DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Biden's bribes

It is a matter of if you don't like. People who were literally there say Biden has taken bribes. You have your fingers in your ears. Nanananananananana

It is a matter of whether the person saying things is credible or not as to whether you trust their validity. When you decide to believe anything you hear even from people who have been proven to be corrupt and not credible, that's a matter of confirmation bias. You'll believe anything that supports your argument whether they are believable, credible people or not. That's not a me issue here.

So, he's not an inmate. And he's not a prisoner. Got it.

Yet he has a prisoner number in Atlanta. And I'm going to use it. Got it?

It doesn't really matter what you think. When this eventually goes to court those people will be witnesses on the stand. Nails in the coffin.

Also, you're not very bright if you think some "honest credible" person will come forward as a whistleblower. Only corrupt people are involved in corrupt business dealings. Those are the only kind of witnesses you're going to get.

That's the same BS you were spewing when you were screaming "Lock her up!". We see how that worked out for you too.



And who is it that's actually going to court? The same guy you were supporting who talked you into believing that. You know, the guy who has been idicted four times and is facing 91 criminal charges. News flash. He's not credible either.

Same as it ever was.

And he's not a prisoner, nor is he an inmate. Got it?

You know, inmate #01135809 has been indicted 4 times on 91 criminal charges and yet you ignore all of that and focus on this? That speaks volumes. His prisoner number in the state of Georgia is #01135809. You can either address why that is or not. But we both know you won't. Instead you will focus on something trivial. Same as it ever was.

He is not, at this time, a prisoner. Period. you won't accept that, yet you constantly state he is, and an inmate.

I know people that got out of prison years ago, and they still have their number.

Yes they do. And many of them have been stripped of many of their rights as a result. Once again you ignore why he has that number to focus on something trivial. Just as I predicted you would.

You didn't predict anything. You stated numerous times he was an inmate. he's not. You called him a prisoner. he's not. Period. The end.

Yes, I predicted exactly how you would respond.....


And that's exactly what you're doing. Ignoring the elephant in the room while standing on a chair screaming about a mouse being in the room.

In the state of Georgia he is listed as prisoner #1135809. That's the number assigned him when being booked in. When and if some of you start addressing the bigger picture here rather than attacking the messenger we will have something to talk about. Until then it seems the gravity of the situation hasn't quite sunk in yet. So you will be reminded by seeing the prisoner number he was assigned when he was booked. Prisoner #1135809.

Better than a fool that keeps getting indicted (4 times) with 91 Counts felony counts....

All you got on Biden is what Fox and Newsmax tell you. Even they don't believe it.. Neither does Comer. But, They know you'll believe anything. In fact, they are counting on it.

So, pit responds with deflection. Yet I counted at least a dozen times today where Pit is complaining about other people deflecting. Priceless. Just more liberal double standards.

Should start hijacking all the trump threads to talk about Biden. That will make pits head explode.

I would love for any of them to show up in any trump thread. They're all AWOL. And just like the rest of them, you avoid who and what prisoner #1135809. You're no better than the rest of them.

Oh look the leader of the trump brigade has spoken. Lol

Please don't forget the idiots in Congress, who keep doing tit for tat, following their "Fuhrer's bidding"- using Congressional subcommittees to harass state employees of justice, both in New York and Georgia. Ain't America Great

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/09/06/politics/hunter-biden-gun-charges-indictment/index.html

Hunter is getting indicted soon.

Face it, as long as the President has the DOJ and FBI in his pocket, it's going to be a tough go. Those are tough walls to crack.

BS. Biden doesn’t have any of that in his pocket for Hunter. If he did, there would not be a ridiculous special counsel appointment to investigate a regular citizen. You should be ashamed of all these blatant lies and misinformation you love to spread. The right has lost it’s way and you can’t handle the truth. Sad af.

Smoke another one.

You mean he can use the DOJ and FBI just like Trump did? Is that what you mean?

I kinda want to do a whatabout or two.

Ken Paxton anyone?? Pretty straight forward case to prosecute based on facts - yet still being defended by Trump and MAGA supporters and right wing lunatics like Steve Bannon. . . . The guy has been impeached by a REPUBLICAN led house 121-23. Are you defending him like so many others?

Georgia indictment was by a REPUBLICAN. But he's now being villified and the GOP is trying to ouster him. Why - what's your take on that? Is that the DOJ or FBI working at Biden's request?!

There's never been a DOJ more in the president's pocket than Barr - He was literally Trump's henchman.

Hunter is being indicted. The rule of law appears to be taking it's course ... where or what is it that you are complaining about.

I've said it before - you seem to want to believe you live in a Bannana Republic.

Why? Garland appointed a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden the same way he appointed a special counsel to investigate trump. In both cases criminal charges are going to be the result. Neither Joe Biden nor Garland have any control over what happens at this point. Now if Hunter were a Republican all we would be hearing is the normal crap about it being a witch hunt or it's election interference. But since it's Hunter all you guys can say, even though there are charges being brought is that it's rigged. If it were rigged and Biden controlled the DOJ as well as Garland, there never would have been a special counsel appointed to investigate hunter in the first place. It seems ya'll are going to whine like an elementary school child no matter what happens.

In both the cases of trump and Hunter I hope that if they're convicted on any of the charges they are facing that they are given the average sentences for what ever they're found guilty of. No special favors for who they are and no harsher than normal punishment for who they are. Just treat them like everyone else.

He would be in the minority if that’s the case. 55% of Americans believe Hunter acted inappropriately. And 42% of democrats believe the same.

Remember, these are the same people who claimed to have an audio tape they couldn't produce and had to admit they didn't know if it even existed. The same people who said hunter's business partner would testify that Joe Biden was involved in hunter;s business dealings. then when he testified said the exact opposite. They sound just like trump. "People are saying" "I've heard a lot of people say". All they're lacking is any evidence.

Didn't Barr appoint the SC that investigated Hunter Biden? I thought so... Am I incorrect?

Can you tell me who these people are that say Biden accepted bribes?

Attorney General Garland appoints a special counsel in Hunter Biden probe

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...ial-counsel-hunter-biden-probe-rcna99447

Sean Hannity
Tucker Carlson
James Comer
Gym Jordon
MTG

What more do need???

Take the stick out of your ass and quit yelling get off the grass… You live in yesteryear.

Well with a high quality character list like that It must be true. SMH, you can’t make this crap up. Unless you’re a MAGA goon that is…

After this November, there will be a pot store on every corner. Bet you can’t wait.

Didn't see a separate active Hunter Biden Thread so placing this here


Trump-Stacked Supreme Court May Have Already Exonerated Hunter Biden
Tori Otten
Thu, September 7, 2023 at 12:43 PM EDT·2 min read


The special counsel investigating Hunter Biden plans to indict the first son on a gun charge. The only problem is that the conservative Supreme Court may have already overturned the law Biden allegedly violated.

Biden had initially agreed to a deal in which he would have pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor charges of tax evasion and participated in a pretrial program for a gun offense, allowing him to avoid jail time. When that deal fell apart in July, the Justice Department appointed David Weiss as a special counsel to investigate Biden further.

Weiss announced his plan Wednesday to indict Biden on just the gun charge by the end of the month. The charge is over Biden answering “no” on a federal form he filled out while buying a handgun when asked if he was an “unlawful user” of drugs. Biden has struggled with crack cocaine addiction and was having trouble staying sober at the time.

Except Weiss may not actually be able to bring the charge. Last year, the Supreme Court significantly loosened gun control laws when the conservative majority ruled that Americans have a general right to arm themselves in public. Biden’s lawyers have already argued that the ruling makes trying to prosecute the first son on gun charges pointless.

The Supreme Court ruling has already been cited in another, much lower-profile case. The Fifth Circuit appeals court ruled in August that drug users shouldn’t be automatically banned from owning guns. The court overturned the conviction of a Mississippi man who had two guns in his car during a 2022 traffic stop and admitted to regular marijuana use, although he was not driving under the influence at the time.

“Our history and tradition may support some limits on an intoxicated person’s right to carry a weapon, but it does not justify disarming a sober citizen based exclusively on his past drug usage,” the three-judge panel said in the ruling.

Republicans have complained that Biden got a “sweetheart” plea deal and that the Justice Department has treated him with kid gloves. But it might be a little harder to take issue with Biden being exonerated by a ruling from the Supreme Court, which was stacked with conservatives by GOP leader Donald Trump.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-stacked-supreme-court-may-164313329.html

j/c:

Kevin McCarthy launches bombshell Biden IMPEACHMENT inquiry: Speaker accuses president of a 'culture of corruption' and 'abuse of power' over Hunter's shady foreign business deals

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...eachment-biden-hunter-foreign-deals.html

Without evidence to substantiate it. The wheels on the bus go round and round.

GOP Rep. Ken Buck calls Marjorie Taylor Greene's comments on timetable for Biden impeachment inquiry 'absurd'

“The time for impeachment is the time when there’s evidence linking President Biden — if there’s evidence linking President Biden to a high crime or misdemeanor. That doesn’t exist right now,” said Buck, a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jo...eenes-comments-biden-impeachm-rcna104346

Still waiting for Eve to tell me who they are that claim Biden took Bribes.. Simple question. Just answer it.

Hunter or Joe....

The common tactic amongst the GOP is to just say Biden....

Hunter is the functional equivalent of Don Jr., and Eric. The reality is that they are private citizens with no role in government.

There is no chance of an investigation for Jared or Ivanka. That one is a bit grey, because they were at one time part of the government.

And bribe has a specific meaning.

Joe would be a matter for Congress. But so far, the linkage has not been found.