, without any notable anomalies — Trump excelled in rural areas, got wiped out in urban areas but often by slightly smaller margins than in 2016, and lost soundly in suburban counties, which proved decisive.
As for the Dominion voting machines that Powell has been inveighing against, Georgia used them this year, and there’s no indication whatsoever that they contributed to significant mistakes, let alone that they were part of a vast plot to steal the election. Voters use the machine to register their choices, then a paper copy of the votes is printed and scanned. This paper record is what was used in Georgia’s hand recount, which has now been completed. It found no major discrepancies (Trump picked up several hundred votes owing to errors in several localities but still trails by more than 12,000). A Trump-appointed judge just dismissed a Republican suit to block the certification of Georgia’s election.
Getting nowhere in court, the White House appears to be shifting to a political strategy based on blocking the certification of results and getting state legislatures to appoint Trump electors in states Trump lost. This is a profoundly undemocratic gambit that, if it were to enjoy any success, would precipitate a major constitutional crisis. The Constitution gives state legislatures the power to appoint electors, but it has been the norm for legislatures to appoint those electors on the basis of state elections for about 200 years. For any legislature to turn around now — solely because its party’s candidate lost and refuses to accept the result — and appoint electors in defiance of the public will would lack all legitimacy. It’d also be legally dubious, at best, to bypass state laws establishing elections as the mechanism for selecting presidential electors.
The most obvious way to prevent this travesty is for Republican state legislators to continue to reject it, the way almost all have done to this point. But they haven’t yet experienced a potential full-court press from Trump and his supporters (the Republican leaders of the Michigan state senate and house have been summoned to a White House meeting today). It’s also important for Republican senators to speak out against this effort and make it clear that they won’t stand for it when it comes time for Congress to consider electors. Finally, it’d be best of all if the president reconsidered going down this route.
He’s turning a narrow election defeat into a bid for infamy.
Dominion Voting Systems fail to show up for state hearing
UPDATED 2:45 PM PT – Saturday, November 21, 2020
GOP leaders in Pennsylvania criticized the voting system ‘‘Dominion’ after their lawyers failed to appear at a committee hearing.
On Friday, Rep. Seth Grove (R-Pa.) slammed ‘Dominion’ for being unwilling to defend their product publicly.
#PAHouse State Govt Cmte Chair Seth Grove details how Dominion Voting Systems were used by 1.3 million PA'ns in 2020 General Election. 19% of the total votes cast in PA's 2020 General Election were cast on Dominion's systems. Dominion abruptly canceled today's hearing. pic.twitter.com/Qt4DAyYDzE
— PA House Republicans (@PAHouseGOP) November 20, 2020
He also noted the company has not released any post-election analysis of their machines, despite there being over a million Pennsylvania voters who relied on the system to cast their ballot in November.
“I am saddened to report to the taxpayers of Pennsylvania and the 1.3 million voters who trusted Dominion Voting Systems with their ballots that Dominion has hung you out to dry and slapped you in your faces,” Rep. Grove stated. “Not only is Pennsylvania more skeptical, but the actions of Dominion Voting Systems last night have led credibility to their accusers’ accusations.”
The Trump legal team alleged a glitch in ‘Dominion’s’ software, which switched votes from President Trump to Joe Biden. Meanwhile on their website, ‘Dominion’ claims their system tabulated votes accurately.
and the evidence was iffy at best or supported by left leaning outlets and then scream "see there is evidence!".
The left on here are completely unhinged.
It's not at all the same and you proved it with your own post.
I disagree that the evidence was IFFY ... But you acknowledge the Democrats had evidence .... TRUMP HAS NONE. ZIP. NADA.
Thank you for highlighting the difference. As for unhinged? That's be any fool who wants to buy into Trump's lies and hissy fit because he lost the election both in terms of the popular vote and the Electoral College. Period.
Last edited by mgh888; 11/21/2008:49 PM.
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/small-gator-chomp.gif)
