Even before I saw the last 2 replies I thought to come here to explain. I thought this question because it bothers me how the Patriots appeared to make the Browns look like they were standing still. ( The packers Qb can just lob up drop in passes to the sideline every 5th play, and it works enough to be a thing.)
I'd argue that with all of the Browns talent, that these other teams are getting more out of their talent, so why does it take so much talent for the Browns to win, unless they need to learn how to win, so "Do they know how to win?"
The Patiriots, Colts,
Titans, Dolphins, ... Cardinals, , Bills, Rams, (rams?) are winning with less talent in players,
Position, by position, player for player, position group by position group, pound for pound, the Browns have better talent top to bottom but the other teams are, doing more with less,
that's what I'm asking,
What are the other teams doing, that they can do more with less, that they know how to win more than the Browns?
What do the Browns have to do? To do more with less?
Do the Browns know how to win.
(I think back on another question I want to ask but haven't. How many Browns starters became starters by beating out the previous starter by outplaying them in head to head competition, or in camp. It's not so many centuries ago, that that used to be a thing, I think.