Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#2120113 09/09/25 04:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,042
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,042
On the plus side, Jacksonville lost and Travis was a non-factor with only 2 catches. The Steelers are good for something after all =P

Chub is still looking good as he ran for more yards alone than our entire offense ... so good for Chub!!!


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,006
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,006
Ummmm, Jacksonville didn't lose - they defeated the Panthers 26-10. Also, Hunter had 6 catches for 33 yards while Chubb had 13 carries for 60 yds & Houston as a whole with 27 carries for 114 yds with 2 receptions for 17 yds from the RB position. The Browns had 24 carries for 49 yds and a TD but also had receiving yds of 61 on 9 receptions from their RB's. So yes, Chubb had a pretty fair game for him. Ummm, the Steelers beat the Jets.


Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,931
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,931
maybe this post/text was supposed to be in purple


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,293
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,293
rofl


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,042
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,042
Someone missed my tongue in cheek ... how could there obviously be good news for the Browns. Chub doing good is just an embarrassment to the Browns since he wanted to play for us.

Something good would be Jutkins not getting a suspension so we have a running game again ... maybe ... since who knows now since the Browns didn't sign him in time for him to attend training camp ...


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,800
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,800
Letting Chubb sign elsewhere while taking the discount on Ford isn't getting the attention it deserves only because the word on Chubb was that he'd lost his burst.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,294
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,294
I think the question at the end of the season will be... is Judkins better than Chubb?

Chubb gaining 60 yards on 13 carries with a long of 13 isn't special. It's very normal. I think that was the FO's fear since Chubb is 2 years removed from injury.


Hunter + Dart = This is the way.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,800
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,800
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I think the question at the end of the season will be... is Judkins better than Chubb?

Chubb gaining 60 yards on 13 carries with a long of 13 isn't special. It's very normal. I think that was the FO's fear since Chubb is 2 years removed from injury.

I agree with the crux of your argument; however, I believe it was Ford taking the pay cut that had them decide to let Chubb move on. I think Flacco throwing the ball as many times as he did has a lot to do with us not having that workhorse back currently on the roster.

Unless Chubb works his way back to near where he was at pre-injury, I feel like this is just arguing for the sake of arguing, but retaining Ford over Chubb was a mistake (albeit probably small) for the roster.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,293
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76,293
If you isolate it to keeping Ford over Chubb I would agree. But I don't think for a moment that was the plan for the RB position. I think they knew all along they would be drafting a replacement for Chubb.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,153
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,153
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I think the question at the end of the season will be... is Judkins better than Chubb?

Chubb gaining 60 yards on 13 carries with a long of 13 isn't special. It's very normal. I think that was the FO's fear since Chubb is 2 years removed from injury.

I disagree that is still 4.6 yards per carry. If he had 20 carries he is over 90 yards and pushing a 100 yard game. 2nd and 6 or 3rd and 2 are downs a distance that keeps offenses on track. The fact Judkins was not under center week 1 and no Chubb is on Andrew Berry. Chubb would have provided value for Judkins to learn behind and provide a running back that could keep the offense on track down and distance that the Browns did not have Sunday.


"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,365
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I think the question at the end of the season will be... is Judkins better than Chubb?

Chubb gaining 60 yards on 13 carries with a long of 13 isn't special. It's very normal. I think that was the FO's fear since Chubb is 2 years removed from injury.

I disagree that is still 4.6 yards per carry. If he had 20 carries he is over 90 yards and pushing a 100 yard game. 2nd and 6 or 3rd and 2 are downs a distance that keeps offenses on track. The fact Judkins was not under center week 1 and no Chubb is on Andrew Berry. Chubb would have provided value for Judkins to learn behind and provide a running back that could keep the offense on track down and distance that the Browns did not have Sunday.

Learn behind?

You mean like how Huey told Chubb to sit and "learn behind" Carlos Hyde?


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,859
D
Legend
Online
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,859
I’m still mad about that. I don’t think that’s a position where there is much “learning.” Either you have it or you don’t.


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,402
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,402
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I think the question at the end of the season will be... is Judkins better than Chubb?

Chubb gaining 60 yards on 13 carries with a long of 13 isn't special. It's very normal. I think that was the FO's fear since Chubb is 2 years removed from injury.

I disagree that is still 4.6 yards per carry. If he had 20 carries he is over 90 yards and pushing a 100 yard game. 2nd and 6 or 3rd and 2 are downs a distance that keeps offenses on track. The fact Judkins was not under center week 1 and no Chubb is on Andrew Berry. Chubb would have provided value for Judkins to learn behind and provide a running back that could keep the offense on track down and distance that the Browns did not have Sunday.

4.6 would be Chubb's worst average of his career outside of last year when he clearly wasn't fully healthy and the OL played rather poorly.

If Chubb had 20 carries, there's a chance that number goes down. He had plenty of carries for 3 yards or less. 13 isn't really a big sample size.

Sampson did just fine keeping the offense on track. He was PFFs 5th best rated RB in week 1. (Chubb in the 20s) Admittedly, it was more through the air, but whatever works.

The Texans scored even fewer points than we did, and that's with their kicker making his FGs (all 45+ yards.)

RB was not our problem.

6 bad plays, none of which involved the RB, were why we lost. 2 WRs popping up passes perfectly for DBs, 2 missed kicks, Diabate biting on a play fake on Fant's TD, and Cam Thomas losing backside contain borderline horrifically on Chase Brown's cutback TD.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,042
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,042
Originally Posted by Bull_Dawg
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I think the question at the end of the season will be... is Judkins better than Chubb?

Chubb gaining 60 yards on 13 carries with a long of 13 isn't special. It's very normal. I think that was the FO's fear since Chubb is 2 years removed from injury.

I disagree that is still 4.6 yards per carry. If he had 20 carries he is over 90 yards and pushing a 100 yard game. 2nd and 6 or 3rd and 2 are downs a distance that keeps offenses on track. The fact Judkins was not under center week 1 and no Chubb is on Andrew Berry. Chubb would have provided value for Judkins to learn behind and provide a running back that could keep the offense on track down and distance that the Browns did not have Sunday.

4.6 would be Chubb's worst average of his career outside of last year when he clearly wasn't fully healthy and the OL played rather poorly.

If Chubb had 20 carries, there's a chance that number goes down. He had plenty of carries for 3 yards or less. 13 isn't really a big sample size.

Sampson did just fine keeping the offense on track. He was PFFs 5th best rated RB in week 1. (Chubb in the 20s) Admittedly, it was more through the air, but whatever works.

The Texans scored even fewer points than we did, and that's with their kicker making his FGs (all 45+ yards.)

RB was not our problem.

6 bad plays, none of which involved the RB, were why we lost. 2 WRs popping up passes perfectly for DBs, 2 missed kicks, Diabate biting on a play fake on Fant's TD, and Cam Thomas losing backside contain borderline horrifically on Chase Brown's cutback TD.

4.6 by Chubb would have been a lot better than the putrid 3.0 that our nonexistent running game put up. Samson had a high rating for his great job in catching so many dink and dunk passes and turning them into something better. Samson did not run well at all at 2.42 ypc and he was given plenty of chances. IMHO he is just too small and weak to break through nfl tackles. He has some nice hands though. Would be nice if Judkins is ready to play against the Ravens but no way he will know enough of the playbook since the Browns took forever to sign him.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum On the Plus Side ...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5