DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Trump Campaign Promises Part 5

You are spreading disinformation. Nothing but lies. Please show sources to back up your claims that the funds of USAID didn't go for food, vaccines and to help with shelter to save starving children. Saving children from starvation isn't trying to "solve the world's problems." It's simply trying to stop innocent children from dying.........................

USAID cuts could lead to 14 million deaths over the next five years, researchers say

The analysis found that, from 2001 through 2021, USAID-funded programs prevented nearly 92 million deaths across 133 countries, including more than 25 million deaths from HIV/AIDS, around 11 million from diarrheal diseases, 8 million from malaria and nearly 5 million from tuberculosis.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/heal...hs-five-years-researchers-say-rcna216095

And rather than just continuing to spew crap, tell me which nations get USAID funding which this describes....... "There are governments that oppress their people by starvation and other means that is who is responsible for taking care of their people and they get left off the hook. Most of them are Socialist dictators, Muslim extremists, etc... It is a tragedy what they do to their people, but I do not see why the American taxpayer has to fit that bill."

Does it matter who is starving children when children are dying? Allow children to starve because of who runs their country? You do realize that Netanyahu is currently cutting off aid to Gaza which is starving their people as well right?

One of my favorite charities is World Central Kitchen. They feed children in Ukraine and in Gaza. This is when Netanyahu doesn't lock down the borders where no aid can get in. Because they understand that people are people. Starvation is starvation. Unlike many self professed Christians they don't allow politics or religion determine who they're willing to help save and who they are not.

That would be cruel and inhumane.

I think you need to re-read that tweet (particularly the highlighted text). This decision doesn't "greenlight" any cuts. It simply said that the EO he signed was legal in that it laid plans for a RIF. Dude still has to get Congress to do its job.

It cleared a hurdle but set another right behind it.

That is what it looks like when you get your news from the Twitterverse as you call actual journalists fake news.

It's about damn time.

Wrong thread. This isn't the political joke thread.