DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus DOJ covering for Hunter Biden...hmmm

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...db589f282de4f35bc559f2ff1004336&ei=8

It looks like the DOJ is running interference for the Biden clan.

Something more reliable than the Daily Caller is needed.

https://nypost.com/2023/05/15/irs-c...tleblower-claims-is-clearly-retaliatory/

https://news.yahoo.com/irs-whistleblower-alleges-removal-entire-135203018.html

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/i...er-claims-retaliation-report/ar-AA1bejKa

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...m-probing-Hunter-Bidens-tax-returns.html

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/15/irs-removes-entire-investigative-team-hunter-biden/



Now did it really happen??

If you're waiting for MSDNC to report... that won't happen. And somehow everyone is just fine with that. We don't want these little brains clouded with any shadow of doubt, now do we?

Hey, these far fetched rumors are fun and all, but how about somebody wake me when the GOP has some actual evidence and are bringing charges. You know, charges like the ones Trump is facing RIGHT NOW. Follow me for more tips on how to spot BS Distractions and misdirection from the right.

Let me guess. You've already found them guilty?

That's not my jam. You seem to not understand our legal system.

I understand perfectly.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...ntire-investigative-team-hunter-biden/


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...estigation-irs-team-removed/70222248007/

You can find more.

the sad fact is most of the media you want won't report this. Look how long to took them to fess up the Russia probe was a farce.

I've seen it reported in several places. But when one doesn't look at those sources they have no clue as to whether they're covering the story or not yet come on here claiming they do. Do you mean some place like this?

IRS whistleblower who claims to have information of alleged mishandling of Hunter Biden probe removed from investigation

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/16/politics/irs-whistleblower-congress/index.html

I get it, but Hunter Biden is the target of the latest "witch hunt" by the congressional GOP.

It reminds me of Darrel Izza a few years ago, their sole purpose is to do damage to democrats.

Hunter is a not very smart, and should be accountable for his actions. To date, there has been no linkage to Joe/Jill.

The "news" is "news" about the investigation.

I could see the DOJ getting pretty upset about a whistleblower claim. Those who work for the DOJ have rules to follow, and filing a whistleblower claim is going to have consequences.

I don't know that the investigation into Hunter Biden in and of itself is a witch hunt or not. But there has been no implication that Joe Biden was in any way involved in anything they are investigating. And I believe that what they are doing is attempting to cast shade on Joe Biden as their main goal.

Joe Biden is definitely going to prison --- USA Today opinion

I guess "I lost my informant" is the new "The dog ate my homework" for the GOP.

Maybe the Clinton's had their witness killed.

Bipartisan group calls for investigation into Comer’s remarks about missing whistleblower

A bipartisan organization is calling for an investigation into Rep. James Comer’s (R-Ky.) comments about a missing whistleblower connected to the House GOP’s ongoing investigation of President Biden and his family.

“The House Republican Conference is on notice that a key member of their slim majority has likely engaged in criminal activity and may well soon be a convicted felon,” the group wrote in the letter. “Not only has the Republican leadership failed to oust known fabulist George Santos, it appears that they are now mimicking his behavior. We write to you regarding that conduct.”

The organization, Facts First USA, sent a letter to U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves asking him to investigate Comer, who the group says is likely lying about having an informant related to the GOP investigation into the Biden family. The group said that if he is lying, he could be in violation of federal law.

“Representative James Comer recently revealed that the ‘informant’ he is relying on for his unsubstantiated allegations against President Biden cannot be located,” the group wrote. “In truth, there is a strong possibility that the ‘informant’ that Representative Comer has been speaking about does not exist. This would explain why Representative Comer never produces the evidence he says demonstrates criminal conduct on the part of the Biden family.”

Punchbowl News first reported the letter.

The group is responding to remarks Comer made Sunday on the Fox News show “Sunday Morning Futures,” when he said House Republicans “unfortunately” can’t “track down the informant” they say they were communicating with about their investigation.

“We’re hopeful that the informant is still there,” Comer said. “The whistleblower knows the informant. The whistleblower is very credible. And all we’re asking the FBI with respect to the Form 1023 is, what did you do to investigate this allegation? And they send us back a very patronizing letter, basically saying, just trust us and don’t worry about it.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...itjBoSWv8IkkBjKvUXMgInXJchCrJYkLAQ-y2Wv0

j/c:

FBI official said something. That's yuge.

Did Marjorie Taylor Greene Email Hunter Biden Nudes to Minors? What We Know

Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene shared a link to a Twitter video which showed her holding up partially obscured nude images of Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden's son, in an email circulated to her newsletter mailing list on Wednesday. Some are asking whether that email could have been sent to minors.

Aaron Fritschner, deputy chief of staff and communications director for Democratic Representative Don Beyer, first raised the question in tweets on Wednesday where he shared a screenshot of Greene's email.

Greene showed the nude pictures during a GOP-led House Oversight Committee's hearing featuring two IRS whistleblowers who have alleged that the IRS gave Hunter Biden preferential treatment during a federal investigation into his taxes. Parts of the images were obscured.

Newsweek has reached out to Greene's office via email for comment.

When reached for comment by Newsweek on Thursday morning, Fritschner said he had nothing further to add.

"Marjorie Taylor Greene just sent this email to her constituents (yes this using official, taxpayer-funded resources). I clicked the link so you don't have to, it is exactly what you think," Fritschner tweeted, sharing the screenshot of the email.

The email, which was shared with Newsweek on Thursday, contained a video screen icon that carried a warning saying: "The following images are disturbing" and "Parental discretion is advised."

Clicking on that link opens a Twitter video showing Greene's comments at the hearing and her holding up the images in question. A press release on Greene's website contains the same content as the email.

The email also contained a transcript of Greene's comments during the hearing, including when she had said "Parental discretion is advised" before showing the images.

In a later tweet, Fritschner added: "I double checked and there isn't an age screen on her eNewsletter subscription page. So a distinct possibility that Marjorie Taylor Greene just emailed links to video containing nude images of Hunter Biden to minors using taxpayer-funded resources."

There is no evidence at this time that Greene's email has been seen by minors and any suggestion that the email may have broken the law is speculation.

That link is in the form of a video screen that displays the warnings "The following images are disturbing" and "Parental discretion is advised."

Anyone can sign up for Greene's email updates on the House of Representatives' website by providing their email address and completing a captcha. While there are fields for first name and last name, these are not required.

Newsletter signups for members of Congress are not uniform—Representative Beyer's, for example, has first name and last name as required fields and also asks those signing up to indicate the topics that most interest them, though answering this is not required.

Congressional newsletters do not generally ask someone to provide their age.

Fritschner added in another tweet: "Going to check in on Georgia's revenge porn statute just, you know, in case" and subsequently shared a screenshot of a Georgia statute from 2020 that deals with "Prohibition on Nude or Sexually Explicit Electronic Transmissions," among other matters.

The updated 2022 statute—GA Code § 16-11-90 (2022)—defines "nudity" in part as "the depiction of covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state."

Newsweek has reached out to legal experts for their views on the matter.

Other Twitter users shared Fritschner's tweets, with liberal PAC MeidasTouch writing: "Marjorie Taylor Greene just emailed revenge porn of Hunter Biden to minors?!?"

"Marjorie Taylor Greene may have sent pornographic images of Hunter Biden to minors on her email list," tweeted Twitter account The Fact Checker, also sharing Fritschner's tweets.

"Marjorie Taylor Greene needs to be held accountable! Sending an electronic newsletter with porn pics to the public and potentially minors is a crime! Lock her up now!" tweeted user BellaMia.

Attorney Andrew Lieb told Newsweek via email on Wednesday that Greene is likely protected from any legal action by Hunter Biden for showing the images during the committee hearing due to her and all members of Congress being protected by the Speech and Debate Clause of the Constitution.

"Yes, it's true that the statute has an exception to its applicability for a matter of public concern or public interest, but you need to ask yourself: why is this a matter of your interest?" Lieb said. "It's certainly not part of my interest."

Greene defended her decision to show the images during the hearing in an interview with Newsmax on Wednesday, saying the photos were "the evidence that I believe the American people deserve to see because when the American people can see this evidence, as uncomfortable as it was for me to show it on the Oversight Committee today, I believe that's how they can hold this government accountable."

https://www.newsweek.com/did-marjor...WnIVHJ7BBVo9gr2rnuUI08i0JiPqIuSKbyjjOLO8

Accountable for what? What law is broken when an adult has nude photos of themselves? That's a pretty lame excuse for turning a congressional hearing into a $#!+ show. It appears she and some others can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that Hunter isn't a government official.

" as uncomfortable as it was for me to show it " BS, evidence of what?
This is what passes for governing if your a republican?

How many years has this investigation been going on into Hunter Biden? 2017 or was it 2019 that it started? I honestly don't remember!

Yes.

I mean, what else would they be doing with their time? Passing legislation that helps American citizens?
Ain't nobody got time for such foolishness.

When you exchange the word Mexicans with Republicans in trump's quote it seems to work just as well.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...resident-Joe-Biden-protect-problems.html

Lock them up.

Once again, from your own source.....


If you wish to discuss locking someone up maybe it should be that guy with all of those indictments against him where prosecutors have a mountain of actual evidence.

Are you saying the fbi documents are fake?

First it's a single document, not documents. Secondly it's not the document that's fake. It's trying to make claims that the document doesn't actually say. What the document says is someone said these things to someone who worked for the FBI and those statements were placed in the document. There is nothing corroborating those statements. It's really not that difficult to understand.

Oh, the irony.

Unlike some I have pointed out the political theater from both sides. But do go on.

For some it seems to be.

I’m just glad that I didn’t vote for Hunter Biden in 2020. Boy I would have been sorry. Bullet dodged.

I see the GOPers are still trying to stick it to Biden’s boy to get to him. Idiots. But if they really find anything, they should stfu and prosecute, you know, like we are taking dear leader down with law and fact. BS lies don’t fly in court, even under this corrupt ass supreme court.

It’s not even about that. There’s no platform. None. If you took away Hunter Biden and asked them to introduce proactive vs reactive platforms, they’d have nothing. The last Republican I can think of who ran on something concrete was Romney and now he’s fringe.

People who can barely form a coherent sentence vote for people like MGT, Trump, etc. They’ll never have a rational platform. They know that and it’s why they are willing to do ANYTHING to win now. Hell, even half of their party rebukes their ideas. Look at the crap they pulled here with this August election. They are dead set on shoving their beliefs down Americas throat or killing the country, losing is no longer an option for them. That’s why I say Dems are sleeping on it. Just like January 6th, they are telling us every damn day what they will do if they get the chance, then trying to do it. And dems act shocked and baffled. Smfh.

It’s time to be cut throat just like them, democracy depends on it.