|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165 |
sounds good to me. We need at least two big-producing additions at WR. We also need a Right Tackle *and* a Swing Tackle. We also need to load up some more developmental OL. We need DT, LB, too. AND, we need to replace all of the guys we have on 1-year deals, which is like half the defense. Next year's Browns will either take a big leap forward, or we will sink back into the abyss. What Berry does over the next 10-12 weeks will decide that.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720 |
With as many guys as we have on one year deals the roster turnover in terms of starters next year is going to be crazy.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
That would be a solid choice. I guess the only receiver I would say I like more is Traylon Burks, Arkansas.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 |
If we're considering OSU WRs, I might prefer Olave, based on what I've read about his dedication to the craft of being a good route runner, plus he's a bit taller than Wilson (6-1 vs 6-0) and a little faster (4.38 vs Wilson's 4.5). Smith-Njigba and Marvin Harrison Jr (who's 6-3) are pretty intriguing too, but they're only freshmen.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
If we're considering OSU WRs, I might prefer Olave, based on what I've read about his dedication to the craft of being a good route runner, plus he's a bit taller than Wilson (6-1 vs 6-0) and a little faster (4.38 vs Wilson's 4.5). Smith-Njigba and Marvin Harrison Jr (who's 6-3) are pretty intriguing too, but they're only freshmen. I watch and follow the Buckeyes almost as much as I do the Browns and I love both WR's but if I had a choice I would take Wilson because he is more explosive runs great routes just a little bit more than Olave but if it wa Olave I would be ok too ...
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435 |
My draft wish list depends on what we do in free agency ....
Address the WR position in free agency then I want Devin Lloyd the LB from Utah in the 1st round.
I love the idea of sticking him next to JOK and letting those two wreak havoc on opposing offenses together.
If we DO NOT address the WR position via free agency then I definitely want a WR in the 1st round.
I'm good with either Olave or Wilson.
Depending on who falls in the draft, I wouldn't necessarily mind double dipping at WR in the first TWO rounds.
We're THAT weak at the position .... especially with Landry and Higgins both likely to be gone.
(Though I hope we bring Landry back, just on a cheaper deal).
"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165 |
If the season ended today, we're picking 13th. That is PRIME territory to get our RT for the next decade***. Yes, I want a WR, too, but we have seen that we need a RT a lot more. I think we sign one in free agency, but doubling down allows whichever one isn't the starter to be the Swing Tackle. A WR taken at the top of Round 2 will still be plenty good. Just look at our very own Four Deuces.
*** If there is someone worthy sitting there, grab a natural LT and then play with flipping Wills back to RT.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Are you cutting Conklin or thinking he’s not going to be ready to play after this injury
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059 |
If the season ended today, we're picking 13th. That is PRIME territory to get our RT for the next decade***. Yes, I want a WR, too, but we have seen that we need a RT a lot more. I think we sign one in free agency, but doubling down allows whichever one isn't the starter to be the Swing Tackle. A WR taken at the top of Round 2 will still be plenty good. Just look at our very own Four Deuces.
*** If there is someone worthy sitting there, grab a natural LT and then play with flipping Wills back to RT. Evan Neal, Alabama, might be your guy, Prpl. He likely won't make it out of the top 10, but you never know....
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165 |
Are you cutting Conklin or thinking he’s not going to be ready to play after this injury https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/jack-conklin-18956/His deal is effectively done AND I don't think he will be healthy and ready in time to warrant him staying. A $6 million cap savings for releasing a guy that that tore a patellar tendon is pretty solid. That jumps to $12 million if it is a Post June 1 release. In short, unless that tendon repair recovers more on the 6-month side and not so much on the 12-month side of the average recovery window, I just don't see us keeping him. At best, because we can't cut an injured player without an injury settlement, I'd expect that he is here through the summer. Maybe even through camp.... but, if we're getting through mini-camps, or even training camp, and he has returned but isn't quite right, there is no way he ends up staying here. You cannot count on him being here, OR being the player he has been.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
I believe the injury settlement has to happen if the injury happens in that league year.
I’d expect us to keep Conklin.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468 |
I think we need look at the makeup of our lineman group. The injuries this year were crazy, but we quickly found ourselves without any viable tackles really quickly. I think it shows how much we relied on Hubbard, and went he went down, then we were just praying for no additional injuries there (which obviously didn't happen).
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
I think we need look at the makeup of our lineman group. The injuries this year were crazy, but we quickly found ourselves without any viable tackles really quickly. I think it shows how much we relied on Hubbard, and went he went down, then we were just praying for no additional injuries there (which obviously didn't happen). I don’t think many teams anticipate being on their third tackle for much of the season.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468 |
Yeah... it just feels like once Hubbard went down we were totally screwed at tackle.... yet we have guards for days.
Or maybe we should gone out and got someone (like we did with Hance last year).
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720 |
That sounds great in theory. That would first mean that you found someone that a team was willing to deal. I think seeing how high OT's are drafted and some of the money the position commands gives us an indication that just going out and finding one may not be as easy as it sounds.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468 |
I wouldn't expect them to swing a trade for a starter, but scour squads for a backup tackle.
It's all hindsight, which sucks, but you're telling me they couldn't sign someone off the street that could've turned in a better performance than Hudson in that last game? Especially since they were going to leave him on an island.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720 |
I'm saying it would be hard for me to believe that they could "sign someone off the streets", yes. Every NFL team in the league has depth charts. Each team has fourth and fifth option at the OT position. Once you get that far into your depth chart, the talent is not good and I don't believe NFL teams would want to weaken their depth at the OT position. So yes, if a player is on the street that can't make it to the fourth or fifth position on any one of 32 NFL depth charts, I doubt that anyone could consider them an upgrade.
Leaving him on an island is a different topic all together. There was certainly no excuse for that.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
I wouldn't expect them to swing a trade for a starter, but scour squads for a backup tackle.
It's all hindsight, which sucks, but you're telling me they couldn't sign someone off the street that could've turned in a better performance than Hudson in that last game? Especially since they were going to leave him on an island. I don't know my friend. I think sometimes you have to go with what you have. We drafted the guy in the 4th round. Maybe around pick 115? Hudson had been with us all season in the system. I don't see a whole lot of value in plucking someone off a PS late in the season or how that would have done much good. We also have to consider we have our own PS. I would assume we have a O-lineman or two stuck there. I think it was just his time up. I fully admit the team might not feel as good about the guy today as they did the day they drafted him. A lot of 4th round picks end up in that boat.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
I think we will be looking at WR DT RT C and LB in FA and the same positions in the draft but I Believe WR regardless of FA will be our first pick In the draft … just some early thoughts 
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806 |
Do we look at TE?
Hooper is paaid a lot and has underperformed. Njoku is a FA and may not want to stay here and/or may ask for a lot of money.
TE in this draft is deep. Draft a guy like Jalen Wyndermyer Texas A&M in the 2nd of Sam Laporta Iowa in the 3rd or 4th Pair them with Bryant then resign Carlson or go with Forristall
I think that would save us a lot of salary cap space and actually be a talent upgrade
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
TE is another possibility…
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,188 |
One of the main uses of analytics is the draft.
Numbers used in analytics point toward the impact of position priority.
Pass rushers are a premium position. So, what happens with Clowney and Takk's injury will mean alot come draft day.
Takk was playing well with good effort. He tore his achilles. His return given he was on a one year deal will be monitored closely. The med staff will have to say grace over if he can recover.
Clowney was outstanding. Very disruptive player who excels against the rush. Myles is on him to come back. The Browns will no doubt make him a good offer. But Myles hinted at he might want to play in warmer weather. We don't control his return. He does.
The third rated DE in the draft is George Karlaftis from Purdue. He should be there around where we pick. So he will be scouted hard.
We may go with a receiver in the first "if" someone is there when we pick that Berry falls all over. That would mean the guy is rated really high because a receiver in the first is not a analytics pick.
My guess is we go after free agents or maybe a trade for receivers. If I were Berry I would be looking to trade Hooper. He is not worth the money he is getting. He is a decent blocker. He does not have good hands. And he is terrible in run after catch.
I could see a BPA receiver in the second or third if it goes down that way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468 |
I just think that when we were starting guards at tackle (emphasis on 'starting' and 'guards') might've been a signal that we needed to find a guy.
I dunno... I hate making hindsight arguments because they're usually unfair. I do like what Hance showed us in some tough situations. I give Hudson a pass because he was a rookie.
I believe we still have Taylor on the roster. Not sure what to think about him never getting time over a guy that doesn't play the position and a rookie.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,447
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,447 |
My problem was that I sat back in my easy chair after our 11-5 season .. This season brought me back to reality , the Browns, Browning ! Now I am back into challenge , question , squint at all aspects of their decisions . Starting with Berry and working my down through the ranks to Callahan. It has been beat to death , but one decision will haunt me all off season. Hudson one on one with Watt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
We pick 13th. The perfect spot to take the punter. If we picked earlier it would be too early.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,530
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,530 |
We pick 13th. The perfect spot to take the punter. If we picked earlier it would be too early. Trade up for Cade York or cancel the 2022 season.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 |
All the teams you will see in the playoffs will have offenses that can impose their will they will have offense that can throw the ball down the field, and they will have offenses that can score points quickly.
I don't think in any way, that trying to find a Right tackle for the next decade is going to help the Browns in that category of developing a quick strike, 2 minute, down field offense.
If the Browns are going to play, 2 yard screen pass offense! then they will Never get back to the playoffs.
Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,806 |
Where the Browns pick in the first round of the 2022 NFL Draft Updated: Jan. 09, 2022, 8:50 p.m. | Published: Jan. 09, 2022, 8:49 p.m. John Kuntz, cleveland.com By Scott Patsko, cleveland.com CLEVELAND, Ohio - The Browns began Sunday with a chance to move as high as seventh and as low as 16th in the first round of the 2022 NFL Draft. In the end, they didn’t move at all. The Browns will pick 13th in the first round of this year’s draft, which will begin April 28 in Las Vegas. The Browns began Sunday in the 13th spot and didn’t move despite their 21-16 win against the Bengals. The Browns last picked 13th in the first round in 2014, when they selected linebacker/edge Kamerion Wimbley out of Florida State. The team’s best pick at No. 13 has been Texas running back Eric Metcalf in 2002. Here’s a look at the first round for non-playoff teams: 1. Jacksonville. 2. Detroit. 3. Houston. 4. N.Y. Jets. 5. N.Y. Giants. 6. Carolina. 7. N.Y. Giants (from trade with Chicago). 8. Atlanta. 9. Denver. 10. N.Y. Jets (from trade with Seattle). 11. Washington. 12. Minnesota. 13. BROWNS. 14. Baltimore. 15. Philadelphia (from trade with Miami) 16. Philadelphia (from trade with Indianapolis) Pick 17 and 18 will be decided by the outcome of Sunday night’s game between the LA. Chargers and Las Vegas. New Orleans will have one of the spots. Pittsburgh is also in play for one of the spots. https://www.cleveland.com/browns/20...e-first-round-of-the-2022-nfl-draft.html
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,648
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,648 |
There is no way that Wimbley was 2014 and Metcalf was 2002… Metcalf was around before the move, Wimbley was 2006 ish.
Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,282
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,282 |
There is no way that Wimbley was 2014 and Metcalf was 2002… Metcalf was around before the move, Wimbley was 2006 ish. Without looking it up, I thought Metcalf was 89 or 90. I did look up Wimbley and he was pick 13, 2006.
Last edited by FORTBROWNFAN; 01/09/22 11:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 |
Looks like cleveland.com & the Plain Dealer can't afford to employ copy editors. Pretty sloppy work by Patsko.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440 |
picking 13th should garner us a top flight WR. There are between 3-5 of them based on my quick research. There are a couple of CBs who will be drafted high, of course a few QBs and edge guys too … I like our spot
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,550 |
We are in a good position allowing us to go any number of ways.
My hope is we do enough in FA to be able to draft a great player no matter the position. It's obvious we aren't good enough to be selecting for "a" position. We can use good players at 4-5 positions.
Just my initial feeling is we can use a player at the following positions. I base this on feeling players suck, or won't be here next season for one reason or another.
WR C RT DT DE LB K P
Those would be positions we need to address through FA and or the draft.
I am not even touching the QB dilemma.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440 |
Our defense has to get better up the middle: DT, LB especially (granted we re-sign Clowney)
Our offense has to get better on the perimeter: WR is a massive hole (of course, QB is the primary issue if we dont think Baker can)
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,165 |
Do we look at TE?
Hooper is paaid a lot and has underperformed. Njoku is a FA and may not want to stay here and/or may ask for a lot of money.
TE in this draft is deep. Draft a guy like Jalen Wyndermyer Texas A&M in the 2nd of Sam Laporta Iowa in the 3rd or 4th Pair them with Bryant then resign Carlson or go with Forristall
I think that would save us a lot of salary cap space and actually be a talent upgrade I could definitely see us allowing Njoku to walk and take the compensatory pick next year in return. Not only has he not really shown himself to be worthy of a mega-contract, our offensive scheme doesn't really allow for it. We're not predicated on having offensive super weapons, but more on having a ho-hum bunch of JAGs at the skill positions. i.e. we spend a ton of time with 3-TEs out there, but we don't really utilize them, never feature or lean on any specifically, and even when we do use them, they don't do much. ANY Tight End can fill that role. The one thing Njoku has going for him, however, is YAC. Far and away, he had the most of any TE on the roster, and he almost had as much as Landry who had like 16 more receptions (and led the team in catches and YAC). Njoku also led the team in receiving TDs, but that's more a function of being called and getting the opportunity. Hunt had more receptions than Bryant, and Hunt missed half the season.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,468 |
I thought Harris looked pretty good at center, no?
Do we know Conklin's timetable/availability? I would think, if necessary, we address that later on in FA since we're expecting him back at some point (essentially, finding Hubbard's replacement).
I hope we re-sign Clowney. If not, we have a gaping hole at the position. The problem is, he knows that too. It doesn't take too much reading between the lines to see he wants that green. Even if we get him back, we still need to draft someone to be groomed behind these 2 guys and to replace Takk.
If we are able to retain Njoku, we are still going to need another depth TE (probably more of the blocking variety). If we lose Njoku and ditch Hooper, we will need 2 starter-caliber TEs, so our need at the TE spot is totally up in the air.
Similarly, WR needs depends largely on what we do with Landry (and to a much less degree, Higgins). We need to find a guy that can look like a #1, and we'll need to find a solid-to-very-good possession receiver if Landry is cut. Finding those 2, that can be starters right away, in one off-season is a big ask.
Between WR and TE groups, at least one of those has to be totally solidified to start the year.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 313
2nd String
|
2nd String
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 313 |
My 2022 draft to chose from
RD 1 & 2
WR - George Pickens, Georgia, 6’3”, 205, JR, 4.61 sec
WR - Justyn Ross, Clemson, 6’4”, 210, RJR, 4.53 sec
WR - Xavier Hutchinson, Iowa State, 6’3”, 207, SR, 4.49 sec
WR - Dahu Green, AR St, 6’4”, 201, SR, 4.51 sec
WR - Alec Pierce, Cincinnati, 6’2”, 213, SR, 4.48 sec
WR - Jahan Dotson, PSU, 5’11”, 184, SR, 4.34 sec
WR - Wan’Dale Robinson, UK, 5’11”, 185, JR, 4.38 sec
RD 3
ILB - Damone Clark, LSU, 6’3”, 245, SR
ILB - Leo Chenal, Wisconsin, 6’2”, 260, JR
ILB - Mike Rose, Iowa State, 6’4”, 245, SR
ILB - Jack Campbell, Iowa, 6’5”, 245, JR
ILB - Quay Walker, Georgia, 6’4”, 240, SR
ILB - Aaron Hansford, Texas A&M, 6’4”, 236, GR
ILB - Nate Landman, Colorado, 6’3”, 235, SR
RD 4
EDGE - Logan Hall, Houston, 6’5”, 260, SR
EDGE - Kingsley Enagbare, South Carolina, 6’4”, 270, SR
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2022 NFL Season 2022 NFL Draft Draft
|
|