DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz ends reelection bid amid welfare fraud scandal

When you post on a message board any other member of that message board has the right to reply. They have the right to question your points, show you lack the evidence to state those things and or your motives. Nothing about that means they are trying to be in charge.

That is your, "How message board work" lesson for today.

You're welcome.

This is why our education system is broken. There are some students who never learn a lesson the first time you teach it to them. Having to repeat it to them over and over again holds the rest of the class back.

It seems that you two are arguing over semantics and probably in agreement.

There are allegations over what has happened so for... And I think everyone would agree we want anyone guilty of any crime that has been committed in association with this fraud to be prosecuted to the fullest extent .... Same as ever for some of us. If they are guilty, prosecute them. If they hold public office and abuse it, they should be held to a higher standard and more severe punishment.

I'm not so sure. I have no problem with investigations to determine what happened and if any of the officials were directly involved. I think we all deserve answers on whether any crimes were committed by government officials. Where it seems the difference comes in is when someone posts this.....


Maybe it's just that he didn't spell out that all of this should be contingent on the results of the investigations that's the issue here. I'm not sure. I can only go by what was posted.

None of these things should be considered if the evidence of the investigations doesn't support any of these actions should be taken first.

But I can see where it could be that that's what he meant but didn't include it in his post.

More nonsense when it would have been just as easy to clarify your intent. You do realize you make it easy to see who the real troll is here don't you? But then that would require you to use a mirror.

lol. Just playing.

Do you really think my intent was to do all of that whether they're guilty or not?

Do I seem like that kind of guy??

I'm not sure. Sometimes I don't think you are. Sometimes I do. Not so much you are really like that as a person per se but that it is more the type of thing you wish to convey in your posts. More that you use such tools as means of instigation rather than out of sincerity.

I use satire a lot to accomplish the same goal. So I'm not trying to claim I'm guiltless here. I just think the way we go about it comes from at least slightly different angles.

If you feel this response...


Over example #45,855 of the endless fraud and lying by our politicians...

is instigating, that's on you and your sensitivities.