DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Kamala Harris

I understand why you are so concerned.... Kamala has much better chance than Biden did of beating Trump. In fact I think it's 50-50 right now.

And that probably says more about Trump than it does Kamala. I think there are Deomocrts who would win more votes than Kamala..... But Trump is very unpopular too. Trump has his faithful who will vote for him no matter what. He's got a swath of R's who will vote R no matter who is on the ticket. Dems have a bunch of Dems who would never vote any other way. There's a small % of never trumpers across all party lines. And then there's the center who will decide the election.

Will civil liability for rape, Jan 6rh and the continued lie and denial that he lost the last election turn enough voters against him? Will the shady circumstances surrounding Kamala being the Democratic ticket turn enough voters off??

One thing is for sure..... IF... If if if.... Kamala wins then all this silly talk about kamalas ticket being undemocratic can stop because the country will have voted and no matter how she got on the ticket, if the country votes and elects her.... Then the country will have spoken.

I wish Harris would quit texting me asking if I will support her and send money. Sheesh, how did she get my number?

So you actually have nothing but an opinion to back up what you're saying as I had thought.


What evidence do you have that all of those being considered by Biden for vice president were black women?

So you believe using racial qualifiers is ok? Good to know. You'd sell your own children if the party told you to do so.

Why wouldn't she? She knows you're on the fence about whether you're voting for her or trump.

I'm under no illusion on who is getting the electoral votes from MD. The upside is I am not bound to vote for the only two choices some people think they have, I can vote for whoever I please. Maybe if some people would quit complaining about that and vote third party one would emerge from the rubble of the two party system we are told we must use.

Or people will continue to vote the way they always have then whine there are no good candidates.

That would be fine of someone actually mandated a racial qualifier but they didn't.


What evidence do you have that all of those being considered by Biden for vice president were black women?

All BS with nothing to back it up. AKA... just another day.

Well I never watch CNN and I don't know who this Frost guy is, but I guess you watch CNN right?

Uh-okay Daman.

You thunk it up all by yourself.

It will probably be racist to call her the border czar by tomorrow. They just need to figure out the angle.

Hey. You can always just change the articles... five years later.

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984

What evidence do you have that all of those being considered by Biden for vice president were black women?

Trump donated to Kamala Harris' campaign when she was California attorney general

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-donated-kamala-harris-campaign-california-attorney-general/

I'm amazed the right wing media hasn't picked up on that story. Just think of the attack they could come at Kamala with for this!

Kamala Harris accepts campaign donations from man convicted on 34 felony counts!

They could really trash her with that story!

Yes, reject your eyes and ears-- His vice president, Mike Pence: “The American people deserve to know that President Trump asked me to put him over my oath to the Constitution. … Anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be president of the United States.” Quoted from CNN article- HIS VP says he should never be President again.......24 other prominent members of his Administration are Never Trumpers, like his new VP who for personal gain traded horses. Got to love those "principled politicians".

Haven't you heard? Once you question trump they disown you. They already threatened to hang Mike Pence. Then there's how they treated Kinzinger and Cheney. Now that trump has taken over the party anyone with principals is rejected. Only blind loyalty gains you favor among the self appointed king and his subjects.

That's a great quote and very pertinent to what Biden's inner circle and Democratic Party Machine have done.

However, given your recent tirade about assigning credit and providing a source for what's posted here.... While you've accurately quoted the Author for this quote, did you come up with that connection and quote yourself or have you seen it elsewhere and are now sharing it with us?

And trump never said lock her up

I attributed the work. I didn't hide it wasn't my own original thought. But you keep at it.

Yet you regurgitate every GOP talking point without citing them or giving them credit for it. Hmmmmm.....

Guns & Roses song Civil War includes a quote form Cool Hand Luke..”what we got here is failure to communicate"

Twisted Sister’s “We’re Not Gonna Take It” used Douglas C. Niedermeyer in the frat comedy Animal House and quoted his lines from the movie in that video.

Neither cited credits.

Plagiarism I tell ya!

Do you believe GnR was trying to represent someone else's work as their own?

I don't have a copy of the liner notes, nor do I care to look for them.

You posted a quip that was not yours, with no indication it was not yours. But here you are, still wanting to fight about it. Poor little you. Always wrong and always mad about it.

What in the world does that have to do with media outlets going back and deleting or changing articles??

I'll wait... probably forever.

They didn't say either way. Exactly the same thing I did. And as I've stated, you have no idea if the person who created that meme actually wasn't repeating something they saw or heard somewhere else. there's zero evidence that the person who created the meme created the saying.


So you mean exactly like the examples I've shown you. Just like twisted sister, G&R among several other examples I could easily show you?


I'm not mad about it. I'm continuing to point out the idiocy of your claim. Speaking of being wrong.

Clowns and sheep.

So you are now asserting GnR stole someone else's work? Fair use would allow them to use a small portion of a work as long as they didn't represent it as their own. You stole the entire thing.

I don't know who made the meme originally, I do know it wasn't you. You also didn't post a meme, you posted it as a quip, a zinger, a singular phrase. There was nothing to indicate you were regurgitating something, I mean, other than your usual tendency to spout off things you were told to think.

There was nothing that indicated they were my words either. "Fair use"? There you go playing attorney again. Same as it ever was. There I went and plagiarized somebody again!

Question. If you have no idea who created the saying, who are you suppose to cite with which to give credit for the saying? So you're saying anything and everything posted in the public domain that isn't credited to anyone or under copyright which you repeat is plagiarism?

And once again, since you regurgitate every GOP talking point why are you not giving them the credit? Where are you telling everyone you are just repeating what you heard from them? Because they certainly aren't "original thoughts" of yours.

You posted a text based quip. Usually in cases like this people post the actual meme. You didn't even bother, and then were butthurt when I pointed it out. Poor you, you weren't so clever as you thought you were.

Get better at losing.

Harris’ immigration role

Trump claimed of Harris: “She was the border czar, but she never went to the border.”

Facts First: Trump made two false claims here. First, Harris did go to the border as vice president, in Texas in mid-2021; many Republicans had criticized Harris prior to the visit for not having gone, and some later argued that she didn’t go frequently enough, but the claim that she “never” went has not been true for more than three years. Second, Harris was never made Biden’s “border czar,” a label the White House has always emphasized is inaccurate. In reality, Biden gave Harris a more limited immigration-related assignment in 2021, asking her to lead diplomacy with El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras in an attempt to address the conditions that prompted their citizens to try to migrate to the United States.

Some Republicans have scoffed this week at assertions that Harris was never the “border czar,” noting on social media that news articles sometimes described Harris as such. But those articles were wrong. Various news outlets, including CNN, reported as early as the first half of 2021 that the White House emphasized that Harris had not been put in charge of border security as a whole, as “border czar” strongly suggests, and had instead been handed a diplomatic task related to Central American countries.

A White House “fact sheet” in July 2021 said: “On February 2, 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order that called for the development of a Root Causes Strategy. Since March, Vice President Kamala Harris has been leading the Administration’s diplomatic efforts to address the root causes of migration from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.”

Biden’s own comments at a March 2021 event announcing the assignment were slightly more muddled, but he said he had asked Harris to lead “our diplomatic effort” to address factors causing migration in the three “Northern Triangle” countries (he also mentioned Mexico that day). Biden listed factors in these countries he thought had led to migration and said that “if you deal with the problems in-country, it benefits everyone.” And Harris’ comments that day were focused squarely on “root causes.”

Republicans can fairly say that even “root causes” work is a border-related task. But calling her “border czar” goes too far.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/25/politics/fact-check-trump-false-claims-kamala-harris/index.html

You called that plagiarism which it clearly is not. Don't backtrack now by your absurd attempt to blame me for it. I'm not the one who is butthurt for being called out for it. Poor you. Should I cite you for credit on the use of "poor you"? Speaking of loser.

You didn't give any indication one way or the other. That's why I asked. After your recent tirade it was relevant. Nothing to keep at. Just simple facts.

You must not understand the word "backtrack". I have never.

Poor you is a common saying. Nice try though, still losing you are.

Didn't I?


Seems I attributed it to George Orwell from the work 1984. Mayhaps you were just blinded by your own need to have a "gotcha". Go sit in the loser corner with Pit now.

So which is it? You're going to continue to lie about what constitutes plagiarism or are you going to back off of it?


Since you just make up $#!+ about what plagiarism is I felt I had to ask.

No.... I said it was a great quote. It'd be impossible not to see who the quote was by and the reference to the book..... in my post I even use the word "author" acknowledging that. My post also says it's GREAT in relation to what the D party have done. So [1] I acknowledged the author [2] I said it was great (as in clever).

My question was and still is about whether or not YOU came up with the that connection - a quote from 1984 to describe the current situation with the Dems ... of if you saw this somewhere else and shared it. Based on your recent tirade I think that's pertinent. So let me know.

Kudos to you if you did it all yourself. If you got fed that line from somewhere else, and based on your recent rants, maybe you want to consider whether your posting lived up to the standards you expect others to post by. Either way - it doesn't diminsh how apt/clver tieing the quote to the 2024 Dems is.

The reference to cool hand Luke in civil war is an audio clip from the original movie, at the start of the song. They didn’t try to pass it off as something they came up with on their own.

And yes, Fate, I have the liner notes.

I’m just a reader in this forum because frankly, it’s crazy ‘round here, but when I need to make a rock and roll clarification, I must chime in.

So what is it about Harris that makes her worthy of the presidency?

I thought so, but maybe someone else thought of it also....I don't know.


But if you think I didn't, you can attempt to prove it. I would love to watch you twist yourself in knots over it.

Same question applies to Trump-,,,,makes him worthy of the Presidency? His previous experience?, his civil molesting/rape conviction, his possible future felony charges, his hawking- steaks, bibles, tennis shoes, action figures- on and on, his billionaire share of taxes- just under $800, his seven bankruptcies ( I know successful people use those all the time- right)...on and on......24 previously hired/fired/wouldn't work for him again 1st term cabinet members/key staffer who say now- NEVER TRUMP----all those accolades - plus he's now the old guy who can't remember names/ places......he is worthy? NOT

I think you can find hundreds of examples of rich people making contributions to both sides of a political race. They back both sides so no matter who gets elected so they have access.

It's a non story.

He’s always been sketchy, and that’s being kind, but what does Harris bring to the table?

Cool then.

You had the same original thought at the exact same time, fair enough.

I'd actually be much more interested in understanding your point then.

How, in your eyes, is mentioning DEI the same as calling someone the N-word?