Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Rishuz #2030726 09/26/23 09:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 1825
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 1825
Field-level cushioned seats, valet parking, premium unlimited food and drink in private club, player access (allegedly).

$10,500 - $15,000 per seat.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
FATE #2030728 09/26/23 09:57 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,713
Likes: 393
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,713
Likes: 393
I get the economics of it.

Just seems sacrilegious to take that away from the fans and players.

Guess Haslam isn't making enough money.

Rishuz #2030735 09/26/23 10:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 1825
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 1825
I don't like it. It will get expanded with the reno and we'll have five rows of people golf-clapping and taking selfies by 2028. This is just the test drive for logistics, accommodations, etc...

That's not Cleveland football. And that's what the Club levels are for.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
ThomasE #2030741 09/26/23 10:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,623
Likes: 509
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,623
Likes: 509
I have access to a suite 2-3 times per year and rumor was that this past weekend the food was CRAZY good ... they must be upgrading based on the new seat revenue lol


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Rishuz #2030764 09/26/23 01:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
Originally Posted by Rishuz
Sounds like a JDubbs idea.

A good idea. They sell seats. They are in the business of selling seats, right? If I can stick seats that sell for several thousand in front of bleacher seats that go for maybe $70, I would put 5 rows in front if I could. So would you.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
FATE #2030786 09/26/23 03:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,946
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,946
Likes: 763
Originally Posted by FATE
That's not Cleveland football.

I normally poo-poo this entire concept, but in this instance, I agree completely. This is some L.A./Hollywood crap; but, money talks and the rest walk.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Rishuz #2030805 09/26/23 04:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,551
Likes: 1328
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,551
Likes: 1328
Originally Posted by Rishuz
I get the economics of it.

Just seems sacrilegious to take that away from the fans and players.

Guess Haslam isn't making enough money.

"It's a marketing world" - Jimmy Halsam


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 1825
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 1825
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by FATE
That's not Cleveland football.

I normally poo-poo this entire concept, but in this instance, I agree completely. This is some L.A./Hollywood crap; but, money talks and the rest walk.

Not only that, but I'll crunch the numbers...

5.5 million in revenue per year (460 more seats @ 12,000 average)

Costs: I'm sure the build-out is 10M plus.
All food and drink is included, so that's a cost, not profit.
Valet parking costs?
Staffing costs for new club section?
I'm sure you can subtract a cool million per year...

Three year analysis...
13.5M profit - 10M cost = 3.5M

3.5 million sounds great to you or me, the Browns do well over 500M in revenue per year... that's 0.2%

Stadium is CLOSED in three years for a multi-year multi-billion renovation. Why not just wait 'til then?

If you want to cater to those that are made of money, carve out a large, field-level section between the 30s on both sidelines with the 'new' stadium. Don't jerk with the people that really pay the bills. Field-level box seats in front of the Dawg Pound is a travesty.

JM2¢


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
FATE #2030816 09/26/23 06:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 293
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 293
Originally Posted by FATE
Field-level cushioned seats, valet parking, premium unlimited food and drink in private club, player access (allegedly).

$10,500 - $15,000 per seat.

Just curious, anyone notice if people are sitting in these seats ?

FATE #2030836 09/26/23 10:51 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
Originally Posted by FATE
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by FATE
That's not Cleveland football.

I normally poo-poo this entire concept, but in this instance, I agree completely. This is some L.A./Hollywood crap; but, money talks and the rest walk.

Not only that, but I'll crunch the numbers...

5.5 million in revenue per year (460 more seats @ 12,000 average)

Costs: I'm sure the build-out is 10M plus.
All food and drink is included, so that's a cost, not profit.
Valet parking costs?
Staffing costs for new club section?
I'm sure you can subtract a cool million per year...

Three year analysis...
13.5M profit - 10M cost = 3.5M

3.5 million sounds great to you or me, the Browns do well over 500M in revenue per year... that's 0.2%

Stadium is CLOSED in three years for a multi-year multi-billion renovation. Why not just wait 'til then?

If you want to cater to those that are made of money, carve out a large, field-level section between the 30s on both sidelines with the 'new' stadium. Don't jerk with the people that really pay the bills. Field-level box seats in front of the Dawg Pound is a travesty.

JM2¢

I am being serious...why? The pound seats are a bit higher. I don't think the new seats impede the view.

IMO, field level seats in an end zone would have to be the worst seats possible, for at least 1/2 of the game. Actually more until the team got down to about the 20. My wife worked with a guy at the hospital, and he had pound season tickets. I bought several games a year from him for 2-3 years. It was kind of cool for a while, but cold bleacher seats got old pretty quick.

It's not as glamorous as some think. They are cheap seats for a reason

As for the ones paying for things. I disagree. There are a lot more seats in the stadium paying for things than the front row of the pound. Come on, you owned a business. You know the 8 stools at the counter weren't paying for more than the 60 other seats you had. That makes no sense.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 238
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 238
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
as I am saying in the Hunt thread... the Ford experiment should be pretty much over. Maybe, they will give him the Ravens and game. But, if he doesn't do better... Berry will be forced to get another back right after the Ravens game so we can get them up to speed before we play the 49ers.



Ford has 160 yards with a 3.8 YPC and 50% of his yards to date have come on one play. Remove that one play... he's basically averaging what he did last year 2.25 YPC.

Meanwhile, Chubb was averaging 6.1 YPC with the same OL and a long of 20.


Another week goes by and his rushing data is normalizing... his YPC was at 2.9 YPC today. He had 9 carries for 26 yards.


He's just a sub-3-yard back that we need to move on from and test out Strong or bring in another back before it is too late.


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
What did Hunt do?

I didn't see any back gaining yards.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
ThomasE #2032035 10/01/23 08:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,511
Likes: 176
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,511
Likes: 176
When Chubb went down we should have went after Taylor as a permanent solution. That would have allowed us to keep going as normal. Instead we put on a back that’s not proven anything and one who was meh last year and had no camp. We need a better option


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
1 member likes this: JimDawg
Ballpeen #2032041 10/01/23 08:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 238
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 238
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
What did Hunt do?

I didn't see any back gaining yards.


Hunt did what Hunt did last year. Not much besides pacifying fans.


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
leadtheway #2032049 10/01/23 09:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 52
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 52
Originally Posted by leadtheway
When Chubb went down we should have went after Taylor as a permanent solution. That would have allowed us to keep going as normal. Instead we put on a back that’s not proven anything and one who was meh last year and had no camp. We need a better option

If you are talking about Jonathan Taylor than I'm confused as to what he could have done the last 2 games when he's on the PUP list and isn't eligible to come off till this coming week. I don't believe you can trade a player when they are on the PUP lists anyways.


#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
ThomasE #2032057 10/01/23 10:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,623
Likes: 509
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,623
Likes: 509
our entire offense is a failure today ... the OL, QB, RB, coaching staff, etc

In terms of Ford/Hunt ... they are just OK. Aren't meant to be lead backs


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
dawg66 #2032059 10/01/23 10:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,511
Likes: 176
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,511
Likes: 176
Originally Posted by dawg66
Originally Posted by leadtheway
When Chubb went down we should have went after Taylor as a permanent solution. That would have allowed us to keep going as normal. Instead we put on a back that’s not proven anything and one who was meh last year and had no camp. We need a better option

If you are talking about Jonathan Taylor than I'm confused as to what he could have done the last 2 games when he's on the PUP list and isn't eligible to come off till this coming week. I don't believe you can trade a player when they are on the PUP lists anyways.
We absolutely could have traded for him. He was put on the pup when a trade didn’t come. He was mentioned in many articles as an option. He would be costly but well worth at as he’s every bit as good as Chubb. Maybe a bit better because he’s a true dual threat


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
leadtheway #2032067 10/01/23 11:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 52
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 52
Taylor was put on the PUP list on before the season even started so why would we have traded for Taylor when we still had a healthy Chubb at the time? Also it was reported that Indy wanted at least a1st rnd pick that we do not have.

Last edited by dawg66; 10/01/23 11:24 PM. Reason: Changed wording

#gmstrong

Live, Love, Laugh
3 members like this: jfanent, Ballpeen, Bull_Dawg
dawg66 #2032070 10/02/23 04:36 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,526
Likes: 809
Originally Posted by dawg66
Taylor was put on the PUP list on before the season even started so why would we have traded for Taylor when we still had a healthy Chubb at the time? Also it was reported that Indy wanted at least a1st rnd pick that we do not have.

Those are just details. Details, schmetails....lol


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
dawg66 #2032072 10/02/23 07:01 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,812
Likes: 460
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,812
Likes: 460
Originally Posted by dawg66
Taylor was put on the PUP list on before the season even started so why would we have traded for Taylor when we still had a healthy Chubb at the time? Also it was reported that Indy wanted at least a1st rnd pick that we do not have.

We could have signed Jim Brown and Otto Graham in their prime, and leadtheway would have cried and told you how bad they suck.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
1 member likes this: jfanent
GMdawg #2032130 10/02/23 11:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,511
Likes: 176
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,511
Likes: 176
Originally Posted by GMdawg
Originally Posted by dawg66
Taylor was put on the PUP list on before the season even started so why would we have traded for Taylor when we still had a healthy Chubb at the time? Also it was reported that Indy wanted at least a1st rnd pick that we do not have.

We could have signed Jim Brown and Otto Graham in their prime, and leadtheway would have cried and told you how bad they suck.
so jerome ford=Jim brown... got it... stick to selling cars


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
ThomasE #2033008 10/07/23 01:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 238
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 238
now that Indy has signed Taylor to a 3 year contract what about the Browns trading for Zack Moss?

he should be plug & play.


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,107
Likes: 347
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,107
Likes: 347
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
now that Indy has signed Taylor to a 3 year contract what about the Browns trading for Zack Moss?

he should be plug & play.

I doubt the value will work out for both sides. He has enough value to them that he's likely more expensive than I'd be willing to give. Who knows, though.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
ThomasE #2033012 10/07/23 03:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 261
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 261
Moss is in the final year of his rookie contract and has a salary of $1,139,260 for the 2023 season. There is nothing cost prohibitive about his contract. He was originally a 3rd round draft pick (86th overall by the Bills) in 2020 so I'd expect the cost to be a little higher than a 3rd round pick right now. He is only 26 though so that needs to be considered.


Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Jerome Ford

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5