Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,266
Likes: 1330
M
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,266
Likes: 1330
I didn't know where to put this but thought it was a cool graphic to share. I'm sure many already know this but for those who don't often travel to different stadiums, here his a picture showing how close or far a stadium is from downtown.



Tackles are tackles.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
Maybe they should re think the way they do stadiums altogether.

sure, why can't I watch the game live from my car anyway. or, why do people all have to gather in one place anyway, what about, what about, what if, hundreds could watch from a ceiling down view, windows in the top of a dome.
or just ride around the field in a low level blimp 20 feet up, that would be cool. I GOT it.
Camera Ball. Ball Camera,

Ehh, put it... 8? 4? miles from downtown? Well, cities like Chicago, and Cleveland, others? are up against a coast
and therefore are different from
cities that sprawl out from a center like KC, Indy, Cincy, and that alone should be a major consideration.

" A tiger got him."


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Downtown is overrated. It's nice if itis fairly close, and some of those stadiums listed are a bit deceiving. Two that I have been to, Tampa and Chicago are downtown stadiums by my definition even if they aren't sitting between skyscrapers.

There are advantages to being away from the downtown area. It creates a bit more infrastructure in the way of hotels, restaurants, etc, and it generally eases congestion getting in and out of the stadium area.

But no doubt you don't want to follow the brainless mold the Cavs undertook when they stuck their arena out in Richfield. That was moronic.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 52
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 52
Maybe we need to build a new stadium outside the downtown area, 9 out of the 12 teams to have never won a SuperBowl have downtown stadiums. lol


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
That may help answer the age old question, "Is it something in the water?"


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Originally Posted by dawg66
Maybe we need to build a new stadium outside the downtown area, 9 out of the 12 teams to have never won a SuperBowl have downtown stadiums. lol

The site most discussed is on the bluff above the muni lot. TV 3 and the FBI are up there. Getting them to move would be seamless. After that is a bunch of worn down buildings and gravel parking lots which would be easy enough to buy...either willingly or by legal action.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Just speaking for myself and family, but we always enjoyed the location of the stadium. There is so much to do around there. You park the car, either tailgate or get something to eat at a local pub. Walk to the stadium. Walk to a few bars after the game to eat again and drink some more. Traffic has cleared by the time you are ready to leave.

3 members like this: FATE, sk8termom, EveDawg
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,347
Likes: 483
E
Legend
Online
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,347
Likes: 483
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Just speaking for myself and family, but we always enjoyed the location of the stadium. There is so much to do around there. You park the car, either tailgate or get something to eat at a local pub. Walk to the stadium. Walk to a few bars after the game to eat again and drink some more. Traffic has cleared by the time you are ready to leave.

This. I love walking to/from the stadium and walking around downtown. I usually try to get a hotel downtown, so it works out perfect.

I understand that if you are coming from the suburbs it may be a pain. But I understand the train to the stadium is out of commission. Atlanta's stadium is downtownish. I take the train in directly to the stadium. Easy peasy. Love it. I don't walk around Atl downtown though, because it's unsafe. That is one thing I love about Cleveland, I have never felt unsafe walking around downtown. Nobody tries to sell me drugs. No panhandlers. No sketchy people. Just drunk Browns fans.


No Craps Given
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
I always liked the central location of the stadium as well. I understand what Peen is saying but why would a city build infrastructure outside the city when it's already available in the city? You already have the hotels downtown to absorb the crowds. The attractions like the Rock&Roll HOF, eateries, etc... are already there. I do understand it would be a positive in the case of traffic after the game but that's the only actual positive I can take away from it. And as far as that goes, I've never had a terrible problem getting out of there after a game.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
I bet neither of you are driving after a game to Columbus 7I south is like dodging stuntmen for 2.4 hours and it wouldn't clear up until late night, so for anyone who may work on Monday, it might be easy to leave the stadium, but you are putting your life in the hands of other drivers and there is about no way around it.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
You put your life in the hands of other drivers any time you drive in traffic. Your only option is defensive driving.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,374
Likes: 437
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,374
Likes: 437
Originally Posted by THROW LONG
I bet neither of you are driving after a game to Columbus 7I south is like dodging stuntmen for 2.4 hours and it wouldn't clear up until late night, so for anyone who may work on Monday, it might be easy to leave the stadium, but you are putting your life in the hands of other drivers and there is about no way around it.

What would moving the location of the stadium do to "clear" up 71 south all the way to Columbus?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
I get that it's different for everyone, but when we lived in Ohio, our house was in country setting even though it was technically the suburbs. We had acreage w/a lot of it being wooded. All except our actual yard, which had been cleared of the majority of trees. Behind the woods was a cornfield and that was flanked by a horse farm. So, going into the city was kind of cool. Would not want to live there, but it was cool having everything right there. I also liked not having to drive around looking for places to eat/drink. It was nice just to walk among the people w/many dressed in Browns gear.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
It wouldn't but both said about the current location that
"Traffic has cleared by the time you are ready to leave"
and
"I've never had a terrible problem getting out of there after a game" Plus it's not just something you can change 30 minutes or even an hour earlier or later to avoid.


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Just speaking for myself and family, but we always enjoyed the location of the stadium. There is so much to do around there. You park the car, either tailgate or get something to eat at a local pub. Walk to the stadium. Walk to a few bars after the game to eat again and drink some more. Traffic has cleared by the time you are ready to leave.

I like the location as well. I am just pointing out some benefits of a stadium not being in the central business district.

Most games I don't stay downtown. When I only came up for 1-2 games a year, I always did for the reasons already mentioned. Now that I come up for at least 6-7 of the home games, I only stay downtown for the night games. I do have to consider the budget spent on hotel rooms. Generally speaking you drop $150 a night staying outside of town. At 2-3 nights per game, that starts to add up over multiple games a year. That $150 also takes in to account the daily parking fees associated with staying downtown.

And to be fair, I avoid the traffic and downtown game parking by getting on the Rapid train out in Brookpark and go to the Terminal Tower. I think the senior daily pass if $2.50 a day. You can't beat being able to park your car and getting a round trip ride for $2.50. Maybe it's a $5 pass. Either way, you can't beat that.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
I always liked the central location of the stadium as well. I understand what Peen is saying but why would a city build infrastructure outside the city when it's already available in the city? You already have the hotels downtown to absorb the crowds. The attractions like the Rock&Roll HOF, eateries, etc... are already there. I do understand it would be a positive in the case of traffic after the game but that's the only actual positive I can take away from it. And as far as that goes, I've never had a terrible problem getting out of there after a game.

Many times the footprint of a new stadium is larger than many cities have available. Unless you tear down the existing structure and play at some remote location for several years there is no real option. NYC as an example didn't have options to build a new stadium in Manhattan. Nor where the old stadium existed. The braves new stadium is outside of town. The only available places to build we more or less in dangerous locations. Not many are going to go to games in high crime areas.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,795
Likes: 452
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,795
Likes: 452
I vote that they move the stadium to my neighborhood so I can walk to the game, and tailgate.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
1 member likes this: jfanent
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,923
Likes: 343
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,923
Likes: 343
Originally Posted by GMdawg
I vote that they move the stadium to my neighborhood so I can walk to the game, and tailgate.

I second that. I think I could make it to your neighborhood to go to games.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,780
Likes: 920
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,780
Likes: 920
There's something about seeing the city's skyline and Lake Erie up close from the stadium that adds to the experience.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
2 members like this: FATE, Versatile Dog
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Originally Posted by jfanent
There's something about seeing the city's skyline and Lake Erie up close from the stadium that adds to the experience.
I agree. And I think it’s even moreso with baseball


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
While I do understand your point, Cleveland isn't New York City. There are actually many areas that are littered with old rust belt manufacturing that have closed shop. Both the cost and ability of being able to locate a stadium in Cleveland doesn't seem as though that would be an issue. I find the two beyond reasonable to compare.

And then you have the negative impact it would have on businesses in the city. The loss of revenue to the hotels and eateries. The loss of tax revenue. In that way too Cleveland is not New York City. Cleveland would have a much tougher time dealing with that loss in revenue.

I do understand what you mean though. The best example I can give you that I know about first hand is Kentucky Speedway which was built in Sparta, Kentucky. It's pretty much in BFE between Cincinnati and Louisville. If you wish to talk about a location where nothing was there, that's the place. lol I have several relatives that live withing a few miles of the racetrack. An entire economy has slowly been built around that racetrack. An economy that never existed there before. It has been great for the community. Hotels and eateries. Supporting race businesses. Quite a boost for them. The only real difference here is they didn't steal that economic boom from their neighbor. No city or town around them were punished or lost economically so they could thrive.

That's what would happen if you relocated the Browns out of the city to a suburb. And my guess would be that most of the people that moved to those suburbs did so to avoid the mess you have in the city. I could only see the city of Cleveland suffer if they lost the revenue associated with the Browns being moved to a suburb. And if what I've seen proposed should happen, a dome, that revenue would be exponentially higher.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Again, I don't advocate the team move out to Medina. I like downtown as well. I like my club seats where i can sit and overlook the lake and innder harbor before games. I like seeing the tops of several buildings while sitting in the seats.

When a new stadium is erected, a new site will have to be found. The one I mentioned earlier would be a good option, even if it is east of the current stadium, by maybe 1 mile. More or less overlooking the muni lot and burke lakefront.

Earlier I said I only stayed downtown for night games. I wasn't clear...it costs near $150 a night more than staying outside of town. I stay at a marriott courtyard in middleburgh heights (berea)for $110 a night You start going in to a downtown hotel and you start paying around $210 a night plus daily parking for your vehicle.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 57
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 57
For nostalgic reasons, I like the stadium right where it is. Same field that the Browns have played on since their inception in the 40’s. - With new seating built around the same hallowed field. The current stadium has what, 30 years left? Absolutely no reason to move it or knock it down anytime soon. It looks great on the outside and inside. Cleveland doesn’t have money to waste by tearing down a stadium for absolutely no reason. And for all this talk about a dome and the revenue it would bring in…. For who? Who would benefit from the additional revenue? The city of Cleveland? Do any of you think that the city of Cleveland, with their incompetent and unqualified politicians would manage the revenue in an intelligent way? No way.

1 member likes this: FATE
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Originally Posted by RememberMuni
For nostalgic reasons, I like the stadium right where it is. Same field that the Browns have played on since their inception in the 40’s. - With new seating built around the same hallowed field. The current stadium has what, 30 years left? Absolutely no reason to move it or knock it down anytime soon. It looks great on the outside and inside. Cleveland doesn’t have money to waste by tearing down a stadium for absolutely no reason. And for all this talk about a dome and the revenue it would bring in…. For who? Who would benefit from the additional revenue? The city of Cleveland? Do any of you think that the city of Cleveland, with their incompetent and unqualified politicians would manage the revenue in an intelligent way? No way.


With the miles of underground hot water tube running under the field, it isn't the same field you mention.

Trying to get the team to use that stadium another 30 years would be a good way for unqualified, incompetent politicians to run the Browns out of town like the group in charge who ran the Browns out of town last time.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by RememberMuni
For nostalgic reasons, I like the stadium right where it is. Same field that the Browns have played on since their inception in the 40’s. - With new seating built around the same hallowed field. The current stadium has what, 30 years left? Absolutely no reason to move it or knock it down anytime soon. It looks great on the outside and inside. Cleveland doesn’t have money to waste by tearing down a stadium for absolutely no reason. And for all this talk about a dome and the revenue it would bring in…. For who? Who would benefit from the additional revenue? The city of Cleveland? Do any of you think that the city of Cleveland, with their incompetent and unqualified politicians would manage the revenue in an intelligent way? No way.


With the miles of underground hot water tube running under the field, it isn't the same field you mention.

Trying to get the team to use that stadium another 30 years would be a good way for unqualified, incompetent politicians to run the Browns out of town like the group in charge who ran the Browns out of town last time.

OOOOhh, then they could start over again, and we can restart this 30 year abissmal process.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Crazy to think our stadium is already 25 years old. It’s one of the most bland stadiums in the NFL (and really never was top tier, even in its original years).

I like the location for nostalgia to be on the lake, but wouldn’t be opposed to moving it either


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
1 member likes this: Milk Man
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Weather impacts all seasons. There is no excuse to limit usage by not covering the thing.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
Yeah, it was awful the way building a new stadium was going on the ballot and polls had shown it was almost guaranteed to be approved by the voters when Art made his deal with Baltimore. Those damned politicians!


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,454
Likes: 1269
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,454
Likes: 1269
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Weather impacts all seasons. There is no excuse to limit usage by not covering the thing.

Here's another reason that I expect the Haslams to push for a new stadium in the near future.

If/when this actually happens, it would be a real kick in the teeth to Browns STHs if the Browns should manage to stumble into a home AFC championship game only to have it moved to a neutral site.


1 member likes this: Ballpeen
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,918
Likes: 1778
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,918
Likes: 1778
Not sure if my memory serves, but wasn't that basically after the fact?


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Originally Posted by FATE
Not sure if my memory serves, but wasn't that basically after the fact?

Yes.

Quote
Art Modell announced on Nov. 6, 1995 that he was moving the Browns to Baltimore for the 1996 football season. The announcement secured the demise of the stadium. The initial demolition of the stadium began on Dec. 17, 1995 as fans began tearing out the wooden bleacher seats in the Dawg Pound to take home for souvenirs after the final Browns' game at Cleveland Municipal Stadium. In January 1996, Michael White reached an agreement with the owners of the NFL that Cleveland could keep the Browns name and colors and would be granted an expansion team in 1999 if they would agree to construct a new stadium to league specifications. Plans to construct the new stadium (Cleveland Browns Stadium) on the same site as Cleveland Municipal Stadium were approved in April 1996.

From this article: https://case.edu/ech/articles/c/cleveland-municipal-stadium

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 52
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 52
Vers, your quote was from when Mayor White tried to get a new team after the fact. There was already a memorandum on the ballot to build a new stadium using tax payer money at the time Modell announced the move and it was voted in favor of just 2 days later.


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
You may be correct about that. The actual truth about Art never being offered a new stadium is totally incorrect. Those who blame the city for not offering Art a new stadium are incorrect. The fact is Art turned down a new stadium over much of what this very thread is about. Location......

Art Modell was offered a stadium for the Cleveland Browns and passed: Mark Naymik

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- What you think you know about Art Modell's decision to take the Browns out of Cleveland for a shiny new stadium in Baltimore is legend.

Today, the consciences of a couple of old-guard Cleveland politicians give us a long-hidden fact about Modell's departure. Specifically, when Modell claimed he would have stayed if city leaders had offered to build him a stadium, he was lying.

He was offered a new stadium.

At the Gateway sports complex.

He rejected the offer, years before leaving.

Since the former Browns and Ravens team owner died last week, we have rehashed the famous narrative that Modell left town out of frustration with political leaders who stuck him with the dumpy, history-rich Cleveland Municipal Stadium, which lacked the revenue-generating luxury suites and other amenities of newer stadiums.

Modell was particularly upset that leaders here bent over backward for Dick Jacobs and Gordon Gund, the former owners of the Indians and the Cavaliers, respectively, who were getting new homes -- courtesy of the taxpayers, at the Gateway sports complex completed in 1994 just north of the Inner Belt downtown.

The story of the stadium snub for years has left us asking: Why didn't city leaders just offer to build Modell a new stadium along with the others?

At the Gateway sports complex.

He rejected the offer, years before leaving.

Since the former Browns and Ravens team owner died last week, we have rehashed the famous narrative that Modell left town out of frustration with political leaders who stuck him with the dumpy, history-rich Cleveland Municipal Stadium, which lacked the revenue-generating luxury suites and other amenities of newer stadiums.

Modell was particularly upset that leaders here bent over backward for Dick Jacobs and Gordon Gund, the former owners of the Indians and the Cavaliers, respectively, who were getting new homes -- courtesy of the taxpayers, at the Gateway sports complex completed in 1994 just north of the Inner Belt downtown.

The story of the stadium snub for years has left us asking: Why didn't city leaders just offer to build Modell a new stadium along with the others?

After leaving town in 1996, Modell reinforced the snub story in interviews with news outlets, though he was not speaking at the time to The Plain Dealer, which he saw as part of the conspiracy against him.

"My major regret is that I should not have acceded to their request to stay on the side on Gateway," Modell told Cleveland Magazine in August 1996. He told the magazine he should have forced a football stadium into the Gateway conversation.

"I should have made my demands known at that time. Then we wouldn't be here now. . . . Had they even mumbled the word 'new stadium' I would have said, 'Let's talk.' "

It turns out that officials at the time tried to talk with him. Modell wouldn't listen.

George Forbes, who was Cleveland's council president during the late 1980s and a key player in negotiations with team owners during planning for Gateway, said he and others asked Modell to be a part of the project.

Forbes said leaders proposed building a third Gateway sports facility for the Browns, just south of the Inner Belt a couple of blocks from what is now Progressive Field.

Forbes' memory for detail is hazy. But he said then-Cuyahoga County Commissioner Tim Hagan, Jacobs and lawyers familiar with the financing options were present with Modell at a meeting when the offer was made.

"Tim and I were saying, 'While we are doing this, we might as well clear up the whole damn thing and build all three stadiums,' " Forbes told me. "This way we don't have to go back, and future councilmen and commissioners won't have to deal with the issue. Let's clear it up once and for all, was our thinking."

Jacobs died in 2009.

Forbes said he remained quiet for decades out of respect for Modell, whom he considered a friend.

"Art was my friend and a good man, and I didn't want to get into it," Forbes said. "I didn't want to pour hot water on a scalding dog."

But Forbes said he's long been bothered by the narrative that government failed Modell.

"I have thought about this meeting every time it was written or televised that no one made an offer to build a stadium," he said. "My words are to set the record straight about the governmental institutions and our involvement."

I called Hagan, who championed the Gateway complex and suffered great criticism about its cost to taxpayers. He confirmed Forbes' account. He described the offer as informal but honest.

"There is no question we made an effort," Hagan said.

Exactly why Modell didn't pursue the discussion remains a mystery.

Forbes recalled that Modell said he just wanted to stay in Municipal Stadium. Hagan couldn't add much more detail, nor would he speculate on why Modell didn't look harder at Gateway.

Historical stories from The Plain Dealer

From Modell's mouth
How Cleveland lost the Browns
Al Lerner speaks on how Art Modell decided to leave town
Bitter end: How Art Modell's on-again, off-again love affair with Cleveland finally ground to a halt
Modell to blast Cleveland on TV
Insider Mike Poplar's 1997 book offers more insights to Art Modell's thinking
Lerner buys new Browns
Battle for the Browns: The inside story
Browns owner lets loose on Ravens: Lerner says he felt like 'jerk' helping Modell

The timing of the Forbes and Hagan offer is critical to sorting out the legend. When Gateway planning was just starting, Modell was told to stay away. City leaders were concerned about appeasing Jacobs, who did not want to share a stadium with the football team and was threatening to move the Indians to a new city.

David Hopcraft, a longtime spokesman for Modell, said leaders planning Gateway were adamant that the Browns owner wait.

"They told him they would take care of him later," Hopcraft told me. Hopcraft also noted that Modell was one of the biggest contributors to the public campaign to persuade taxpayers to support the tax on alcohol and tobacco that paid for Gateway.

But Forbes said that after Jacobs was satisfied with plans for the new baseball stadium, the time was ripe to bring Modell into Gateway. So Forbes and Hagan made their offer.

Years later, politicians had cooled to the idea to asking taxpayers for more money for a football stadium. Modell no doubt became frustrated by his failure to win political backing for refurbishing Municipal Stadium.

Hagan famously quipped in 1995 about a proposed tax for Municipal Stadium: "We all wish Mother Teresa owned the Browns. It'd be an easier sell."

But timing is everything. And there was a time, long before Modell abandoned Cleveland, when he was offered a new stadium.

Whether or not a Gateway deal could have been struck with Modell -- and ultimately sold to voters -- is immaterial. That leaders offered Modell his own stadium at Gateway changes the storyline that has been central to his excuse for leaving. This fundamentally changes our view of one of the biggest moments in the history of this town.

aybe Forbes and Hagan were wise to keep the Gateway offer quiet all these years. Modell already was viewed by many as the worst villain Cleveland ever saw. And knowing that Modell was offered a stadium deal and still left would have only further damaged our psyche at the very time the city's football fans needed to move on.

I know the latest revelation may revive some fans' anger toward Modell, but I'm glad the record is clear, so we can move on.

We need to focus on the team's history on the field, not off.

Hopefully, this history won't be as painful.

https://www.cleveland.com/naymik/2012/09/art_modell_gateway_stadium.html


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 52
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,494
Likes: 52
Originally Posted by dawg66
Vers, your quote was from when Mayor White tried to get a new team after the fact. There was already a memorandum on the ballot to build a new stadium using tax payer money at the time Modell announced the move and it was voted in favor of just 2 days later.


My mistake it wasn't a vote to build a new stadium, it was a vote to extend the tax to generate enough money to build a new stadium.


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
It's okay. It was a long time ago even if it seems like just yesterday.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,475
Likes: 161
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,475
Likes: 161
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Weather impacts all seasons. There is no excuse to limit usage by not covering the thing.

Agreed... from a business aspect it makes zero sense to not have a dome....


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,472
Likes: 795
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Yeah, it was awful the way building a new stadium was going on the ballot and polls had shown it was almost guaranteed to be approved by the voters when Art made his deal with Baltimore. Those damned politicians!

My feeling is while they started to act, they should have been acting 3-4 years sooner. They were a day late, so to speak. By the way, I am not saying Art wasn't guilty in any of that. Muni had been a horrible venue for a long time. Kicking that can down the road started many years before.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66,894
Likes: 1295
If you read the article above they started much sooner. It wasn't the city that didn't offer him a stadium.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,347
Likes: 483
E
Legend
Online
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,347
Likes: 483
https://www.cleveland.com/opinion/2...nocking-brent-larkin.html?outputType=amp

New stadium is out. Raising taxes to pay for stadium improvements is in.


No Craps Given
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by EveDawg
https://www.cleveland.com/opinion/2...nocking-brent-larkin.html?outputType=amp

New stadium is out. Raising taxes to pay for stadium improvements is in.

Looks like Brent isn't happy.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Stadium Placement Relative to Downtown

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5