DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Jim Jordan refuses to answer questions

Well, Jim Jordan is at it again, he's refusing to answer question.. Actually, he's refusing to be questioned about Jan 6.. Here are the various organizations reporting it....Note: No right wing reporting on the subject... No wonder Trumpians are so lost.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Jim+Jordan

Good! He has no reason to cooperate with anyone. A peaceful protest turned into a riot. Saw it happen all summer 2020 and nothing was done about it.

Do you feel Tucker’s hand move when you talk?

No just see Democrats trying to place blame on an unfortunate event for political gain. There is no proof anyone orchestrated the riot. So I sure would not help them manufacture blame.

You didn't listen to the speeches at the pre-riot rally and hear Trump lie about the election for two months before January 6th I suppose.

That is just rhetoric. Same rhetoric just on the other side that led to the riots of 2020. The Jan 6th committee is nothing but a political motivation committee. No substance just emotional nonsense.

What president lied for months to inspire the summer riots? I must have missed that part. What high ranking government officials lied and told those people to take to the streets? You do remember that Trump told them to march to the capital after he had several speakers fire up the crowd, right?

He planned the rally, fired them up and then sent them to where the insurrection took place. You have nothing that compares to that. Nothing.

Oh people definitely orchestrated the riot. Watch the documentary. Also, there are two Republicans on the committee who want the same answers. It has also gone against their career aspirations to request such information.

Jordan has also contradicted himself on when he spoke to the president on January 6 and what the conversations were about.

Also, it took Trump 187 minutes to call off the rioters. That’s over 3 hours. 3 hours! You really don’t think that merits investigating?

On top of that, Jim Jordan sent a text to Mark Meadows that said, in part “Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.”

That, in combination with the riots, doesn’t merit any cooperation, explanation, etc?

I gave my kids a bunch of caffeine and sugar and then told them to play outside, but not to run, because that’s dangerous when it’s icy, and wouldn’t you know it, when I walked outside they were running around!

I do not see anything other than political gain by the Communist party in the Jan 6th investigation.

So you think it's communists that are investigating the despot? I see how you came to your opinion based on the fact you refuse to look at the evidence. You're too busy blaming those doing the investigating rather than take an honest look at why they are investigating him.

There is no evidence there is rhetoric. Why is your Vice President not held accountable for bailing rioters out of jail from the summer of 2020. Where are the investigations into those riots. This is nothing but political theater.

Then there shouldn't be anything to worry about.... What's to stop him then from doing a Clinton Benghazi hearing?

If Congress assembles a committee to investigate her for those actions, then she should testify. That did not happen during a Republican controlled Congress.

Also, what makes the Democrats on the panel communists? Which policies do they endorse that are Communist? Are Kinzinger and Cheney communists, too?

WHITE: an unfortunate event? You mean where a mob of whipped up Trump supporters, gravy militias, and Q believers stormed the US Capitol Building to stop the business of government the day they were certifying the 2020 Presidential election. That's now an unfortunate event? Tucker must have pulled that one out of the insurrectionists' thesaurus of lesser synonyms. You must be pretty nimble with all the mental gymnastics it takes to get from attempted coup to unfortunate event.

RED: for political gain? Yes, I'm sure it has nothing to do with holding people responsible for their actions. Boy, the party of personal responsibility and law and order is just chucking those values right out the window to justify Trump's actions and those traitors that attempted to overthrow the government. AND I GUESS NONE OF THAT WAS FOR POLITICAL GAIN?

YELLOW: There is no proof anyone orchestrated the riot.??? Get your head out of Tuckers butt and open your eyes, there is all kinds of proof! Video of the event, guilty pleas, an investigation reaching the highest offices, and those leaders confessing they planned it. BUT I GET YOU BRO, NO PROOF… EXCEPT FOR THE PROOF… AND WE'LL JUST TRY TO IGNORE THAT.

I don't watch Tucker. I don't watch the news. I do think those that stormed the capital and those that rioted should be charged to the full extent of the law. The political part of this is propaganda. The Democrats want to use whatever they can make stick and attach it to Trump. That is a waste of tax payer time, money, and energy. He called a rally/ No law against that but, it was pretty stupid in my opinion. The election was over. There were many people that attended that rally that did not storm the capitol. Why were they not motivated? Why were they not some how driven to do those stupid acts? The rhetoric was also stupid. Quite a bit of the rhetoric during his 4 years was stupid. If he would have toned down the rhetoric he would have exposed the Democrats and media for who they really are. During the 1st debate vs Biden if he would have toned down his rhetoric then he would have exposed Biden as a senile blabbering puppet that he is. Trump was to undisciplined. The Dems fear him though. That is what Jan 6th is all about. I see it as a stain on America just like the BLM riots of 2020. A stain on what was once a great country.

I don't believe you. You're a Trump supporter and by default not trustworthy. You defend an attack on our country and our democracy, then dismiss it like yesterdays' humorous news folly… Deplorable to the core. If this country falls, it will be because of the likes of you.

You say the 'rioters' should be punished, but not the political players… this is more Trumpian rhetoric to protect Trump, nothing more. It has no basis in law or fact, just a twisting of the truth to fit your agenda. So sad.

Dude - you are trying to have a conversation with someone that believes that believes that Biden and Democrats are "Evil". You aren't permitted to have a different opinion - you are actually branded evil. Save your typing.

They've already disclosed the text messages/testimony of the attempted coup organizers planning with Trump campaign people. They've disclosed the text messages of the Congress people and media people trying to go to Trump to get him to call off the dogs.

The links between the legal and political are there, unfortunately.

He said he doesn't watch the news. If that's true he bases his opinion on nothing but "feelings" and has no intent at looking at the facts with which to form a reasonable conclusion. That helps explain a lot.

And that's exactly the type of thinking that caused the attack at the capital on Jan. 6th. Trump and his cronies spoke. He had lied to them about the election being stolen for two months before the attack on the Capital. Rather than his followers looking at the facts, they acted on their emotions he invoked because it "felt true". It "felt" like something they wanted to believe.

So here we are..... still. The #bluelivesmatter crowd that injured 140 Capital police officers.

Oh yes, just like they proved collusion and Ukraine right? They spew it out and you all keep lapping it up! Blinded by hate!

You're right about Ukraine. They never did pin anything on Hunter Biden. Yes, it was proven that Trump held up the money congress approved for Ukraine. And it appears you never heard the portion of the phone call he made to Ukraine. Even when they edited what they did release, it was awful.

You should really start watching the news.

Wow is all I can say. They have his lap top. They just choose to ignore the issue. He used his Father's influence to get rich over there but hey if you want to ignore it Ok by me. I will tell you this though, if The Democrats actually had something on Trump that should breaking the law he would have went down long ago. Just keep believing what your news tells you.

By the way we do not have news. We have propoganda from the right and from the left. We do nkt have a fair and balanced media. Not anymore.

Yeah, Trump's hand picked DOJ just decided to ignore Hunters laptop and his dad's involvement. Do you even hear yourself?



For someone who doesn't watch it, you sound just like a repeat of the propaganda the right keeps spewing.

Yep. To his point, I’m sure there are political motivations by the Democrats. However, even if there are political motivations, that’s not enough to say that all it is is political motivations. Like you said, there is objective evidence that is out there.

I mean, plainly, how is it possible that the president of the United States doesn’t respond for THREE HOURS when the Capitol is overrun - with his running mate inside by the way - when we all know he is in town and just held a rally previously on that day?

oh, look there is a balloon.

So far all I see is the Dems trying to deflect from how bad things are in America since their Progressive Leaders got a chance to run the show.

Actually, the investigation is an attempt to address it head on.

Actually, his good lawyer advised him to avoid this Democrat political trap at all costs.

As a result, one might say he’s deflecting…

Rhetoric is exactly what you've been spouting in all these responses...

Republicans or should I say Trumpians are afraid to speak.. They are afraid to go on record.. Terrified of it I think.

Remember how republicans beat on Hillary Clinton... Say what you want, but she sat in front of a decidedly unfriendly congress and answered questions for about 11 hours. Didn't take the 5th once. They asked and she answered..

Frankly, Hillary have bigger balls than any of these Trumpians...



IT WAS NOT A PEACEFUL DEMONSTRATION... IT WAS NEVER INTENDED TO BE PEACEFUL... LISTEN TO THE SPEECHES BEFORE THE ACTION STARTED... TRUMP AND EACH MINION MADE IT CLEAR..

Hillary answered questions for 11 hours... She clearly didn't feel she had anything to hide..

Jordan and the rest of these nutless wonders are chicken.....

If you consider chickens to be wise, I would agree with you.

Other than her server.

That really torqued me off immensely, especially because I work in a secure environment at times and we are very strict about protocols. It was clear that it was rules for the peasants and not for the royalty.

I detest that woman. In 2016, I detested her more than Trump. I could go on for days discussing my disdain.

That all being said, she still appeared.

I don’t think her any better than people like Jim Jordan. But, I think a lot of my frustration is that Republicans in office were pounding on the table to hold her accountable. Fine with me. Now that it’s them in the crosshairs, it’s “I ain’t sayin’ nothin’.”

For all the negatives about her, she's got way bigger balls than they do (take that however you want).

Chickens are retarded and Jordan is a match.

On top of being a vile creature.

Your taste in humans beings is very telling about who you are.

And what they found wasn't enough to press any charges or "lock her up" for.... In fact, while they didn't like her having a private server, there was nothing to hang her for... Just another in a long line of distractions put out there by Trumpians. Funny thing, during that investigation, it was found that many individuals have used Private emails and servers.. Like Colin Powell and George W. Bush....

Do you detest her for things you KNOW she did, or for things that she was ACCUSED of? Thus far, she's answered every question she was asked.. Unlike Trump and his minions who continue to hide and then yell and scream about witch hunts and the like.

I guess it's ok for republicans to go on witch hunts (no, I don't think it was) but not ok for Democrats to do it... (no, I don't think this is a witch hunt either)


And yes, she did appear and didn't make a fuss.. She showed up and answered every question asked.... which was my point.

Let's be honest, who really "liked" Hillary? I sure didn't. But she does have bigger balls than these Republicans. She did testify for 11 hours. And all they have in response is "what about her server"? After all Trump and his cronies have done to undermine our election they still won't step up to the plate and admit they were the cause of Jan. 6th and are still screaming what about hillary!?

Even after Trump was elected he hand picked his own committee to investigate her and they found nothing.

The Justice Department investigation into Trump's claims of Hillary Clinton's corruption is reportedly over, and found nothing

https://www.insider.com/doj-probe-trump-alleged-clinton-corruption-found-nothing-2020-1

His ego is so fragile he couldn't accept the fact he didn't win the majority of the vote in 2016 and had his own voter fraud commission that also found nothing.

Trump scraps his own voter fraud commission

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42561699

He was saying in 2016 that if he lost the election was rigged. He repeated that same thing in 2020. Then when he lost he claimed the election was stolen. And his minions gobbled it up like Halloween candy.

Now they hide like children playing hide and seek on an elementary school playground.