DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Cuckoo Democrats And What They Have Become Pt 5

Like I said, this sicko has been doing it since Barron was 12...




Likely a pedo, but that's okay in Libville...

Ooops. My bad... minor attracted person.

"Likely as pedo". You keep inventing boogeymen. Another made up theory pulled out of your azz with zero basis in fact.

Dude's been posting pics of Barron and picking on him since he was twelve.

A. Piece of Garbage Human
B. Pedo minor attracted person
C. Both

I vote C. You don't like it, pound salt.

Keep those criminals safe!!

Aw. Inventing pedos now. Not long ago you railed against an experiment that may have reduced pedophilia. It seems to be a fixation with you. Is there something you would like to tell us?

I think you missed the "non violent" part. Man you are on a roll today. lol

Yes. I'd like to let it be known once again, that unlike YOU, I do not support child sex dolls for pedos.

And your excuse for that trash: "How do we know it won't work?"

So even after I've posted proof from clinical psychologists that this would actually promote pedophilia, you still support child sex dolls for pedos.


Maybe there's something you'd like to tell us.

Oh, wait, you already did.

I didn't miss anything.


This is just another example of step after step after step to "protect" criminals, reward bad behavior, and make even the most egregious of society's bad actors -- VICTIMS.

It's the biggest hallmark of the left's woke ideology, this is just one more step towards the continued madness.

Yes, I already told you I support trying almost anything that may lessen pedophilia. You do not. There were studies in the other direction that indicated it might help. But you ignored that to fight against at least trying to help lessen the problem. But I understand your need to protect sex dolls more than children. No, wait, I don't.

Links?

Where are the "studies"?

Since you seem extremely confused as to what pedophilia actually looks like, I'll give you an example. Maybe this will help you in the future from flailing your arms making accusations with no basis in facts.....

Businessman pleads guilty in polygamous leader's scheme to orchestrate sexual acts involving underage girls

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moroni...oDsr31Pk52wIsXz1tFG7vWAqdN0jiBdBy4am0GSQ

For future reference, this not only covers pedophilia but human sex trafficking as well. You're welcome.

Cool story.

I'll call Human Garbage whatever I want to.

Don't forget the links for the Child Sex Dolls and how they will help. I'm eager to see what no one else has been able to produce.

Labeling someone as human garbage doesn't make them or mean that they're actually human garbage. A lesson you can't seem to learn. You simply label them to suit yourself regardless of anything other than your feelings. What I posted was factual. What you posted was a fantasy created in your own mind. You seem to be having difficulty understanding the difference.

Another cool story.

He's Human Garbage.


Sex doll links? I want to learn all about this breakthrough in treating monsters by giving them dolls to [censored] that look like children.

Trying to have an actual conversation or debate with you is meaningless and a waste of time.

From the national library of medicine.....

Summary

Despite an absence of empirical data on the characteristics and subsequent effects of doll ownership, discussions about the ethical and legal status of doll ownership continue. This highlights a real and urgent need for a coherent research agenda to be advanced in this area of work.

Much like I was advocating they should try it on an experimental basis to see if the findings would indicate if it helped or not.

So you've played judge, jury and executioner on someone with no actual evidence. Murica! Freedumb!

Link??

That summary you posted is for sex doll ownership and sex robot ownership... with absolutely no consideration to child sex dolls.

Try again.

It includes all sex doll ownership and how such ownership relates in terms of behavior. If you mean it wasn't broken down into subsets you are correct.

So, in other words, this "study" has nothing to do, specifically, with supplying sex dolls to pedophiles.

It's basically a paper questioning the idea of research in the possible effects of sex dolls on human sexuality and attitude toward the opposite sex.


How 'bout the other studies you spoke of?

This study is all inclusive. The word "specifically" does not exclude the fact that all information wasn't entered into the study. You do understand that the "the possible effects of sex dolls on human sexuality" is exactly what we have been discussing, right? Your issue is it isn't exclusively about the portion of the topic you wish to focus on.

No. That is NOT what we've been discussing at all.

We've been discussing giving sex dolls that look like kids to known pedophiles. NOT pondering the effects of sex dolls on the general population.

That's like talking about vehicular deaths and statistics and acting like they represent the statistics of drunk drivers -- because "they're included".

Try harder.


You said "studies", plural, any more studies?

LMAO@U

If Barron gets Benny Boy’d by a pedo, it would be due to Trump’s bad karma and his pedo history with Jeffry Epstein. Now I would never wish that on the innocent kid. But soon that kid will be a grown Trump jackass, just like the other two. And I’m 99% sure they were both Benny Boy’d.

"Despite an absence of empirical data on the characteristics and subsequent effects of doll ownership"

There is no data on the effects owning sex dolls has on the conduct of the people who own them. I want to find out if this would lessen the acts of pedophilia against children. You do not. Maybe it's the dolls you are trying to protect rather than the children. Seems kind of strange.

I want to find out if teaching alcoholics to drive drunk will reduce vehicular homicides. I think we taxpayers (those of us that actually pay) should buy some cars to smash up.

#DrunkLivesMatter

I think we should fund a VR game for youths that show the early signs of being a serial killer. Let them torture and cut up animals in the VR world, maybe then they won't do it in real life.

#ifitsavesonelife
#killerswontbekillersiftheycankillinthemetaverseinstead

And now you're saying that since there's NO DATA to back up your absurd theory, it's an even better idea??

Can't make it up!

Maybe if they were driving fake cars. You know, when the item is fake nobody gets hurt and there isn't a crash.

Sadly the average sentence for pedophilia is only 87 to 108 months. The cost of keeping an inmate in an Ohio prison for a year is $30,558 per year. it seems you prefer to keep spending all the money that way instead of seeing if we can cut down on that cost.

I'm saying to find out of it helps is a good idea. You do understand that to find out if something works or not at some point you have to get the data on whether it works or not. Otherwise we just hear meaningless gibberish like we see you doing here.

I seem to remember seeing a study from a few years ago that demonstrated that areas if the country with the highest porn use had the lowest incidence of sexually violent crimes. The theory being that porn gave a safe outlet to those predisposed to committing these types if crimes.

Drop it bro. The only thing that works in the GOPers world is hate. There is no fix for anything in that world. Just hate.

So in your world there is no way this could hurt, correct?

Even though clinical psychologists have insisted this is dangerous and lends to "rehearsal" and building the fantasy to the point where they act on it, we should just throw all of that out because Pit@DawgTalkers?

And then you're going to virtue signal as if others don't care because "try it, what could go wrong?"

And lastly, in your world of strawmen and mutually exclusive b.s. arguments, you want to discount the long list of things that do work because letting sickos bang child sex dolls on the taxpayers dime is a better idea. You say "nothing else has worked" and promote a blatant LIE to support your argument.


I can't even describe how disturbing this argument is, not that you care.

An argument doesn't equal data. A supposition isn't a relevant way to construct the point you aren't willing to try to help lessen the problem. That's why everything and the points were shown on both sides they write in that source, the summary stated there needed to be studies conducted. But you go on and keep claiming that we should feed the prison system rather than try a possible solution. I'm sure obstructionist have a handbook that helps you try and stifle progress.

The source says there would need to be studies to analyze the true effect of sex dolls on humans. It doesn't say "we need to do studies", it says "we can't reach a conclusion without them". And again, this entire paper pertains to sex dolls in general...

Not child sex dolls for pedophiles to see if it makes them stop raping.


Lay. off. the crack pipe.

"the true effect of sex dolls on humans". Yes, humans. Not some humans. Not all humans except for certain humans. English is hard.

Speaking of crack pipes.

Spits out a word salad, uses "English is hard" as the dressing. 🤣

It seems you have no idea that all people are human. That's a you problem.