White House cover up for YEARS to try to hide Biden's condition from the country. This should bother all Americans.
You keep quoting a right wing rag newspaper that's about on the same level as the national enquirer.... Not everything in it is a lie and not everything in is true. Nearly everything in it is made to be more sensational and extreme than reality.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
For the 2/3rds of biden voters that want him gone, can I ask why you didnt vote for Marianne Williamson just a,few short months ago? Nothing about Biden has changed since then.
Because she was a horrible candidate. She would have fixed the country using her crystals and healing stones
Dean Phillips is who you should have asked about. I would have voted for him if he hadn't dropped out before my state primary
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
White House cover up for YEARS to try to hide Biden's condition from the country. This should bother all Americans.
You keep quoting a right wing rag newspaper that's about on the same level as the national enquirer.... Not everything in it is a lie and not everything in is true. Nearly everything in it is made to be more sensational and extreme than reality.
There is nothing wrong with my source just because it's not MSNBC. It's a FACT that the White House has covered up Biden's cognitive decline and straight lied to the American People about it. You should be bothered when the Government lies to you. If they lie to you about this, what else will they lie to you about?
For the 2/3rds of biden voters that want him gone, can I ask why you didnt vote for Marianne Williamson just a,few short months ago? Nothing about Biden has changed since then.
Dean Phillips for me, but the DNC did not give the electorate a real choice and now they have egg on their faces when Grandpa Joe could not speak a coherent sentence.
And no matter who the D’s put up, they are still better than Don the Con.
I’m interested to see if the try to force feed Harris down the convention goers throats or other candidates come forward. It should be an exciting convention!
Biden endorsed her and her first comments were about how she has to earn the nomination. I don't see that as being force fed anything. Yes, it should be a lively convention. I rarely watch these conventions. But this one, I may have to at least try.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
And who exactly does he think he’s gonna get support from? lol dude needs to just go on somewhere
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Here is my question ' if kamila isn't on the ticket then they cannot use the biden/harris donations of $90 + million. So what then happens to that money? Is ut given back to the donors?
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
Here is my question ' if kamila isn't on the ticket then they cannot use the biden/harris donations of $90 + million. So what then happens to that money? Is ut given back to the donors?
For the 2/3rds of biden voters that want him gone, can I ask why you didnt vote for Marianne Williamson just a,few short months ago? Nothing about Biden has changed since then.
Because most people didn't even have a clue who she was much less vote for her.
So for them it was voting for the sake of voting and not taking the time to research a candidate when they had one they didnt like at the top. The never-trumpers are insufferable, but at least they have a principle guiding them. The 2/3rds are obviously party loyal lemmings.
Lemmings? Like people who support a 34 time convicted felon and sexual predator because they think he's the best candidate? Sure.....
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
And there it is. Republicans plan to make sure that if they aren't facing Biden they won't be facing abyone. It doesn't sound like they're looking forward to facing Kamala or anyone else other than Biden. Their answer is to blame someone else for rigging an election while they want to make sure trump is the only name on the ballot.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
Here is my question ' if kamila isn't on the ticket then they cannot use the biden/harris donations of $90 + million. So what then happens to that money? Is ut given back to the donors?
It would likely go to the DNC.
Give money back? No one gives money back.
If it goes to the DNC why couldn't they just use it for another candidates campaign?
Am I perfect? No Am I trying to be a better person? Also no
Here is my question ' if kamila isn't on the ticket then they cannot use the biden/harris donations of $90 + million. So what then happens to that money? Is ut given back to the donors?
It would likely go to the DNC.
Give money back? No one gives money back.
If it goes to the DNC why couldn't they just use it for another candidates campaign?
They can as far as I understand. I don't know what the implications of that are but they may be loath to part with all of it.
Yall know this is on the republicans and trump, right?
Nobody has a presidential debate before both parties conventions have been finished. But Trump and his followers decided to challenge Biden way too early in the process, which gave the Dems time to find another candidate before the DNC.
If they would’ve waited til after the conventions, and done there first debate afterwards as well, then the Dems would have no choice but to keep Biden on the ticket.
But nope. They were in such a rush to get Biden on stage that they screwed themselves in the long run. Good job republicans.
Nobody knows how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory quite like yall do.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Trump challenged him way back in April. What you posted was his response
Last edited by Swish; 07/22/2411:33 AM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Your link plainly states that trump challenged him to debate "any time he wants". Nothing about that indicates it was trump wanted such an early debate. Biden was the one who wanted to debate early.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
Yes bro because Trump was challenging Biden to a debate early on because of the whole age thing. He was challenging him during his trials. Biden accepted the challenge, he didn’t issue it.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Trump was the first one to issue the challenge. How he said it matters none. But keep going off, bro. You got it.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Mr Trump, who has for months been calling for a debate "anytime, anywhere", got what he wanted. Mr Biden, meanwhile, got to set the terms of their meetings. Now we have an idea of the agreed terms, here's a closer look at how the debates could benefit, or damage, the two campaigns.
So again, Trump issues the challenge, Biden accepts.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”