|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Here is some information about safeties that might be available in free agency. All of these guys are ranked in PFF's top 10 FA safeties. I am going to post their "projected contract" information.
Bates: 5 years. $15 million avg per year. $40 million guaranteed.
Johnson-Gardner: 3 years. $11.5 million avg per year. $23 million guaranteed.
Love: 2 yrs. $7.75 million avg per year. $15 million guaranteed.
Ward: 2 years. $6.75 million avg per year. $8 million guaranteed.
Amos: 2 years. $5.5 million avg per year. $6.25 million guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,235
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,235 |
J/C
I think the tags are already set, and what we do with Watson wouldn't have any effect until next year. That was my understanding as well. yep! that's correct https://overthecap.com/franchise-transition-and-rfa-tendersnext years numbers are daunting! Franchise, Transition, and RFA Tenders The NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement allows for some constraints to free agency. Among them, the CBA allows for each team to use one of either the franchise tag or transition tag on a player who would otherwise become an Unrestricted Free Agent. In addition, players with expiring contracts that have earned exactly three accrued seasons are considered Restricted Free Agents. In order to use these designations, the team must tender a qualifying offer on a one year contract. These tables display the current and projected future values of these tenders. Projected tenders are based on future salary cap estimations and are subject to change when a future salary cap is made official. Franchise and transition tenders are calculated by adding the respective tag numbers, divided by the sum of the salary caps, from the previous five seasons, and finally multipled by the current season's salary cap. Franchise tag figures are based upon the top five salaries at each respective position, while transition tag figures are based on the top ten. RFA tenders are calculated by increasing the previous year's respective tender by the same rate as the increase of the salary cap. 2023 Franchise and Transition Tenders Position Franchise Tag Transition Tag QB $32,416,000 $29,504,000 LB $20,926,000 $17,478,000 WR $19,743,000 $17,991,000 DE $19,727,000 $17,452,000 DT $18,937,000 $16,068,000 OL $18,244,000 $16,660,000 CB $18,140,000 $15,791,000 S $14,460,000 $11,867,000 TE $11,345,000 $9,716,000 RB $10,091,000 $8,429,000 ST $5,393,000 $4,869,000 2023 RFA Tenders Type Amount First Round $6,005,000 Second Round $4,304,000 Right of First Refusal $2,627,000 2024 Projected Franchise and Transition Tenders Position Franchise Tag Transition Tag QB $41,768,000 $36,328,000 WR $24,855,000 $22,525,000 OL $24,618,000 $22,242,000 DE $24,478,000 $19,766,000 CB $21,552,000 $18,642,000 DT $21,412,000 $17,448,000 LB $20,802,000 $17,446,000 S $19,048,000 $15,822,000 TE $13,956,000 $12,067,000 RB $13,888,000 $11,317,000 ST $6,299,000 $5,750,000 2024 Projected RFA Tenders Type Amount First Round $6,838,000 Second Round $4,901,000 Right of First Refusal $2,992,000 Herbert, Burrow, and Jordan Love (club option) are FA's in 2024 and the tag on them would be a blistering 42 mill. If Lamar gets tagged this year... there is very little chance Baltimore brings him back in 24.
Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,977
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,977 |
J/C
I think the tags are already set, and what we do with Watson wouldn't have any effect until next year. That was my understanding as well. yep! that's correct https://overthecap.com/franchise-transition-and-rfa-tendersnext years numbers are daunting! Franchise, Transition, and RFA Tenders The NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement allows for some constraints to free agency. Among them, the CBA allows for each team to use one of either the franchise tag or transition tag on a player who would otherwise become an Unrestricted Free Agent. In addition, players with expiring contracts that have earned exactly three accrued seasons are considered Restricted Free Agents. In order to use these designations, the team must tender a qualifying offer on a one year contract. These tables display the current and projected future values of these tenders. Projected tenders are based on future salary cap estimations and are subject to change when a future salary cap is made official. Franchise and transition tenders are calculated by adding the respective tag numbers, divided by the sum of the salary caps, from the previous five seasons, and finally multipled by the current season's salary cap. Franchise tag figures are based upon the top five salaries at each respective position, while transition tag figures are based on the top ten. RFA tenders are calculated by increasing the previous year's respective tender by the same rate as the increase of the salary cap. 2023 Franchise and Transition Tenders Position Franchise Tag Transition Tag QB $32,416,000 $29,504,000 LB $20,926,000 $17,478,000 WR $19,743,000 $17,991,000 DE $19,727,000 $17,452,000 DT $18,937,000 $16,068,000 OL $18,244,000 $16,660,000 CB $18,140,000 $15,791,000 S $14,460,000 $11,867,000 TE $11,345,000 $9,716,000 RB $10,091,000 $8,429,000 ST $5,393,000 $4,869,000 2023 RFA Tenders Type Amount First Round $6,005,000 Second Round $4,304,000 Right of First Refusal $2,627,000 2024 Projected Franchise and Transition Tenders Position Franchise Tag Transition Tag QB $41,768,000 $36,328,000 WR $24,855,000 $22,525,000 OL $24,618,000 $22,242,000 DE $24,478,000 $19,766,000 CB $21,552,000 $18,642,000 DT $21,412,000 $17,448,000 LB $20,802,000 $17,446,000 S $19,048,000 $15,822,000 TE $13,956,000 $12,067,000 RB $13,888,000 $11,317,000 ST $6,299,000 $5,750,000 2024 Projected RFA Tenders Type Amount First Round $6,838,000 Second Round $4,901,000 Right of First Refusal $2,992,000 Herbert, Burrow, and Jordan Love (club option) are FA's in 2024 and the tag on them would be a blistering 42 mill. If Lamar gets tagged this year... there is very little chance Baltimore brings him back in 24. Technically you are right unless those teams exercise the 5th year option by May 1 putting them all under contract until 2025.
Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,355
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,355 |
Who will play safety with Delpit in 2023 is anybody’s guess. JOK in a hybrid role? Maybe it’s time to not look at JOK as a linebacker, in the traditional sense of the word Just throwing ideas out
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,977
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,977 |
The problem is the Browns are desperately in need of a Free Safety. JOK would be a bigger Delpit and put us right back in the same situation as with Johnson - no true FS. Though I don't necessarily disagree with your thought process because JOK gets pushed around too much at the LB position, JOK at SS might be his best position but still doesn't address FS and creates another opening on the defense at LB. It should be interesting to see if the new DC has plans to capitalize on JOK's skillset.
Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,147
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,147 |
We haven't had a good free safety since Felix Wright (who filled the void left when Don Rogers passed, RIP). Should have kept Tashaun Gipson.
And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul. - John Muir
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223 |
I don't think JOK is a safety.
I doubt Schwartz will use him that way as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Here is some information about safeties that might be available in free agency. All of these guys are ranked in PFF's top 10 FA safeties. I am going to post their "projected contract" information.
Bates: 5 years. $15 million avg per year. $40 million guaranteed.
Johnson-Gardner: 3 years. $11.5 million avg per year. $23 million guaranteed.
Love: 2 yrs. $7.75 million avg per year. $15 million guaranteed.
Ward: 2 years. $6.75 million avg per year. $8 million guaranteed.
Amos: 2 years. $5.5 million avg per year. $6.25 million guaranteed. I don't think the Browns will pay Bates that much. Probably won't pay Johnson-Gardner that much, either. Here are PFF's comments on Love, Ward, and Amos. 5. S JIMMIE WARD, SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS Contract projection: Available in PFF's free agency rankings
Ward was forced to switch positions from safety to slot cornerback this season, a decision he apparently expressed displeasure about to head coach Kyle Shanahan, but he quickly acclimated and put together a very strong stretch of play over the second half of the year.
From Week 8 through the end of the season, Ward’s 78.0 coverage grade in the slot ranked 11th. He’s also earned back-to-back 90.0-plus run-defense grades as one of the better tacklers among defensive backs. Ward will likely look to return to playing safety, but his ability to cover in the slot is an added bonus, and he appears to still have some juice left in the tank wherever he lines up. 7. S JULIAN LOVE, NEW YORK GIANTS Contract projection: Available in PFF's free agency rankings
Love offers a diverse skill set as a defensive back who can serve as a ballhawk in the deep third and make plays down in the box. He was also a player the New York Giants trusted in the slot. He played by far the most snaps in his career in 2022 (1,006) and earned a career-high 71.5 coverage grade in the process.
Love is a good tackler in space, with his 80 tackles in 2022 the seventh most among safeties and his six missed tackles the second-fewest among safeties in the top 25 in total tackles. 10. S ADRIAN AMOS, GREEN BAY PACKERS Contract projection: Available in PFF's free agency rankings
Amos had long been one of the most consistent, reliable safeties across the NFL, allowing an explosive reception on just 1% of coverage snaps over five seasons from 2017-21 and forcing an incompletion on 17.3% of targets into his coverage over the span, which ranked tied for 21st. He took a step back in 2022, earning a 54.2 grade — a career-low mark by more than 15 grading points.
That said, betting on a bounce-back 2023 campaign for a versatile defensive back who has logged roughly 1,000 snaps in five straight seasons could be worthwhile. While Amos may not have the highest ceiling, before 2022 his floor was very, very high. https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-2023-free-agent-rankings-safety
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223 |
What we do not know is what Berry will do to create money.
I know steve likes to manage cap. And that is fine. He likes doing it and knows it pretty well.
What he does not know is the big picture. What other plans are in the works. What contingencies are in place. How the staff views the roster. What they see as far as planned changes in personnel. Who are they looking at in free agency.
Free agency is close at hand. It well tell a lot about how this roster will be shaped.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,977
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,977 |
Nice post, what you don't know is the big picture either. We are both going on personal assumptions so neither is right or wrong. One thing I do know is the history of what Berry has done. Let's not kid ourselves at all, everyone here on this forum wants a Super Bowl winner. How the Browns get there is the base for most discussions here. I'm eagerly watching what Berry and team will pull off just like you.
I will voice the opinion that I don't like what Berry has done to this point specifically because it continually looks like he's always taking a 1-year shot instead of building a consistent winner. IMHO, you build your team to get you to the playoffs as consistently as possible. The more times you get to the playoffs the better chance you have of eventually getting to the Super Bowl. Signing a bunch of guys to one-year deals and pushing that cost into void years like he has done with guys like Clowney and Walker doesn't give me as warm and fussy of planning for the future. Signing big FA's like Johnson and Hooper only to take dead money hits of over 10M in future seasons doesn't make me confident in Berry making a game changing acquisition in free agency.
I really hope that Berry can prove me wrong, but NFL resumes are based on wins and losses and Berry's record of building a better team after a playoff appearance has not proved to be fruitful to this point. That's before we get into the draft where (IMHO) his only real successes have been DPJ, Emerson, and Newsome to this point yet none of them can be called "real" game changers yet.
Berry is going to obviously restructure Watson's contract again. That will give him big funding to make an impact this year after just sitting on those excess funds in 2022. He better do something this year because he's setting up his QB as having 20M more of a yearly cap charge than any other team in the NFL with close to 20M per season in prorated bonus going forward. Kicking the can down the road will eventually have consequences.
Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223 |
What gives you a chance is a quarterback. They cost money.
Every team that has "a franchise guy" after his rookie deal faces the same issues. You may not like what Berry has done.
But let's get real. They took a shot at DW and surprise surprise. They got him. Honestly, when you assess their situation. Getting DW was a long shot. Not getting him and we would have cap space and no quarterback. BM was done in Cleveland no matter what.
So then where are the Browns? In the quarterback line. Looking at Derek Carr or some other quarterback some other team does not want.
So, they got DW. And with that means the challenge of managing that as well as the rest of the team. You keep harping about the last two years record. What were your expectations? You think Super Bowl with BM or JB? I think not.
So, I would rather be where we are and have a shot than not have DW. Because without him we would have no shot for years until we got a real quarterback. As you look around the NFL look at the teams playing musical chairs without a quarterback.
"In his first season at the helm, Berry shaped a roster that helped the team to their first playoff appearance since 2002 and first playoff victory in 26 years. Berry used an aggressive approach to improve the roster during his first offseason, including inking DE Myles Garrett to a five-year contract extension and signing unrestricted free agent RT Jack Conklin. Both Garrett and Conklin went on to earn first-team All-Pro honors in 2020, while G Joel Bitonio and G Wyatt Teller were each second team selections. Berry also drafted offensive tackle Jedrick Wills in the first round of the 2020 NFL Draft, who made a successful transition from right tackle to left and earned All-Rookie Team Honors from the Pro Football Writers Association."
You judge drafts after three years. There are players like JOK, Bell, York, Winfrey and perhaps others that may turn out. We gave up draft capital to get DW. He traded for Cooper which most believe was a steal. Berry has made mistakes. It comes with the job. This season is a big test because now DW is rightfully expected to deliver. And let's face it. Deshaun Watson will define the Browns till he is gone.
So you have your way of looking at this. Time will tell.
Myself there is no right or wrong. I am nothing more than a fan.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
I wasn't trying to direct the conversation to the salary cap. We've been down that road more than enough. My point is that we have multiple needs and it isn't wise to throw that much money at Bates. We need to address the DT and DE positions in FA.
What I was trying to do was steer the discussion toward player evaluation and how they might fit w/the Browns. It's cool if you think that Bates is the guy we should go after. I politely disagree and it's cool to offer differing opinions on what players the Browns should pursue.
Ward played for the league's best defense. He is a FS and can also play in the slot, when needed. That's a bonus when we run different coverages. He should be affordable and we can still go after defensive linemen.
What I like about Love is that he can play in space. We haven't had a guy like that in years. He is also a good tackler. Some of the other guys like Thornhill [KC] and McLeod [Indy] struggle with.
Amos would be very inexpensive. He's had a very solid career. Intelligent player. His slippage last year is a concern.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,223 |
I really do not have an opinion on Bates other than I think he maybe a target.
Same with the other guys.
Free agency is a two way street. In fact the decision is not ours to make. The player decides.
So, really until we actually sign someone. I don't have an opinion.
Bates is a good player. But I agree I would rather spend the big money on the DL.
I have no clue how Berry will approach this. Because I really do not know how much money is available. I don't know if he will go after a big name or spread the money on guys who can be serviceable.
He could surprise me and go after D'hop.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns Release John Johnson
|
|