Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
bonefish #2065541 04/12/24 01:07 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
1. First Round: Roughly 97% to 99% of players drafted in the first round make it onto an NFL roster. These are usually the most promising or "sure-bet" players coming out of college and NFL teams tend to take more risks on the first round.

2. Second Round: Approximately 94% to 96% of players drafted in the second round make NFL rosters. These athletes are still high-value but may not have been the first pick due to a position not being a priority for teams drafting early, or they may have minor limitations or concerns.

3. Third Round: Generally, around 85% to 90% of players drafted in this round end up securing a spot on a roster. Despite being drafted later, third round players still show significant potential.

4. Fourth to Seventh Rounds: The success rates can drop a bit from here, but it's not uncommon for these rounds to have some hidden gems. Approximately 60%-70% of fourth-round players make a roster, which dips to 50%-60% in the fifth round, and roughly 30%-50% for the sixth and seventh rounds.

5. Undrafted Players: Only about 15% to 20% of undrafted players (UDFAs) end up securing a spot on an NFL roster. These athletes might not have been picked during the seven rounds of the NFL Draft, but that doesn't mean they don't have potential – they often have to prove themselves more than drafted players.

bonefish #2065542 04/12/24 01:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Making a roster is one thing.

Playing and when can be something else.

Getting a second contract is another.

PitDAWG #2065543 04/12/24 01:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,472
Likes: 145
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,472
Likes: 145
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Maybe someone should look at the actual success rate of draft picks made in the later rounds and say they expect success despite very long adds against it in those later rounds. At least that would be honest.

pit..I did exactly that and you didn't care for the answer..!

You used Dawand Jones, drafted in 4th round last year as an example of drafting a hidden gem in a later round...and I agreed with you.

Since it was Berry's draft room and scouting department that drafted Jones, I went back to Berry's first draft as the Browns GM...2020.

...I counted up the players that Berry had drafted in the 4th round and below the 4th round since becoming the Browns GM...I counted 19 total draft choices.

...the only player to step into a starting role and be considered a solid starting material in the year he was drafted was Dawand Jones...thus he is the standard I used as being a legit "hidden gem". Dawand proved to be better than back-up material, part time material or simply special teams material.

Therefore, Daward is 1 out of 19 picks that meets the standard of drafting a hidden gem.





Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
mac #2065544 04/12/24 02:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
There's a difference between the standard and the exception to the rule. Rarely is an OT of that talent level who can perform in the NFL to his level found in the fourth round. That's the very definition of "exception".


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
PitDAWG #2065545 04/12/24 02:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 14
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Maybe someone should look at the actual success rate of draft picks made in the later rounds and say they expect success despite very long adds against it in those later rounds. At least that would be honest.

mac, better yet break down each team's success rates in rounds 5-7 in the last five years. It is easy to say Berry missed on this player. If you want an honest grade on Berry, give a count on teams who re-signed their late-round pick to a second contract.

PitDAWG #2065546 04/12/24 02:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,472
Likes: 145
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,472
Likes: 145
pit...I even used the standard you cited and now you want to fall back on "word games" rather than admit, the Browns ability to find such hidden gems is not so good...1 out of 19 tries.

The boys in the draft room and scouting department need to continue to improve at finding late round talent...find us some more like Dawand.




Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
mac #2065547 04/12/24 02:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Originally Posted by mac
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Maybe someone should look at the actual success rate of draft picks made in the later rounds and say they expect success despite very long adds against it in those later rounds. At least that would be honest.

pit..I did exactly that and you didn't care for the answer..!

You used Dawand Jones, drafted in 4th round last year as an example of drafting a hidden gem in a later round...and I agreed with you.

Since it was Berry's draft room and scouting department that drafted Jones, I went back to Berry's first draft as the Browns GM...2020.

...I counted up the players that Berry had drafted in the 4th round and below the 4th round since becoming the Browns GM...I counted 19 total draft choices.

...the only player to step into a starting role and be considered a solid starting material in the year he was drafted was Dawand Jones...thus he is the standard I used as being a legit "hidden gem". Dawand proved to be better than back-up material, part time material or simply special teams material.

Therefore, Daward is 1 out of 19 picks that meets the standard of drafting a hidden gem.


Interesting definition of "hidden gem." Late rounder that has to be a starter in his rookie year. We had Nick Chubb, no other RB was going to be a starter while he was here. In places where we needed starters, we drafted them by round 3.

You don't expect late rounders to be starters immediately. Especially not on teams with good rosters with no glaring holes. You might draft future starters ("developmental" players.) The only reason Jones started was because Conklin got hurt.

Using your definition, a team that has good starters will hardly ever find hidden gems.

DPJ was a 6th rounder that started 30 games for us. He didn't start as a rookie because we had 2 (former) Pro Bowl WRs in Landry and OBJ.

Cam Mitchell actually did start a few games last season. He didn't start more because he was behind Ward, Emerson, and Newsome.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
mac #2065549 04/12/24 02:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
The only one playing word games here is you. An exception isn't a standard by any definition. Claiming it is, is the word game here. Hoping they will find them is not only our hope but there's as well. But the odds of that happening are low and somehow you have decided that beating the odds by a wide margin is now "the standard".


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
bonefish #2065566 04/12/24 04:49 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,317
Likes: 248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,317
Likes: 248
We now have another 7th round pick



#gmstrong
PitDAWG #2065567 04/12/24 05:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 35
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 35
The squabbles on here are endless. At this point, I expect them and don't get too invested in any of them. With that being said, it seems that the definition of a "hidden gem" draft selection is nebulous. What I mean is it's arbitrary to say it has to be a late round pick or even a pick at all because player acquisition happens in a number of ways.

Martin Emerson qualifies in my opinion. Drafted in round 3 of 2022 he was not on my radar. He didn't seem to be on the radar of most media or Browns fans if we're being honest. He has outperformed his draft status to date.

JOK has outperformed his draft status as well. Berry recognized the value and aggressively moved up to get him when he was sliding.

Given Grant Delpits' medical history and questions about his ability to withstand injury he was a steal.

Alex Wright is on the verge of becoming a steal and he continues to develop on the arc he appears to be on this time next year we might say confidently that he was a steal.

Since the argument seems to be about the franchise as a whole and not just Berry the acquisition of Wyatt Teller who had a so-so career before coming to the Browns should also be considered a hidden gem.

Im hoping that we'll be talking about Jerry Jeudy as a hidden gem because a 5th and a 6th for that talent could be huge.

Continue the fight...come out swinging, lol

Last edited by guard dawg; 04/12/24 05:15 PM.
1 member likes this: bonefish
guard dawg #2065572 04/12/24 08:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
In the end it is about building the entire roster 1 to 53. Depth is often the key to winning by the end of the season.

Berry has done a good job. No GM hits 1000%. If you have a good roster with depth that is what counts.

Mike Mayock was a TV draft guru. He leveraged that into becoming a GM. Once in that position he found out that it is not as easy as it is talking about the draft.

How many number one draft picks have failed? Winston and Baker were not busts but neither has had the expected careers as most predicted.

The history of the draft proves it is a crap shoot.

bonefish #2065574 04/12/24 08:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,472
Likes: 145
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,472
Likes: 145
Quote
Since the argument seems to be about the franchise as a whole and not just Berry the acquisition of Wyatt Teller who had a so-so career before coming to the Browns should also be considered a hidden gem.

guard..I just want to add a bit of information concerning the Browns acquisition of Wyatt Teller.

Teller was drafted by the Buffalo Bills in the 5th round of the 2018 draft after playing 4 seasons at Virginia Tech. After his senior season Teller was named to the All-ACC first team and was named the runner up for the ACC Jacobs Blocking Trophy.

As a rookie, Teller was a back-up OG for the Bills until game 10 when he was named the starting OG for the last 7 games of the 2018 season. John Dorsey, the Browns GM, worked out a trade for Teller just before the start of the 2019 season..Dorsey traded a Browns 5th and a 6th round pick of the 2020 draft for Teller with the Bills throwing in their 7th round pick of the 2021 draft to complete the deal.

Teller became a starting OG for the Browns in week 9 of the 2019 season and remains the Browns starter, earning all-pro honors in 2020 and 2021 along with Pro-Bowl honors in 2021, 2022 and 2023.

The Bills might have under valued Teller's potential after his rookie season but the Browns made them an offer that was good enough to steal Teller away from them.

Whether drafting or acquiring talent via trade, recognizing player potential and talent are a must for the Browns if they expect to win a Super Bowl in the next few years. The Browns need to hit on as many of their draft picks as they possibly can... and make smart trades that improve the performance of the offense, defense and special teams.

Last edited by mac; 04/12/24 08:23 PM.



Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
1 member likes this: guard dawg
bonefish #2065578 04/13/24 08:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
There is a 20% probability that Troy Franklin will be there when we select at 54.

IMO if he is there we need to draft him. I think it would be a big mistake if we did not.

bonefish #2065590 04/13/24 12:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Originally Posted by bonefish
There is a 20% probability that Troy Franklin will be there when we select at 54.

IMO if he is there we need to draft him. I think it would be a big mistake if we did not.

Which simulator is giving you that probability? The one I tried didn't seem very accurate. I didn't mind drafting guys that only had 10% chances of getting where they fell repeatedly, but the percentages didn't seem to make sense/play out that way.

Franklin could be a good player. I'm not sure I see it for us. WR projections seem to be all over the place now. Hard to know which ones might be available.

I could actually see us going LB. Trevin Wallace could be a fit, maybe. Someone that can cover, and also would seem to have the range to help corral Lamar.

I'm starting to wonder if LB and TE might be the play "early", then OL and RB on day 3. Of course, if the right player drops in our lap that goes out the window.

It's kind of hard to find spots on the 53 for rookies. It's almost weird to not be needing instant starters.

I was on board with the there are so many good receivers in this draft we should take one approach. However, the more I think about it, the less I want to go that direction. There will be a bunch of good receivers every draft. That room looks pretty well stocked for this coming season. With Cooper, Jeudy, Moore, and Tillman, I'm not sure a rookie would see the field.

I could see us drafting for future needs, and a WR would make more sense in that light, but I still think it's more likely that a good receiver would be available to plug and play in next year's draft than other positions.

Because there appears to be a lot of depth at some positions (WR, OL,) I kind of wonder if teams might try to wait on those and they fall a bit (probably not the top 3 WRs.) It will be interesting to see how this draft plays out.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Bull_Dawg #2065591 04/13/24 12:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 14
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 14
I think they are more likely to take OT/IL replacements for Bitonio and Teller in the next year or two.

bugs #2065592 04/13/24 01:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Originally Posted by bugs
I think they are more likely to take OT/IL replacements for Bitonio and Teller in the next year or two.

Definitely wouldn't hurt my feelings if a good OL "fell" to us.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Bull_Dawg #2065593 04/13/24 01:15 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013

bonefish #2065594 04/13/24 01:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Originally Posted by bonefish

https://espnanalytics.com/draft-sim/

That is the draft simulator I came across the other day that I was thinking of.

Zach Frazier played center at West Virginia, but I think he could play guard, too. He's a guy I'd be on board with taking at 54.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Bull_Dawg #2065595 04/13/24 02:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
I think there will be some great options at 54.

I did not look at offensive linemen. I looked Braden Fiske who I like a lot.

However, I am zeroing in on two guys. Trey Benson and Troy Franklin.

Benson I believe is going to be a good pro. Because of the entire situation surrounding Nick; I think we should draft him.

Franklin has skills that I believe will fit the Browns. He was the very first guy I looked at in the draft. Then I started looking at other receivers.

I kept coming back to Franklin. His tape when you keep watching is very impressive. Greg Cosell sealed it for me. Nobody studies more tape than Greg Cosell.


bonefish #2065618 04/13/24 05:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,855
Likes: 182
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,855
Likes: 182
Bone I mentioned that I felt we should take an OL or a DL with pick 54. However, whomever we choose at whatever position if he turns out to be a good player for us that's all I'm concerned about. That to me is the bottom line.

Homewood Dog #2065622 04/13/24 06:29 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
No doubt but I like to make my own picks and see if they happen.

1 member likes this: bugs
Homewood Dog #2065627 04/13/24 08:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,838
Likes: 947
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,838
Likes: 947
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Bone I mentioned that I felt we should take an OL or a DL with pick 54. However, whomever we choose at whatever position if he turns out to be a good player for us that's all I'm concerned about. That to me is the bottom line.

Yes. Berry's put us in a position where we can and should draft BPA.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
bonefish #2065635 04/14/24 07:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
I was looking at some mock drafts this morning.

Damn some that I saw were just wacked out. One had the Browns selecting Bo Nix at 54????

Another had guys like Troy Franklin in the third round. I don't think so.

There are always surprises. Guys slip that many think will not.

Some players that nobody thought will be drafted high will get drafted high.

That is why the draft is fun. Organizations see players differently.

bonefish #2065649 04/14/24 11:26 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
And what you saw is the problem. No matter how you slice it some of these "draft gurus" are no better at predicting the draft than some posters on this board.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
jfanent #2065685 04/15/24 06:09 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,537
Likes: 811
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,537
Likes: 811
Originally Posted by jfanent
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Bone I mentioned that I felt we should take an OL or a DL with pick 54. However, whomever we choose at whatever position if he turns out to be a good player for us that's all I'm concerned about. That to me is the bottom line.

Yes. Berry's put us in a position where we can and should draft BPA.

I agree. We went in with guardrails everybody agreed upon. We selected players in a methodical way to build the team inside the parameters set. The FO has done a good job of addressing needs before the draft to give us the flexibility to just draft good players without needs dictating 85% of the selection. We are at the point where Berry's idea of needs isn't simply this year. It is more about next year and the year after when selecting players.

We are finally a professional football team with a competent staff from planning, to player aquation, to on field management. We are in a good spot.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #2065699 04/15/24 10:51 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,606
Likes: 1330
I feel as though the biggest deal by far that they've made to date is still undetermined. That one still weighs pretty heavily. Outside of that I must agree with you.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
bonefish #2065704 04/15/24 11:01 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Interesting I started this thread in January.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles...undup-of-br-staff-kiper-and-expert-picks


The two guys I have been pimping were Troy Franklin and Trey Benson.



bonefish #2065712 04/15/24 11:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
I mentioned the "other Penn State OT" as a potential later round target.

Well, the "other Notre Dame OT" could maybe be a target at 54. Blake Fisher looks pretty good to me.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
PitDAWG #2065791 04/16/24 06:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,537
Likes: 811
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,537
Likes: 811
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
I feel as though the biggest deal by far that they've made to date is still undetermined. That one still weighs pretty heavily. Outside of that I must agree with you.

Fair comment, and no doubt the final results are undetermined. I do think that on the whole the FA selections have been at least on the good side. You are never going to hit on every move. I guess to define good...in a classic grading system, "B-" would be my grade.

But Watson will be like that final test one takes that accounts for a larger portion of your overall grade but isn't the entire grade.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
1 member likes this: PitDAWG
bonefish #2065796 04/16/24 09:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Potential D2 RB "sleeper"



Blake Watson, RB, Memphis is another "under the radar" guy that looks interesting.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
bonefish #2065854 04/17/24 08:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Originally Posted by bonefish
Interesting I started this thread in January.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles...undup-of-br-staff-kiper-and-expert-picks


The two guys I have been pimping were Troy Franklin and Trey Benson.





That's not definitive, but I have some hesitation with Franklin. He could work out, but I see some bust potential.

He probably wouldn't be the route I'd go.

Edit: I'm under the impression that that was taken from Bob McGinn's work, and he's had some notable misses (CJ Stroud.) But, it resonated with the concerns I felt.

Last edited by Bull_Dawg; 04/17/24 08:42 AM.

[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
bonefish #2065858 04/17/24 09:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Another interesting looking RB. Not sure about the long speed, but I like pretty much everything else that I'm seeing so far.



[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Bull_Dawg #2065860 04/17/24 09:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
I completely disagree with whoever Billy M is.

"In 1984, Greg Cosell with NFL Films President Steve Sabol created a show titled Monday Night Matchup (now known as NFL Matchup) which was initially hosted by Chris Berman."

He watches over 40 hours of film a week.

I posted his video and his take on Franklin and other receivers in this draft.

Billy M???

bonefish #2065864 04/17/24 09:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 101
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 101
Billy Madison

Hammer #2065867 04/17/24 10:00 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Not a credible source IMO.

bonefish #2065871 04/17/24 10:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 101
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 101

bonefish #2065904 04/17/24 01:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,116
Likes: 349
Originally Posted by bonefish
I completely disagree with whoever Billy M is.

"In 1984, Greg Cosell with NFL Films President Steve Sabol created a show titled Monday Night Matchup (now known as NFL Matchup) which was initially hosted by Chris Berman."

He watches over 40 hours of film a week.

I posted his video and his take on Franklin and other receivers in this draft.

Billy M???

Yeah, don't know Billy M, but someone I follow retweeted it. Some digging indicated that it's pulled from something by Bob McGinn, a sportswriter that covered the Packers for ~40 years.

I generally like Cosell, but nobody bats 1,000 in the draft.

Franklin has some things he does well. I just see some things that could hold him back. I'd rather take a player that I have more conviction in. Especially when I don't see WR as a need. Franklin is only 21, so he's definitely not a finished product. I wouldn't hate it if we picked him, it's just not what I would do.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
bonefish #2065939 04/17/24 03:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,965
Likes: 352
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,965
Likes: 352
I would just as soon take our picks and package them into moving up in the draft. We don't have a ton of spots on the roster .... and if I could add a couple of potential impact players, I would rather do that,


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 1013
I can understand that sentiment but I don't think that Berry does.

IMO he likes to trade back and have more picks to increase the odds of finding guys.

Also I think he believes in trying to develop guys from the later rounds.

I can see it either way. If I see a good value for a player that has dropped from where you had him ranked say 40 and now it is pick 48-50.

Yes go get him.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,279
Likes: 1827
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,279
Likes: 1827
I could see R5 and R6 getting packaged together:

* on their own to move up for a player they like between 85 and 156
* with R3 (85) to move to the late 2nd
* with R2 (54) to move high in the 2nd

I only see the first scenario as bordering on 'likely'.
I do not see R2 and R3 getting packaged for a 1st round pick.

It's tough to get too 'crazy' without a 1st and a 4th.

Most likely scenario is one like Bone described above. Lumping our R5 to move up a few spots in the 2nd for a high-value target.


Cleveland Browns 2024 NFL Draft picks
Round 2: No. 54
Round 3: No. 85
Round 5: No. 156 (from PHI through AZ)
Round 6: No. 206
Round 7: No. 227 (from TEN)
Round 7: No. 243


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Page 7 of 10 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk 2024 NFL Draft The Draft

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5